Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Biden: The one thing that really bothers me about where many of my Republican friends are, even the ones that aren't crazy, is they really underestimate the value of alliances. The reason why we're so secure is because of NATO, for God's sake. Attack on one is attack on...

clashreport's profile picture

Clash Report

868,069 subscribers

201,698 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

COLD HEAVEN There is chaos abroad in the world The United States appears set on literal, and violent if necessary, invasion of Greenland, a part of the EU and of Nato. How is Nato Article 5 - an attack on one state is an attack on all - going to deal with that? Follow #MOATS 518 #Trump #Nato #Greenland #Article5
0:30

COLD HEAVEN There is chaos abroad in the world The United States appears set on literal, and violent if necessary, invasion of Greenland, a part of the EU and of Nato. How is Nato Article 5 - an attack on one state is an attack on all - going to deal with that? Follow #MOATS 518 #Trump #Nato #Greenland #Article5

George Galloway

14,750 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

One thing that bothers me about this show is that PhobTin believe the only reason they can't be together is because of the class difference. And not that they are two men in 1930s. They are acting like that in public, make out on the street+ THE EDGE OF HORIZON EP5 #อรุณรุ่งEP5
0:33

One thing that bothers me about this show is that PhobTin believe the only reason they can't be together is because of the class difference. And not that they are two men in 1930s. They are acting like that in public, make out on the street+ THE EDGE OF HORIZON EP5 #อรุณรุ่งEP5

meggi

31,680 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"NATO is not the thing that Russia is afraid of. Russia is afraid of democracy expanding to Russia. Why are we in NATO? It is because we are afraid of Russia. And the only thing that really works – the only security guarantee that works – is NATO's umbrella," Kaja Kallas said in an interview with AFP in Washington.
0:24

"NATO is not the thing that Russia is afraid of. Russia is afraid of democracy expanding to Russia. Why are we in NATO? It is because we are afraid of Russia. And the only thing that really works – the only security guarantee that works – is NATO's umbrella," Kaja Kallas said in an interview with AFP in Washington.

Anton Gerashchenko

2,189,084 просмотров • 1 год назад

NOW - NATO Chief Rutte: "Allies reaffirmed their ironclad commitment to the collective defence under Article 5. That an attack on one is an attack on all."
0:27

NOW - NATO Chief Rutte: "Allies reaffirmed their ironclad commitment to the collective defence under Article 5. That an attack on one is an attack on all."

Disclose.tv

73,823 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇭🇺Orban has been replaced! Putin's friend thinks Russians are too weak to attack NATO — Do you see the risk of a general war in Europe? — No. — Why? — Because the Russians are too weak for that. They can't even defeat Ukraine, so they are not capable of truly attacking NATO. ⁉️Where is the real Orban? Write in the comments urgently!!!
0:22

🇭🇺Orban has been replaced! Putin's friend thinks Russians are too weak to attack NATO — Do you see the risk of a general war in Europe? — No. — Why? — Because the Russians are too weak for that. They can't even defeat Ukraine, so they are not capable of truly attacking NATO. ⁉️Where is the real Orban? Write in the comments urgently!!!

NEXTA

457,589 просмотров • 1 год назад

"NATO is one big confidence trick - to convince the rest of the world we’re so united that if you come for one of us, we’re all coming for you." "Does anyone 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘭𝘺 believe that right now?" As Trump threatens to take Greenland, is NATO on the brink of implosion?
1:50

"NATO is one big confidence trick - to convince the rest of the world we’re so united that if you come for one of us, we’re all coming for you." "Does anyone 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘭𝘺 believe that right now?" As Trump threatens to take Greenland, is NATO on the brink of implosion?

The News Agents

42,472 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

.Elon Musk: "The fraud we're seeing is overwhelmingly on the left ... The single biggest thing that they're worried about is that DOGE is going to turn off fraudulent payments of entitlements ... to illegals ... This is why they really hate my guts and want me to die."
2:59

.Elon Musk: "The fraud we're seeing is overwhelmingly on the left ... The single biggest thing that they're worried about is that DOGE is going to turn off fraudulent payments of entitlements ... to illegals ... This is why they really hate my guts and want me to die."

Chief Nerd

903,866 просмотров • 1 год назад

SECRETARY RUBIO: One of the reasons I supported NATO is because it gave us basing rights in Europe. So when NATO partners like Spain deny us use of these bases, the primary reason for why NATO is good for America, then what is the purpose of the alliance?
0:34

SECRETARY RUBIO: One of the reasons I supported NATO is because it gave us basing rights in Europe. So when NATO partners like Spain deny us use of these bases, the primary reason for why NATO is good for America, then what is the purpose of the alliance?

