Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

BIG | 🇷🇺🇳🇴🇺🇸‼️‼️ Russia is openly identifying military facilities in Norway that it could target in a future conflict, escalating its rhetoric against NATO as the alliance strengthens its northern flank and expands long-range capabilities close to Russia. According to Reuters, Russia’s Foreign Ministry warned that sites hosting U.S....

97,108 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

32 Yorum

Tim profil fotoğrafı
Tim7 gün önce

ALL of these were already targets. Russia propaganda is claiming they are just now becoming targets to induce fear by making media write their stories that Moscow was somehow passive before and are now being forced to target new areas because of recent wrong doing by the West.

drs.even 🟡 profil fotoğrafı
drs.even 🟡7 gün önce

They do this since the start of the Cold War. Look at this map of Netherlands with US military airfield Soesterberg and other details.

ChrisH profil fotoğrafı
ChrisH7 gün önce

Norway is ready, the country is packed with advanced air defence on important locations. And now they'll help Ukraine as well.

MoonZ profil fotoğrafı
MoonZ7 gün önce

🙄……Whom God wants to destroy, He first makes 「crazy」⚡️☝🏻#🗽🌐

Edward Logical profil fotoğrafı
Edward Logical7 gün önce

What a bunch of BS. Ukraine by itself has crippled Pootin's Russia. Those missiles will be blown up in Russia over Pootin's head.

Clowncar1986 profil fotoğrafı
Clowncar19867 gün önce

While America is risking blood and treasure to defend Europe. The actual Europe in Europe. The EU / European President Ursula is over in North America making ridiculous claims Greenland is in Europe, basically stabbing America in the back over #Greenland. Crazy.

US.Germany.Czech profil fotoğrafı
US.Germany.Czech7 gün önce

The core content of this report is factually accurate, but it blends official reporting with political analysis. Factual Core (Verified) * The Threat: The Russian Foreign Ministry (including spokesperson Maria Zakharova) has officially stated that sites hosting US missile systems in Norway, along with their command and control centers, would be considered targets for Russian armed forces in the event of an armed conflict. * The Weapon Systems: Moscow specifically pointed to ground-based US systems equipped with Mk 41 vertical launching systems. Russia argues these can launch Tomahawk cruise missiles, capable of striking targets deep inside the European part of Russia, including Moscow. * Reuters as a Source: Reuters and other international media outlets reported consistently on this official statement from Moscow. Context & Assessment * Military Background: Norway is modernizing and reinforcing its northern defenses (including the Finnmark Brigade and additional artillery units), which Moscow has repeatedly denounced as provocative. * Commentary in the Post: The third paragraph ("Moscow’s threat reflects a broader Russian effort...") is not neutral news reporting, but rather the author’s geopolitical analysis and commentary regarding NATO's deterrence posture. The reports regarding Russian threats against US installations in Norway are therefore authentic and accurate.

MGD profil fotoğrafı
MGD7 gün önce

what does "Russia is openly identifying military facilities in Norway that it could target in a future conflict" mean?

IANNADIN profil fotoğrafı
IANNADIN7 gün önce

Russia is not threatening anyone in Europe but[t] European NATO forces are threatening [thread 'n' ing tread 'n' ing dread 'n' ing frightening flight 'n' in' flit 'n' inn frit 'n' ing fret en ing threat en ing] Russia by[e]/buy massing weapons and troops all around its borders/boarders [and lodgers ledgers sledge'rs sludge ere's s'led ge's slid gees skid geese ski'd goose skied goosed s'kid gees[e] s'kit Jeez[US]]

ErminLor profil fotoğrafı
ErminLor7 gün önce

I do not see Russia's interest in attacking Europe, whereas Europe's interest in attacking Russia—to seize its natural resources alongside a regime change coordinated with anti-Putin oligarchs—is very clear to me. Let's stop the bullshit of a miliatry attack from Russia.

☯️ for ya 🍀 profil fotoğrafı
☯️ for ya 🍀7 gün önce

@mizugameGOod ふむ!!

williambendenders profil fotoğrafı
williambendenders7 gün önce

the trump effect

ShahelFin 🇪🇺🇬🇱🇺🇦🇫🇮🇨🇦🐬 profil fotoğrafı
ShahelFin 🇪🇺🇬🇱🇺🇦🇫🇮🇨🇦🐬6 gün önce

Russia will die.

Carlo La Ferlita profil fotoğrafı
Carlo La Ferlita7 gün önce

Bruxelles è più a sud

Vadersar(Justified) profil fotoğrafı
Vadersar(Justified)7 gün önce

If Russia is being defeated by Ukraine... How dare the Russians pick on NATO? Key points: 1. Explain the loss of the war to the Russians. NATO attacked us! 2. We'll say we won, but it will be contingent on showing territory, Auantams!

Ekapol profil fotoğrafı
Ekapol6 gün önce

Moscow's bluster aims to distract from its own military build-up and reassure its loyalists that Russia remains a force to be reckoned with.

Intlintelcore profil fotoğrafı
Intlintelcore7 gün önce

Russia’s statement is best explained as coercive signaling plus information operations, not as evidence that a temporary U.S. exercise launcher has produced a new, standing targeting requirement. The most consistent reading is that Moscow is trying to raise the political cost of future allied deployments in Norway while locking in a public narrative that NATO, not Russia, closed the door on strategic-stability talks.

Rudy profil fotoğrafı
Rudy7 gün önce

Fk putinhitler!!!

Dennis Dykes Jr. 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Dennis Dykes Jr. 🇺🇸7 gün önce

Bottom line, Russia is probing and countering NATO because he sees the US has pulled back and now it “seems” possible and feasible to test how far he can move forward into NATO (softly and without a major attack) due to European weaknesses. He is riding the default line between NATO and Russia strategically without going full-fledged into war with NATO. His activity is clearly RIF (reconnaissance in force). It is up to NATO how far he is allowed to probe Europe. It is the concept of a frog boiling slowly in water. Slow and sure, no one says it is enough and holds him accountable for turning up the heat against Europe and NATO.

Awe Naw profil fotoğrafı
Awe Naw7 gün önce

Norway maintains around 20,000 emergency shelters with capacity for 2.5 million people, many from the Cold War era and suited for nuclear threats. Scotland has feck all ! Defence spending has not been spent on defence ?

Adi Andrei profil fotoğrafı
Adi Andrei6 gün önce

Any idiot can put a target on something. The smart one never gets there in the first place.

Solo Leo 🇦🇷 profil fotoğrafı
Solo Leo 🇦🇷7 gün önce

Moscú, debe decidir que atacar. Porque ese será el último de Rusia en la era moderna.

VectorWar profil fotoğrafı
VectorWar7 gün önce

Is Oslo testing Moscow's "red lines" for real?)))

Santo profil fotoğrafı
Santo7 gün önce

El hijo de Putin ruso no puede con un pobre pais como Ucrania y va a atacar a la OTAN? 😂😂😂

Burak Deniz Durucan profil fotoğrafı
Burak Deniz Durucan7 gün önce

Why war ❗️

Bernhard profil fotoğrafı
Bernhard6 gün önce

Ob wir dann die Atominen vor Murmansk scharf schalten.

Godzbe profil fotoğrafı
Godzbe6 gün önce

Fah

PieroDC profil fotoğrafı
PieroDC7 gün önce

All that remains is to defeat the invading Russian empire that constantly threatens Europe.

Bill E profil fotoğrafı
Bill E7 gün önce

Oh, and Moscow isn’t a target? They can say whatever they want. I’m sure there are many targets in Russia that are already identified.

