Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Between 2014 and 2016, under the Obama administration, federal contracts with Microsoft opened the door for foreign nationals without U.S. security clearances to help manage cyber infrastructure at the Pentagon and across federal agencies. Navy Whistleblower Tom Schiller reveals Microsoft pushed to use H1B visa workers, many from China,... show more

Laura Loomer

1,886,354 subscribers

76,614 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Navy Whistleblower Tom Schiller says it wasn't some mid-level bureaucrat who approved giving foreign Chinese nationals access to U.S. government cyber systems via the Microsoft Government Azure platform. It was Barack Obama himself. According to Schiller, Obama's name and signature authorized the original Microsoft contracts between 2014 and 2016, allowing unvetted, foreign, Chinese tech workers located in China to provide tech support for Pentagon cyber and Intel systems through Microsoft Government Azure. This went straight to the top. Obama must be held accountable for giving the CCP access to the entire US federal government’s cyber systems. @DeptofDefense Pete Hegseth Donald J. Trump JD Vance Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao Satya Nadella

Navy Whistleblower Tom Schiller says it wasn't some mid-level bureaucrat who approved giving foreign Chinese nationals access to U.S. government cyber systems via the Microsoft Government Azure platform. It was Barack Obama himself. According to Schiller, Obama's name and signature authorized the original Microsoft contracts between 2014 and 2016, allowing unvetted, foreign, Chinese tech workers located in China to provide tech support for Pentagon cyber and Intel systems through Microsoft Government Azure. This went straight to the top. Obama must be held accountable for giving the CCP access to the entire US federal government’s cyber systems. @DeptofDefense Pete Hegseth Donald J. Trump JD Vance Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao Satya Nadella

Laura Loomer

1,232,836 views • 1 year ago

The Obama Administration approved a contract that let Microsoft use Chinese foreign nationals to provide tech support across all U.S. federal agencies, including the Pentagon and our intel agencies. Navy Whistleblower Tom Schiller joined me on Loomer Unleashed to explain how Microsoft’s “escort team” was supposed to provide oversight, but in reality, it was just for show. They hired vets and reservists who barely understood PowerShell, which allowed CCP-affiliated engineers to get remote access to classified information and top secret government systems. This isn't negligence. This is ESPIONAGE, and it has created a massive threat to our national security. Microsoft must be investigated!

The Obama Administration approved a contract that let Microsoft use Chinese foreign nationals to provide tech support across all U.S. federal agencies, including the Pentagon and our intel agencies. Navy Whistleblower Tom Schiller joined me on Loomer Unleashed to explain how Microsoft’s “escort team” was supposed to provide oversight, but in reality, it was just for show. They hired vets and reservists who barely understood PowerShell, which allowed CCP-affiliated engineers to get remote access to classified information and top secret government systems. This isn't negligence. This is ESPIONAGE, and it has created a massive threat to our national security. Microsoft must be investigated!

Laura Loomer

838,904 views • 1 year ago

Department of War Department of War 🇺🇸 CIO Katie Arrington Katie Arrington confirmed to me at the Pentagon this week that Microsoft was forced to stop using Chinese nationals for Pentagon tech support following my July investigation and disclosures by Navy whistleblower Tom Schiller. Arrington admitted that Microsoft’s Government Azure Platform created security vulnerabilities, noting that Microsoft has now restricted access exclusively to U.S. citizens and cleared personnel when it comes to tech support on their US Government contracts. Although the DOW claims a third party audit paid for by Microsoft found no malicious activity, Arrington’s statements prove that my reporting was the decisive factor that motivated the Department of War Department of War 🇺🇸 to take action to close this back door for the CCP to meddle in our national security and secret Department of War Cyber Systems.

Department of War Department of War 🇺🇸 CIO Katie Arrington Katie Arrington confirmed to me at the Pentagon this week that Microsoft was forced to stop using Chinese nationals for Pentagon tech support following my July investigation and disclosures by Navy whistleblower Tom Schiller. Arrington admitted that Microsoft’s Government Azure Platform created security vulnerabilities, noting that Microsoft has now restricted access exclusively to U.S. citizens and cleared personnel when it comes to tech support on their US Government contracts. Although the DOW claims a third party audit paid for by Microsoft found no malicious activity, Arrington’s statements prove that my reporting was the decisive factor that motivated the Department of War Department of War 🇺🇸 to take action to close this back door for the CCP to meddle in our national security and secret Department of War Cyber Systems.

Laura Loomer

200,992 views • 10 months ago

WATCH: Microsoft FOUNDER BILL GATES Bill Gates CONFRONTED ON VIDEO BY Loomer Unleashed OVER MICROSOFT CLASSIFIED INFO LEAKS TO THE CCP Today, Loomer Unleashed Charles R Downs confronted Microsoft Founder and Jeffrey Epstein associate Bill Gates about whether he would condemn Microsoft for giving Chinese foreign nationals located in China access to US Classified information via the Microsoft Government Azure program. Last week, I secured the exclusive interview with Navy Whistleblower Tom Schiller to expose this national security threat and massive breach of US DOD cyber systems. It’s now under review by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth! There needs to be a criminal investigation into Microsoft for this Espionage. @DeptofDefense @SecDef Satya Nadella Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao

WATCH: Microsoft FOUNDER BILL GATES Bill Gates CONFRONTED ON VIDEO BY Loomer Unleashed OVER MICROSOFT CLASSIFIED INFO LEAKS TO THE CCP Today, Loomer Unleashed Charles R Downs confronted Microsoft Founder and Jeffrey Epstein associate Bill Gates about whether he would condemn Microsoft for giving Chinese foreign nationals located in China access to US Classified information via the Microsoft Government Azure program. Last week, I secured the exclusive interview with Navy Whistleblower Tom Schiller to expose this national security threat and massive breach of US DOD cyber systems. It’s now under review by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth! There needs to be a criminal investigation into Microsoft for this Espionage. @DeptofDefense @SecDef Satya Nadella Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao

Laura Loomer

415,820 views • 1 year ago

🚨 BOMBSHELL: MICROSOFT GAVE CCP ACCESS TO U.S. MILITARY SECRETS 🚨 🔴 Navy whistleblower Tom Schiller just dropped a national security nuke: 🗣️ Chinese engineers were granted access to classified U.S. military systems through Microsoft Azure — for over a decade. 🔴 Loomer and Charles confronted Bill Gates on camera — demanding answers. Microsoft didn’t deny it. They just quietly changed the policy. 🔥 This isn’t a leak. This is treason by tech infrastructure. 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ The CCP had their hands in the heart of U.S. defense systems. ⚠️ Gates’ empire sold out American sovereignty for profit and global positioning. ⚠️ And the Pentagon is only now reviewing the fallout. 💥 Who approved this? 💥 Why hasn’t Microsoft been raided? 🚨 THIS IS ESPIONAGE — AND SOMEONE NEEDS TO GO TO JAIL. 🚨 🛡️ Join — Expose the traitors, protect the Republic, and prepare for what’s coming. 💪 Don’t be scared. Be prepared.

🚨 BOMBSHELL: MICROSOFT GAVE CCP ACCESS TO U.S. MILITARY SECRETS 🚨 🔴 Navy whistleblower Tom Schiller just dropped a national security nuke: 🗣️ Chinese engineers were granted access to classified U.S. military systems through Microsoft Azure — for over a decade. 🔴 Loomer and Charles confronted Bill Gates on camera — demanding answers. Microsoft didn’t deny it. They just quietly changed the policy. 🔥 This isn’t a leak. This is treason by tech infrastructure. 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ The CCP had their hands in the heart of U.S. defense systems. ⚠️ Gates’ empire sold out American sovereignty for profit and global positioning. ⚠️ And the Pentagon is only now reviewing the fallout. 💥 Who approved this? 💥 Why hasn’t Microsoft been raided? 🚨 THIS IS ESPIONAGE — AND SOMEONE NEEDS TO GO TO JAIL. 🚨 🛡️ Join — Expose the traitors, protect the Republic, and prepare for what’s coming. 💪 Don’t be scared. Be prepared.

Jim Ferguson

1,642,109 views • 1 year ago

🚨 MUST WATCH VIDEO: 🚨 Over the 2024 Fourth of July weekend, Prescott Paulin, a Department of Defense Acquisition Program Manager based at the Pentagon, contacted Microsoft technical support for assistance with his U.S. Government Azure account. During the call, he noticed several red flags—most notably that the support representative appeared to be a Chinese national working out of China. Recognizing the potential national security concern, Mr. Paulin immediately began recording the call and asked the representative to confirm her name and location, which she did, stating she was employed by Microsoft in China. Alarmed by the situation, Mr. Paulin shared the incident on LinkedIn and tagged key government officials, including the DoD Chief Information Officer. To my knowledge, he never received a reply back from anyone at @DeptofDefense and it remained unreported. This video was provided to me by Navy Whistleblower Tom Schiller, and I played it during my exclusive interview with him on Loomer Unleashed tonight. Microsoft needs to be criminally held accountable for this. There needs to be an immediate Congressional investigation into China’s penetration of DOD cyber systems, and all cyber systems across the entire US Government since the Microsoft Government Azure platform is used by every US Government agency. We are completely infiltrated by the CCP! Attn: Satya Nadella Brad Smith Bill Gates Pete Hegseth @SecDef Tom Cotton Donald J. Trump JD Vance

🚨 MUST WATCH VIDEO: 🚨 Over the 2024 Fourth of July weekend, Prescott Paulin, a Department of Defense Acquisition Program Manager based at the Pentagon, contacted Microsoft technical support for assistance with his U.S. Government Azure account. During the call, he noticed several red flags—most notably that the support representative appeared to be a Chinese national working out of China. Recognizing the potential national security concern, Mr. Paulin immediately began recording the call and asked the representative to confirm her name and location, which she did, stating she was employed by Microsoft in China. Alarmed by the situation, Mr. Paulin shared the incident on LinkedIn and tagged key government officials, including the DoD Chief Information Officer. To my knowledge, he never received a reply back from anyone at @DeptofDefense and it remained unreported. This video was provided to me by Navy Whistleblower Tom Schiller, and I played it during my exclusive interview with him on Loomer Unleashed tonight. Microsoft needs to be criminally held accountable for this. There needs to be an immediate Congressional investigation into China’s penetration of DOD cyber systems, and all cyber systems across the entire US Government since the Microsoft Government Azure platform is used by every US Government agency. We are completely infiltrated by the CCP! Attn: Satya Nadella Brad Smith Bill Gates Pete Hegseth @SecDef Tom Cotton Donald J. Trump JD Vance

Laura Loomer

268,034 views • 1 year ago

I break down new polling on Iran and what it reveals about how Americans really see the conflict. Despite media narratives, the data tells a very different story—most Americans view Iran as a serious national security threat and believe the U.S. is in a strong position. I cut through the noise, highlight the key numbers, and explain what this means for U.S. foreign policy, national security, and the broader global landscape. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

I break down new polling on Iran and what it reveals about how Americans really see the conflict. Despite media narratives, the data tells a very different story—most Americans view Iran as a serious national security threat and believe the U.S. is in a strong position. I cut through the noise, highlight the key numbers, and explain what this means for U.S. foreign policy, national security, and the broader global landscape. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

72,325 views • 6 months ago

America must stockpile compute for the new era of national security. Armada just secured $230M to help build that compute stockpile, developing modular edge data centers for critical infrastructure and remote environments. U.S. Navy ships, oil rigs, remote mines, manufacturing facilities, and critical infrastructure sites are becoming the front lines of data generation, where 75% of data is now being generated. Our interview with Armada CEO Dan Wright breaks down the rise of hyperscaler infrastructure at the edge and why decentralized compute is becoming one of the most important strategic assets.

America must stockpile compute for the new era of national security. Armada just secured $230M to help build that compute stockpile, developing modular edge data centers for critical infrastructure and remote environments. U.S. Navy ships, oil rigs, remote mines, manufacturing facilities, and critical infrastructure sites are becoming the front lines of data generation, where 75% of data is now being generated. Our interview with Armada CEO Dan Wright breaks down the rise of hyperscaler infrastructure at the edge and why decentralized compute is becoming one of the most important strategic assets.

Atoms Not Bits

28,618 views • 4 months ago

2026.7.09 Beijing did not need to break in because America’s national-security gate failed from within. In 2015, BHR teamed up with AVIC, a Chinese state aviation giant later listed by the Pentagon as a military company, to buy Henniges Automotive and its sensitive defense technology. AVIC took 51%. BHR took 49%. The warning signs were everywhere: stolen Joint Strike Fighter data linked to AVIC in 2007 and the 2014 indictment of a CCP operative for stealing data on the C-17, F-22, and F-35. Yet the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) approved the deal.

2026.7.09 Beijing did not need to break in because America’s national-security gate failed from within. In 2015, BHR teamed up with AVIC, a Chinese state aviation giant later listed by the Pentagon as a military company, to buy Henniges Automotive and its sensitive defense technology. AVIC took 51%. BHR took 49%. The warning signs were everywhere: stolen Joint Strike Fighter data linked to AVIC in 2007 and the 2014 indictment of a CCP operative for stealing data on the C-17, F-22, and F-35. Yet the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) approved the deal.

NFSC Speaks

6,720,802 views • 2 months ago

I'm concerned that the merger between Vodafone Group and Three UK is dangerous and risks giving a company with its roots in Communist Party-ruled China a more prominent place in the UK’s mobile network. Not only does the proposed deal raise serious questions about national security and competition, but it poses risks to our communication networks and personal data; given the Cheung Kong Group and the Li family being so knowingly involved with Chinese Government committees, their contacts in the Chinese Government and having to pass data over under the national security law. I'd like to hear that the UK Government are able to assure everybody publicly that this will not take place unless the security issues are clarified and are not still security issues at the end of this process.

I'm concerned that the merger between Vodafone Group and Three UK is dangerous and risks giving a company with its roots in Communist Party-ruled China a more prominent place in the UK’s mobile network. Not only does the proposed deal raise serious questions about national security and competition, but it poses risks to our communication networks and personal data; given the Cheung Kong Group and the Li family being so knowingly involved with Chinese Government committees, their contacts in the Chinese Government and having to pass data over under the national security law. I'd like to hear that the UK Government are able to assure everybody publicly that this will not take place unless the security issues are clarified and are not still security issues at the end of this process.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

