Big discussion this morning Is there deviation when looking at this angle? #AFLCrowsSwans

Im not going to give an answer from 180p shaking footage AFL need to invest in 8k Cameras

Huge deals dropping daily, just like this one 🚨 Follow for more & turn on alerts.... they go fast!

Always thought it was a stupid rule anyway. Why not just call it a goal if it goes between the posts, even if it touches a post on the way through.

The other angle from the original tv vision shows a clear gap between ball and post.

No. This is on a different angle. The footage was to far to the left to tell. The one one directly behind it on the footage shown numerous times clearly shows that it missed. So why the hell is it still being discussed. The umpires/review/Arc fucked it up, SIMPLES. End of debate

This is like the claim that it hit the back of the pad all over again. That is not when it passed the post! The deviation is the camera moving in the shaky hand of the fan. 8 bit pixel games have clearer pictures. Fox Footy showed the arc footage that would have overturned it

There is much clearer footage from front on the clearly shows a gap. Not sure why you're trying to stir up controversy here by showing grainy mobile footage.

It was already starting to curl before it got to the post so it was naturally going to keep going.

Why don't they triangulate with 3 different cameras that are 50 meters away? 🙄Also do it in under 10 seconds

It’s just the arc of the kick.

No, it goes straight through.