正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

BIG DEAL BBC1 1984-86 Devised by Geoff McQueen Robby Box (Ray Brooks) makes his living playing poker. Some people say he's got it made, but his girlfriend Jan (Sharon Duce) isn't one of them. Opening titles designed by Roger Ferrin. Theme song written, performed by Bobby Gubby.

23,856 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

An interesting analysis on Hucklerobby physicality, that I believe actually starts BEFORE “all this touching” ever began.. In Episode One, back when (IN MY OPINION) Robby was testing him. Clip 1: After their first meeting, Robby nods at and makes clear direct eye contact with Whitaker before he walks through without deviating to see if Whitaker will move out of his way. A show of assertion. Whitaker moves. First test successful. Whitaker will move when and where he needs him too. Clip 2: After Whitaker embarrassed himself in front of Robby in their first direct interaction with each other by injuring his finger. Robby tells him coldly to go ice his finger (Seeing how he does with the “push away” aspect of his teaching style, which I’ve discussed in my last long post) and then he invades his space with his body as he’s passing by to see if Whitaker will flinch or move away to test the waters on if he’s uncomfortable with the invasion. Whitaker doesn’t. Even though there was space to back up. The camera even focuses on Whitaker’s reaction to the invasion, even in the external shot showing Robby leaving makes sure we can see that Whitaker is still watching him. Second test successful. Whitaker will let Robby into his space. “What are you going on about.. what does this even mean.” I hear you! I’m going! TO ME this is like I said the precursor to Robby manhandling Whitaker, because after these two tests.. 1. Will he move where I need him to/obey. 2. Will he let me invade his space/physically touch him. ROBBY DOES THESE THINGS! Their immediate next interaction after these “tests” Robby confidently drags that little man by his shoulder and moves him into his own space where he wants him. He invades his space, and Whitaker moves where Robby wants him to! When people try and analyze their physicality they always start at the first touch and say “wow! Robby just right off the bat started touching him.” NOPE! As you can see he actually started off NOT touching him, and TO ME that was calculated and intentional. Robby didn’t start touching Whitaker randomly, Robby started touching Whitaker AFTER he made sure he could. By testing him in their first interactions. If you go back and watch his interactions with other characters he’s very careful not to invade their space, Robby moves around people, not through them and he NEVER touches anyone. So no.. it’s not something he does with everyone. I firmly believe in my theory that it was a test to see if Whitaker was malleable and comfortable towards him. Anyways! That’s just my over-analysis on those two quick scenes. You don’t have to agree and I’m sure I’ll get pqt to hell and back anyways so I might as well do my thing. What are your thoughts? Let me know (respectfully)! Bye! ✨

🖤ViVi🤍

21,994 次观看 • 8 个月前

It's almost too bright after everything before it. Frodo opens his eyes in a clean bed, light everywhere, and the first face he sees is Gandalf. For a second you understand why people joke that Frodo thought he'd died. The last time he saw Gandalf, the wizard was falling into the dark of Moria. Waking after Mount Doom to find him standing there, smiling, has to feel impossible. It isn't only a reunion. It's the return of someone Frodo had already grieved. Then the others come in, one by one. Gimli. Aragorn. Legolas. Merry. Pippin. The Fellowship is back, but not all of it. Boromir isn't there, and the gap sits quietly under the joy in the room. They survived. Not all of them did. That's what makes it land. The film lets itself be happy, but never simply. These aren't the same people who left Rivendell. Frodo's being celebrated as a hero, and his face is carrying something heavier than victory. Then Sam walks in. And it changes. The score turns toward the Shire theme, and Frodo's reaction goes somewhere the others didn't. He's glad to see everyone. But the look he gives Sam says what words can't. Sam isn't one more friend coming through the door. Sam is the reason Frodo reached the end at all. The world will remember Frodo as the Ring-bearer. Frodo knows who carried him when he couldn't carry himself. That's why it still lands. It gives you laughter, reunion, one last look at the whole Fellowship together. But under it is the thing Tolkien understood better than almost anyone: the great stories usually get saved by small hands and ordinary people who just refuse to leave each other behind. The Fellowship is reunited. But it's the look between Frodo and Sam that tells you what the journey cost.

