Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Bernie: "I do question her judgment, a judgment that voted for the war in Iraq... " Hillary: "President Obama trusted my judgment... Bernie could not answer about how to break up the banks....."

143,565 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's steak knife analogy might be the most vivid warning yet about giving AI its own judgment: "And so it's a little bit like a steak knife where if you were served medium well, it cuts perfectly, but if you were served rare steak, and it looks awfully like live meat, somehow it doesn't cut." The knife still has its edge. Something in it has simply looked at the plate, reached a conclusion, and decided not to do the job. That, Jensen Huang argues, is the risk of building AI with values. He starts from a simple premise: "The SI's are tools." A tool with values is a tool with judgment, and that judgment shapes how well the tool works for you: "And the challenge with an SI with values, meaning it has judgment, depending on how you use that SI, it may decide how it may judge you, and its effectiveness would be affected by that judgment." Same knife, same capability: medium well, it cuts perfectly; rare, it stops. What changes the outcome is the knife's judgment about what's in front of it, and about you. Jensen leaves the answer open, framing it as a question he's still wrestling with: "And so I think… there's a question in my mind yet about how much judgment you really want these tools to have." And he points to what he sees as the missing piece: "And so the intentions of the user." That's the tension at the heart of his analogy: the more judgment we build into AI, the more its usefulness depends on whether its values line up with what the user actually intends. When they don't, the knife quietly stops cutting.

Big Brain AI

20,855 views • 9 days ago