Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Better Cursor alternative? I've been playing with the new AI IDE Windsurf launched by Codeium past few days, and the result was impressive, particularly: 1. Code base understanding: One thing Windsurf did really well is its understanding of the whole code base & dependencies; This led to a big...

64,713 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Julian Harris
Julian Harris1 год назад

@codeiumdev If I’m working with APIs or libraries that are new or changed in the last 12 months (hint: almost everything) the only way code-gen works reliably for me is if there’s a web search in the loop. I’ve struggled to get Cursor to do this reliably. What about Windsurf?

Фото профиля Jason Zhou
Jason Zhou1 год назад

@codeiumdev Ideally yes.. I just paste doc in, and I found windsurf follows better than cursor in my experience; But still, it tends to revert back to old knowledge unless you prompt it hard

Фото профиля Edwardooo
Edwardooo1 год назад

@codeiumdev I have been using cursor for three months daily. I just tried Windsurf. I say it is pretty smart. It learned the code base to make a new page that plot all the locations. (with auto zoomout to see all the spots )

Фото профиля Phatic
Phatic1 год назад

@codeiumdev Welp

Фото профиля Jason Zhou
Jason Zhou1 год назад

@codeiumdev Oh woah, didn’t know about this, pretty exciting

Фото профиля Louiepecan.base.eth🗡🛡
Louiepecan.base.eth🗡🛡1 год назад

@codeiumdev @grandorganics

Фото профиля George Siosi Samuels
George Siosi Samuels1 год назад

@codeiumdev Just downloaded

Фото профиля Axel Sachmann
Axel Sachmann1 год назад

@codeiumdev Thx for the great presentation 🙏

Фото профиля konstantinpaulus
konstantinpaulus1 год назад

@codeiumdev

Фото профиля pharo
pharo1 год назад

@codeiumdev I tried it today Feels more powerful than cursor But I have to test it more

Похожие видео

I built an agent that answers machine-learning questions. It's autonomous, and the best part is that I built the whole thing without writing a single line of Python code. Here is what I did and how I did it: Over a year ago, a friend and I built a site that publishes multi-choice questions. You get a new one every day. I decided to have GPT-3.5 answer questions. Here is what I needed to build: 1. Connect to the site's API to retrieve today's question 2. Extract the question and the potential choices 3. Connect to OpenAI's API and ask GPT-3.5 to answer the question 4. Parse the answer from the model 5. Submit the answer back to the API to get the score Not difficult. Likely several hours of work. But I didn't have to write any code. I built the whole thing by dragging and dropping components using Vellum is a YC-backed platform for developers to build LLM applications. They are the only ones I've seen offering this functionality. They sponsored this post, and their team helped me with all my questions while I built this. I created a workflow. The platform supports several node types to build whatever you have in mind. I show how I put the whole thing together in the attached video. The only code I had to write was a few lines of Jinja to parse and transform the API and the LLM results. There are three lessons I want to share from this experience: First, the best possible code is the one you didn't write. I'm a big fan of no-code tools because they help me materialize my ideas fast. They help product people, designers, and no coders collaborate on the solution. Second, Large Language Models are sensitive to how you prompt them. Small changes to prompts can make a big difference in results. This is more pronounced when you are building a multi-step workflow. Third, automated testing and evaluation for prompts is critical. There aren't many companies thinking about this. They'll have a hard time moving from a demo phase. The attached video will show you what I did.

Santiago

309,825 просмотров • 3 лет назад

This might be the best "AI Engineer" I've tried so far. ​ I'm an old school developer who started 30 years ago. I feel very uncomfortable letting AI take control of my code, but for the sake of science, I spent two hours building an application that took me weeks to build a couple of years ago. ​ I used Pythagora, a brand new tool backed by Y Combinator. They just released to the public. ​ Keep in mind that I use AI every day to write code, but Pythagora is something different: it's a tool that leads, and uses you—the human—as the copilot. ​ I go into more details in the video, but here is the TLDR; ​ 1. Holy molly! We've made a ton of progress on this front! This is way better than Devin when I tested it a few months back. ​ 2. Love the approach of generating a plan with sub-tasks before writing any code. ​ 3. The tools never tries to do too much: it tackles every small task one at a time, and gives you instructions so you test everything. ​ 4. It does exactly what you'd do when it gets stuck: writes a bunch of logs and uses those to correct itself. Pretty neat! ​ 5. It's fast. It runs locally. It's an extension to Visual Studio Code. ​ I'm impressed, but I don't think this tool is for me. ​ I'm not the type of developer who's ready to relinquish control. I felt I had no connection with the code because I didn't write it. It was not my code. ​ I know many people who don't care about this. I know many people who will get tremendous value out of Pythagora. I hope they keep pushing the limits, providing feedback, and helping this get to a point where old folks like me feel more comfortable using it. ​ Don't take my word for it. The best thing you can do is to give it a try and see how you feel using it. ​ Thanks to the team who built this, for all of the explanations and support, and especially, for sitting and listening to my dumb questions for 2 hours while I tested this.

Santiago

212,056 просмотров • 1 год назад