Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Bill O’Reilly just delivered a DEVASTATING reality check to Chris Cuomo on his own show. Cuomo floated an endgame scenario where Iran’s regime remains in power even after the U.S. signaled that “help was on the way.” O’REILLY: “The people of Iran have gotten a lot of help at... show more

Overton

264,235 subscribers

56,324 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

WHOA: Bill O’Reilly just predicted on Chris Cuomo’s show that a “major event” is about to happen within the next 30 days. O’Reilly hinted that the event could be so consequential that it changes the trajectory of the midterm elections. O’REILLY: “I’m very, very cautious about this midterm because I believe something is going to happen in the next 30 days.” “Some major event.” CUOMO: “What kind of major event? What are you saying?” O’REILLY: “I think that the president is going to have to take what they call ‘decisive action,’ which means he’s going to have to blow up a lot of the infrastructure in Iran.” CUOMO: “You think American people want to see a deeper escalation, unless there’s absolute regime change that we have to own? You think that’s a winning formula?” O’REILLY: “You just said the word. I think American people want to win.” “I think they despise Iran, there’s no sympathy for Iran.”

WHOA: Bill O’Reilly just predicted on Chris Cuomo’s show that a “major event” is about to happen within the next 30 days. O’Reilly hinted that the event could be so consequential that it changes the trajectory of the midterm elections. O’REILLY: “I’m very, very cautious about this midterm because I believe something is going to happen in the next 30 days.” “Some major event.” CUOMO: “What kind of major event? What are you saying?” O’REILLY: “I think that the president is going to have to take what they call ‘decisive action,’ which means he’s going to have to blow up a lot of the infrastructure in Iran.” CUOMO: “You think American people want to see a deeper escalation, unless there’s absolute regime change that we have to own? You think that’s a winning formula?” O’REILLY: “You just said the word. I think American people want to win.” “I think they despise Iran, there’s no sympathy for Iran.”

Overton

514,806 views • 7 days ago

The decisive battle is between the people of Iran and this dying regime, a regime that is trapped in a dead end no matter which way it turns. It is a regime that has condemned tens of millions of Iranians to hunger. Many survive on nothing more than dry bread, with scarcely enough to sustain life. There is only one way—one way alone—to save the people of Iran: the overthrow of this vile regime through a democratic revolution. Ultimately, this fate is inevitable for the regime. #FreeIran10PointPlan

The decisive battle is between the people of Iran and this dying regime, a regime that is trapped in a dead end no matter which way it turns. It is a regime that has condemned tens of millions of Iranians to hunger. Many survive on nothing more than dry bread, with scarcely enough to sustain life. There is only one way—one way alone—to save the people of Iran: the overthrow of this vile regime through a democratic revolution. Ultimately, this fate is inevitable for the regime. #FreeIran10PointPlan

Maryam Rajavi

11,700 views • 2 months ago

An instant classic. Bill O’Reilly and Chris Cuomo just got into a full-blown DOGFIGHT live on NewsNation — with Cuomo eventually telling O’Reilly to LEAVE the show. “KEEP QUIET for a SECOND! — NO! It’s MY show, pal!” What started as a debate over IAEA Director Rafael Grossi’s comments on Iran’s uranium enrichment quickly spiraled into total chaos. CUOMO: “But they haven’t had any real monitoring in 5 years.” O’REILLY: “No, but the director, Rafael Grossi on March 22nd of this year made it very clear that he believes the enrich uranium in Iran stands 60%.” “So why would he say that? He would say—” CUOMO: “Well, that’s not…that’s not exactly what he said.” O’REILLY: “Alright, I got the quote right here.” CUOMO: “Yeah, me too!” “What’d you think, that I was just going to let you take it out of context like you did on your show last night? Not here.” O’REILLY: “No, I didn’t take it out of context on my show.” CUOMO: “Yeah you did!” O’REILLY: “No! You said, quote, we didn’t know what the nuclear capabilities were. Grossi knows!” CUOMO: “No, he doesn’t.” O’REILLY: “Grossi knows! So, who’s we?!” CUOMO: “No, he doesn’t. Here’s what he said. He said that they have 60% enriched uranium. Why? Because Iran says they were going to do it after what they said was Israel hitting one of their enrichment facilities…” O’REILLY: “Alright, look, you can believe what you want to believe, but I’m believing his words.” CUOMO: “NO, NO, NO, NO. No Bill! Just say, I’m corrected, let’s move on.” O’REILLY: “I’m not going to say that because it wouldn’t be true.” “YOU made the mistake and this is the quote.” CUOMO: “No, I did not make a mistake!” O’REILLY: “Alright, then KEEP QUIET for a second!” CUOMO: “No! It’s MY SHOW PAL!” “If you don’t like it, you can go!” O’REILLY: “You don’t want me to read a quote BECAUSE it’s going to make YOU look foolish!”

An instant classic. Bill O’Reilly and Chris Cuomo just got into a full-blown DOGFIGHT live on NewsNation — with Cuomo eventually telling O’Reilly to LEAVE the show. “KEEP QUIET for a SECOND! — NO! It’s MY show, pal!” What started as a debate over IAEA Director Rafael Grossi’s comments on Iran’s uranium enrichment quickly spiraled into total chaos. CUOMO: “But they haven’t had any real monitoring in 5 years.” O’REILLY: “No, but the director, Rafael Grossi on March 22nd of this year made it very clear that he believes the enrich uranium in Iran stands 60%.” “So why would he say that? He would say—” CUOMO: “Well, that’s not…that’s not exactly what he said.” O’REILLY: “Alright, I got the quote right here.” CUOMO: “Yeah, me too!” “What’d you think, that I was just going to let you take it out of context like you did on your show last night? Not here.” O’REILLY: “No, I didn’t take it out of context on my show.” CUOMO: “Yeah you did!” O’REILLY: “No! You said, quote, we didn’t know what the nuclear capabilities were. Grossi knows!” CUOMO: “No, he doesn’t.” O’REILLY: “Grossi knows! So, who’s we?!” CUOMO: “No, he doesn’t. Here’s what he said. He said that they have 60% enriched uranium. Why? Because Iran says they were going to do it after what they said was Israel hitting one of their enrichment facilities…” O’REILLY: “Alright, look, you can believe what you want to believe, but I’m believing his words.” CUOMO: “NO, NO, NO, NO. No Bill! Just say, I’m corrected, let’s move on.” O’REILLY: “I’m not going to say that because it wouldn’t be true.” “YOU made the mistake and this is the quote.” CUOMO: “No, I did not make a mistake!” O’REILLY: “Alright, then KEEP QUIET for a second!” CUOMO: “No! It’s MY SHOW PAL!” “If you don’t like it, you can go!” O’REILLY: “You don’t want me to read a quote BECAUSE it’s going to make YOU look foolish!”

Overton

185,781 views • 4 months ago

Bill O’Reilly pulls receipts on Chris Cuomo after Cuomo tried to claim Secretary Hegseth “made up” the intelligence on Iran’s nuclear program. O’REILLY: “So you’re a president of the United States, Cuomo, and you have Intel coming in from the CIA, the NSA and Mossad that says these people, the Iranians are very close to getting a nuclear weapon—” CUOMO: “That wasn’t the intelligence he got.” O’REILLY: “Yes, it was.” CUOMO: “We just heard the U.S. intelligence agencies put out information that they were not weeks away from having a nuclear weapon, just like Grossi from the IAEA. Hegseth either made that up or got it wrong.” O’REILLY: “Okay, no it’s a Reuters report. That’s what you were citing last week, which was totally phony.” CUOMO: “Oh, really? How do you know?” O’REILLY: “The Wall Street Journal...because the Wall Street Journal citing the Institute for Science and International Security.” “Whereas Reuters cited nothing, just anonymous sources.” “The headline was U.S. Israeli strike set back Iran’s ability to build a nuclear weapon.” “The headline at Reuters, that you jumped on, was Iran no further from nuclear weapon than before war.” “Reuters is not a legitimate news agency, it’s a partisan news agency that hates Trump.”

Bill O’Reilly pulls receipts on Chris Cuomo after Cuomo tried to claim Secretary Hegseth “made up” the intelligence on Iran’s nuclear program. O’REILLY: “So you’re a president of the United States, Cuomo, and you have Intel coming in from the CIA, the NSA and Mossad that says these people, the Iranians are very close to getting a nuclear weapon—” CUOMO: “That wasn’t the intelligence he got.” O’REILLY: “Yes, it was.” CUOMO: “We just heard the U.S. intelligence agencies put out information that they were not weeks away from having a nuclear weapon, just like Grossi from the IAEA. Hegseth either made that up or got it wrong.” O’REILLY: “Okay, no it’s a Reuters report. That’s what you were citing last week, which was totally phony.” CUOMO: “Oh, really? How do you know?” O’REILLY: “The Wall Street Journal...because the Wall Street Journal citing the Institute for Science and International Security.” “Whereas Reuters cited nothing, just anonymous sources.” “The headline was U.S. Israeli strike set back Iran’s ability to build a nuclear weapon.” “The headline at Reuters, that you jumped on, was Iran no further from nuclear weapon than before war.” “Reuters is not a legitimate news agency, it’s a partisan news agency that hates Trump.”

Overton

50,292 views • 3 months ago

🚨 MARCO RUBIO WANTS TO MOVE ON CUBA "We've offered the regime there $100 MILLION dollars of humanitarian aid that unfortunately, so far, they have not agreed to distribute, to help the people of Cuba!" "So we did the hurricane relief, but we're offering more, and it's the regime that's not accepting it." "It's the regime that's standing in the way of it, so we discussed that and we hope we can do it because we do want to help the people of Cuba who are being hurt by this incompetent regime." 🇺🇸🇨🇺

🚨 MARCO RUBIO WANTS TO MOVE ON CUBA "We've offered the regime there $100 MILLION dollars of humanitarian aid that unfortunately, so far, they have not agreed to distribute, to help the people of Cuba!" "So we did the hurricane relief, but we're offering more, and it's the regime that's not accepting it." "It's the regime that's standing in the way of it, so we discussed that and we hope we can do it because we do want to help the people of Cuba who are being hurt by this incompetent regime." 🇺🇸🇨🇺

Eric Daugherty

181,391 views • 3 months ago

$ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”$

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”

RedWave Press

419,610 views • 4 months ago

Bill O’Reilly LOSES IT on Chris Cuomo after Cuomo claims President Trump is “the boy who cried wolf” on Iran. “Wait a minute — who’s the boy crying wolf?!” CUOMO: “This is not helping the domestic situation right now. And I think promises that gas prices will be even better after this is a silly thing to say.” O’REILLY: “Wait…wait…wait…wait!” CUOMO: “I do think he’s going on affordability tour in for a real reason.” O’REILLY: “What did you think was going happen? What did you think was going to happen?!” “This is a military FIGHT! Okay? There are going to be bad things that occur. And the press is; Oh no! Oh no!” “I mean come on, is this little bo peep land?!” CUOMO: “No, it’s not little bo peep…it’s the boy who cried wolf.” O’REILLY: “Wait a minute! Who’s the boy! Who’s the boy CRYING WOLF?!” CUOMO: “Donald Trump promised—” O’REILLY: “Who’s the boy crying wolf Cuomo?!” CUOMO: “Donald Trump.” O’REILLY: “What is he crying? He’s crying wolf?!” CUOMO: “Oh yeah. No more wars. If I’m president, will never go to war with Iran. It doesn’t work going with military into the Middle East. It’s been a waste of blood and treasure.” “These are ALL paraphrased quotes from the president!” O’REILLY: “It’s out of context. You’re taking it completely out of context!”

Bill O’Reilly LOSES IT on Chris Cuomo after Cuomo claims President Trump is “the boy who cried wolf” on Iran. “Wait a minute — who’s the boy crying wolf?!” CUOMO: “This is not helping the domestic situation right now. And I think promises that gas prices will be even better after this is a silly thing to say.” O’REILLY: “Wait…wait…wait…wait!” CUOMO: “I do think he’s going on affordability tour in for a real reason.” O’REILLY: “What did you think was going happen? What did you think was going to happen?!” “This is a military FIGHT! Okay? There are going to be bad things that occur. And the press is; Oh no! Oh no!” “I mean come on, is this little bo peep land?!” CUOMO: “No, it’s not little bo peep…it’s the boy who cried wolf.” O’REILLY: “Wait a minute! Who’s the boy! Who’s the boy CRYING WOLF?!” CUOMO: “Donald Trump promised—” O’REILLY: “Who’s the boy crying wolf Cuomo?!” CUOMO: “Donald Trump.” O’REILLY: “What is he crying? He’s crying wolf?!” CUOMO: “Oh yeah. No more wars. If I’m president, will never go to war with Iran. It doesn’t work going with military into the Middle East. It’s been a waste of blood and treasure.” “These are ALL paraphrased quotes from the president!” O’REILLY: “It’s out of context. You’re taking it completely out of context!”

Overton

157,971 views • 5 months ago

Bill O’Reilly draws a direct parallel between the final days of Nazi Germany and the current situation in Iran, explaining why the Iranian people may not have risen up against the regime. O’REILLY: “So in the U.S. government and Israel were hopeful that the people would rise up in conjunction with the military destruction.” “And that has not happened.” “That has meant that the Pentagon has to basically redefine what a victory is. So regime change is starting to recede in the background.” “Now, this is not unusual.” “Students of history and people who’ve read my book Killing Patton know that in 1945 even though Germans were getting pummeled, okay, they would not turn on Hitler.” “They would not rise against him. Even in Berlin.” “And the reason was that SS shot them dead if there was any sign of rebellion.” “And we saw that when the Persians tried to demonstrate against the mullahs, 30,000 — and we’ve confirmed that figure — Iranians were killed by their own countrymen.” “So people are frightened. They’re scared to death, and I use that phrase literally, to rise up.” “It’s not likely that that will happen. So therefore, the definition of victory in Iran for the U.S. and Israel is to destroy every bit — and I mean that literally — of military infrastructure.” “Down to pistols if they can do it.” “Just wipe that out, so they have no chance to ever be on the offense again.”

Bill O’Reilly draws a direct parallel between the final days of Nazi Germany and the current situation in Iran, explaining why the Iranian people may not have risen up against the regime. O’REILLY: “So in the U.S. government and Israel were hopeful that the people would rise up in conjunction with the military destruction.” “And that has not happened.” “That has meant that the Pentagon has to basically redefine what a victory is. So regime change is starting to recede in the background.” “Now, this is not unusual.” “Students of history and people who’ve read my book Killing Patton know that in 1945 even though Germans were getting pummeled, okay, they would not turn on Hitler.” “They would not rise against him. Even in Berlin.” “And the reason was that SS shot them dead if there was any sign of rebellion.” “And we saw that when the Persians tried to demonstrate against the mullahs, 30,000 — and we’ve confirmed that figure — Iranians were killed by their own countrymen.” “So people are frightened. They’re scared to death, and I use that phrase literally, to rise up.” “It’s not likely that that will happen. So therefore, the definition of victory in Iran for the U.S. and Israel is to destroy every bit — and I mean that literally — of military infrastructure.” “Down to pistols if they can do it.” “Just wipe that out, so they have no chance to ever be on the offense again.”

Overton

78,088 views • 5 months ago

Bill O’Reilly leaves Chris Cuomo looking completely stumped with an election analysis that went straight over his head. O’REILLY: “[Tonight’s results] have nothing to do with the midterms.” CUOMO: “You better hope.” But Cuomo’s face turned confused when O’Reilly said: “Between now and this next year… it’s going to be a completely different country than it is now. Now, I can’t predict which way that’s going to go” Looking stumped, Cuomo interjected: “Then how do you know it’s going to be a completely different country?” “Because there are so many things that have to be decided. There are too many undecideds,” O’Reilly explained. “And you can start with the Supreme Court ruling on the tariffs… That will give Trump then a free field to see if, in the next eight months, the tariffs can kick in to bring prices down and to help people. That’s what the midterms are all about. It’s about economics here. It’s not about China. It’s not even about Putin. It’s about that.”

Bill O’Reilly leaves Chris Cuomo looking completely stumped with an election analysis that went straight over his head. O’REILLY: “[Tonight’s results] have nothing to do with the midterms.” CUOMO: “You better hope.” But Cuomo’s face turned confused when O’Reilly said: “Between now and this next year… it’s going to be a completely different country than it is now. Now, I can’t predict which way that’s going to go” Looking stumped, Cuomo interjected: “Then how do you know it’s going to be a completely different country?” “Because there are so many things that have to be decided. There are too many undecideds,” O’Reilly explained. “And you can start with the Supreme Court ruling on the tariffs… That will give Trump then a free field to see if, in the next eight months, the tariffs can kick in to bring prices down and to help people. That’s what the midterms are all about. It’s about economics here. It’s not about China. It’s not even about Putin. It’s about that.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

3,041,703 views • 9 months ago

Bill O’Reilly just revealed he spoke directly with Chinese officials — and what he says is coming next could have massive implications for the Trump administration. According to O’Reilly, China is signaling it may help pressure Iran…but there’s a catch. O’REILLY: “I did talk to the Chinese today.” “Your producers should have informed you of that, at noon eastern time.” CUOMO: “What did the Chinese say to you, Bill?” O’REILLY: “I have some pretty good information.” “So number one, there will be discussions about China helping the united States with Iran, to tamp Iran down.” “But in return, the Chinese are going to want something in that will center around Taiwan, not a hand over or anything thing like that.” “But maybe the beginning of a discussion about Taiwan.” CUOMO: “Do you like that trade?” O’REILLY: “Yeah, I think it’s good for us. 2049 is the 100th anniversary of the evil of Mao Zedong’s takeover of China and they want the Chinese flag flying over that island nation.” “But there’s room for discussion about a number of things with Taiwan and the Chinese at this point are just trying to get into the room.”

Bill O’Reilly just revealed he spoke directly with Chinese officials — and what he says is coming next could have massive implications for the Trump administration. According to O’Reilly, China is signaling it may help pressure Iran…but there’s a catch. O’REILLY: “I did talk to the Chinese today.” “Your producers should have informed you of that, at noon eastern time.” CUOMO: “What did the Chinese say to you, Bill?” O’REILLY: “I have some pretty good information.” “So number one, there will be discussions about China helping the united States with Iran, to tamp Iran down.” “But in return, the Chinese are going to want something in that will center around Taiwan, not a hand over or anything thing like that.” “But maybe the beginning of a discussion about Taiwan.” CUOMO: “Do you like that trade?” O’REILLY: “Yeah, I think it’s good for us. 2049 is the 100th anniversary of the evil of Mao Zedong’s takeover of China and they want the Chinese flag flying over that island nation.” “But there’s room for discussion about a number of things with Taiwan and the Chinese at this point are just trying to get into the room.”

Overton

686,486 views • 3 months ago

Bill O’Reilly just proved to Chris Cuomo that the ONLY cudgel Democrats have left against President Trump is Epstein. And he predicts that even that will BACKFIRE on them. O’REILLY: “All the Democrats have right now — this is the only thing they have — is Epstein. That’s ALL they have.” CUOMO: “And the economy.” O’REILLY: “And I’ll prove it.” “Right after the State of the Union ended, I switched over to CNN, reliably Democrat.” “What were they talking about? Epstein.” “They weren’t talking about economy. Weren’t talking about foreign affairs. Weren’t talking about any of that — Epstein.” “That’s all they have.” “And that’s going to backlash AGAINST the Democratic Party. You wait and see!” CUOMO: “Why?” O’REILLY: “Because it’s overdone, number one.” “And number two, after all of this time, there isn’t a SHRED of evidence linking President Trump to ANY illegality.”

Bill O’Reilly just proved to Chris Cuomo that the ONLY cudgel Democrats have left against President Trump is Epstein. And he predicts that even that will BACKFIRE on them. O’REILLY: “All the Democrats have right now — this is the only thing they have — is Epstein. That’s ALL they have.” CUOMO: “And the economy.” O’REILLY: “And I’ll prove it.” “Right after the State of the Union ended, I switched over to CNN, reliably Democrat.” “What were they talking about? Epstein.” “They weren’t talking about economy. Weren’t talking about foreign affairs. Weren’t talking about any of that — Epstein.” “That’s all they have.” “And that’s going to backlash AGAINST the Democratic Party. You wait and see!” CUOMO: “Why?” O’REILLY: “Because it’s overdone, number one.” “And number two, after all of this time, there isn’t a SHRED of evidence linking President Trump to ANY illegality.”

Overton

368,120 views • 6 months ago

“The real cost is not to the United States, it’s to the Iranian people. Because Trump said, ‘Help is on the way.” And help was not on the way. And now this deal will enshrine the Iranian regime, for a generation, with American support and cooperation, and send a message to people all over the world who are brave enough to stand up to their dictators and despots, that when America says help is on the way, that doesn’t mean anything.” “And that’s the real cost of this. It’s that we’ve promised the Iranian people that we care about their lives, and now we are throwing them to the wolves. No matter what happens with the $300 billion or the Strait of Hormuz, those people will have to wait another several years before they get another chance at dignity. And it’s partially our fault, for raising their hopes and then squashing them unceremoniously because Trump just changed his mind and doesn’t care anymore.”

“The real cost is not to the United States, it’s to the Iranian people. Because Trump said, ‘Help is on the way.” And help was not on the way. And now this deal will enshrine the Iranian regime, for a generation, with American support and cooperation, and send a message to people all over the world who are brave enough to stand up to their dictators and despots, that when America says help is on the way, that doesn’t mean anything.” “And that’s the real cost of this. It’s that we’ve promised the Iranian people that we care about their lives, and now we are throwing them to the wolves. No matter what happens with the $300 billion or the Strait of Hormuz, those people will have to wait another several years before they get another chance at dignity. And it’s partially our fault, for raising their hopes and then squashing them unceremoniously because Trump just changed his mind and doesn’t care anymore.”

Josh Rogin

39,979 views • 2 months ago

My interview on NEWSMAX: NGOs have collected thousands of video evidence of the bodies of Iranians killed by the Islamic regime. These were crimes against humanity. President Donald J. Trump asked the Iranian people to take over the institutions and promised that help is on the way. And the one way to protect protesters is to weaken the two militias that is terrorizing Iranians. This regime cannot govern Iran anymore.

My interview on NEWSMAX: NGOs have collected thousands of video evidence of the bodies of Iranians killed by the Islamic regime. These were crimes against humanity. President Donald J. Trump asked the Iranian people to take over the institutions and promised that help is on the way. And the one way to protect protesters is to weaken the two militias that is terrorizing Iranians. This regime cannot govern Iran anymore.

Dr Walid Phares

20,587 views • 7 months ago

Bill O’Reilly just DROPPED new intel on Iran strategy after his call with President Trump. O’REILLY: “I talked to the president last night, late. And here’s what I know. Cuomo.” “The United States would like to have a dialogue with Iran, but they don’t know to talk to. There’s no clear leader anywhere.” “I mean, Omar the tent maker could show up to have the dialogue.” “They’d like to do it in Pakistan. They have Witkoff and Kushner ready to go.” “And they’d like to start to dialogue to get the things that the United States feel are necessary for world peace.” “So that’s the American component.” “The chaos on the other side is undefined.” “There’s no reporting on the ground. Nobody knows really where these people are. They’re all hiding. A lot of them have been assassinated.” “So it’s very hard to quantify what they’re doing.” “The Revolutionary Guard is pretty much in control of hurling missiles drones in the the Straits of Hormuz. They’re run out of ordnance soon.” “And then you have the China factor, which is huge because President Trump doesn’t lot to eliminate the oil from Iran to China, particularly when he’s going there and middle of May.” “So it’s a very complicated thing. The simplistic garbage that you hear on television news in America is insulting.” “The administration is now waiting to see if it can get the deal that it wants. And that’s where we are.”

Bill O’Reilly just DROPPED new intel on Iran strategy after his call with President Trump. O’REILLY: “I talked to the president last night, late. And here’s what I know. Cuomo.” “The United States would like to have a dialogue with Iran, but they don’t know to talk to. There’s no clear leader anywhere.” “I mean, Omar the tent maker could show up to have the dialogue.” “They’d like to do it in Pakistan. They have Witkoff and Kushner ready to go.” “And they’d like to start to dialogue to get the things that the United States feel are necessary for world peace.” “So that’s the American component.” “The chaos on the other side is undefined.” “There’s no reporting on the ground. Nobody knows really where these people are. They’re all hiding. A lot of them have been assassinated.” “So it’s very hard to quantify what they’re doing.” “The Revolutionary Guard is pretty much in control of hurling missiles drones in the the Straits of Hormuz. They’re run out of ordnance soon.” “And then you have the China factor, which is huge because President Trump doesn’t lot to eliminate the oil from Iran to China, particularly when he’s going there and middle of May.” “So it’s a very complicated thing. The simplistic garbage that you hear on television news in America is insulting.” “The administration is now waiting to see if it can get the deal that it wants. And that’s where we are.”

Overton

821,196 views • 5 months ago

"The people of Brazil should know that there is an abuse of judicial power to an extreme degree that we have not seen in any country on Earth. The judiciary is there to execute upon the law, but not to make the law" - Elon Musk via Mario Nawfal

"The people of Brazil should know that there is an abuse of judicial power to an extreme degree that we have not seen in any country on Earth. The judiciary is there to execute upon the law, but not to make the law" - Elon Musk via Mario Nawfal

DogeDesigner

409,641 views • 2 years ago

TRITA PARSI: There was a segment of the Iranian people that seemed to welcome this conflict because they were just so sick and tired of this theocracy. But those sentiments seem to have shifted very fast as it's become clear to them that this is a war on the country, not a war on the regime. Trita Parsi

TRITA PARSI: There was a segment of the Iranian people that seemed to welcome this conflict because they were just so sick and tired of this theocracy. But those sentiments seem to have shifted very fast as it's become clear to them that this is a war on the country, not a war on the regime. Trita Parsi

Bannon’s WarRoom

28,098 views • 5 months ago

Ana Kasparian on a potential U.S. strike on Iran: “There's no way in which it would benefit the United States. Iran's ballistic missiles are not capable of reaching the US. The only country that has a vested interest in regime change war in Iran, of course, is Israel...”

Ana Kasparian on a potential U.S. strike on Iran: “There's no way in which it would benefit the United States. Iran's ballistic missiles are not capable of reaching the US. The only country that has a vested interest in regime change war in Iran, of course, is Israel...”

The Resonance

55,048 views • 6 months ago

OUTSTANDING answer from Secretary Marco Rubio on the Iranian regime vs. the Iranian people: “[T]his regime is not — guys, I know I’ve said this — I think I said this in my hearing before the Senate when I got confirmed, I don’t know of any country in the world where there’s a bigger difference between the people and the people who run the country, okay? This country is run by radical Shia clerics, and that’s not what Iran and the Iranian people are. Now, they may be Shia, but they’re not radicals and they’re not clerics. And they just want a normal life and a regular life. And, in many ways, a very cosmopolitan country with a with an incredible history, incredible history, an incredible legacy and the like. So, there’s this huge divide between the people of Iran whom we sympathize with and who the President sympathize with, because they’re the ones suffering. Look, the world is a victim of Iran, okay? The world is a victim of Iran because they’re terrorists, because of what they’re doing now on the Straits. But the people of Iran are daily victims of the regime. And the president has deep sympathy for what they’re going through. And I think he’s just expressing that sympathy and that frustration that they don’t have the ability to do more to get rid of this regime that has crushed this country and isolated it from the world, which is a country that shouldn’t be isolated from the world because its people are phenomenal.”

OUTSTANDING answer from Secretary Marco Rubio on the Iranian regime vs. the Iranian people: “[T]his regime is not — guys, I know I’ve said this — I think I said this in my hearing before the Senate when I got confirmed, I don’t know of any country in the world where there’s a bigger difference between the people and the people who run the country, okay? This country is run by radical Shia clerics, and that’s not what Iran and the Iranian people are. Now, they may be Shia, but they’re not radicals and they’re not clerics. And they just want a normal life and a regular life. And, in many ways, a very cosmopolitan country with a with an incredible history, incredible history, an incredible legacy and the like. So, there’s this huge divide between the people of Iran whom we sympathize with and who the President sympathize with, because they’re the ones suffering. Look, the world is a victim of Iran, okay? The world is a victim of Iran because they’re terrorists, because of what they’re doing now on the Straits. But the people of Iran are daily victims of the regime. And the president has deep sympathy for what they’re going through. And I think he’s just expressing that sympathy and that frustration that they don’t have the ability to do more to get rid of this regime that has crushed this country and isolated it from the world, which is a country that shouldn’t be isolated from the world because its people are phenomenal.”

Curtis Houck

43,429 views • 3 months ago

President Trump just gave an answer that will go down in the history books when Peter Doocy asked why assassination attempts keep happening to him. “We’ve changed this country and there are lot of people that are not happy about that.” TRUMP: “Well, you know, I’ve studied assassinations and I must tell you, the most impactful people...” “The people that do the most...you take a look at the people, Abraham Lincoln...the people that have gone through this...the people to do the most...the people that make the biggest impact, they’re the ones that they go after.” “They don’t go after the ones that don’t do much because they like it that way.” “And when you look at the people that have either...whether it was an attempt or a successful attempt, and they’re very impactful people just take a look at the names there.” “And I hate to say I’m honored by that but I’ve done a lot.” “We’ve taken this country and we were a laughingstock years and now we’re the hottest country anywhere in the world.” “We’ve changed this country and there are lot of people that are not happy about that.”

President Trump just gave an answer that will go down in the history books when Peter Doocy asked why assassination attempts keep happening to him. “We’ve changed this country and there are lot of people that are not happy about that.” TRUMP: “Well, you know, I’ve studied assassinations and I must tell you, the most impactful people...” “The people that do the most...you take a look at the people, Abraham Lincoln...the people that have gone through this...the people to do the most...the people that make the biggest impact, they’re the ones that they go after.” “They don’t go after the ones that don’t do much because they like it that way.” “And when you look at the people that have either...whether it was an attempt or a successful attempt, and they’re very impactful people just take a look at the names there.” “And I hate to say I’m honored by that but I’ve done a lot.” “We’ve taken this country and we were a laughingstock years and now we’re the hottest country anywhere in the world.” “We’ve changed this country and there are lot of people that are not happy about that.”

Overton

57,936 views • 4 months ago