正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
🚨 BIG! TOP intel sources reveal Pak handler RADICALISED the accused in Ranchi RSS office petrol bomb attack. Probe exposes CROSS-BORDER terror network: Plot allegedly originated in Dubai; accused used Botim app & WhatsApp. Agencies are tracing funding & recruitment trail.
30,132 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)
0 条评论
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
![The CIA's Covert Networks and The Asia Foundation Blueprint Funding FRAUD, Color Revolutions, and Election Meddling Worldwide. The cover-up became the model. Launder intel ops through "independent" NGOs, slap on USAID labels, and deny everything. A declassified State Department bombshell from 1967 uncovered the CIA's covert creation and funding of the Asia Foundation (TAF) as a front for psychological operations in Asia. What starts as a Cold War relic quickly morphs into a blueprint for today's global regime-change playbook—funneling billions through USAID, Soros-linked NGOs like Open Society Foundations (OSF), and election manipulators like A-WEB. This isn't ancient history; it's the machinery behind "color revolutions" that have toppled governments in over 100 countries, from Serbia to Sudan, and now threatens elections at home in the U.S. Buckle up—this thread exposes the entire web. The CIA's original sin was birthing the Asia Foundation as a covert weapon. Flash back to 1954. Amid the Red Scare, the CIA spins up the Committee for a Free Asia (later rebranded TAF) as a "proprietary"—a fake NGO to wage cultural and educational warfare against communism in Asia. Declassified docs from the State Department's Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS) series reveal TAF's mission: "undertake cultural and educational activities on behalf of the U.S. Government in ways not open to official U.S. agencies." It funneled millions covertly to intellectuals, media, and unions, building anti-communist networks under the guise of philanthropy. By 1966, investigative mag Ramparts sniffed out the CIA ties, sparking panic in D.C. A frantic CIA memo to the 303 Committee (the agency's covert ops overseers) admits TAF's "total dependence upon covert funding support" and begs for a bailout to avoid "embarrass[ing] the Administration and U.S. national interests at home and abroad." Enter the Katzenbach Committee, LBJ's fix was to "terminate" CIA cash and pivot to overt funding via USAID and State Department grants. TAF's trustees issued a "carefully limited statement" admitting past ties but vowing to soldier on as a "private institution" with U.S. government backing. TAF funded the East-West Center, where Barack Obama's parents met—tying this op to modern U.S. elite networks. But the real genius? The cover-up became the model. Launder intelligence operations through "independent" NGOs, slap on USAID labels, turn your head and deny everything. USAID became the laundromat for regime-change dollars. Fast-forward to today. TAF's no dusty relic—it's a USAID cash cow, raking in $17.3 million in FY2024 alone for "democracy-building" in Asia. Programs? "Capacity building" for unions, media, judiciary, and civil society in hotspots like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Indonesia, and China. TAF's own site boasts alignment with "U.S. foreign policy priorities," from "improving governance" (i.e., installing friendly judges) to fostering "vibrant civil society" (i.e., training protesters). USAID's role? It's the Trojan horse. Post-1967, Congress codified TAF funding via the Asia Foundation Act, declaring it "advantageous to U.S. relations with Asia." Today, USAID pours billions into 100+ countries, including Australia, South Korea, Canada, the Congo, Brazil, South Africa, and dozens more, for "democracy assistance"—code for grooming opposition, funding election monitors, and scripting narratives. In Indonesia alone, TAF's USAID-backed ERAT program (2021-2025) targets 30 districts for "subnational governance," training local assets to push U.S.-aligned reforms. Critics call it "regime change laundering," black-budget CIA ops rebranded as "aid." Soros's Open Society is like the billionaire enforcer behind the scenes. Enter George Soros and OSF, the $18B+ juggernaut bankrolling "open societies" since 1979. OSF denies direct USAID funding—"manifestly false," they say—but the trails lead straight back. Enter the East-West Management Institute (EWMI). A Soros partner that's slurped $270M in U.S. grants over 15 years, mostly USAID/State, for "judicial reform" and "civil society training" in Albania, Georgia, and beyond. OSF and TAF? Thick as thieves—joint studies on "higher education" and "anti-corruption," with OSF appointing ex-TAF staffers. OSF's Asia program head edited a site funded by TAF, NED, and OSF itself. Soros's fingerprints? All over "color revolutions"—nonviolent coups scripted by U.S. intel cutouts. Serbia's 2000 Bulldozer Revolution? OSF trained Otpor activists with NED/USAID cash. There are plenty of examples like Georgia's 2003 Rose Revolution. $42M from OSF to "build democratic institutions." Ukraine's 2004 Orange and 2014 Maidan? Soros poured $100M+, admitting his foundation crafted post-Maidan strategies. Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, even Haiti's unrest—OSF's playbook: Fund media smears, youth mobs, and "election monitors" to delegitimize rulers. Putin nailed it, These aren't "people power"—they're Soros-fueled psyops to install pro-West puppets, collapsing economies for vulture capitalists like him. What many never talk about is A-WEB, the election rigging arm. The stealth player, A-WEB (Association of World Election Bodies), a Seoul-based outfit claiming to "promote democratic elections" in 100+ countries. Sounds benign? Dig deeper. A-WEB's funded via USAID/NED grants for "election training" and observation—mirroring TAF's "capacity building." In Georgia (pre-2003), A-WEB precursors trained "observers" who cried fraud, sparking the Rose Revolution. Fast-forward to A-WEB's in Ukraine, Bolivia, even U.S. swing states via partnerships with IFES (USAID-funded).Allegations? A-WEB's a "deep state" tool for interference. In 2020, Bolivian elections: A-WEB/OAS "observers" (Soros/USAID-backed) alleged fraud against Evo Morales—later debunked—paving his ouster. Domestically? A-WEB trains U.S. poll workers via USAID pipelines, accused of biasing toward Dems in 2020 mail-in ops. Judicial Watch is on the money claiming it's "exporting fraud": Train foreign "experts" to certify rigged votes, then import the tactics home. The global harvest is happening in 100+ countries. This is stolen sovereignty. This nexus—CIA blueprints → USAID laundromats → Soros enforcers → A-WEB fixers—has engineered "color revolutions" in 100+ nations since 2000. Serbia, Georgia, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, Tunisia (Arab Spring kickoff), Sudan (2019 ouster), even Bolivia and Myanmar. Pattern: Fund NGOs to train protesters, hack elections via "monitors," amplify via OSF media (e.g., Reporters Without Borders). Result? Pro-West regimes, resource grabs, chaos. In the U.S.? It's boomeranging. USAID/OSF cash flows to domestic NGOs like CTIA (Soros-funded) for "voter mobilization"—targeting urban/minority turnout that flipped 2020. A-WEB's U.S. ties? Training via USAID for "secure elections," but whistleblowers allege it greased mail-in fraud pipelines. Foreign echoes: Russia's Doppelganger op mimics this, but who's the OG? The Reckoning needs to happen, not just in the U.S., but around the world. We must dismantle the machine. What Mike Benz added to this isn't just history—it's a warning. This is what many having been saying for decades but nobody believed it. A shadow network steals elections not with just fake ballots, but with "democracy" as cover. Over $70B in U.S. "aid" yearly, much USAID-routed, props up 100+ puppets while eroding sovereignty. Trump and Musk are right. Defund USAID's Soros slush fund. Demand audits, expose cutouts, reclaim foreign policy for Americans. H/T: Mike Benz](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1998107206416245201/amplify_video_thumb/1998105329259757568/img/4esjbbhgOX77wHVo.jpg)
![Intelligence Agency Alleges “Pro-Russia” TikTok Accounts Are Interfering In Czech Elections Despite speculation, there is no evidence tying social media accounts to Russia by Cecílie Jílková alex gutentag and Michael Shellenberger Almost 1,000 accounts on TikTok are promoting pro-Russian narratives in support of “extremist” parties ahead of this week’s elections in the Czech Republic, according to a Czech intelligence agency and a group of analysts who identify as the “Center for Online Risk Research.” And some in the Czech news media are suggesting that Russia may be behind the accounts. “Secret services have discovered hundreds more pro-Russian accounts that want to influence the election,” reported Denik N, a Czech news publication, this morning. “They have millions of views.” But neither BIS nor the Center for Online Risk Research says they can link the Russian government to any of the accounts. “We don’t know,” said researcher Vendula Prokůpková to Public. “We don’t have the tools to find out.” The BIS declined to comment. A TikTok spokesperson told Public, “We have proactively implemented additional safety and security measures ahead of the elections in Czechia, including an in-app Election Center to provide access to authoritative information about the vote. We continue to aggressively counter deceptive behaviour, and we have already prevented and removed millions of fake likes and follow requests in Czechia since the start of August.” Notably, the Czech media and the Center are making similar arguments to those used by a Romanian court last year to nullify the presidential election, which legal scholars viewed as unconstitutional. The case may seem unimportant to Americans, given the relatively small size of the Czech Republic, which has 11 million people, and since the Romanian intelligence agencies made stronger claims about Russian interference than the Czech BIS or the Center for Online Risk Research have made. And the possibility remains that Russia, or Russia-linked bot networks, are indeed engaged in algorithm manipulation to help the Czech parties opposed to continuing arming of Ukraine. In Romania, intelligence officials accused the Russians of creating fake accounts and manipulating algorithms. But the information comes at a moment when Internet censorship is a sticking point between the Trump administration and the EU over a trade deal, and just days after the European Commission leaked plans that it could fine Meta’s Instagram and Facebook up to six percent of its global revenue if it doesn’t make it easier for users to flag posts for censorship. The Commission is currently investigating Facebook and Instagram for supposed failure to stop “disinformation” and “deceptive advertising” in advance of last year’s European Parliament elections. The EU has made no secret of its desire to censor social media worldwide, not just in Europe. Meanwhile, Americans are obligated under NATO to defend both Romania and the Czech Republic, and the NATO treaty requires its members to hold free and fair elections, which Romania did not do. Romania’s intelligence officials presented no evidence to support their claims, and subsequent analyses revealed that the Romanian ruling party had funded at least some of the allegedly pro-Russian TikTok accounts. Where the Romanian TikTok accounts supposedly promoted a right-wing populist, the Czech Center claims that the Czech language TikTok posts, back the “far-right SPD party, which ranks third in most polls with around 13% support, and the far-left Stacilo!,” according to Reuters, “which is gaining just over the 5% threshold needed to secure parliamentary seats.” Notes Reuters, “Both parties advocate for Czechia to leave NATO and the European Union.” Prokůpková said, despite its name, that “Center for Online Risk Research” is “not an organization. We are an initiative.” However, she also said, “My partner is the CTU,” referring to the Czech government’s Telecommunications Office. This office organized a meeting on August 29th due to the upcoming Czech elections, which was attended by the European Commission, Google, Meta, Microsoft, TikTok, and X. “The participants discussed their readiness to address potential systemic risks in connection with the parliamentary elections and respond to possible incidents,” a European Commission spokesperson told Public today. Prokůpková also said, “I proceed in accordance with the DSA,” the EU’s Digital Services Act, which entitles anyone to report false accounts or misinformation on social media to the Czech Telecommunications Office.”We are ordinary citizens and we use the R programming language,” she explained. One of the Center’s members is Josef Šlerka, who collaborated with “The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project,” which the US State Department created in 2008, and which the USAID funded. After President Trump cut off USAID funding, the European Commission began to financially support OCCRP. In January, Šlerka and the director of the Czech government’s Security Information Service (BIS), the equivalent of the FBI and DHS in the US, briefed Czech members of Parliament about the Romanian TikTok case as a potential model for the Czech Republic. Now, the BIS has sent a report on Czech-speaking pro-Russian TikTok accounts to the president, prime minister, and Czech Telecommunications Office. Earlier this year, a Czech Army group