正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

BFS and DFS are two major graph traversal #algorithms used to systematically explore nodes or paths in structures such as mazes 😎👇 Find high-res pdf ebooks with all my #technology related infographics from #techjobs #computerscience

182,261 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Vimanas are described in ancient Indian texts as highly advanced aerial craft, capable of vertical ascent, sustained hovering, and interplanetary travel. Far from primitive myth, these vehicles are depicted as engineered machines—metallic, luminous, and powered by forces unknown to modern science. In epics such as the Mahabharata, vimanas are used by god-like beings in warfare, reconnaissance, and long-distance travel, demonstrating flight capabilities that rival or exceed modern aerospace technology. These accounts describe craft that emitted intense light, thunderous vibrations, and devastating energy-based weapons, suggesting the use of advanced propulsion systems and directed-energy technology. Rather than symbolic chariots of imagination, some researchers propose that these descriptions may represent ancient eyewitness accounts of technologically superior beings—often associated with the Anunnaki—who possessed knowledge of gravity control, advanced materials, and cosmic navigation. From this perspective, vimanas may not be mythological at all, but remnants of suppressed or lost technological knowledge, preserved through symbolic language after civilizations collapsed. The so-called “gods” of antiquity may have been advanced non-human or off-world intelligences whose technology was later deified, misunderstood, or deliberately encoded into sacred texts to survive the passage of time. What remains is a tantalizing blueprint of an ancient, forgotten age—one in which humanity may have once shared the skies with beings far more advanced than we are today. Join Billy Carson on the next 4bidden Tour. LINK IN COMMENTS.

Billy Carson II

88,041 次观看 • 8 个月前

ROBOMAEDA TALK TODAY: Thank you to Professor Hiroshi Ishii 石井 裕 as the inspiration for my talk today at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) MIT Media Lab on "life as a hybrid." And it's not going to be my Azure AI Avatar talking for me today -- it'll be the real me. I think ... Date: November 8 (Friday), 11am Boston time Talk info at MIT: Zoom livestream (free): ** --- Building A Hybrid Career Across Tech, Business, And Design. Or, ”How I Learned to Speak Human After Leaving MIT :-)” What happens when a computer science major steps out of MIT and into design, business, and leadership? In “How I Learned To Speak Human After Leaving MIT :-),” I’ll share how leaving the Media Lab in 2008 set me on an unexpected path—from advocating for the arts with the STEAM movement at RISD to navigating venture capital, startups, and industries of all scales. Does being a multidisciplinary “hybrid” thinker and doer enhance or limit one’s career prospects? Through insights from my own journey, I’ll explore the unique challenges and opportunities hybrids face today, offering key takeaways for those building careers across multiple disciplines. This talk brings my journey full circle—from the early foundations of AI in the 80s to the dawn of a new AI-powered industrial revolution. --- Related links: - “Design Against AI” / Design in Tech Report 2024 at SXSW - “The Art and Craft of Business Resilience” / LinkedIn Learning - “Mr. Maeda’s Cozy AI Kitchen” / Learn LLM Coding Easy as CAIK - “Design, Business, Inclusion” / LinkedIn Learning - “How art, technology, and design inform creative leaders” / TED 2012

John Maeda

13,022 次观看 • 1 年前

Facial reconstruction of a 7,500-year-old man from Kenya A large collection of ancient human remains was recovered in the Elmenteita district of Kenya, at the Bromhead site. Eight relatively complete skulls and numerous skeletal fragments were found, representing as many as 29 individuals. The burials belong to different periods, but their exact chronology remains uncertain; it is only clear that they date to the Mesolithic. The best available date comes from ten mandibles, which were dated to approximately 7,400 years ago (Bada et al., 1974), although some of the skeletons are undoubtedly older, while others are younger. Individual finds from Elmenteita were variously described as proto-Bushmanoid, resembling the Khoikhoi of Kakamas, or as a distinct "Elmenteita type" characterized by extreme dolichocephaly, long faces, and tall stature. However, these classifications were purely typological, and even the "Bushman type" grouped together the markedly different Elmenteita A and F1 skulls. All of the Elmenteita skulls are long or very long, but they vary greatly in breadth, ranging from very narrow to broad, and from hyperdolichocranic to brachycranic. Cranial height also varies considerably, from low to high, though the average is moderate. Minimum frontal breadth is average or slightly above average. Most skulls have a receding forehead, while the brow ridges are relatively weak by Mesolithic standards. A distinctive feature is the very high placement of the temporal lines. The face has a long cranial base and is of moderate to great height (very low only in the female Elmenteita F1), with a broad upper portion. Facial and bizygomatic breadth vary greatly, from very narrow to broad. Vertical facial profile ranges from prognathous to orthognathous. In transverse profile, the faces show no exceptional flattening and remain within the range of clinopy and clinozygy. The orbits are high, broad, or very broad, and mesoconchic. The interorbital region is broad and flattened. Nasal height ranges from moderate to very great (very low in Elmenteita F1), while nasal breadth varies enormously, from very narrow to very broad. The noses are leptorrhine. As is evident, the Elmenteita series is highly heterogeneous. The male skulls Elmenteita A and B differ noticeably from one another, while Elmenteita F1 stands out most distinctly. L. Leakey divided the series into two groups: the first included Elmenteita A and D, and the second Elmenteita B, F, and F1. The skulls of the first group (to which the reconstructed individual belongs) are more robust, hyperdolichocranic or dolichocranic, with faces that are broad relative to the cranial vault. Their faces are mesognathous and either mesoprosopic or leptoprosopic, with chamaeconchic orbits and leptorrhine or mesorrhine noses. The skulls of the second group are more gracile, being moderately dolichocranic (B), mesocranic (F), or brachycranic (F1). Their cranial vaults are broad relative to the face, with pronounced parietal eminences. They exhibit overall facial orthognathism (B) or prognathism (F and F1), a narrow, high leptorrhine nose, and pronounced alveolar prognathism. In fact, this second group could itself be divided into two or even three distinct types, since skull B differs from F and F1 in being dolichocranic, orthognathous, and hypsiconchic, while F1 is distinguished by its brachycrany, euryprosopy, and chamaeconchy. To what extent this diversity reflects individual variation or true population differences remains unknown. Judging from the stratigraphy, the Elmenteita cemetery may well contain burials of people from different periods, cultures, populations, and biological races. Overall, the series displays an unusual combination of traits for Africa: large cranial size, a receding forehead, a high face, and, in some individuals, orthognathism, high orbits, and a narrow nose. However, this combination is also atypical for the East African race, to which the Elmenteita skulls are often assigned. Only Elmenteita F1 more or less fits the description of the southern prognathous variant of the East African race (S. V. Drobyshevsky, Antropogenez).

Ancestral Whispers

23,418 次观看 • 1 个月前