Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Big hate. Big claims. Zero proof. Ana Kasparian steers every discussion back to Israel—literally every time. If she had evidence of Israel running child kidnapping rape rings, it’d already be pinned to her profile. I have ZERO skin in this game. Show the proof and I’ll believe it …...

34,898 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Megyn Kelly has now outflanked Nick Fuentes. She didn't just support Candace Owens's "questions" about Israeli involvement in Charlie's murder. Megyn Kelly said she also has "questions." Even Fuentes blasted such "questions" as just asserting "that Israel killed Charlie." A week after Charlie was assassinated, Fuentes ridiculed Candace Owens for claiming that she had never accused Israel of being involved. "For literally the past week, uninterrupted, nonstop, [Candace Owens] has been pushing this narrative on her show that Israel killed Charlie Kirk." As Fuentes noted then, and has doubled down on as recently as last month in also attacking Ian Carroll, there is "zero evidence" Israel had anything to do with Charlie's murder — adding that it would make no sense, given that Charlie was one of Israel's most vocal and important supporters. Yet Megyn Kelly evidently disagrees. She told Tucker Carlson that she has "questions about what if anyone aligned with Israel or from Israel might have had to do with Charlie's death. I think it was Tyler Robinson... but, ehhh... I got, I have an open heart to [the idea] he was manipulated by somebody, I do." The very idea that Israel would want Charlie is so outrageous, Fuentes explained, that anyone who "takes [Candace] seriously" is a "sucker." "If any person takes this person seriously after this, you are a sucker. This person (Candace) should have zero credibility going forward... There is no evidence for this theory."

Joel Mowbray

28,737 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten