Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

BIG | 🇳🇴🇺🇸🇬🇧‼️‼️ NATO is rapidly assembling a powerful strike-and-denial network across the High North, moving missile launchers, HIMARS, Marines and surveillance aircraft into positions that could threaten Russia’s Northern Fleet and key military infrastructure on the Kola Peninsula. The activity includes the deployment of a U.S. Mk 70...

110,264 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля ZwaiStein
ZwaiStein29 дней назад

Nehmen wir an, die Nato würde Russland präventiv angreifen, wie würde Russland reagieren, die sind doch bereits auf Anschlag.

Фото профиля Mika Kivi
Mika Kivi29 дней назад

Hyvä asemapaikka

Фото профиля Adam Bucon
Adam Bucon29 дней назад

👏👏👏

Фото профиля Michael Dekasha
Michael Dekasha29 дней назад

@grok war with nato happening

Фото профиля 9
91 месяц назад

Huuuuuuuu. Russland zittert

Фото профиля Alexa
Alexa29 дней назад

Interesting

Фото профиля Freebird1967
Freebird196729 дней назад

Wow.

Фото профиля Thomas Anderson
Thomas Anderson1 месяц назад

nice

Фото профиля No Worries
No Worries28 дней назад

As far as I remember, I've always detested the idea of Russia... centuries of aggressive imperialism thinly veiled.

Фото профиля The Real One
The Real One29 дней назад

@PrepperCanadian STOP THE WAR.

Похожие видео

🇬🇧🇺🇸🇷🇺 Britain is moving deeper into the High North for a reason. More troops in Norway, carrier strike group ops, NATO’s Arctic Sentry, plus Royal Marines and RAF training with the U.S. and Norway on Jan Mayen. London is treating the Arctic like a live flank, and Svalbard is the awkward piece on the map. It is Norwegian territory, but the 1920 Svalbard Treaty still lets Russia live and work there, so Moscow keeps that foothold in Barentsburg through a state mining company and a consulate. The same treaty bars naval bases, fortifications, and “warlike purposes.” So Norway owns the islands, but it cannot turn them into a normal NATO outpost. That matters because of where Svalbard sits: Close to the Kola Peninsula and Russia’s Northern Fleet, beside the Bear Gap, upstream of the GIUK gap that guards the North Atlantic, and next to the cables feeding SvalSat, a major satellite ground station. This spring, UK, Norwegian, and U.S. forces tracked Russian undersea activity near the archipelago. There was no shooting, but it was a reminder that the first move up there may be against cables, not towns. So the flashpoint is alliance forces operating closer and closer to a Russian civilian presence on allied soil, under a 100-year-old treaty that limits how hard Norway can militarize the ground they’re standing on. Deterrence, legal gray zone, and geography in one place. That’s why Svalbard keeps coming up. Source: BFBS Forces News YT / Writer: Val

Mario Nawfal

35,440 просмотров • 18 дней назад

Zakharova: US launchers for short- and intermediate-range missiles in Norway will be subject to special attention from Russia’s strategic deterrence forces. Peskov: The deployment in Norway of missiles posing a threat to Russia is grounds for additional security measures. (Comment from me below the quotes) Moscow views the appearance in Europe of US launchers for intermediate- and shorter-range missiles as "yet another step in the endless chain of highly destabilizing actions by NATO countries aimed at striking deep into Russian territory," Zakharova said. According to her, the Mk-41 is capable of launching Tomahawk missiles, and its range covers a significant part of Russia's European territory, including Moscow. Zakharova added that Washington and Oslo "should not be surprised that the locations of these systems are now under the special attention of Russia’s strategic deterrence forces, which includes planning for the combat use of relevant strike weapons in the event of an armed conflict." Regarding strategic stability talks, Zakharova said that the dialogue "was interrupted by the administration of Joe Biden," while the current US authorities are "unrealistically discussing multilateral negotiations with the mandatory participation of China." "Steps such as the deployment of US land-based intermediate- and shorter-range missiles in Europe that threaten Russia, to put it mildly, 'zero out' the prerequisites for a constructive dialogue with the United States on strategic issues," she said. Comment from me: Norway and its NATO allies are strengthening their defenses in the north due to the need to protect the Arctic and North Atlantic from military threats posed by Russia and China. The system appeared as part of the trilateral Operation Atlantic City exercises (part of NATO’s permanent Arctic Sentry mission). NATO leadership identifies several key security threats in the region: • Russia’s military activity in the Arctic: NATO considers Russia the main threat to its security in the northern latitudes. Oslo is particularly concerned about the Kola Peninsula, a key base of Russia’s Northern Fleet, where nuclear-powered submarines and nuclear weapons are stationed, capable of reaching most cities in NATO countries. • Another reason is the threat of control over strategic passages: In the event of a conflict, Russia could attempt to establish control over the Bear Gap - the operational space between Norway, the Svalbard archipelago, and the United Kingdom. Control of this area would allow Russia to deploy sea-launched anti-ship and hypersonic missiles against the United Kingdom, Denmark, and Norway itself. • Hybrid threats and sabotage: Norway’s Police Security Service (PST) has repeatedly documented incidents and warned of the risk of sabotage by Russian intelligence services targeting Norway’s critical and energy infrastructure. • Territorial and geopolitical disputes: Oslo points to Moscow’s aggressive actions in the High North, including repeated challenges to Norwegian sovereignty in the Svalbard area.

Anton Gerashchenko

32,146 просмотров • 26 дней назад

🇷🇺🇪🇺‼️ NATO has reportedly developed a detailed battle plan for stopping a potential Russian invasion of the Baltic states, built around overwhelming long-range firepower, autonomous systems and systematic destruction of Russia’s ability to sustain an offensive. According to BILD, the objective would not be to occupy Russian territory, but to halt Moscow’s advance and weaken its forces as severely as possible. The opening phase would focus on suppressing Russian missile and drone attacks with NATO aircraft, missiles and unmanned systems, while simultaneously striking military infrastructure in Kaliningrad. NATO would then establish an “autonomous zone” along the borders with Russia and Belarus, where Russian advances would be stopped largely by aerial and ground robotic systems rather than a permanent physical presence of allied troops. Subsequent operations would expand against the infrastructure supporting Russia’s war effort, including military bases, airfields, bridges, railways and defense-industrial facilities. The plan reflects how dramatically NATO’s doctrine has evolved since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The alliance is preparing not simply to defend every kilometer of territory with soldiers, but to destroy the logistics, infrastructure and combat systems required for Russia to sustain an invasion. With NATO already implementing its largest eastern-flank defense plans since the Cold War and maintaining substantially more forces at high readiness, Moscow would face a fundamentally different military environment from the one it encountered in Ukraine. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

54,690 просмотров • 1 месяц назад