Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Bigass snowbunny taking raw backshots from a ruthless BBC cheeks clapping like an applause. Could you handle it? (Backshots compilation) #NSFW #Backshots #BBC #Snowbunny #ThickWhiteGirl #moaning #deepthroat #pussyfart #freaks #porn #nsfwtwt

Freaky Content 😩💦

1,724 subscribers

96,014 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #NSFW #Backshots #BBC #Snowbunny #ThickWhiteGirl #moaning #deepthroat #pussyfart #freaks #porn #nsfwtwt

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

snowbunny leak creampie squirt nsfw porn sex latina onlyfans cumslut cheating nudes mommy horny wankchat anime milf cumtribute ebony backshots teen thot interracial throatgoat college bbc onlyfans feet nsfwtwt love Bbw Asian riding squat Pawg cum phat ass cumslut bbc thot blowjob

snowbunny leak creampie squirt nsfw porn sex latina onlyfans cumslut cheating nudes mommy horny wankchat anime milf cumtribute ebony backshots teen thot interracial throatgoat college bbc onlyfans feet nsfwtwt love Bbw Asian riding squat Pawg cum phat ass cumslut bbc thot blowjob

Bad Bitches Daily

10,889 views • 3 years ago

snowbunny leak creampie squirt nsfw porn sex latina onlyfans cumslut cheating nudes mommy horny wankchat anime milf cumtribute ebony backshots teen thot interracial throatgoat college bbc onlyfans feet nsfwtwt love Bbw Asian riding squat Pawg cum phat ass cumslut bbc thot blowjob

Sensitive content

snowbunny leak creampie squirt nsfw porn sex latina onlyfans cumslut cheating nudes mommy horny wankchat anime milf cumtribute ebony backshots teen thot interracial throatgoat college bbc onlyfans feet nsfwtwt love Bbw Asian riding squat Pawg cum phat ass cumslut bbc thot blowjob

Bad Bitches Daily

270,925 views • 3 years ago

😡 Jenas ANGRILY HITS OUT At GMB Hosts: Throws Tantrum Over Ranvir’s Tough Questions & Plays Victim Again 🤔 Jermaine Jenas is back moaning about his Good Morning Britain interview, claiming it was a big bad trap and an ambush he never saw coming. The ex-Match of the Day star, still licking his wounds from the 2024 sexting scandal that cost him his BBC gigs, took to social media to play the victim card once more: “There’s obviously a level of disappointment… It felt like they had an agenda. It felt like there was a thirst for blood from one presenter in particular… It just felt unnecessary to me.” He goes on to complain that producers promised to focus on his “rebuilding” journey, but it all went wrong: “They invited me on. I didn’t ask to go on the show… It just felt like a trap. It just felt like one individual had an agenda and she was going to twist the knife because she wanted to.” Yeah, because no one could possibly have predicted that going on GMB with Kate Garraway and Ranvir Singh would involve tough questions about the scandal that got you sacked. Come on Jermaine. You’re not stupid. You knew exactly how this was going to go, and you’re clearly referring to Ranvir when talking about the “agenda”, “thirst for blood” and “twisting the knife”. Why not just say her name? Just be honest for once. We all know who you’re talking about. Instead of owning it, he’s back to the same “poor me, everyone’s out to get me” routine he pulled during the interview itself. You lost your jobs and damaged your family because of your own actions, Jenas. Time to stop the endless whining and actually move on, or at least stop agreeing to interviews if you can’t handle the heat.

😡 Jenas ANGRILY HITS OUT At GMB Hosts: Throws Tantrum Over Ranvir’s Tough Questions & Plays Victim Again 🤔 Jermaine Jenas is back moaning about his Good Morning Britain interview, claiming it was a big bad trap and an ambush he never saw coming. The ex-Match of the Day star, still licking his wounds from the 2024 sexting scandal that cost him his BBC gigs, took to social media to play the victim card once more: “There’s obviously a level of disappointment… It felt like they had an agenda. It felt like there was a thirst for blood from one presenter in particular… It just felt unnecessary to me.” He goes on to complain that producers promised to focus on his “rebuilding” journey, but it all went wrong: “They invited me on. I didn’t ask to go on the show… It just felt like a trap. It just felt like one individual had an agenda and she was going to twist the knife because she wanted to.” Yeah, because no one could possibly have predicted that going on GMB with Kate Garraway and Ranvir Singh would involve tough questions about the scandal that got you sacked. Come on Jermaine. You’re not stupid. You knew exactly how this was going to go, and you’re clearly referring to Ranvir when talking about the “agenda”, “thirst for blood” and “twisting the knife”. Why not just say her name? Just be honest for once. We all know who you’re talking about. Instead of owning it, he’s back to the same “poor me, everyone’s out to get me” routine he pulled during the interview itself. You lost your jobs and damaged your family because of your own actions, Jenas. Time to stop the endless whining and actually move on, or at least stop agreeing to interviews if you can’t handle the heat.

J Stewart

212,259 views • 2 months ago

Mz.Dani revealed she wants her first an*l scene to be with Dredd and his BBC She shared a story about a man from Milwaukee who initially connected with her through a free tattoo, and their relationship later became more personal. She clarified that the tattoo wasn’t exchanged for anything—it simply developed naturally over time. She also explained that she’s been preparing herself for a future scene with a performer she finds very attractive(Dredd) and has been taking things step by step. “let’s try this again because I’m really trying to train my b#tthole because I want to anal with someone in the industry who’s like huge,you have to start with a smaller d1ck though…yeah he’s got a huge d1ck”

Sensitive content

Mz.Dani revealed she wants her first an*l scene to be with Dredd and his BBC She shared a story about a man from Milwaukee who initially connected with her through a free tattoo, and their relationship later became more personal. She clarified that the tattoo wasn’t exchanged for anything—it simply developed naturally over time. She also explained that she’s been preparing herself for a future scene with a performer she finds very attractive(Dredd) and has been taking things step by step. “let’s try this again because I’m really trying to train my b#tthole because I want to anal with someone in the industry who’s like huge,you have to start with a smaller d1ck though…yeah he’s got a huge d1ck”

Fazzy

236,890 views • 2 months ago

$It’s outrageous that President Donald Trump has threatened to sue the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), say many in the media. “You have to admire the chutzpah,” wrote one columnist. “Donald Trump describing the BBC as ‘corrupt’ while threatening to take legal action….The man has never been known for his self-awareness, so it’s safe to say the irony has almost certainly passed him by.” But there is no question that BBC employees deliberately manipulated Trump’s remarks on January 6, 2021, to make it sound like he had encouraged violence. An independent outside auditor, Michael Prescott, wrote a major report on the BBC’s bias, which concluded that the BBC had “spliced together two clips” to create “the impression that Trump said something he did not and, in doing so, materially misled viewers.” Americans might think this story doesn’t concern them because it’s about a British media company. Few Americans listen to the BBC. But the story is highly relevant to Americans because US news media companies are guilty of manipulating their coverage of Trump, transgenderism, and race in nearly identical ways as the BBC. And given the BBC’s longstanding reputation as one of the most credible news organizations in the world, Prescott’s independent report has rightly sparked a major international media discussion. Over the weekend, the BBC’s CEO and its Director-General both stepped down. “The Future of the BBC is Now in Doubt,” writes Tim Stanley, an influential columnist, in the Daily Telegraph. Prescott’s report should inspire reform-minded owners of US news media companies to clean up their act. For example, CNN falsely claimed that January 6 was an “insurrection” that resulted in the deaths of five people and did a similarly manipulative edit of Trump’s speech, noted an investigator on X, MAZE. “It may not be technically as bad as what the BBC did,” he noted, “because there was a quick flash transition, but the goal was the same. Make the speech sound worse than it was. Take everything out of context and put it together in an order that makes it sound as bad as possible.” Last year, we criticized CNN and other news media for deliberately twisting the meaning of Trump’s remarks about Liz Cheney for being a war hawk, and Prescott makes the same observation. “Mr. Trump was clearly criticising politicians who readily send US troops to war without thinking about the human cost,” he notes. And yet “the BBC repeatedly pushed this inaccurate version of what Trump said.” Readers of Public are aware that we have been critical of the BBC’s fact-checking program, “BBC Verify.” One purpose of BBC Verify appears to be to label stories with which the BBC disagrees as “misinformation” and thus as something that social media platforms should censor. Last year, the BBC’s Director General, Tim Davie, said, “Disinformation, propaganda, and partial news is [sic] weakening our shared understanding of the world, undermining trust in our institutions and our democratic process,” shortly after the BBC had buried a large package of investigative stories on the problems with giving children and adolescents puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. BBC’s first “disinformation” reporter, Mariana Spring, apologized in 2023 after she was caught lying on her resume. Spring remains employed at BBC as its “Social Media Investigations Senior Correspondent.” Prescott described how BBC Verify spread misinformation. “BBC audiences were being encouraged to believe Britain’s major insurers were, intentionally or unintentionally, racist and charging high prices to customers based on their ethnicity,” notes Prescott. “The central claim implied causation, (that being an ethnic minority resulted in you being charged more), but the reporting and commentary did not consider other issues that can affect insurance charges.” Adds Prescott, “the entire report was taken down, which I understand is very rare. It had taken six months for the BBC to take decisive action about a story that was not fit for purpose and spread damaging misinformation. As far as I know, no one has ever been disciplined for this hugely embarrassing episode and worrying questions remain.” Another example of the BBC’s bias concerned a major story about doctors causing serious harm to children, adolescents, and vulnerable adults. Readers of Public will recall that in the Spring of last year, we released documents, The WPATH Files, which a whistleblower had given to us. “In March 2024,” writes Prescott, “there was widespread media coverage of leaked documents from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health [WPATH] which raised concerns about the quality of care given to gender-distressed children. It was picked up by the Mail, Economist, Observer, Washington Post, the Times, and others, but not the BBC.” Prescott points out other examples of the BBC's censorship and bias on transgenderism. It refused to cover detransitioners, people who regretted taking hormones or receiving surgeries in an attempt to change their sex or gender. It didn’t cover a major lawsuit by a group of nurses after their hospital allowed a man to use their changing room. And, beyond WPATH, the BBC gave little to no coverage of the trans medical scandal, even though the UK government has banned puberty blockers. By contrast, the BBC produced “a surprisingly high number of stories about drag queens,” celebrated a male wrestler who competed in the women’s category, and published an article last year headlined, “Transgender woman guilty of rape after night out.” Wrote the reporter, “Lexi Secker, 35, of Lowbourne, near Melksham, was living as a man when she attacked a woman in Blunsdon, Wiltshire, on 23 April 2023.” More information about the scandal may come out. Just today, Cath Leng, BBC’s former chief writer, says she was “forced out” in 2023 after 25 years because she was critical of transgender ideology. Prescott identified other areas of bias, including on race and the war in Gaza, all of which pointed to a single significant underlying problem. “My view is that the Executive repeatedly failed to implement measures to resolve highlighted problems, and in many cases simply refused to acknowledge there was an issue at all,” he writes. “Indeed, I would argue that the Executive’s attitude when confronted with evidence of serious and systemic problems is now a systemic problem in itself - meaning the last recourse for action is the Board.” All of this is deeply damaging to the BBC, regardless of whether Trump decides to sue it. “BBC staff have destroyed their own trump card in future negotiations over the licence fee,” writes Stanley at the Daily Telegraph. “The problem is this: in the modern, post-TV world, the licence fee is entirely unjustifiable. The BBC has to explain why, when there’s so much else available, it should be allowed to compel us to pay for it – just when tastes are diverging, national identity is fractured and the quality of the BBC’s output is in doubt…” What, then, explains the BBC’s fall from grace? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!$

It’s outrageous that President Donald Trump has threatened to sue the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), say many in the media. “You have to admire the chutzpah,” wrote one columnist. “Donald Trump describing the BBC as ‘corrupt’ while threatening to take legal action….The man has never been known for his self-awareness, so it’s safe to say the irony has almost certainly passed him by.” But there is no question that BBC employees deliberately manipulated Trump’s remarks on January 6, 2021, to make it sound like he had encouraged violence. An independent outside auditor, Michael Prescott, wrote a major report on the BBC’s bias, which concluded that the BBC had “spliced together two clips” to create “the impression that Trump said something he did not and, in doing so, materially misled viewers.” Americans might think this story doesn’t concern them because it’s about a British media company. Few Americans listen to the BBC. But the story is highly relevant to Americans because US news media companies are guilty of manipulating their coverage of Trump, transgenderism, and race in nearly identical ways as the BBC. And given the BBC’s longstanding reputation as one of the most credible news organizations in the world, Prescott’s independent report has rightly sparked a major international media discussion. Over the weekend, the BBC’s CEO and its Director-General both stepped down. “The Future of the BBC is Now in Doubt,” writes Tim Stanley, an influential columnist, in the Daily Telegraph. Prescott’s report should inspire reform-minded owners of US news media companies to clean up their act. For example, CNN falsely claimed that January 6 was an “insurrection” that resulted in the deaths of five people and did a similarly manipulative edit of Trump’s speech, noted an investigator on X, MAZE. “It may not be technically as bad as what the BBC did,” he noted, “because there was a quick flash transition, but the goal was the same. Make the speech sound worse than it was. Take everything out of context and put it together in an order that makes it sound as bad as possible.” Last year, we criticized CNN and other news media for deliberately twisting the meaning of Trump’s remarks about Liz Cheney for being a war hawk, and Prescott makes the same observation. “Mr. Trump was clearly criticising politicians who readily send US troops to war without thinking about the human cost,” he notes. And yet “the BBC repeatedly pushed this inaccurate version of what Trump said.” Readers of Public are aware that we have been critical of the BBC’s fact-checking program, “BBC Verify.” One purpose of BBC Verify appears to be to label stories with which the BBC disagrees as “misinformation” and thus as something that social media platforms should censor. Last year, the BBC’s Director General, Tim Davie, said, “Disinformation, propaganda, and partial news is [sic] weakening our shared understanding of the world, undermining trust in our institutions and our democratic process,” shortly after the BBC had buried a large package of investigative stories on the problems with giving children and adolescents puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. BBC’s first “disinformation” reporter, Mariana Spring, apologized in 2023 after she was caught lying on her resume. Spring remains employed at BBC as its “Social Media Investigations Senior Correspondent.” Prescott described how BBC Verify spread misinformation. “BBC audiences were being encouraged to believe Britain’s major insurers were, intentionally or unintentionally, racist and charging high prices to customers based on their ethnicity,” notes Prescott. “The central claim implied causation, (that being an ethnic minority resulted in you being charged more), but the reporting and commentary did not consider other issues that can affect insurance charges.” Adds Prescott, “the entire report was taken down, which I understand is very rare. It had taken six months for the BBC to take decisive action about a story that was not fit for purpose and spread damaging misinformation. As far as I know, no one has ever been disciplined for this hugely embarrassing episode and worrying questions remain.” Another example of the BBC’s bias concerned a major story about doctors causing serious harm to children, adolescents, and vulnerable adults. Readers of Public will recall that in the Spring of last year, we released documents, The WPATH Files, which a whistleblower had given to us. “In March 2024,” writes Prescott, “there was widespread media coverage of leaked documents from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health [WPATH] which raised concerns about the quality of care given to gender-distressed children. It was picked up by the Mail, Economist, Observer, Washington Post, the Times, and others, but not the BBC.” Prescott points out other examples of the BBC's censorship and bias on transgenderism. It refused to cover detransitioners, people who regretted taking hormones or receiving surgeries in an attempt to change their sex or gender. It didn’t cover a major lawsuit by a group of nurses after their hospital allowed a man to use their changing room. And, beyond WPATH, the BBC gave little to no coverage of the trans medical scandal, even though the UK government has banned puberty blockers. By contrast, the BBC produced “a surprisingly high number of stories about drag queens,” celebrated a male wrestler who competed in the women’s category, and published an article last year headlined, “Transgender woman guilty of rape after night out.” Wrote the reporter, “Lexi Secker, 35, of Lowbourne, near Melksham, was living as a man when she attacked a woman in Blunsdon, Wiltshire, on 23 April 2023.” More information about the scandal may come out. Just today, Cath Leng, BBC’s former chief writer, says she was “forced out” in 2023 after 25 years because she was critical of transgender ideology. Prescott identified other areas of bias, including on race and the war in Gaza, all of which pointed to a single significant underlying problem. “My view is that the Executive repeatedly failed to implement measures to resolve highlighted problems, and in many cases simply refused to acknowledge there was an issue at all,” he writes. “Indeed, I would argue that the Executive’s attitude when confronted with evidence of serious and systemic problems is now a systemic problem in itself - meaning the last recourse for action is the Board.” All of this is deeply damaging to the BBC, regardless of whether Trump decides to sue it. “BBC staff have destroyed their own trump card in future negotiations over the licence fee,” writes Stanley at the Daily Telegraph. “The problem is this: in the modern, post-TV world, the licence fee is entirely unjustifiable. The BBC has to explain why, when there’s so much else available, it should be allowed to compel us to pay for it – just when tastes are diverging, national identity is fractured and the quality of the BBC’s output is in doubt…” What, then, explains the BBC’s fall from grace? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

43,703 views • 9 months ago

Mia Khalifa exposes how the adult film industry profits off creators without paying royalties on BBC HARDtalk: "Despite that in the porn world stardom, you were paid a grand total for all the 12 sex videos you made... a grand total of $12,000. And yet, you made millions and millions of dollars for both BangBros and Pornhub. How could that be?" "That's just how it is. I'm not the only one who was singled out... It's not like I had a terrible contract or a terrible manager—not that I had a manager or an agent." "At 21... you were barely out of childhood, frankly." "The human brain doesn't fully develop until the age of 25, so my decision-making part of my brain still needed forming... There was no one to tell me what to do or to say this is wrong." "However popular you became the number one star in this business—you had no residuals, no rights whatsoever to get any sort of recompense for your popularity?" "None. None whatsoever." "Is that the way porn contracts work?" "Absolutely. For everybody. Everyone—male, female, everyone who comes in."

Sensitive content

Mia Khalifa exposes how the adult film industry profits off creators without paying royalties on BBC HARDtalk: "Despite that in the porn world stardom, you were paid a grand total for all the 12 sex videos you made... a grand total of $12,000. And yet, you made millions and millions of dollars for both BangBros and Pornhub. How could that be?" "That's just how it is. I'm not the only one who was singled out... It's not like I had a terrible contract or a terrible manager—not that I had a manager or an agent." "At 21... you were barely out of childhood, frankly." "The human brain doesn't fully develop until the age of 25, so my decision-making part of my brain still needed forming... There was no one to tell me what to do or to say this is wrong." "However popular you became the number one star in this business—you had no residuals, no rights whatsoever to get any sort of recompense for your popularity?" "None. None whatsoever." "Is that the way porn contracts work?" "Absolutely. For everybody. Everyone—male, female, everyone who comes in."

CIP3R

251,531 views • 11 days ago

wisdom is the new intelligence. joe hudson (who coaches sam altman and research teams across openai, anthropic, deepmind, apple) has the best explanation why his logic is simple: every major technology shift in history changed which human skill mattered most 1. before the industrial revolution, physical strength was the edge. farming, building, hauling goods, fighting wars. the stronger you were, the more you could produce and the more you were worth 2. then machines took over the physical work. so the edge shifted to learned skills. you could learn a trade, work a factory line, operate equipment. the skill was knowing how to do the thing 3. then the information age hit and the edge moved again. raw intelligence. if you could process information, write code, analyze systems, solve complex problems, you had the advantage 4. now ai is outsourcing intelligence. you can get a free tool to write your emails, research your market, analyze your data, build your software so what's the edge now? wisdom. sounds abstract until you break it down: it's the quality of the decisions you make. > can you see patterns others miss? > can you decide well on where to direct the ai? > can you do the hard thing when everyone else avoids it? > can you spot which opportunity is real and which is hype before you waste 3 months on it? in other words, a form of taste and emotional intelligence hudson put it like this: "if I can get 70 people to run a company for me, they're all free and they're all AI agents, then the question is, what are the decisions I'm making to make that company successful? What advice am I taking? How am I listening advice? How do I create alignment between the five or six people?" ai handles the thinking, but only you can handle the deciding we're moving from knowledge workers to wisdom workers

wisdom is the new intelligence. joe hudson (who coaches sam altman and research teams across openai, anthropic, deepmind, apple) has the best explanation why his logic is simple: every major technology shift in history changed which human skill mattered most 1. before the industrial revolution, physical strength was the edge. farming, building, hauling goods, fighting wars. the stronger you were, the more you could produce and the more you were worth 2. then machines took over the physical work. so the edge shifted to learned skills. you could learn a trade, work a factory line, operate equipment. the skill was knowing how to do the thing 3. then the information age hit and the edge moved again. raw intelligence. if you could process information, write code, analyze systems, solve complex problems, you had the advantage 4. now ai is outsourcing intelligence. you can get a free tool to write your emails, research your market, analyze your data, build your software so what's the edge now? wisdom. sounds abstract until you break it down: it's the quality of the decisions you make. > can you see patterns others miss? > can you decide well on where to direct the ai? > can you do the hard thing when everyone else avoids it? > can you spot which opportunity is real and which is hype before you waste 3 months on it? in other words, a form of taste and emotional intelligence hudson put it like this: "if I can get 70 people to run a company for me, they're all free and they're all AI agents, then the question is, what are the decisions I'm making to make that company successful? What advice am I taking? How am I listening advice? How do I create alignment between the five or six people?" ai handles the thinking, but only you can handle the deciding we're moving from knowledge workers to wisdom workers

Ole Lehmann

34,178 views • 5 months ago

How a💋porn star💋taught us we need Bitcoin... In 1975, mattress actress Andrea True was hired to film some ads in Jamaica but - to her horror - she was banned from taking her payment home to the US, as Jamaica had imposed capital controls. Faced with having to leave the money behind, she instead splurged it on making a Jamaican studio demo of a song she'd been working on. "More, More, More" made her a global star (of disco, not mattresses). The moral of this story is that we all need either: a) A hit song about making porn films, or b) Bitcoin In my recent BBC interview, I warned that gold is pretty useless for moving your money out of your country if the government restricts capital flight. How are you going to get a suitcase of gold across the border? In that situation, you need Bitcoin instead. Buy it in your home country, fly abroad, convert it into local currency online and withdraw from a bank. Done. Think it's not a plausible risk? Well, Ireland, Portugal and Spain still had capital controls as recently as the 1990s. And most major countries restricted money movements in the 70s, (y'know, that decade economists are always comparing the 2020s to). As I've stressed before, Bitcoin is currently out of fashion because people are scared (hence the rush to gold) but they're not scared enough for Bitcoin, because governments aren't restricting currency movements. If we get even a sniff of that happening, Bitcoin could rally like nothing we've seen before. But things aren't that desperate yet.

How a💋porn star💋taught us we need Bitcoin... In 1975, mattress actress Andrea True was hired to film some ads in Jamaica but - to her horror - she was banned from taking her payment home to the US, as Jamaica had imposed capital controls. Faced with having to leave the money behind, she instead splurged it on making a Jamaican studio demo of a song she'd been working on. "More, More, More" made her a global star (of disco, not mattresses). The moral of this story is that we all need either: a) A hit song about making porn films, or b) Bitcoin In my recent BBC interview, I warned that gold is pretty useless for moving your money out of your country if the government restricts capital flight. How are you going to get a suitcase of gold across the border? In that situation, you need Bitcoin instead. Buy it in your home country, fly abroad, convert it into local currency online and withdraw from a bank. Done. Think it's not a plausible risk? Well, Ireland, Portugal and Spain still had capital controls as recently as the 1990s. And most major countries restricted money movements in the 70s, (y'know, that decade economists are always comparing the 2020s to). As I've stressed before, Bitcoin is currently out of fashion because people are scared (hence the rush to gold) but they're not scared enough for Bitcoin, because governments aren't restricting currency movements. If we get even a sniff of that happening, Bitcoin could rally like nothing we've seen before. But things aren't that desperate yet.

Glen Goodman

59,219 views • 8 months ago

This was my favorite part of #Flex1045xJossGawinConcert 🎙: What is something you've managed to overcome within yourself? 🐻: The first big thing that comes to mind was before the fancon. 🎙: Last year's fancon? 🐻: Yes. I remember talking to Gawin about how I still wasn't confident that I could do it. I already knew that no matter what, I was going to have to get on that stage. But at that time, I felt like I didn't really belong there. Maybe because I came from an acting background. 🐻: I also had a lot of worries. A lot of my friends are artists, like Timethai and P'Pae, who are musicians. They've spent years building up their experience. Even Gawin himself has been playing music since he was a teenager, since he was a kid. 🐻: But for me, I had only recently started trying and learning. A lot of the time, it didn't feel natural. It wasn't something I could just do right away. I had to practice, practice, and practice again and agian. When I first started taking lessons, there were still times when I'd sing off key or dance out of rhythm. So I felt like everything was moving so slowly. I was starting late, after all. 🐻: But as I kept practicing more and more, I gradually became more confident. Still, there was always a small part of me that wondered, because I'd never performed on a big stage before. I didn't know what it would be like. Would I be able to handle the nerves? What if I made a mistake? What would happen then? 🐻: It took time. In the end, my friends and the people close to me helped me realize that it was all just part of the experience. Whatever is going to happen will happen. I feel lucky to have people around me who made me feel comfortable enough to just go for it. 🐻: And we practiced so much that, for some songs, it became second nature to me. That's when I started thinking, Okay, maybe I started later than other people, but if I put in enough practice and give myself enough time, I can do it. 🐻: Then when the day finally came and I actually did it, I really could do it. Even though there were mistakes and it wasn't perfect, I still felt like, Wow, I actually did a good job. And when I got feedback from my friends, the fans, and the seniors who told me they were very surprised that I was able to do this well, I thought, Okay... yeah, it's difficult. But it's not impossible. 🎙: Everything is possible. Anything is possible. Let's give him a round of applause. 👏🏻

This was my favorite part of #Flex1045xJossGawinConcert 🎙: What is something you've managed to overcome within yourself? 🐻: The first big thing that comes to mind was before the fancon. 🎙: Last year's fancon? 🐻: Yes. I remember talking to Gawin about how I still wasn't confident that I could do it. I already knew that no matter what, I was going to have to get on that stage. But at that time, I felt like I didn't really belong there. Maybe because I came from an acting background. 🐻: I also had a lot of worries. A lot of my friends are artists, like Timethai and P'Pae, who are musicians. They've spent years building up their experience. Even Gawin himself has been playing music since he was a teenager, since he was a kid. 🐻: But for me, I had only recently started trying and learning. A lot of the time, it didn't feel natural. It wasn't something I could just do right away. I had to practice, practice, and practice again and agian. When I first started taking lessons, there were still times when I'd sing off key or dance out of rhythm. So I felt like everything was moving so slowly. I was starting late, after all. 🐻: But as I kept practicing more and more, I gradually became more confident. Still, there was always a small part of me that wondered, because I'd never performed on a big stage before. I didn't know what it would be like. Would I be able to handle the nerves? What if I made a mistake? What would happen then? 🐻: It took time. In the end, my friends and the people close to me helped me realize that it was all just part of the experience. Whatever is going to happen will happen. I feel lucky to have people around me who made me feel comfortable enough to just go for it. 🐻: And we practiced so much that, for some songs, it became second nature to me. That's when I started thinking, Okay, maybe I started later than other people, but if I put in enough practice and give myself enough time, I can do it. 🐻: Then when the day finally came and I actually did it, I really could do it. Even though there were mistakes and it wasn't perfect, I still felt like, Wow, I actually did a good job. And when I got feedback from my friends, the fans, and the seniors who told me they were very surprised that I was able to do this well, I thought, Okay... yeah, it's difficult. But it's not impossible. 🎙: Everything is possible. Anything is possible. Let's give him a round of applause. 👏🏻

🌛โตไม่โต🌈

16,088 views • 3 months ago

An Open Letter to Aravinda de Silva on his 59th Birthday : As a lifelong fan, I’m at a loss for words when it comes to expressing just how much you’ve meant to the game & to all of us who grew up watching you... At just 5ft 3 ½ inches, you didn’t just play cricket; you redefined it. You weren’t merely an entertainer; you were an artist, painting a masterpiece with every shot. Your incredible footwork, sharp judgment & extraordinary eye for the ball made every delivery seem like another stroke of brilliance. You could read a bowler's intentions almost as soon as the ball left their hand; an ability that set you apart from the rest... I still remember how my father keep telling me in my childhood about those little yet iconic moments like when you played against India for the first time in Tests & in that game smashed 1st ball of the 4th inning for a Six to Kapil Dev or on your 20th birthday, when you took on the great Imran Khan & sent him for a towering six on the leg side to bring up your first Test hundred... That fearlessness was just a glimpse of what was to come as you & Sri Lankan cricket embarked on an incredible journey together, lifting a nation from its early struggles to the pinnacle of world cricket... In those early days, Sri Lanka may have been the underdogs; smiling, talented, but often on the losing side. Yet, you were always there, a quiet force, crafting your way to greatness with grace & determination... We remember you as "Mad Max" : a daring batsman with an insatiable hunger to dominate, lighting up every match with flashes of brilliance... For many, it’s easy to focus on raw numbers, but for us, it was never just about the stats. It was the magic you brought to the game, the joy you instilled in every fan... And then came that unforgettable 1996 World Cup: You didn’t just lead Sri Lanka to victory; you made history! In the final against my team: Australia, your all-round brilliance: three wickets with your cunning off-spin & a dazzling century: was nothing short of heroic... But it’s the semi-final at Eden Gardens that still stands out. Battling sickness, you walked in with Sri Lanka in trouble & silenced a 100,000-strong crowd with a batting masterclass by hitting 14 boundaries in just 47 deliveries... Calm, controlled & precise; you weren’t just attacking for survival; you were taking the game to the next level. That moment mesmerized me, a 5-year-old boy, and today, as a 33-year-old, it still resonates... For a few golden years, you stood alongside legends like Tendulkar & Lara, unstoppable between 1997 & 1999, scoring runs with breathtaking consistency. And even when the fire seemed to fade, you found a way to return, at 37, after shedding 12 kilos, showing us all flashes of the Aravinda we adored. Though it wasn’t the sustained brilliance of your prime, you remained a middle-order force, capable of single-handedly changing the course of any match... All Sri Lankan fans must remember the heartbreak of your run-out in the 2003 World Cup semi-final, knowing that your dismissal signaled the end of Sri Lanka's hopes. But even then, your importance to the team was undeniable; your presence alone lifted the spirits of every fan & player... You may not have had the consistency of a Sangakkara or the explosive hundreds of Sanath, but in those fleeting magical moments, you achieved heights that very few could. You brought a kind of magic to cricket that lives on in our hearts... Here’s to you, Aravinda; the legend, the magician, the soul of Sri Lankan cricket... Happy Birthday! Sharing this short clip where you smashed sixes for fun to likes of Akram, Lee, McGrath...

An Open Letter to Aravinda de Silva on his 59th Birthday : As a lifelong fan, I’m at a loss for words when it comes to expressing just how much you’ve meant to the game & to all of us who grew up watching you... At just 5ft 3 ½ inches, you didn’t just play cricket; you redefined it. You weren’t merely an entertainer; you were an artist, painting a masterpiece with every shot. Your incredible footwork, sharp judgment & extraordinary eye for the ball made every delivery seem like another stroke of brilliance. You could read a bowler's intentions almost as soon as the ball left their hand; an ability that set you apart from the rest... I still remember how my father keep telling me in my childhood about those little yet iconic moments like when you played against India for the first time in Tests & in that game smashed 1st ball of the 4th inning for a Six to Kapil Dev or on your 20th birthday, when you took on the great Imran Khan & sent him for a towering six on the leg side to bring up your first Test hundred... That fearlessness was just a glimpse of what was to come as you & Sri Lankan cricket embarked on an incredible journey together, lifting a nation from its early struggles to the pinnacle of world cricket... In those early days, Sri Lanka may have been the underdogs; smiling, talented, but often on the losing side. Yet, you were always there, a quiet force, crafting your way to greatness with grace & determination... We remember you as "Mad Max" : a daring batsman with an insatiable hunger to dominate, lighting up every match with flashes of brilliance... For many, it’s easy to focus on raw numbers, but for us, it was never just about the stats. It was the magic you brought to the game, the joy you instilled in every fan... And then came that unforgettable 1996 World Cup: You didn’t just lead Sri Lanka to victory; you made history! In the final against my team: Australia, your all-round brilliance: three wickets with your cunning off-spin & a dazzling century: was nothing short of heroic... But it’s the semi-final at Eden Gardens that still stands out. Battling sickness, you walked in with Sri Lanka in trouble & silenced a 100,000-strong crowd with a batting masterclass by hitting 14 boundaries in just 47 deliveries... Calm, controlled & precise; you weren’t just attacking for survival; you were taking the game to the next level. That moment mesmerized me, a 5-year-old boy, and today, as a 33-year-old, it still resonates... For a few golden years, you stood alongside legends like Tendulkar & Lara, unstoppable between 1997 & 1999, scoring runs with breathtaking consistency. And even when the fire seemed to fade, you found a way to return, at 37, after shedding 12 kilos, showing us all flashes of the Aravinda we adored. Though it wasn’t the sustained brilliance of your prime, you remained a middle-order force, capable of single-handedly changing the course of any match... All Sri Lankan fans must remember the heartbreak of your run-out in the 2003 World Cup semi-final, knowing that your dismissal signaled the end of Sri Lanka's hopes. But even then, your importance to the team was undeniable; your presence alone lifted the spirits of every fan & player... You may not have had the consistency of a Sangakkara or the explosive hundreds of Sanath, but in those fleeting magical moments, you achieved heights that very few could. You brought a kind of magic to cricket that lives on in our hearts... Here’s to you, Aravinda; the legend, the magician, the soul of Sri Lankan cricket... Happy Birthday! Sharing this short clip where you smashed sixes for fun to likes of Akram, Lee, McGrath...

Abhishek AB

67,906 views • 1 year ago

a portfolio manager running $8.4 billion once paid a quant researcher $410,000 a year to answer one question: “can you tell me which breakouts are real before we risk the money?” the researcher started with an idea traders had repeated for decades a breakout is stronger when the tape becomes “twitchy” everyone understood what that looked like nobody could define it precisely enough to code so he measured the speed at which trades forced price to update not raw volume because one million orders hitting the same price can create activity without moving the market the difference was enormous during lunch, price changed around 4 times per second near the closing bell, it jumped to almost 70 a 17.5x increase in the speed of price discovery then he built the test: breakout = 5-minute close beyond the previous 30-minute high or low signal = normalized price-update speed success = profit barrier reached before the equal-distance loss barrier now imagine the fund puts $25 million behind each breakout basket filtering out one false 0.8% move protects roughly $200,000 that is why the manager did not care whether the chart looked convincing he cared whether “twitchy” could be turned into a number most traders protect their intuition from being tested quants turn it into code and make it fight for capital and this is exactly the skill firms pay six figures for: taking a vague market idea, defining it mathematically, then testing whether it deserves real money I broke down how to build that skill from zero in 16 weeks bookmark this lesson then read the full quant roadmap below ↓

a portfolio manager running $8.4 billion once paid a quant researcher $410,000 a year to answer one question: “can you tell me which breakouts are real before we risk the money?” the researcher started with an idea traders had repeated for decades a breakout is stronger when the tape becomes “twitchy” everyone understood what that looked like nobody could define it precisely enough to code so he measured the speed at which trades forced price to update not raw volume because one million orders hitting the same price can create activity without moving the market the difference was enormous during lunch, price changed around 4 times per second near the closing bell, it jumped to almost 70 a 17.5x increase in the speed of price discovery then he built the test: breakout = 5-minute close beyond the previous 30-minute high or low signal = normalized price-update speed success = profit barrier reached before the equal-distance loss barrier now imagine the fund puts $25 million behind each breakout basket filtering out one false 0.8% move protects roughly $200,000 that is why the manager did not care whether the chart looked convincing he cared whether “twitchy” could be turned into a number most traders protect their intuition from being tested quants turn it into code and make it fight for capital and this is exactly the skill firms pay six figures for: taking a vague market idea, defining it mathematically, then testing whether it deserves real money I broke down how to build that skill from zero in 16 weeks bookmark this lesson then read the full quant roadmap below ↓

Sammy

54,858 views • 1 month ago

[ENG Trans] — GMMTV Live House 🔴 SEA' PHENOMENON #CalvinKlein #sea_tawinan #GMMTVLiveHouse ☀️ Tay: This morning, we’ve got an “El Niño” (heat up) phenomenon!! Because “Sea-Tawinan” came along and woke up the entire social media world. ☀️ Tay: It got so many fans from the “mommy” side wanting to switch over and become “girlfriend-type” fans instead. And it’s not just the “mommy” fans who want to switch sides — the fans in the “Polca” fandom want to switch sides too. Hahaha 😂 ☀️ Tay: The moment everyone saw Sea’s post, they were completely stunned and caught off guard!! Everyone rushed in to drop comments in massive numbers. It became the talk of the town all over the internet — honestly, you could call it a national agenda… ☀️ Tay: Let me tell you, his physique is practically like a “Greek statue”. Sea already has a strong advantage in this area. His body naturally has such beautiful proportions and curves, and on top of that, he’s someone who is extremely disciplined when it comes to taking care of his body. It’s something to be proud of, and I’m genuinely very happy for Sea about this particular work. ☀️ Tay: Everyone has been praising Sea in the comments — there are tens of thousands, thousands upon thousands of comments. So many people are saying that Sea is absolutely perfect for this position: “The Prince of the Sexy World” — From a warm-gentle young man, he’s now turned up the heat and added an entirely new level of fierceness. 🔥 ☀️ Tay: So please support and check out Sea’s fashion shoot as well. You can follow it through Mint-Magazine. There are both video and still-photo versions. (applause) 👏

[ENG Trans] — GMMTV Live House 🔴 SEA' PHENOMENON #CalvinKlein #sea_tawinan #GMMTVLiveHouse ☀️ Tay: This morning, we’ve got an “El Niño” (heat up) phenomenon!! Because “Sea-Tawinan” came along and woke up the entire social media world. ☀️ Tay: It got so many fans from the “mommy” side wanting to switch over and become “girlfriend-type” fans instead. And it’s not just the “mommy” fans who want to switch sides — the fans in the “Polca” fandom want to switch sides too. Hahaha 😂 ☀️ Tay: The moment everyone saw Sea’s post, they were completely stunned and caught off guard!! Everyone rushed in to drop comments in massive numbers. It became the talk of the town all over the internet — honestly, you could call it a national agenda… ☀️ Tay: Let me tell you, his physique is practically like a “Greek statue”. Sea already has a strong advantage in this area. His body naturally has such beautiful proportions and curves, and on top of that, he’s someone who is extremely disciplined when it comes to taking care of his body. It’s something to be proud of, and I’m genuinely very happy for Sea about this particular work. ☀️ Tay: Everyone has been praising Sea in the comments — there are tens of thousands, thousands upon thousands of comments. So many people are saying that Sea is absolutely perfect for this position: “The Prince of the Sexy World” — From a warm-gentle young man, he’s now turned up the heat and added an entirely new level of fierceness. 🔥 ☀️ Tay: So please support and check out Sea’s fashion shoot as well. You can follow it through Mint-Magazine. There are both video and still-photo versions. (applause) 👏

พิเกี๊ยว 🥟 Gyo Nom Nom

22,979 views • 24 days ago

The BBC channels the spirit of Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels while discussing why the West Midlands police chief had to go. Reporter Daniel Sandford asks two questions that turn reality on its head: "What was it about the fans from the Israeli club Maccabi Tel Aviv that was so bad that they had to be banned rather than just being policed in the normal way? "And how much influence did noisy, local anti-Israel campaigners and politicians have on that decision?" Let's consider your first question, Daniel. Oh, I don't know, maybe it was because many of the "ultras" who travel to away games are Israeli soldiers who have been committing mass slaughter in Gaza – in what most human rights groups, legal experts and scholars conclude is a genocide. Or maybe it's the fact that the Israeli fans love a good genocidal chant at away games, like "Why are the schools closed in Gaza? Because there are no children left", and "Death to the Arabs!" Or it could have been because these fans have a tendency to go around attacking anyone who looks like an Arab or Muslim. That could have proved quite threatening, I guess, in a multicultural city like Birmingham. And then there's the fact that the Israeli branch of the anti-racism organisation Kick It Out found Maccabi Tel Aviv fans were the most aggressively racist of all the Israeli premier clubs – in a very crowded field. As for your second question, Daniel, who are these "noisy anti-Israel campaigners" you're referring to? Do you mean the millions of Britons who have peacefully opposed Israel's genocide? Is being anti-genocide the same as being anti-Israel? And if so, does that mean you're saying Israel is an inherently genocidal state? Maybe I'm overthinking it. Maybe it's not complicated. Maybe you just see your job as unthinkingly reciting whatever those in power tell you is true.

The BBC channels the spirit of Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels while discussing why the West Midlands police chief had to go. Reporter Daniel Sandford asks two questions that turn reality on its head: "What was it about the fans from the Israeli club Maccabi Tel Aviv that was so bad that they had to be banned rather than just being policed in the normal way? "And how much influence did noisy, local anti-Israel campaigners and politicians have on that decision?" Let's consider your first question, Daniel. Oh, I don't know, maybe it was because many of the "ultras" who travel to away games are Israeli soldiers who have been committing mass slaughter in Gaza – in what most human rights groups, legal experts and scholars conclude is a genocide. Or maybe it's the fact that the Israeli fans love a good genocidal chant at away games, like "Why are the schools closed in Gaza? Because there are no children left", and "Death to the Arabs!" Or it could have been because these fans have a tendency to go around attacking anyone who looks like an Arab or Muslim. That could have proved quite threatening, I guess, in a multicultural city like Birmingham. And then there's the fact that the Israeli branch of the anti-racism organisation Kick It Out found Maccabi Tel Aviv fans were the most aggressively racist of all the Israeli premier clubs – in a very crowded field. As for your second question, Daniel, who are these "noisy anti-Israel campaigners" you're referring to? Do you mean the millions of Britons who have peacefully opposed Israel's genocide? Is being anti-genocide the same as being anti-Israel? And if so, does that mean you're saying Israel is an inherently genocidal state? Maybe I'm overthinking it. Maybe it's not complicated. Maybe you just see your job as unthinkingly reciting whatever those in power tell you is true.

Jonathan Cook

102,109 views • 7 months ago

I think it's fair to say that Nigel Farage's return to the media round yesterday morning was an unmitigated catastrophe. When he began his defence to Sally Nugent on the BBC, he repeated his mantra “no one cares” to her three times. He could not have been further from the truth. With the exception of Ed Balls on ITV, the UK's interviewers finally found their backbones and took him to task over the five million pound bung/gift/donation. Immediately taking the über-defensive stance, he made so many different claims, that even Julia Hartley-Brewer and Nick Ferrari got in on the anti-Farage action. I assume there is a Grimm fairy tale that highlights the plight of a little boy that changes his story so many times that he can't remember his own truth. Probably in that tale, he'll be eaten by a witch living in a giant flying bowl of some sort — and no, this is not an allegorical allusion to Hartley-Brewer, before you @ me! Farage is that little boy. Talking to Sally Nugent, he told her that the money was an unconditional gift and it was none of her business what he spent it on, before saying he'd not spent it. Going on, he told us that he needed it for a lifetime of security while on Nick Ferrari's show, he got so muddled up that he said it was definitely not used for a house purchase but ... maybe, and even if it were, he'd not tell anyone. Oh, and he said he might have put it on the horses or bought some Ferraris. The root of his story began when he told the world that it was an unconditional gift, but within days the official line had changed to a donation to cover a 'lifetime of security'. Only for it to morph again the following week into a gift for his work achieving Brexit. Yesterday he trotted out all of these lines and more so you can see where the conspiracy stems from and why it won't be dropped any time soon. And I'm sorry Nigel, we do care, absolutely everyone cares. If you missed the relevant interview, here's the 3:45 when Sally Nugent instigated the end of Nigel Farage's career. Bravo.

I think it's fair to say that Nigel Farage's return to the media round yesterday morning was an unmitigated catastrophe. When he began his defence to Sally Nugent on the BBC, he repeated his mantra “no one cares” to her three times. He could not have been further from the truth. With the exception of Ed Balls on ITV, the UK's interviewers finally found their backbones and took him to task over the five million pound bung/gift/donation. Immediately taking the über-defensive stance, he made so many different claims, that even Julia Hartley-Brewer and Nick Ferrari got in on the anti-Farage action. I assume there is a Grimm fairy tale that highlights the plight of a little boy that changes his story so many times that he can't remember his own truth. Probably in that tale, he'll be eaten by a witch living in a giant flying bowl of some sort — and no, this is not an allegorical allusion to Hartley-Brewer, before you @ me! Farage is that little boy. Talking to Sally Nugent, he told her that the money was an unconditional gift and it was none of her business what he spent it on, before saying he'd not spent it. Going on, he told us that he needed it for a lifetime of security while on Nick Ferrari's show, he got so muddled up that he said it was definitely not used for a house purchase but ... maybe, and even if it were, he'd not tell anyone. Oh, and he said he might have put it on the horses or bought some Ferraris. The root of his story began when he told the world that it was an unconditional gift, but within days the official line had changed to a donation to cover a 'lifetime of security'. Only for it to morph again the following week into a gift for his work achieving Brexit. Yesterday he trotted out all of these lines and more so you can see where the conspiracy stems from and why it won't be dropped any time soon. And I'm sorry Nigel, we do care, absolutely everyone cares. If you missed the relevant interview, here's the 3:45 when Sally Nugent instigated the end of Nigel Farage's career. Bravo.

Don McGowan

109,120 views • 2 months ago

This is such a difficult watch ☹️ Amanda Abbington, "I have a 30 page report.. Nearly half of the allegations were upheld" "What's being said in the tabloids is just not true.. There were five breaches of the code of conduct within the organisation" Victoria Derbyshire, "What have the last 12 months been like for you since you left last year's Strictly?" AA, "One of the worst years of my life... Unpleasant.. Turbulent.. Relentless time in my life.. Because I alerted people of bad behaviour" VD, "In terms of the complaints against Giovanni Pernice that were upheld, what happened in rehearsals?" AA, "Verbally abused.. Sexual innuendos.. Sexual gestures.. A 35 min rant at me calling me names.. This went on for 7 hours a day for 7 weeks.. I was called mad.. Unstable" VD, "How did you respond?" AA, "I'm open to criticism.. I've worked 32 years as an actress and I've never had to leave a job or experience anything like I experienced in that rehearsal room.. I not only did it for myself but for the contestants partnered with his previously.. I wasn't the only person that complained" "When you're constantly told that you're not good enough and you're going to make a fool of yourself.. I don't respond well to that sort of teaching" VD, "Papers reported there was a crotch incident" AA, "There were two allegations of inappropriate conduct of a sexual nature and they were upheld.. One was physical.. One was verbal" "When I got a dance step right, he would outline an erection in his trousers and tell me my dance move made that happen" "They weren't isolated one off incidents.. Over a period of 7 weeks" VD, "How did you react to that?" AA, "Because you were in a bubble.. I was either being called names.. Or worked without a break.. When you're in that bubble for 7 hours a day you lose all sense of reality.. I kind of just looked and sort of went, ok.. Only when I got home did I realise.. You lose all sense of reality" "In hindsight, you walk out and you don't look back" VD, "When did you first tell someone at BBC and how did they respond?" AA, "I told producers after 3 or 4 days of being in the rehearsal room.. They said sorry and said they would monitor the situation.. This wasn't an isolated incident, I know that it happened before to other contestants" VD, "You met up with other previous dance partners" AA, "Yes.. We all found each other.. I was put in touch with a few of them through mutual friends.. We just wanted to make sure we weren't on our own thinking this just happened to us.. All of us.. Have said the same thing.. It wasn't pleasant.. It wasn't isolated.. It happened to all of us" VD, "When you first met" AA, "We all cried, we burst into tears.. It was managing the room and our own mental health and emotional well being" VD, "Sarah Vine wrote: women like AA are part of the reason other women who find themselves in worse situations dont get taken seriously. What do you say to that?" AA, "I'm always shocked when women throw other women under the bus for standing up for what they think is wrong" "So many other women have thanked me for giving them the strength to speak up in similar situations" VD, "Strictly is a family show.. Some of the things do not appear to be very wholesome" AA, "I loved Strictly.. I never wanted to cause trouble.. All I did was experience something in a workplace environment.. And I didn't want anybody else to go through what I had gone through, and what people went through in the past before me" VD, "How do you feel you have been treated by the BBC throughout this process?" AA, "It's still ongoing.. There are things in the 30 page report that are unresolved.. I'm taking guidance from my lawyer who has been so amazing" VD, "BBC says it takes allegations seriously.. We want thank AA for coming forward as its not an easy thing to do.. Do you feel the BBC were as concerned for your well being as they were for the program?" AA, "I think they tried.. But I wouldn't be sitting here if they tried harder.. I got an apology.. And a lot of the allegations were upheld.. Everybody has to be looked after so things like this don' t happen" VD, "You talk about rape and death threats" AA, "Over the last eight months, hundreds.. I had a credible death threat.. The police had to be called.. A bomb threat to my place of work.. Death threats to me, my family.. Rape threats to my 15 year old daughter" "I've got screenshots that I've sent to the Met police" VD, "Did you do the right thing speaking up?" AA, "Oh My God, yea.. All I did was ask the BBC to address inappropriate bad behaviour"

This is such a difficult watch ☹️ Amanda Abbington, "I have a 30 page report.. Nearly half of the allegations were upheld" "What's being said in the tabloids is just not true.. There were five breaches of the code of conduct within the organisation" Victoria Derbyshire, "What have the last 12 months been like for you since you left last year's Strictly?" AA, "One of the worst years of my life... Unpleasant.. Turbulent.. Relentless time in my life.. Because I alerted people of bad behaviour" VD, "In terms of the complaints against Giovanni Pernice that were upheld, what happened in rehearsals?" AA, "Verbally abused.. Sexual innuendos.. Sexual gestures.. A 35 min rant at me calling me names.. This went on for 7 hours a day for 7 weeks.. I was called mad.. Unstable" VD, "How did you respond?" AA, "I'm open to criticism.. I've worked 32 years as an actress and I've never had to leave a job or experience anything like I experienced in that rehearsal room.. I not only did it for myself but for the contestants partnered with his previously.. I wasn't the only person that complained" "When you're constantly told that you're not good enough and you're going to make a fool of yourself.. I don't respond well to that sort of teaching" VD, "Papers reported there was a crotch incident" AA, "There were two allegations of inappropriate conduct of a sexual nature and they were upheld.. One was physical.. One was verbal" "When I got a dance step right, he would outline an erection in his trousers and tell me my dance move made that happen" "They weren't isolated one off incidents.. Over a period of 7 weeks" VD, "How did you react to that?" AA, "Because you were in a bubble.. I was either being called names.. Or worked without a break.. When you're in that bubble for 7 hours a day you lose all sense of reality.. I kind of just looked and sort of went, ok.. Only when I got home did I realise.. You lose all sense of reality" "In hindsight, you walk out and you don't look back" VD, "When did you first tell someone at BBC and how did they respond?" AA, "I told producers after 3 or 4 days of being in the rehearsal room.. They said sorry and said they would monitor the situation.. This wasn't an isolated incident, I know that it happened before to other contestants" VD, "You met up with other previous dance partners" AA, "Yes.. We all found each other.. I was put in touch with a few of them through mutual friends.. We just wanted to make sure we weren't on our own thinking this just happened to us.. All of us.. Have said the same thing.. It wasn't pleasant.. It wasn't isolated.. It happened to all of us" VD, "When you first met" AA, "We all cried, we burst into tears.. It was managing the room and our own mental health and emotional well being" VD, "Sarah Vine wrote: women like AA are part of the reason other women who find themselves in worse situations dont get taken seriously. What do you say to that?" AA, "I'm always shocked when women throw other women under the bus for standing up for what they think is wrong" "So many other women have thanked me for giving them the strength to speak up in similar situations" VD, "Strictly is a family show.. Some of the things do not appear to be very wholesome" AA, "I loved Strictly.. I never wanted to cause trouble.. All I did was experience something in a workplace environment.. And I didn't want anybody else to go through what I had gone through, and what people went through in the past before me" VD, "How do you feel you have been treated by the BBC throughout this process?" AA, "It's still ongoing.. There are things in the 30 page report that are unresolved.. I'm taking guidance from my lawyer who has been so amazing" VD, "BBC says it takes allegations seriously.. We want thank AA for coming forward as its not an easy thing to do.. Do you feel the BBC were as concerned for your well being as they were for the program?" AA, "I think they tried.. But I wouldn't be sitting here if they tried harder.. I got an apology.. And a lot of the allegations were upheld.. Everybody has to be looked after so things like this don' t happen" VD, "You talk about rape and death threats" AA, "Over the last eight months, hundreds.. I had a credible death threat.. The police had to be called.. A bomb threat to my place of work.. Death threats to me, my family.. Rape threats to my 15 year old daughter" "I've got screenshots that I've sent to the Met police" VD, "Did you do the right thing speaking up?" AA, "Oh My God, yea.. All I did was ask the BBC to address inappropriate bad behaviour"

Farrukh

434,875 views • 1 year ago

I’m not gunna lie…. THIS SUCKED!!! This Saturday I’m attempting to break a World Record and take my JustGiving page to £1,000,000 for REORG Charity. Normally I’d have some sort of training program I would have stuck to in the run up to such an event, but I’ve been travelling so much for work it hasn’t been easy so this morning was my first training session. The idea is to pull a truck 100m which I found out this morning is much harder than I had anticipated. It’s also extremely difficult to find completely flat ground but as always we did what we could with what we had. Throw into the mix that I have surgery tomorrow and it’s gunna be a hectic week, however…. the mission remains. There are men and women out there from the Military and Emergency Services who need what REORG offers so I’ll suck it up and crack on regardless. I’d appreciate and help you could give me with spreading the word and sharing the challenge. If you’d like to donate the link is below and if you want to watch we’ll be live on BBC Breakfast this Saturday. Thank you 29 Commando for the use of your car park and the Ford UK Ranger, and thanks to Sam Sheriff as always for the support 🛻🦾🛻

I’m not gunna lie…. THIS SUCKED!!! This Saturday I’m attempting to break a World Record and take my JustGiving page to £1,000,000 for REORG Charity. Normally I’d have some sort of training program I would have stuck to in the run up to such an event, but I’ve been travelling so much for work it hasn’t been easy so this morning was my first training session. The idea is to pull a truck 100m which I found out this morning is much harder than I had anticipated. It’s also extremely difficult to find completely flat ground but as always we did what we could with what we had. Throw into the mix that I have surgery tomorrow and it’s gunna be a hectic week, however…. the mission remains. There are men and women out there from the Military and Emergency Services who need what REORG offers so I’ll suck it up and crack on regardless. I’d appreciate and help you could give me with spreading the word and sharing the challenge. If you’d like to donate the link is below and if you want to watch we’ll be live on BBC Breakfast this Saturday. Thank you 29 Commando for the use of your car park and the Ford UK Ranger, and thanks to Sam Sheriff as always for the support 🛻🦾🛻

Mark Ormrod MBE

23,039 views • 1 year ago