Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Bery young children often hit or rough-handle pets because they lack impulse control, emotional regulation, and a true understanding that animals feel pain the same way they do. It is usually driven by curiosity or sensory

270,865 views • 7 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

When Little Children and a Foal Share a “Picnic” In the simple setting of a horse stable, three children about 3–6 years old sit on a pile of golden straw, gathered around a brown foal lying in their midst. They gently stroke it, hug its face, and lightly touch its nose and mouth with the same tenderness and ease as if they were playing with a friend of the same age. The foal lies relaxed, showing no fear; the mother horse stands nearby, calmly watching. There is no species barrier, no hesitation or “distinction” — only closeness, trust, and pure joy, like a picnic among dear friends. Why do children love animals so deeply and naturally treat them as close friends? Many scientific and developmental psychology reasons help explain this phenomenon. Biologist Edward O. Wilson proposed the biophilia hypothesis — an innate human tendency, especially strong in young children, to bond with other living beings. Research shows that even from a few months of age, babies prefer looking at, touching, and smiling at real animals more than at toys. Children have not yet been “filtered” by adult reasoning and experience, so their responses remain pure and unfiltered. In the preoperational stage (roughly ages 2–7 according to Jean Piaget), children naturally anthropomorphize and believe in animism. They attribute human emotions, thoughts, and personalities to animals, talking to dogs, cats, or horses as if they were real friends. Animals become “social others” — always listening, never judging, never arguing. In the video, the children treat the foal exactly as they would care for a little sibling or playmate. Added to this is the “baby schema” effect (or Kindchenschema). Foals — like most young animals — have large eyes, round faces, and soft bodies. These features strongly trigger humans’ caregiving and nurturing instincts. Children respond even more powerfully than adults to this cuteness, making it easy for them to form instant friendships. Unlike adults, who often view animals through the lens of utility (food, tools, pets), culture, or fear, young children have not yet learned those distinctions. They value animals simply because they are alive. In return, animals “make no distinctions” about children either: they pay no attention to skin color, family background, or appearance — responding only to gentleness. This creates a pure and emotionally safe relationship. Interacting with animals also brings many developmental benefits. Children learn empathy, how to read body language, and how to care for others. Animals provide unconditional emotional support — many children even regard their pets as closer friends than their siblings because there is far less conflict. These interactions also help build self-confidence, responsibility, and social skills.

Nature 🦜and Music 🎶

48,607 views • 3 days ago

Ostriches are intensely social animals who understand their world through movement contact and the presence of their flock. They do not experience life with human concepts or human language but they do experience fear safety comfort and distress in ways that are clear measurable and deeply felt. When ostriches live together they learn the shapes sounds and movements of the birds around them. They feel secure when the flock is calm and they become anxious when others show signs of alarm. Their sense of safety depends entirely on the stability of the group. Any threat to one member of the flock creates a wave of fear through all of them. Because of this the emotional impact of violent handling and mass killing is not limited to the bird that is struck but spreads through every ostrich who sees hears or senses it. When force and confinement are imposed on them the birds experience a level of fear that overwhelms their natural coping behaviors. Ostriches respond to danger with flight or alert stillness and when neither response is possible they enter a state of acute stress that includes trembling pacing vocalizing or freezing in place. Their hearts race their muscles tense and their entire body prepares to escape. When they are surrounded or trapped they cannot understand why the danger cannot be avoided. The sense of helplessness for a prey animal is not a thought but a physical shock that floods them with stress and panic. To a creature who survives through movement and awareness the loss of space and the inability to flee is a form of suffering in itself. The abuse of forcing ostriches to witness the injury or death of familiar flock mates creates another layer of distress. These birds recognize individuals. They notice when one of their companions collapses or cries out. They become restless and agitated when a bird they know is harmed. They remain close to fallen birds and often attempt to investigate or stay near them because their instinct pushes them to stay with the group even when the group is being destroyed. The emotional meaning of this moment is not symbolic but immediate. The flock is breaking apart. The cues of danger multiply. The birds see others in pain or falling and their own fear grows with each new sign of suffering. When violent killing happens around them ostriches sense it as the collapse of their only system of safety. They are not built to make sense of destruction happening in their own flock. Instead they respond with escalating panic. Their bodies show it clearly through rapid breathing frantic shifts in posture and attempts to move closer to surviving flock mates. They do not understand why the danger continues or why the people near them are the source of harm. The stress they experience is intense enough to cause physical shock. Their final moments are dominated by confusion fear and the overwhelming instinct to escape a threat that cannot be avoided. The public often imagines large animals as numb or unaware but ostriches feel the world with a sensitivity shaped by millions of years as prey animals. Their eyes are sharp their hearing is attuned to stress in others and their bodies react strongly to fear and pain. When dozens or hundreds of birds are subjected to violence in a confined area every ostrich feels the fear of the others. The suffering does not happen to them one by one but as a shared experience of terror. This is an experience that no animal should ever be forced to endure. The reality is not clinical or quick. It is emotionally devastating to the animals caught in it because it destroys the flock bond that is their only sense of stability and then it destroys the birds themselves. Understanding this matters because it shows that the harm done to these animals was not only physical but deeply emotional. The ostriches suffered long before any final action was taken against their bodies. They suffered through fear they could not escape through the panic created by the collapse of their flock and through the helplessness of being unable to understand why the world around them suddenly turned violent. Recognizing this is essential because it reveals the true scale of what was done. This was not a neutral procedure. This was the infliction of terror on beings capable of feeling it powerfully. The public deserves to know that these birds were not indifferent creatures. They were living animals who felt fear and confusion and distress and whose final experiences were shaped by violence they could not comprehend or escape.

Vote Canada

55,531 views • 9 months ago