20,759 views • 3 years ago

EXCLUSIVE: ‼️ Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s Cloud Directive Ignored By Microsoft As They Continue To Use Chinese Engineers ‼️ Pete Hegseth Tom Cotton On July 18, 2025, the same day Navy whistleblower Tom Schiller Tom Schiller was interviewed on Loomer Unleashed to blow the Whistle on China’s breach of DOD cyber systems, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered a two-week review of all Pentagon cloud contracts. Additionally, the directive banned foreign engineers from supporting U.S. military systems, declaring: “China will no longer have any involvement whatsoever in our cloud services.” “Foreign engineers – from any country, including of course China – should NEVER be allowed to maintain or access DoD systems.” The revelation that China has infiltrated the entire cyber system of the US Government via Microsoft Government was fully exposed on Loomer Unleashed. However, after Hegseth’s memo was released, Schiller and I discussed our concerns about its implementation. 1. That the investigation might be handed over to the very individuals and entities previously implicated in obstruction and complicity of Chinese espionage. 2. That the memo might lack clear language barring individuals without security clearances—including U.S. citizens—from accessing government and DoD systems. Last week, China launched a massive cyberattack, including a direct hit on the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Agency. The timing? Almost certainly not a coincidence, and it was directly pinned to the Digital Escort program on Microsoft Government Azure. On July 22, the official memo signed by Pete Hegseth dropped—and confirmed our suspicions. The review of China’s breach was handed over to the DoD CIO’s office, with DoD CISO David McKeown given the lead. This is outrageous on many levels, especially since David McKeown and the DOD’s CIO office is the same office and same person who was publicly implicated just days earlier on my show Loomer Unleashed for retaliating against, defaming, and dismissing Schiller’s whistleblower efforts. I asked Schiller for his response, and he said: “When the person who stole the cookies becomes the chief investigator of the missing cookie jar case.” Adding further concern, the memo appears to have been influenced by McKeown himself, with the inclusion of programs McKeown has championed—most notably, the Software Fast Track Program (SWFT). In a statement made regarding SWFT, DoD Acting-CIO Katie Arrington commented: “AI tools on the back end will analyze the data. If everything meets the requirements for a digital ATO, we won’t have to wait on a human to review it.” Translation: no human oversight, just algorithms running on Chinese-built AI software. 🤖 This week, a source contacted me with even more bombshell evidence: Despite the Secretary of Defense’s directive, the controversial “Digital Escort” program is still fully operational. Chinese engineers still have full access to U.S. defense systems despite @SecDef ordering Chinese involvement to end. The program wasn’t shut down. It wasn’t even paused. The source tells me they raised the issue with a senior official on the Digital Escort team—& got scoffed at: “A Twitter comment is not official policy.” When it was explained to the senior official that the directive was not merely a tweet but a signed, binding Department of Defense order issued by the Secretary of Defense—prompted by the revelation of an Obama-era program previously unknown within the DoD—the senior official responded: “Yeah… no one in the DoD has heard about it, except that their signatures are on it, so…” Perhaps the most damning statement made by the Digital Escort team senior official was: “All of this, from both the DoD & Microsoft, is nothing more than posturing and grandstanding. It’s fine to say ‘no more foreign engineers’—but without a plan, that’s just empty words.” Why hasn’t David McKeown, a Biden holdover, been fired for ignoring pro CCP espionage? Secretary of the Navy John C. Phelan