Department of State

1,632,540 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

I would like to remind you of several interesting factors about how Putin and Russia’s rhetoric about NATO has changed, as well as about Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In 2002, in Rome, when asked by a journalist about how Ukraine’s accession to NATO would affect relations between Russia and Ukraine, Putin replied that Ukraine is a sovereign state. And she herself has the right to freely choose her future, including the future of her security. And that Russia is not against if Ukraine and the Alliance decide that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Now these liars are using NATO expansion as one of the reasons for their invasion. And this despite the fact that Ukraine has never been a member of this military bloc, and there were no plans to admit it there in the near future. And we all understand that all these reasons for the invasion are manipulation and lies in order to justify their aggression, terror and attempt to occupy Ukraine. Regarding the second part of the video, Putin says that NATO expansion is unacceptable in 2022. Some time later, when he is asked about Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He says he doesn't mind. NATO is the Defense Alliance. Even Article 5 of NATO implies collective security in the event of an attack on one of the Alliance countries. But this in no way obliges all NATO members to fight for a country that is itself an aggressor. Even if he is a member of NATO. Therefore, Putin’s manipulations that if Ukraine had joined NATO, it would have attacked Russia and started a war between NATO and Russia is a complete lie. Article 5 does not oblige one to fight for a side that itself is the aggressor. But only to protect a NATO member from attack and invasion by other countries. Against the backdrop of all this, all these fairy tales and Russian propaganda that Ukraine wanted to attack Russia is a lie. (I remind you that until 2014 Ukraine was not a member of NATO and there were no plans to admit it there, at least in the near future). And if Ukraine wanted to attack, why did it give up nuclear weapons? Why didn’t she carry out a massive militarization of the country, but, on the contrary, reduced the army? Why now, when the war is already going on, does Ukraine not enter Russian territory with its troops? After all, propaganda says that it was Ukraine that wanted to attack.
2:13

I would like to remind you of several interesting factors about how Putin and Russia’s rhetoric about NATO has changed, as well as about Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In 2002, in Rome, when asked by a journalist about how Ukraine’s accession to NATO would affect relations between Russia and Ukraine, Putin replied that Ukraine is a sovereign state. And she herself has the right to freely choose her future, including the future of her security. And that Russia is not against if Ukraine and the Alliance decide that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Now these liars are using NATO expansion as one of the reasons for their invasion. And this despite the fact that Ukraine has never been a member of this military bloc, and there were no plans to admit it there in the near future. And we all understand that all these reasons for the invasion are manipulation and lies in order to justify their aggression, terror and attempt to occupy Ukraine. Regarding the second part of the video, Putin says that NATO expansion is unacceptable in 2022. Some time later, when he is asked about Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He says he doesn't mind. NATO is the Defense Alliance. Even Article 5 of NATO implies collective security in the event of an attack on one of the Alliance countries. But this in no way obliges all NATO members to fight for a country that is itself an aggressor. Even if he is a member of NATO. Therefore, Putin’s manipulations that if Ukraine had joined NATO, it would have attacked Russia and started a war between NATO and Russia is a complete lie. Article 5 does not oblige one to fight for a side that itself is the aggressor. But only to protect a NATO member from attack and invasion by other countries. Against the backdrop of all this, all these fairy tales and Russian propaganda that Ukraine wanted to attack Russia is a lie. (I remind you that until 2014 Ukraine was not a member of NATO and there were no plans to admit it there, at least in the near future). And if Ukraine wanted to attack, why did it give up nuclear weapons? Why didn’t she carry out a massive militarization of the country, but, on the contrary, reduced the army? Why now, when the war is already going on, does Ukraine not enter Russian territory with its troops? After all, propaganda says that it was Ukraine that wanted to attack.

Igor Kyivskyi

226,429 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🇺🇸TUCKER: IF I WERE PRESIDENT, I'D PULL OUT OF NATO IMMEDIATELY "Look, the thing that Russia wants, and I think probably has a right to, is not to have NATO missiles on its border. I don't know why we would do that or what we get out of it. I just don't even understand it. I don't understand the purpose of NATO. I don't think NATO is good for the United States. I think it's an attack on our sovereignty. I would pull out of NATO immediately if I were the U.S president because I don't think it helps the U.S. I know a lot of people are getting their bread buttered by NATO." Source: Lex Fridman Podcast
0:26

🇺🇸TUCKER: IF I WERE PRESIDENT, I'D PULL OUT OF NATO IMMEDIATELY "Look, the thing that Russia wants, and I think probably has a right to, is not to have NATO missiles on its border. I don't know why we would do that or what we get out of it. I just don't even understand it. I don't understand the purpose of NATO. I don't think NATO is good for the United States. I think it's an attack on our sovereignty. I would pull out of NATO immediately if I were the U.S president because I don't think it helps the U.S. I know a lot of people are getting their bread buttered by NATO." Source: Lex Fridman Podcast

Mario Nawfal

168,905 просмотров • 2 лет назад

We will have more on this tomorrow morning. The only reason he is doing all of this is because they really are that bad… The files.
1:06

We will have more on this tomorrow morning. The only reason he is doing all of this is because they really are that bad… The files.

MAGA Cult Slayer🦅🇺🇸

42,093 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

'Spain is a wasted cause; they are a terrible partner in NATO. Cut off all trade with Spain.' Alongside criticising Spain, Trump criticised NATO, saying he is not happy because of Greenland, and that NATO didn't want to help in the U.S. attack on Iran.
3:46

'Spain is a wasted cause; they are a terrible partner in NATO. Cut off all trade with Spain.' Alongside criticising Spain, Trump criticised NATO, saying he is not happy because of Greenland, and that NATO didn't want to help in the U.S. attack on Iran.

Sky News

699,537 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

One of the many scenes that makes attack on titan so iconic
1:09

One of the many scenes that makes attack on titan so iconic

Yeager

32,660 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.
1:27

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.

Amit Segal

41,392 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

“The fundamental lesson that I learned on 9/11 is we need friends and allies in the world.” Nicholas Burns was U.S. ambassador to NATO when Al Qaeda attacked. He tells me that, even with all of America’s power, “we need to be respectful of our allies.”
1:54

“The fundamental lesson that I learned on 9/11 is we need friends and allies in the world.” Nicholas Burns was U.S. ambassador to NATO when Al Qaeda attacked. He tells me that, even with all of America’s power, “we need to be respectful of our allies.”

Christiane Amanpour

48,935 просмотров • 22 дней назад