admitted to monitoring opposition figures. Leaked documents show the group monitored “the opinions and attitudes of these [opposition] individuals towards the activities of the Ministry of Defense, its leaders, senior representatives of the Czech army, and the war in Ukraine.” General Karel Řehka later defended the Army’s actions by alleging that it was just a military exercise in case of possible future interference in the elections. A few weeks ago, Romania’s Interior (security) Minister said the intelligence agencies of the Czech Republic and those in other nations admire what Romania did. “I believe that what happened in Romania last year is currently being studied by all intelligence agencies in the Western world,” said Cătălin Predoiu. “Conclusions are being drawn and countries are taking defensive measures, inspired by how Romania defended itself.” He went on to say that “my Czech colleague, who is a good friend of mine, approached me and said, ‘We also have elections in the fall, and we are watching very closely what has happened in your country.’” From left: Vít Rakušan, Czech Minister of the Interior and Deputy Prime Minister, and Marian-Cătălin Predoiu, Romanian Minister of the Interior and Deputy Prime Minister, at the Round Table (Justice and Home Affairs Council) on December 12, 2024. Source: Other groups are involved in the possible influence operation. A liberal website called Voxpot recently published a list of websites that repost content from Russian state platforms, but provided no information about any links to or financing from Russia. The Independent Journalism Foundation financed the Voxpot report. And Seznam, a news website that has advocated for EU government censorship of “misinformation,” finances the Foundation. Finally, GLOBSEC, the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), and CEDMO (Central European Digital Media Observatory), all of which appear to have links to the intelligence community, published a report warning of the alleged risks of Russian interference; however, it contained no evidence to support these claims. Major military contractors, including Lockheed Martin, KNDS, and Saab finance GLOBSEC, while the US, UK, EU, and other Western governments finance ISD and CEDMO. While the allegations focus on alleged pro-Russian support for the nationalist-populist SPD party and the radical Left-Wing coalition Stacilo!, party, the latest polls show that the ANO party, led by former Prime Minister and billionaire Andrej Babiš has over 33% support, which is 12 points more than the centre-right SPOLU (Together) coalition, which the current Prime Minister leads. Like the SPD and Stacilo!, Babiš is running directly against the EU’s agenda, including on migration, climate change, the Ukraine war, and censorship. His party rejected NATO’s new defence spending target and called for halting ammunition supplies to Ukraine. With the SPD and Stacilo! expected to win roughly 18% of the vote, and given their shared opposition to arming Ukraine, they could join in a coalition government with ANO to end further military support. “If the electoral contest were close, then even several tens of thousands of votes that voters cast for someone (or conversely decided not to cast) could determine whether, for example, the Czech ammunition initiative, crucial aid for defending Ukraine, will continue,“ confirms in today’s article the Czech liberal newspaper Deník N. Czech President Petr Pavel is a former NATO general and a strong supporter of supplying Ukraine in its war with Russia. Nothing happened after the Romanian court nullified its election. Romania remains a member of NATO and the EU. Indeed, the EU supported the judicial coup. The same could happen in the Czech Republic. Others think that’s unlikely. “I don’t think we are approaching what is known as the ‘Romanian scenario,’” wrote Lukáš Prchal, a journalist who has written on the TikTok scandal for Deník N, in an email to Public. Whatever the case, the fact remains that there is no evidence of Russian government interference in the Czech elections, and any effort to nullify it based on allegations about anonymous TikTok accounts would violate the Czech Republic’s constitution, the European Union’s constitution, and the NATO treaty. “There is an attempt here,” a source told Denik N, “but the potential and significance are not essential. It is an unsuccessful attempt.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1973452631139033346/amplify_video_thumb/1973450924258697216/img/R-E35fTqfWML2Zih.jpg)