EXCLUSIVE: ‼️ Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s Cloud Directive Ignored By Microsoft As They Continue To Use Chinese Engineers ‼️ Pete Hegseth Tom Cotton On July 18, 2025, the same day Navy whistleblower Tom Schiller Tom Schiller was interviewed on Loomer Unleashed to blow the Whistle on China’s breach of DOD cyber systems, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered a two-week review of all Pentagon cloud contracts. Additionally, the directive banned foreign engineers from supporting U.S. military systems, declaring: “China will no longer have any involvement whatsoever in our cloud services.” “Foreign engineers – from any country, including of course China – should NEVER be allowed to maintain or access DoD systems.” The revelation that China has infiltrated the entire cyber system of the US Government via Microsoft Government was fully exposed on Loomer Unleashed. However, after Hegseth’s memo was released, Schiller and I discussed our concerns about its implementation. 1. That the investigation might be handed over to the very individuals and entities previously implicated in obstruction and complicity of Chinese espionage. 2. That the memo might lack clear language barring individuals without security clearances—including U.S. citizens—from accessing government and DoD systems. Last week, China launched a massive cyberattack, including a direct hit on the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Agency. The timing? Almost certainly not a coincidence, and it was directly pinned to the Digital Escort program on Microsoft Government Azure. On July 22, the official memo signed by Pete Hegseth dropped—and confirmed our suspicions. The review of China’s breach was handed over to the DoD CIO’s office, with DoD CISO David McKeown given the lead. This is outrageous on many levels, especially since David McKeown and the DOD’s CIO office is the same office and same person who was publicly implicated just days earlier on my show Loomer Unleashed for retaliating against, defaming, and dismissing Schiller’s whistleblower efforts. I asked Schiller for his response, and he said: “When the person who stole the cookies becomes the chief investigator of the missing cookie jar case.” Adding further concern, the memo appears to have been influenced by McKeown himself, with the inclusion of programs McKeown has championed—most notably, the Software Fast Track Program (SWFT). In a statement made regarding SWFT, DoD Acting-CIO Katie Arrington commented: “AI tools on the back end will analyze the data. If everything meets the requirements for a digital ATO, we won’t have to wait on a human to review it.” Translation: no human oversight, just algorithms running on Chinese-built AI software. 🤖 This week, a source contacted me with even more bombshell evidence: Despite the Secretary of Defense’s directive, the controversial “Digital Escort” program is still fully operational. Chinese engineers still have full access to U.S. defense systems despite @SecDef ordering Chinese involvement to end. The program wasn’t shut down. It wasn’t even paused. The source tells me they raised the issue with a senior official on the Digital Escort team—& got scoffed at: “A Twitter comment is not official policy.” When it was explained to the senior official that the directive was not merely a tweet but a signed, binding Department of Defense order issued by the Secretary of Defense—prompted by the revelation of an Obama-era program previously unknown within the DoD—the senior official responded: “Yeah… no one in the DoD has heard about it, except that their signatures are on it, so…” Perhaps the most damning statement made by the Digital Escort team senior official was: “All of this, from both the DoD & Microsoft, is nothing more than posturing and grandstanding. It’s fine to say ‘no more foreign engineers’—but without a plan, that’s just empty words.” Why hasn’t David McKeown, a Biden holdover, been fired for ignoring pro CCP espionage? Secretary of the Navy John C. Phelan

Laura Loomer

368,351 views • 1 year ago

Carney wants sweeping powers over your phone while using a foreign one himself 🇨🇦 Sheila Gunn Reid According to the Wall Street Journal, Carney has continued using a British cellphone while speaking with foreign leaders. Prime Minister Mark Carney wants sweeping new powers over Canada's telecommunications system. But according to a recent Wall Street Journal report, when it comes to his own communications, he's reportedly relying on a U.K.-based cellphone to communicate with foreign leaders. If true, the irony is impossible to ignore. The Carney government is pushing Bill C-22, legislation that would significantly expand Ottawa's authority over Canada's telecommunications sector in the name of national security. The bill would give the federal government broad powers to issue security orders to telecommunications companies, require providers to comply with government directives, and increase federal oversight of Canada's communications infrastructure. Canadians are being told these extraordinary powers are necessary because secure communications matter. Apparently, that principle may not apply to the Prime Minister himself. According to the Wall Street Journal, Carney has continued using a British cellphone while speaking with foreign leaders. If that reporting is accurate, Canadians deserve answers. The issue isn't simply where the phone was purchased; it's about whether the Prime Minister is following the same security, transparency, and record-keeping standards imposed on everyone else in government, and now on the public. Among the questions that should be answered: ➢ Communications security: Was the device approved for sensitive government communications under standards established by the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) and Treasury Board? ➢ Government records: Were official calls, text messages and other communications retained in accordance with the Library and Archives of Canada Act and federal information management policies? ➢ Access to Information: If government business was conducted using a foreign device or foreign telecommunications provider, are those records preserved in a manner that complies with the Access to Information Act, or could they be more difficult for Canadians to obtain? ➢ Government device policies: Was the phone issued, managed and secured by the Government of Canada, or was it a personal device used for official business? Foreign jurisdiction: Were official communications routed or stored through infrastructure subject to U.K. law, and what security assessment was conducted before using that device to communicate with foreign leaders? ➢ Bill C-22: Why is the government demanding unprecedented oversight of Canadian telecommunications providers on national security grounds while the Prime Minister reportedly relies on a foreign telecommunications provider for his own communications? Ottawa insists foreign technology, foreign influence and foreign infrastructure pose national security concerns. Yet the Prime Minister himself reportedly chose a foreign cellphone and foreign carrier while conducting international diplomacy. Rules for thee, but not for me. The contradiction remains glaring: a Prime Minister seeking sweeping new powers over Canadians' communications while reportedly placing his own trust in a foreign telecommunications provider.

Carney wants sweeping powers over your phone while using a foreign one himself 🇨🇦 Sheila Gunn Reid According to the Wall Street Journal, Carney has continued using a British cellphone while speaking with foreign leaders. Prime Minister Mark Carney wants sweeping new powers over Canada's telecommunications system. But according to a recent Wall Street Journal report, when it comes to his own communications, he's reportedly relying on a U.K.-based cellphone to communicate with foreign leaders. If true, the irony is impossible to ignore. The Carney government is pushing Bill C-22, legislation that would significantly expand Ottawa's authority over Canada's telecommunications sector in the name of national security. The bill would give the federal government broad powers to issue security orders to telecommunications companies, require providers to comply with government directives, and increase federal oversight of Canada's communications infrastructure. Canadians are being told these extraordinary powers are necessary because secure communications matter. Apparently, that principle may not apply to the Prime Minister himself. According to the Wall Street Journal, Carney has continued using a British cellphone while speaking with foreign leaders. If that reporting is accurate, Canadians deserve answers. The issue isn't simply where the phone was purchased; it's about whether the Prime Minister is following the same security, transparency, and record-keeping standards imposed on everyone else in government, and now on the public. Among the questions that should be answered: ➢ Communications security: Was the device approved for sensitive government communications under standards established by the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) and Treasury Board? ➢ Government records: Were official calls, text messages and other communications retained in accordance with the Library and Archives of Canada Act and federal information management policies? ➢ Access to Information: If government business was conducted using a foreign device or foreign telecommunications provider, are those records preserved in a manner that complies with the Access to Information Act, or could they be more difficult for Canadians to obtain? ➢ Government device policies: Was the phone issued, managed and secured by the Government of Canada, or was it a personal device used for official business? Foreign jurisdiction: Were official communications routed or stored through infrastructure subject to U.K. law, and what security assessment was conducted before using that device to communicate with foreign leaders? ➢ Bill C-22: Why is the government demanding unprecedented oversight of Canadian telecommunications providers on national security grounds while the Prime Minister reportedly relies on a foreign telecommunications provider for his own communications? Ottawa insists foreign technology, foreign influence and foreign infrastructure pose national security concerns. Yet the Prime Minister himself reportedly chose a foreign cellphone and foreign carrier while conducting international diplomacy. Rules for thee, but not for me. The contradiction remains glaring: a Prime Minister seeking sweeping new powers over Canadians' communications while reportedly placing his own trust in a foreign telecommunications provider.

Rebel News

60,465 views • 2 months ago

A massive clash is unfolding between the federal government and the press. 📰✈️ Four New York Times reporters have been ordered to testify before a federal grand jury after publishing details about security gaps on Air Force One. The FBI previously tried to stop the story, but the Times pushed forward, arguing the public has a right to know how taxpayer dollars are spent. Now, with federal agents delivering subpoenas directly to journalists' homes, press freedom advocates are calling it an intimidation tactic, while the DOJ argues it must stop unauthorized leaks of classified data. What are your thoughts on this? Does national security override the public's right to know in this case? 💬

A massive clash is unfolding between the federal government and the press. 📰✈️ Four New York Times reporters have been ordered to testify before a federal grand jury after publishing details about security gaps on Air Force One. The FBI previously tried to stop the story, but the Times pushed forward, arguing the public has a right to know how taxpayer dollars are spent. Now, with federal agents delivering subpoenas directly to journalists' homes, press freedom advocates are calling it an intimidation tactic, while the DOJ argues it must stop unauthorized leaks of classified data. What are your thoughts on this? Does national security override the public's right to know in this case? 💬

Diamond and Silk®

43,042 views • 2 months ago