Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Bill C-34 is worse than I expected. It would create a Digital Safety Commission with the power to force social media companies and AI chat services to censor the speech of adults. I explain why I'm so concerned below. If you agree, sign our petition:

Josh Dehaas

7,482 subscribers

11,999 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Bill C-34: The End Of Anonymous Internet In Canada – What You NEED TO KNOW!! Last month the Carney Liberals tabled Bill C-34, marketed as the “Safe Social Media Act.” In reality, this bill is a full-scale assault on anonymity and digital freedom. Under the banner of “protecting children,” the government wants to raise the minimum social media age to 16 and force every single user, including adults, to verify their age through government ID uploads, facial scans, AI age estimation, or whatever method their new Digital Safety Commission approves. That means the end of anonymous browsing, private thoughts online, and unmonitored speech. Every Canadian will be tracked, traced, and databased all while the government “promises” to delete your data later. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down exactly what Bill C-34 does, how it revives the worst elements of the failed Online Harms Act, the vague “hatred” and “incitement” rules that will lead to mass over-censorship, and most importantly what YOU can do about it now before it’s too late! Please share this video far and wide!!

Bill C-34: The End Of Anonymous Internet In Canada – What You NEED TO KNOW!! Last month the Carney Liberals tabled Bill C-34, marketed as the “Safe Social Media Act.” In reality, this bill is a full-scale assault on anonymity and digital freedom. Under the banner of “protecting children,” the government wants to raise the minimum social media age to 16 and force every single user, including adults, to verify their age through government ID uploads, facial scans, AI age estimation, or whatever method their new Digital Safety Commission approves. That means the end of anonymous browsing, private thoughts online, and unmonitored speech. Every Canadian will be tracked, traced, and databased all while the government “promises” to delete your data later. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down exactly what Bill C-34 does, how it revives the worst elements of the failed Online Harms Act, the vague “hatred” and “incitement” rules that will lead to mass over-censorship, and most importantly what YOU can do about it now before it’s too late! Please share this video far and wide!!

Dan Dicks

25,724 views • 2 months ago

As online harms intensify, children are particularly at risk. To better protect them, our government has introduced the Safe Social Media Act, which will make social media services and AI chatbot services safer for children. The bill, if passed, would require social media services and AI chatbot services to identify, mitigate, and address risks of harm on their platforms, and to develop services that are safe by design and put the safety of children first. It would also prevent Canadians under 16 from having accounts on social media services, while providing a process for social media platforms to seek an exemption if they can demonstrate that they have put in place a sufficient set of protections for children. This law is about holding platforms accountable and ensuring they have protections in place to keep children safe online, reduce harm before it happens, and ensure that digital spaces are safe by design all while protecting the privacy of Canadians.

As online harms intensify, children are particularly at risk. To better protect them, our government has introduced the Safe Social Media Act, which will make social media services and AI chatbot services safer for children. The bill, if passed, would require social media services and AI chatbot services to identify, mitigate, and address risks of harm on their platforms, and to develop services that are safe by design and put the safety of children first. It would also prevent Canadians under 16 from having accounts on social media services, while providing a process for social media platforms to seek an exemption if they can demonstrate that they have put in place a sufficient set of protections for children. This law is about holding platforms accountable and ensuring they have protections in place to keep children safe online, reduce harm before it happens, and ensure that digital spaces are safe by design all while protecting the privacy of Canadians.

Yvan Baker, MP 🇨🇦🇺🇦

18,083 views • 3 months ago

Travis Kalanick: The UK's Social Media Ban is About Censoring and Tracking Adults, Not Protecting Kids travis kalanick: “I think we all agree social media is bad for the kids and for the adults. Too much of that stuff is very bad. It's brain rot for real, and it's going to be worse than cigarettes. It's all the things. But the real point of banning under 16 is so that you can force adults to identify themselves and de-anonymize themselves, so you can set up a full-scale censorship regime, which they're sort of contemplating in the UK. And what censorship is really about is not harmful content, it's about content that the people in power don't want you to see that disagrees with them. If it agreed with them, it's not harmful. It's the stuff that doesn't agree with them. And so what they're doing is they're criminalizing disagreeing with them. And so there's a derivative of this age-based stuff, which is really about the adults, not the kids.”

Travis Kalanick: The UK's Social Media Ban is About Censoring and Tracking Adults, Not Protecting Kids travis kalanick: “I think we all agree social media is bad for the kids and for the adults. Too much of that stuff is very bad. It's brain rot for real, and it's going to be worse than cigarettes. It's all the things. But the real point of banning under 16 is so that you can force adults to identify themselves and de-anonymize themselves, so you can set up a full-scale censorship regime, which they're sort of contemplating in the UK. And what censorship is really about is not harmful content, it's about content that the people in power don't want you to see that disagrees with them. If it agreed with them, it's not harmful. It's the stuff that doesn't agree with them. And so what they're doing is they're criminalizing disagreeing with them. And so there's a derivative of this age-based stuff, which is really about the adults, not the kids.”

The All-In Podcast

85,173 views • 3 months ago

The manosphere is having a worrying impact on our boys and young men. Misogyny is spreading like wildfire, and social media algorithms are making it worse. If social media companies can't guarantee young people’s safety, then we have to take action.

The manosphere is having a worrying impact on our boys and young men. Misogyny is spreading like wildfire, and social media algorithms are making it worse. If social media companies can't guarantee young people’s safety, then we have to take action.

Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan

33,042 views • 3 months ago

Labor is attempting to establish a ‘Ministry of Truth’ with the power to censor anything they deem as "misinformation". If passed, Australian Communications and Media Authority would become the ‘arbiter of truth’, with the ability to censor anything on social media that contradicted the government’s narrative. This pattern of government interference in free speech is being rolled out across the Western world. Australia is becoming little more than a vassal state of the global elite. Watch as I discuss with Paul Murray on PM Live Sky News:-

Labor is attempting to establish a ‘Ministry of Truth’ with the power to censor anything they deem as "misinformation". If passed, Australian Communications and Media Authority would become the ‘arbiter of truth’, with the ability to censor anything on social media that contradicted the government’s narrative. This pattern of government interference in free speech is being rolled out across the Western world. Australia is becoming little more than a vassal state of the global elite. Watch as I discuss with Paul Murray on PM Live Sky News:-

Senator Alex Antic

119,382 views • 3 years ago

Bill C-34: The REAL REASON Canada Wants To “PROTECT KIDS” ONLINE!! Canada is pushing Bill C-34, the so-called “Safe Social Media Act” forcing age verification using your ID or your face to access social media. They claim it’s about protecting kids… but we’ve seen this playbook before. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down how this is nothing more than a massive digital ID grab disguised as child protection. From Marc Carney’s post and community notes exposing the truth, to the RCMP labeling “traditional values” as extremism, this bill is a direct threat to privacy and freedom. Last year Dan warned you about Australia’s under-16 social media ban. Now Canada is following the exact same path. If your kids are rotting their brains on social media, the problem isn’t the apps, it’s the adults who gave up on parenting. This is the beginning of Digital ID control. Don’t let them normalize it. Watch until the end and share this video if you value freedom over government surveillance.

Bill C-34: The REAL REASON Canada Wants To “PROTECT KIDS” ONLINE!! Canada is pushing Bill C-34, the so-called “Safe Social Media Act” forcing age verification using your ID or your face to access social media. They claim it’s about protecting kids… but we’ve seen this playbook before. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down how this is nothing more than a massive digital ID grab disguised as child protection. From Marc Carney’s post and community notes exposing the truth, to the RCMP labeling “traditional values” as extremism, this bill is a direct threat to privacy and freedom. Last year Dan warned you about Australia’s under-16 social media ban. Now Canada is following the exact same path. If your kids are rotting their brains on social media, the problem isn’t the apps, it’s the adults who gave up on parenting. This is the beginning of Digital ID control. Don’t let them normalize it. Watch until the end and share this video if you value freedom over government surveillance.

Dan Dicks

10,778 views • 3 months ago

They are building a digital cage, and they are doing it through a web of multiple bills designed to strip away your remaining anonymity. Look at the full picture: 🚨Bill C-34 (the safe social media act): Branded as a kids ban for under 16. But to lock kids out, they have to lock adults in. Main steam platforms will be forced to implement facial age, estimation and digital ID gates for everyone just to verify that you are an adult. 🚨Bill S-210: branded as a crackdown on adult websites, but the legal text is so broad. It catches search engines like Google and open platforms like X and Reddit. It forces facial recognition checkpoints onto the sites you use daily, backed by $500,000 corporate fines. 🚨Bill C-36: the brand new bill that just dropped, creating a massive federal, digital safety commission. This new digital, super regulator strips, power away from the independent privacy, commissioner, centralizing, total enforcement and private data oversight under a single government appointed panel. 🚨Bill C-63: the massive framework creating a new, government appointed digital safety commission. It weaponizes human rights tribunal to police online speech and introduces heavy-handed hate speech regulations that civil liberty groups warn threaten your right to dissent. 🚨Bill C-9: the criminal follow up that expands the definition of hate and increases penalties under the criminal code, building the legal teeth to enforce what the new digital regulators deem. Unacceptable speech online. 🚨Bill C-22: the ultimate surveillance trap. It forces, Internet providers, VPN’s, and tech platforms to build back and back doors for law-enforcement, mandating that companies, track and store the personal meta-data of all Canadians for up to a year without you ever been suspected of a crime. They didn’t pass one massive digital ID law because they knew that you would fight it. They broke it into pieces. They wrapped it in child safety. They are forcing the private sector to build the walls. No more casual scrolling. No more anonymity. Every tap, account, and view tied directly to your legal name. God Speed.

Unfiltered With Kels

12,429 views • 3 months ago

Back door to Digital ID? Some are asking if the under-16s social media ban is a backdoor to Digital ID? As far as Kemi and the Conservatives are concerned, absolutely not. We are entirely opposed to digital ID and want to see the ban implemented in a way that doesn’t force mandatory digital ID onto anyone. Proving your age for social media should be no more intrusive than it is for buying alcohol.

Back door to Digital ID? Some are asking if the under-16s social media ban is a backdoor to Digital ID? As far as Kemi and the Conservatives are concerned, absolutely not. We are entirely opposed to digital ID and want to see the ban implemented in a way that doesn’t force mandatory digital ID onto anyone. Proving your age for social media should be no more intrusive than it is for buying alcohol.

Kevin Hollinrake MP

193,425 views • 3 months ago

Sen. KLOBUCHAR: What will happen if we pass my bill to force social media companies to remove nonconsensual images of children? NCMEC expert: It’d address one of the biggest threats our kids face and finally gives children their power back.

Sen. KLOBUCHAR: What will happen if we pass my bill to force social media companies to remove nonconsensual images of children? NCMEC expert: It’d address one of the biggest threats our kids face and finally gives children their power back.

Senate Judiciary Democrats 🇺🇸

56,333 views • 9 months ago

As I told Jon Favreau, If AI isn't safe for kids, it shouldn't be available to kids. I delivered the strongest AI safety bill in the country here in NY, but there's more to do. In Albany, I'm advancing a bill with Kristen Gonzalez that would prohibit AI companies from making their products available to kids if they don't make them safe for kids. I'm running for Congress to do the same, and to make sure no parent is forced to share the Raine family's pain.

As I told Jon Favreau, If AI isn't safe for kids, it shouldn't be available to kids. I delivered the strongest AI safety bill in the country here in NY, but there's more to do. In Albany, I'm advancing a bill with Kristen Gonzalez that would prohibit AI companies from making their products available to kids if they don't make them safe for kids. I'm running for Congress to do the same, and to make sure no parent is forced to share the Raine family's pain.

Alex Bores

67,683 views • 4 months ago

Chrystia Freeland told Americans their democracy is “on life support.” Here’s her party’s record: ✅ Froze Canadians’ bank accounts with no court order (ruled unconstitutional) SHE LAUGHED ABOUT IT. ✅ Proposed Bill C-34: a “Digital Safety Commission” to police online “harm” it wouldn’t even define ✅ Bill C-22: warrantless access to telecom subscribers, a year of your metadata stored ✅ Age verification to use social media, a back door to digital ID There certainly is a country whose democracy is on life support, but it’s not America. THE AUDACITY.

Chrystia Freeland told Americans their democracy is “on life support.” Here’s her party’s record: ✅ Froze Canadians’ bank accounts with no court order (ruled unconstitutional) SHE LAUGHED ABOUT IT. ✅ Proposed Bill C-34: a “Digital Safety Commission” to police online “harm” it wouldn’t even define ✅ Bill C-22: warrantless access to telecom subscribers, a year of your metadata stored ✅ Age verification to use social media, a back door to digital ID There certainly is a country whose democracy is on life support, but it’s not America. THE AUDACITY.

Mario Zelaya

29,662 views • 18 days ago

Hasan Piker: “If I hated the United States of America, I would be a Republican. Who has done more damage to Americans broadly than the Republican Party? If I hated Americans why would I want them to have healthcare? Why would I want to create a more equitable taxation structure where we tax the wealthy so we can pay for social safety nets that will lend a helping hand to Americans in dire straits?”

Hasan Piker: “If I hated the United States of America, I would be a Republican. Who has done more damage to Americans broadly than the Republican Party? If I hated Americans why would I want them to have healthcare? Why would I want to create a more equitable taxation structure where we tax the wealthy so we can pay for social safety nets that will lend a helping hand to Americans in dire straits?”

Marco Foster

435,747 views • 1 month ago

Diana Carney speaking with Jonathan Haidt about social media bans for the youth. You will notice Mark Carney taking notes. It’s clear this is coming to Canada. They want to control what people consume online. It starts with children under the guise of “safety” and will eventually lead to digital ID. The diabolical thing is they will force companies to do this through regulations as to take the blame away from politicians & focus it solely on the large social media companies.

Diana Carney speaking with Jonathan Haidt about social media bans for the youth. You will notice Mark Carney taking notes. It’s clear this is coming to Canada. They want to control what people consume online. It starts with children under the guise of “safety” and will eventually lead to digital ID. The diabolical thing is they will force companies to do this through regulations as to take the blame away from politicians & focus it solely on the large social media companies.

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

96,080 views • 4 months ago

The United Australia Party will protect all Australians from a coming dystopian future. At the next sitting of the Senate I will move to repeal the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 colloquially known as the 'social media ban'. Do your part, sign my petition. I will submit this to the Senate along with my repeal bill. It is important that I have as many signatures as possible to display to my fellow Senators just how unhappy the Australian people are. United Australia Click here -

The United Australia Party will protect all Australians from a coming dystopian future. At the next sitting of the Senate I will move to repeal the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 colloquially known as the 'social media ban'. Do your part, sign my petition. I will submit this to the Senate along with my repeal bill. It is important that I have as many signatures as possible to display to my fellow Senators just how unhappy the Australian people are. United Australia Click here -

Senator Babet

15,405 views • 1 year ago

The future of Ai is, and always has been mixed realities and stable building across physical and digital worlds. It’s moving slower than I expected but it continues to move forward inch by inch. In the end our language interaction with Ai will be almost entirely social.

The future of Ai is, and always has been mixed realities and stable building across physical and digital worlds. It’s moving slower than I expected but it continues to move forward inch by inch. In the end our language interaction with Ai will be almost entirely social.

Jon Finger

15,064 views • 1 month ago

Bill C-9, C-22 And C-8 Are All Interconnected: Why Aren't They Talking About This? Bill C-9 criminalizes hate speech — it defines what you're allowed to say. Bill C-22 forces telecoms to record everything you do online and save it for up to one year without a warrant. Bill C-8 allows the government to cut you off the internet entirely if they consider you a threat to the network. They would never know you're a threat without Bill C-22. They could never call you a threat without Bill C-9. What will it take for Conservatives and Independent Media to start connecting the dots?

Bill C-9, C-22 And C-8 Are All Interconnected: Why Aren't They Talking About This? Bill C-9 criminalizes hate speech — it defines what you're allowed to say. Bill C-22 forces telecoms to record everything you do online and save it for up to one year without a warrant. Bill C-8 allows the government to cut you off the internet entirely if they consider you a threat to the network. They would never know you're a threat without Bill C-22. They could never call you a threat without Bill C-9. What will it take for Conservatives and Independent Media to start connecting the dots?

Nico Lagan

84,280 views • 4 months ago

It's sunny in Ottawa, but one of the darkest weeks for our democracy. The Liberals are ramming through, C-9 (hate), C-22 (lawful access) and C-34 (digital safety). Give me a few minutes to explain. ⬇️

It's sunny in Ottawa, but one of the darkest weeks for our democracy. The Liberals are ramming through, C-9 (hate), C-22 (lawful access) and C-34 (digital safety). Give me a few minutes to explain. ⬇️

Roman Baber

89,558 views • 3 months ago