Tolkien Universe

13,932 次观看 • 2 个月前

Mehdi Hasan & Bassem Youssef TEAR Into Bill Maher Over His Obsession With Israel Mehdi Hasan: Before we finish, I've got to throw one last name in here: Bill Maher. Bill Maher recently said, "Israel's never started a war, it's always attacked first," and called claims of colonization and genocide antisemitism. He said, if he has to be on one side of MAGA Trump or Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and Nick Fuentes he'll be with Trump. Bassem Youssef: He's adopting your same side. Mehdi Hasan: The thing that pisses me off is Bill Maher saying Joe Kent said, "The Jews made us do it." He didn't say that. He referred to Israel. It's actually antisemitic to conflate Jews with Israel, which is what Bill Maher's doing. It's always about Israel, and then they say it's about antisemitism. Bassem Youssef: What is really pissing me off is, why are we still speaking about Bill Maher in any other capacity other than that he is a 100% pro-Israel asset? Mehdi Hasan: I think you're actually doing him a favour with that argument. I don't think he needs to be paid. He's an ideologue. He's believed this stuff all his life. I think he's a hardcore Zionist in his heart. Bassem Youssef: Bill Maher has a famous documentary called Religulous. He went and made fun of all religions. He went to the Muslims and made fun of them. Then he went to the Christians and made fun of them. And when he went to the Jews, who did he make fun of? Neturei Karta the anti-Israeli Jewish group. Mehdi Hasan: For him, Israel is everything. He's a noted atheist, but he's fine with the Jewish state run by theocrats. Bassem Youssef: He's an atheist who's like, "Well, it was given to them by God!" What is wrong with you? Mehdi Hasan: My biggest objection to Bill Maher is not his Zionism, it's not his Islamophobia, it's not his racism, it's not his misogyny. It's the fact he's not funny. Bassem Youssef: He's not funny at all. Mehdi Hasan: It's like when Henry Kissinger got the Nobel Peace Prize. Bassem Youssef: That's the perfect analogy.

Jeff

46,488 次观看 • 29 天前

Dear whoever you are, Your "20 years of struggle" doesn't give you the right to disrespect j-hope, especially when you clearly haven't sat with an album as critically acclaimed as “Jack In The Box”. And don't put him in the same sentence as idols from other labels who use company influence to collab with whoever's trending. j-hope and BTS started from the bottom if you didn’t know that, a struggling company, zero industry privileges, even mocked by parts of the Korean hip-hop scene early on. They didn't get here on luck. They got here on preparation meeting opportunity. Big Hit didn't make BTS, BTS made Big Hit /HYBE what it is today. Korean music critic Randy Suh put it well in a 2018 piece: "j-hope doesn't really owe the Korean hip hop scene much because it isn't where he got his start. He has since said with confidence that his musical roots are the 1980s and '90s hip hop that he grew up dancing to" He didn't come up through the underground rap scene, but he spent his late teens studying it and building a flow that's entirely his own. That groundwork is what made him the first South Korean artist to headline a major U.S. festival, not a Big Hit connection, but raw talent. That's also where he met J. Cole in person, told him he was his muse, and exchanged numbers. That friendship started artist to artist, not through some HYBE rep making a call. 🤨 “on the street” with J.Cole is j-hope’s way of paying respect to one his early hip-hop inspirations. He gave Jermaine has more bars in the song, that’s how much he respects him. j-hope only collaborates with people he genuinely respects. Korean hip-hop legends like Yoon Mirae and Gaeko who joined him on "Neuron" didn't show up because he's popular. They showed up because they believe in his skill, and because he's cited them as inspirations since day one. Years in the game don't automatically make you more deserving than someone else. Sure, some artists lean hard on their label, can't rap or sing live, and still get everything handed to them. But j-hope has never been one of them. Twenty years of experience should teach you the difference between resenting someone’s success and understanding it. j-hope’s is the kind you study, not the kind you dismiss.

HobiCasa ⊙⊝⊜ HEARD TEAR & 00:00 LIVE😭 🇨🇦🪥🤳👟

838,176 次观看 • 2 个月前

Bertrand Russell on Philosophy, Doubt, and the Danger of Hate Philosopher Bertrand Russell, asked if he can offer a positive philosophy for those who reject Marx, responds with something unexpected: a warning against dogmatism itself. "One of the troubles of the world has been the habit of dogmatically believing something or other, and I think all these matters are full of doubt." Russell refuses to replace one certainty with another. Even his own views, he insists, should be held loosely: "The rational man will not be too sure that he's right. I think that we ought always to entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt. I shouldn't wish people dogmatically to believe any philosophy not even mine. Not even mine." But doubt alone isn't enough. Russell argues there's a second ingredient that determines whether a philosophy helps or harms the world. The emotional foundation it's built on: "If a philosophy is to bring happiness, it should be inspired by kindly feeling." This is where his critique of Marx becomes pointed. For Russell, the problem is the feeling underneath them: "Marx is not inspired by kindly feeling. Marx pretended that he wanted the happiness of the proletariat. What he really wanted was the unhappiness of the bourgeoisie. And it was because of that negative element, because of that hate element, that his philosophy produced disaster." His conclusion: "A philosophy which is to do good must be one inspired by kindly feeling and not by unkindly feeling."

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

21,260 次观看 • 5 个月前