Peace profil fotoğrafı
Peace7 gün önce

🙈💩

Joseph Day profil fotoğrafı
Joseph Day7 gün önce

You and what army

△rūnas Ratkus 🇱🇹 profil fotoğrafı
△rūnas Ratkus 🇱🇹7 gün önce

Another bullshit 🫤

Benzer Videolar

🇷🇺🇪🇺‼️ NATO has reportedly developed a detailed battle plan for stopping a potential Russian invasion of the Baltic states, built around overwhelming long-range firepower, autonomous systems and systematic destruction of Russia’s ability to sustain an offensive. According to BILD, the objective would not be to occupy Russian territory, but to halt Moscow’s advance and weaken its forces as severely as possible. The opening phase would focus on suppressing Russian missile and drone attacks with NATO aircraft, missiles and unmanned systems, while simultaneously striking military infrastructure in Kaliningrad. NATO would then establish an “autonomous zone” along the borders with Russia and Belarus, where Russian advances would be stopped largely by aerial and ground robotic systems rather than a permanent physical presence of allied troops. Subsequent operations would expand against the infrastructure supporting Russia’s war effort, including military bases, airfields, bridges, railways and defense-industrial facilities. The plan reflects how dramatically NATO’s doctrine has evolved since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The alliance is preparing not simply to defend every kilometer of territory with soldiers, but to destroy the logistics, infrastructure and combat systems required for Russia to sustain an invasion. With NATO already implementing its largest eastern-flank defense plans since the Cold War and maintaining substantially more forces at high readiness, Moscow would face a fundamentally different military environment from the one it encountered in Ukraine. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

54,635 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

Zakharova: US launchers for short- and intermediate-range missiles in Norway will be subject to special attention from Russia’s strategic deterrence forces. Peskov: The deployment in Norway of missiles posing a threat to Russia is grounds for additional security measures. (Comment from me below the quotes) Moscow views the appearance in Europe of US launchers for intermediate- and shorter-range missiles as "yet another step in the endless chain of highly destabilizing actions by NATO countries aimed at striking deep into Russian territory," Zakharova said. According to her, the Mk-41 is capable of launching Tomahawk missiles, and its range covers a significant part of Russia's European territory, including Moscow. Zakharova added that Washington and Oslo "should not be surprised that the locations of these systems are now under the special attention of Russia’s strategic deterrence forces, which includes planning for the combat use of relevant strike weapons in the event of an armed conflict." Regarding strategic stability talks, Zakharova said that the dialogue "was interrupted by the administration of Joe Biden," while the current US authorities are "unrealistically discussing multilateral negotiations with the mandatory participation of China." "Steps such as the deployment of US land-based intermediate- and shorter-range missiles in Europe that threaten Russia, to put it mildly, 'zero out' the prerequisites for a constructive dialogue with the United States on strategic issues," she said. Comment from me: Norway and its NATO allies are strengthening their defenses in the north due to the need to protect the Arctic and North Atlantic from military threats posed by Russia and China. The system appeared as part of the trilateral Operation Atlantic City exercises (part of NATO’s permanent Arctic Sentry mission). NATO leadership identifies several key security threats in the region: • Russia’s military activity in the Arctic: NATO considers Russia the main threat to its security in the northern latitudes. Oslo is particularly concerned about the Kola Peninsula, a key base of Russia’s Northern Fleet, where nuclear-powered submarines and nuclear weapons are stationed, capable of reaching most cities in NATO countries. • Another reason is the threat of control over strategic passages: In the event of a conflict, Russia could attempt to establish control over the Bear Gap - the operational space between Norway, the Svalbard archipelago, and the United Kingdom. Control of this area would allow Russia to deploy sea-launched anti-ship and hypersonic missiles against the United Kingdom, Denmark, and Norway itself. • Hybrid threats and sabotage: Norway’s Police Security Service (PST) has repeatedly documented incidents and warned of the risk of sabotage by Russian intelligence services targeting Norway’s critical and energy infrastructure. • Territorial and geopolitical disputes: Oslo points to Moscow’s aggressive actions in the High North, including repeated challenges to Norwegian sovereignty in the Svalbard area.

Anton Gerashchenko

32,146 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

BREAKING NEWS !! NATO’s Provocative Moves of Troops to Polish Blrder and Russia’s Response & Stance The recent deployment of U.S. troops from the 2nd Cavalry Regiment to Orzysz, Poland, near the Poland-Ukraine border, represents a reckless escalation by NATO in an already volatile region. Framed as part of NATO’s Enhanced Forward Presence mission, this move is a thinly veiled attempt to provoke Russia and undermine its legitimate security concerns. Russia, fully aware of these maneuvers, remains steadfast in its commitment to safeguarding its sovereignty and protecting its sphere of influence. With the Russia-Ukraine conflict poised to intensify in later 2025, NATO’s actions are not only irresponsible but also dangerously shortsighted, risking a broader confrontation with a militarily formidable Russia. Russia’s awareness of the mass movement of U.S. forces underscores its sophisticated intelligence capabilities and unwavering vigilance. The Kremlin has consistently warned that foreign military presence near its borders, particularly in Ukraine, crosses a critical red line. NATO’s decision to bolster its eastern flank, under the guise of deterrence, is perceived in Moscow as a direct challenge to Russia’s national security. The 2nd Cavalry Regiment’s arrival in Poland is not a defensive measure but a provocative act, signaling NATO’s intent to encircle Russia and project power in a region historically tied to Russian influence. This deployment disregards Russia’s repeated calls for de-escalation and mutual respect for geopolitical boundaries. Russia’s military prowess is undeniable. With a modernized arsenal, including advanced hypersonic missiles, strategic nuclear capabilities, and a battle-hardened army, Russia possesses the means to decisively counter any unauthorized incursion into Ukraine. The Russian Ministry of Defense has made it clear that any foreign forces entering Ukraine without Moscow’s consent will face severe consequences. This is not mere rhetoric but a reflection of Russia’s resolve to protect its borders and prevent NATO from turning Ukraine into a Western military outpost. The catastrophic potential of such a confrontation should compel NATO to reconsider its aggressive posturing. From a Russian perspective, NATO’s actions are not about defending Poland or Ukraine but about perpetuating U.S. hegemony in Europe. The Enhanced Forward Presence mission is part of a broader strategy to weaken Russia, encroach on its sphere of influence, and destabilize the region. Ukraine, historically a buffer state, has been manipulated by Western powers into a proxy battleground, with NATO’s military buildup exacerbating tensions. Russia’s operations in Ukraine are rooted in a defensive necessity—to prevent the country from becoming a launchpad for NATO aggression. Moscow’s stance is clear: it will not allow its security to be compromised by foreign troops amassing on its doorstep. The Russian people and leadership view NATO’s maneuvers as a continuation of decades-long Western attempts to marginalize Russia. Yet, Russia remains undeterred, confident in its ability to defend its interests. President Putin has emphasized diplomacy, urging NATO to engage in meaningful dialogue to avoid catastrophic escalation. However, Russia’s patience is not infinite. Its military readiness and strategic depth ensure that any miscalculation by NATO could lead to a swift and overwhelming response. The West must recognize Russia’s legitimate concerns and cease its provocative deployments. Only through mutual respect and de-escalation can peace prevail, and Russia stands ready to defend its rightful place in a multipolar world.

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺🇮🇪

154,292 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🇺🇸🇪🇺The Pentagon is preparing several options for reshaping or reducing the U.S. military presence in Europe, adding another layer of uncertainty for NATO at a moment when concern over Russia’s intentions toward the Alliance’s eastern flank is growing. According to Reuters, the Pentagon’s NATO review will provide Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth with at least four options by November 6 for potentially reducing or restructuring U.S. deployments across Europe. Allies will reportedly be assessed according to their defense spending, contributions to NATO forces, access provided for U.S. military operations, and support for broader American defense and foreign-policy priorities. Washington has already begun altering its European posture, including withdrawing troops from Germany and cancelling the planned rotation of roughly 4,000 U.S.-based troops to Poland. The timing is particularly sensitive for NATO. European governments fear Washington may already be moving toward a smaller military footprint just as Russia is rebuilding its forces and Western intelligence is increasingly focused on potential Russian pressure against NATO’s eastern members. Trump’s frustration with allies over defense spending and their refusal to support aspects of the U.S. war with Iran has further intensified those concerns. Any substantial American drawdown would therefore accelerate pressure on Europe to assume responsibility for capabilities long underwritten by the United States, while forcing NATO to ensure that Moscow does not interpret a changing U.S. posture as an opportunity to test the Alliance. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

37,031 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce