Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Big step forward 🙏 White cells up from 1.2 → 8.65. Hyperbaric, fasting & strict discipline are helping. Still struggling with radiation ☢️… but doing it. One session at a time. Grateful. Ready. MSC Golf Day next ⛳️ No Retreat. No Surrender 💪

10,984 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 Why Ivermectin Shows So Much Promise Against Cancer (But Almost No Human Trials) Ivermectin doesn’t just have one or two effects on cancer; it has over a dozen different mechanisms of action. Here are some of the key ones: - Kills cancer stem cells (the cells chemotherapy often misses) - Reverses multidrug resistance, making cancer cells more sensitive to chemotherapy again - Acts as a radiosensitizer, helping radiation work better - Inhibits angiogenesis (stops tumors from forming new blood vessels) - Blocks matrix metalloproteinases, which helps prevent cancer from spreading and metastasizing Despite hundreds of preclinical studies showing these effects, there are almost no large human trials. Only small case reports exist (for example, some leukemia patients showing remission). Why? Because Ivermectin has been off-patent since the 1990s. It’s a cheap, generic drug. When there’s no money to be made, tragically, large-scale research rarely happens, especially in oncology. This is the same story with many other repurposed drugs. Promising lab results exist, but without financial incentive, human trials rarely move forward. That’s why so many patients are now doing their own research into these options. If you're exploring Ivermectin or Fenbendazole protocols, many people are choosing clean, pharmaceutical-grade versions from PharmacyinUSA. Save this for reference. #Ivermectin #CancerResearch #RepurposedDrugs #Fenbendazole #CancerStemCells

PharmacyinUSA

12,063 views • 1 month ago

The Dangerous Cult of 'Fasting' Influencers. Fasting has its anecdotal benefits, yes. But it is overrated. And water fasting is highly overrated. But this video featuring a Cardiologist is amusingly nonsense. There is no study from Boston (from a "University?" - how vague!) that says 7-days water fasting reduces risk of cancer (what cancer?) by 70%. And there is no proof that fasting kills cancer cells in humans. Here is what fasting does to cancers in humans. Nothing. Fasting is now become a sort of religion-like cult for wellness influencers to rake in views and engagement. From a scientific standpoint, there are no realistically good human studies to prove anything from fasting that benefits cancers. I know, I know, "autophagy" and all that. Autophagy: Autophagy is the natural, conserved degradation of the cell that removes unnecessary or dysfunctional components. Yes, its a legit term and all. But in the context of cancer reduction and fasting in humans, it sounds like "immunity boosting," another wellness fraud term. The effects of fasting on cancer cells are all based on MOUSE studies, and none explicitly translated to humans. See this paper: everything is based on cells and tissues and small animal experiments: "While research on the subject is tantalizing, there’s little clinical evidence involving humans to substantiate the claims. Studies on the potential impacts on cancer treatment from various forms of fasting or calorie restriction, including the possibility that they reduce side effects, have been limited." "Fasting may not be appropriate for malnourished individuals or those with cancer cachexia, which results in a continuing loss of skeletal muscle mass, or for people with chronic diseases. Those with diabetes need to be very careful, because of the risk of hypoglycemia." "Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, there is currently no evidence supporting the superiority of therapeutic fasting over non-fasting in preventing chemotherapy toxicity." - see here: Even intermittent fasting (IF) is overrated in cancer. "IF may be considered in adults seeking cancer-prevention benefits through means of weight management, butwhether IF itself affects cancer-related metabolic and molecular pathways remains unanswered. See here: Also this: "Fasting for short periods does not have any beneficial effect on the quality of life of cancer patients during treatment. Evidence on fasting regimes reducing side effects and toxicities of chemotherapy is missing." See here: The whole aspect of "fasting reducing cancer incidence" in the real world is just due to weight loss. Obesity is associated with at least 13 types of cancers and reversing obesity reduces risk of cancer - nothing to do with fasting killing off cancers cells in the body. And one can lose weight even without fasting. See here: Everything from prevention of adverse events of cancer, to reduction in side effects from chemotherapy, to slowing cancer growth by reducing glucose levels, to promoting cell regeneration by affecting autophagy is all LAB BASED MOLECULAR LEVEL HYPOTHESIS that has not been proven conclusively in humans. See here: Cancer patients must not starve. They must remain hydrated and they must eat a well balanced diet because cancer condition is highly demanding. And dont water fast for 7 days. Easy for people to make reels on it, but in real life, it may prove disastrous. Water fast does make you lose weight (because of starvation) but it is not at all a healthy way to lose weight. Stop with this fasting and cancer madness already.

TheLiverDoc™

269,527 views • 2 years ago