Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Bill Maher's New Rule monologue is rarely more on point than this Maher discusses the rise in antisemitism between Far Left and what Steve Deace calls the Halal Right 'Israel was founded on the idea that antisemitism made a Jewish state a necessity because Jews would never be safe...

84,342 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

“Bill Maher and Rula Jebreal's Debate on Islam Took a Heated Turn Live on Air.” Rula Jebreal: Would you accept an openly anti-Semitic person to give a commencement speech to Jewish students? I actually would not. Bill Maher: Even Reza Aslan says I'm not a bigot, so I resent the idea that I'm comparable to an anti-Semite. All I've ever done is read facts. Rula Jebreal: What facts? You never invited... I'm sorry, Bill. You're comparing Jihadists, Salafists, Sunnis... You don't know the difference. You're putting all Muslims into one bucket, including secular Muslims. And when you talk about them that way, Bill, it's offensive. Bill Maher: But it's okay to be offensive. Speaker: That's what free speech is all about. If free speech is only speech you like, it's not free speech. Rula Jebreal: He was invited to give a commencement speech, not a debate. If you want a debate, I'll gladly join you anywhere. Speaker: He was invited to be a commencement speaker, and then people didn't like what he said. Bill Maher: Can you be gay in Gaza? And live? Rula Jebreal: Yes, you can. Absolutely. You're comparing the majority of Muslim countries to places like Saudi Arabia. Bill Maher: Is there a gay bar in Gaza? Rula Jebreal: I travel the Middle East. This is what I do for a living. You're comparing all Muslim societies as if they're the same. Gen. Wesley Clark: I think this is really about whether someone can be invited to give a speech. People may agree or disagree, but that's the American system. People should be allowed to speak. Rula Jebreal: The Muslim community in this country is being treated like a fifth column, and they're not. They feel threatened, they're underrepresented in the media and politics, and you never invite them here to discuss these issues. Bill Maher: Never invite them? You're here. Reza is here. They're here all the time. Rula Jebreal: On these issues. Bill Maher: Every time I say something you don't like, suddenly it's not a serious conversation or I'm a bigot. That doesn't work for me. Rula Jebreal: I don't want a war on Islam. I want to win the war on terror. But when you repeat the same things Al-Qaeda used to say—that this is a war on Islam—you're doing their work for them. My father was Muslim. He was Sufi. You don't even know the difference between Sufi, Sunni Shafi'i, or Sunni Hanbali. Bill Maher: Yeah, I do. Rula Jebreal: For you, we're all Jihadists. Bill Maher: I know that in many places around the world, if you left your religion, there would be consequences. Would it be okay for someone to say, "You know what? I'm a Presbyterian today?"

Jeff

775,711 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

NEW: Scott Jennings says Larry David’s attack on Bill Maher wasn’t about dinner—it was the modern left threatening the next person into silence. Larry David just dropped a venom-laced op-ed in the New York Times titled “My Dinner With Adolf,” unleashing on Bill Maher for one thing: having dinner with President Donald Trump. But as Scott Jennings pointed out, this wasn’t really about Maher at all. It was the modern left doing what it does best—weaponizing public shame to keep others in line. “The message of this is not to——because Bill Maher, first of all, I totally agree. He's totally in the right to do it,” Jennings said. “And I loved his monologue, even though I disagree with most everything he believes politically, he was right to do this and he was right to speak out about it.” Then he exposed the real playbook. “But this isn't about that dinner. It's about the next one. Because this is the modern left. It's an attempt always to intimidate people into not ever doing it again.” “It's to silence yourselves or we'll do it for you. That's the purpose of this op ed, so that the next comedian or the next person on the American left chooses not to speak to Donald Trump.” “This is all an effort to get people not to do what you just said, which is to talk to each other and our political leaders.” This is how the modern left enforces obedience: torch one person in public—so no one else dares step out of line.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,355,698 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr