Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Big problem for Candace. She just vouched for Mitch Snow again. Candace says he can’t be debunked, so she thinks he’s truthful. That means Candace and Joe Kent were coordinating on Charlie Kirk. Joe vetted Mitch for her while running the National Counterterrorism Center. A sitting counterterrorism boss helping...

13,018 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 BREAKING: The TRUTH About the Joe Kent "Vetting" Mitch Snow's STORY—The Calculated ATTACK on Joe Kent and Candace Owens Exposed🕵️‍♀️⚖️ The "anti-Candace" crowd and the fake-narrative spinners are trying to claim Joe Kent "illegally vetted" Mitch Snow. They couldn't be more wrong. This wasn't about "vetting" a guest for a show—it was about protecting the United States of America. 🇺🇸🕵️‍♂️ THE REAL STORY: In my opinion when Mitch Snow came forward with sensitive information about Fort Huachuca, Candace Owens didn't just "chase a headline." She performed the ultimate act of due diligence. She refused to air a single word until she could ensure two things: Zero Risk to National Security: I believe she went to Joe Kent to ensure that sharing Mitch’s story wouldn't violate classified information laws or endanger our country. Federal Awareness: She put Joe Kent and the Federal government on notice of what Mitch saw, hoping to forcing an investigation into the federal government's own actions. that's what i think. THE FACTS vs. THE SPIN: Fact 1: It was a Legal Safeguard, not a "Favor." Candace sought out the National Counterterrorism Director to ensure she wasn't exposing secrets that could harm the nation. That isn't "shady"—it’s Responsible Patriotism. Fact 2: This VALIDATES Mitch Snow. Think about it: If Mitch’s story was "fake," why would the National Counterterrorism Director spend 15 minutes reviewing his records and give a "green light"? Joe Kent recognized the truth in those records immediately. Joe’s approval makes Mitch’s account MORE credible, not less. Fact 3: The "Trap" Question. The opposition is weaponizing a "trap" interview where Mitch was lured into using the word "vetted." They are trying to nail Joe Kent to the wall for doing his job: reviewing potential threats and ensuring transparency for the American people. THE BOTTOM LINE: Candace Owens and Joe Kent did exactly what "White Hats" are supposed to do. They communicated to ensure the truth reached the public legally and safely. The "retards" attacking them are just mad they don't have anything REAL to discredit Candace Owens , Real_Mitch_Now , or Joe Kent. They’re trying to discredit the Fort Huachuca story by attacking the messengers. The fact that the Director of Counterterrorism deemed it credible enough to move forward tells you everything you need to know.

Project Constitution

43,615 views • 4 months ago

🚨 CANDACE OWENS TIGHTENS THE TIMELINE ON SEPT 8TH: Erika Kirk MIA – Charlie Alone with Kids, No Alibi, Mitch Snow's Fort Huachuca Sighting Vindicated?! 💥👀 Tonight on Candace Owens podcast all the PUZZLE PIECES are snapping together. Candace just exposed the gaping holes in Erika Kirk's story around Charlie Kirk's final days. Candace dives deep: "Now we've learned more about Erica... the Fort Huachuca story. I'm leaning towards Mitch." September 8th timeline? TIGHTENING UP—Charlie was HOME watching the Chicago Bears game, screaming at his TV (waking Gigi), detailing plays like the Noah Sewell fumble. Candace's take: "Charlie was the parent that night... he was at home alone with the kids." Why? If Erika was there, he wouldn't be solo-dadding! Candace then questions Frank Turek's truthfulness. He claims Charlie had "dinner with the family" but NEVER mentions Erika. Candace: "I think Frank Turek was with Charlie... but I just don't buy that he was just suddenly in need of so much debate help." Crisis mode? Charlie consulted a rabbi, pastor (Turek?), priest in 48 hours—something BIG brewing. And that "angry" photo of Charlie looking off-screen during Ingram Angle? Likely Turek there, not Erika. NO ONE confirms seeing Erika on Sept 8th—neighbors know the family, spot the kids, but Erika? Ghost. "Nobody yet... an APB for September 8th for Erica Kirk." She pretends not to "understand instructions" for alibi proof—texts with Charlie? Unverified, could be faked. Erika's claim: Home at 5:24 PM making dinner? Lies—timeline shows Charlie parenting solo. This SCREAMS Mitch Snow was RIGHT: Saw Erika at Fort Huachuca on the 8th. "My spidey senses are telling me that Erica was not there on the 8th." Cover-up? Aggressive attacks when mentioned—we were "holding that back," but vibes say she was AWOL. All pieces aligning: Erika's pathological lies, no alibi—betrayal exposed. Charlie's legacy demands truth! FOLLOW Candace Owens, watch her FULL episode and RT if this timeline chills you. Candace is unraveling the web in real time!

Project Constitution

38,523 views • 5 months ago