Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Big Statement by Court! "There is no specific evidence showing any such cash evidence of bribe or repayment of kickbacks. The only evidence presented has been some vague statements by witnesses, and on the basis of these statements, it cannot be inferred that cash payments were given as bribes."...

772,063 просмотров • 3 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 8

Фото профиля Deepak Singh
Deepak Singh3 лет назад

तो @AtishiAAP को ये सबूत कोर्ट में देना चाहिए और मनीष सिसोदिया को छुड़ा लेना चाहिए। क्या प्रेस कांफ्रेंस करने से सिसोदिया छूट जाएगा? तो कृपया राजनीति ना करे, पब्लिक सब जानती है और कोर्ट में जाकर दारू मास्टर को जमानत दिलाये।

Фото профиля No Conversion
No Conversion3 лет назад

No proof

Фото профиля ANUPAM MISHRA
ANUPAM MISHRA3 лет назад

“statements by witnesses” Aur kya chahiye, CCTV par bhrashtachar to hoga nahin 😎

Фото профиля Pavan Kaushik
Pavan Kaushik3 лет назад

दोस्तों सच-सच बताना - क्या आपको नहीं लगता की यह madam @AtishiAAP हंसते हंसते बातें करती हैं, जैसे अपना ही मज़ाक़ बना रही हों। इनका हर press conference देख लीजिए, ऐसा lagta है मीडिया के मज़े ले रही हैं। क्या level का घमंड है।

Фото профиля Kumar
Kumar3 лет назад

कोर्ट जा ना यहाँ क्यों शोर मचा रहा है….जा के मैलार्ड को बोल के दिखाओ बिके हुए मैलार्ड हो मोदी मैलार्ड हो …जल्दी जाओ

Фото профиля Rajendra Sharma
Rajendra Sharma3 лет назад

भाई वाह वाह वाह वाह क्या कहानी है इतनी जबरदस्त कहानी है कि मनीष सिसोदिया अगले चार पांच मिनट के बाद ही जेल से बाहर आ जाएंगे संजय को बोल दिया है ना किमाना लेकर स्वागत के लिए गेट पर पहुंच जाए

Фото профиля Mitul
Mitul3 лет назад

@ArvindKejriwal A gift to you from @capitaltvindia

Фото профиля 🇮🇳💫VB💫🇮🇳
🇮🇳💫VB💫🇮🇳3 лет назад

अच्छा आतिशी मारलेना। फिर ये क्या हैं। #SheeshMahalAurSharab

Похожие видео

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

696,892 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад