Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Bills fans have a point👇

84,222 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

33 Comments

Joel Johnston's profile picture
Joel Johnston8 months ago

Bills fans are the biggest crybabies in the NFL now lol good lord.

Ryan mordahl's profile picture
Ryan mordahl8 months ago

Your video does not show the backside of the play where the ball moves almost immediately after it bounces all over cooks helmet and pads…not a catch.

BringBackPontiac's profile picture
BringBackPontiac8 months ago

No they don't. The game should have ended before this ever happened.

Mark Clayton's profile picture
Mark Clayton8 months ago

lol he has to survive the ground.. Adam’s had already taken a couple steps after catching it very clean. Start your replay of Adam’s a little further back.

DanielDubs's profile picture
DanielDubs8 months ago

It’s an INT and not a hard call even. I have 0 dog in the hunt as a Bengals fan and I’m here to tell you it’s a Pick

Kilroy WH's profile picture
Kilroy WH8 months ago

Too bad this happened earlier in the drive.

TeeDubya's profile picture
TeeDubya8 months ago

How do you not see the ball moving the whole way down?

Denver Dude's profile picture
Denver Dude8 months ago

“What is cooks supposed to do?” .. complete the catch by holding onto the ball to the ground.

Basin Street Records's profile picture
Basin Street Records8 months ago

A travesty with Cooks/Buffalo ruling. I will put it at number two. Here is number one.

Kale Eslick's profile picture
Kale Eslick8 months ago

But do they though? They did the same exact thing and didn’t complain then

rob's profile picture
rob8 months ago

I find it really interesting that the ball is moving in Cooks hand during the process of the catch(you can tell from the red gloves in his left hand) while at the same time he doesn't survive the ground!

Rogelio HernĂĄndez CĂĄzares's profile picture
Rogelio HernĂĄndez CĂĄzares8 months ago

Rolling to avoid the ball hitting the ground is a football move. Everyday I get more upset about all of this.

Mr. Emery's profile picture
Mr. Emery8 months ago

Game was already Over....

Natekola MacKić🏔️⚒️'s profile picture
Natekola MacKić🏔️⚒️8 months ago

“Bills fans have a point” like you’re some neutral person dissecting the play from an unbiased standpoint while you’re wearing a buffalo bills long sleeve😭😭😭🤡🤡🤡

squirrel's profile picture
squirrel8 months ago

No, they do not. It’s not a catch by any stretch of the imagination.

Mac Deal's profile picture
Mac Deal8 months ago

So are we just ignoring the fact that when a receiver in the process of a catch immediately goes to the ground, that the ball has to survive the ground? For one to believe that it was a catch, one would need to be ignorant of the rules or, just making up their own, in which case, nobody cares.

Josey Juan Wales's profile picture
Josey Juan Wales8 months ago

Can’t change shit now so shut yo bitch ass up I’m tired of seeing you all still crying get over it

SamManning's profile picture
SamManning8 months ago

They don’t have a point lmfao you lost cope

Wesley Walker's profile picture
Wesley Walker8 months ago

This video does nothing but show that it was a clear int

Dust's profile picture
Dust8 months ago

Hey, Bills fans, where is the “football move” after possession? That’s what the rule requires, and there wasn’t any. Easy call, which the officials got right.

Stevie Reyes's profile picture
Stevie Reyes8 months ago

Same exact play. Ruled an interception and you can pause and freeze frame a live play to find the perfect screen shot of what looks like “possession” but the word you’re supposed to be using is control because you can’t have possession until the catch is finished. It never was.

Hey...Juan's profile picture
Hey...Juan8 months ago

I’ll take things that don’t matter for 500 Alex

GoBills 🦬's profile picture
GoBills 🦬8 months ago

It’s gross in so many ways. Not to mention that ding dong removed his helmet to celebrate after the “interception.” That is an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty that wasn’t called.

Michael's profile picture
Michael8 months ago

“If you take all the nfl rules out of the equation it’s a catch” great argument. Tbf bills will probably get this rule changed this spring.

Michael J. Didion, CFPÂŽ, EA, MBA's profile picture
Michael J. Didion, CFPÂŽ, EA, MBA8 months ago

No they don’t. This angle clearly shows Cooks didn’t survive the ground and that’s how Macmillan made the pick. It wasn’t a catch.

Chiefskingdom79's profile picture
Chiefskingdom798 months ago

So what about the holding penalty that was never called on the Bills in the end zone that started that drive that would have ended the game 32-30 Denver before this play even happened? Do we just forget about that one?

James Caine's profile picture
James Caine8 months ago

Yall need to get over this. This didn't decide the game. The five turnovers were why they lost.

SanchoPanzy's profile picture
SanchoPanzy8 months ago

You don’t know the rules. The refs got both of these calls right. Adams secured possession and then “perform(ed) an act common to the game” (Rule 8-1-3(c)). He took a step with his left foot. That makes it a completion and he became a ball carrier. He was then down by contact (knee hit) before the ball came loose. Cooks did secure possession before going to the ground. He still had it when he hit the ground. But, in order to satisfy Rule 8-1-3(c), he has to “maintain control of the ball long enough to (perform an act common to the game). He did not do this, so it was never a completed pass. But it was still a live ball because it didn’t hit the ground. Had it hit the ground after being stripped, it would’ve been incomplete. But McMillian secured the live ball. Interception.

Jordan White's profile picture
Jordan White8 months ago

There is one group of people who call this a catch. Bills fans. The VAST majority of people recognize this is an interception. When the only group of ppl who are saying differently are the ones hurt, that’s called cope. Literally cope.

CardVille’s RedRage Machine's profile picture
CardVille’s RedRage Machine8 months ago

Good gawd the amount of people who “know ball” don’t really know ball. Cooks had to survive the ground, and didn’t. Adams had both feet on the ground and then down to one knee. I don’t see how it’s that hard for yall to understand. But wait.. there was still time on the clock..

GuruTwoey's profile picture
GuruTwoey8 months ago

Refs ruled this also not a catch for the same reason they ruled this an Interception

Bob Simmons's profile picture
Bob Simmons8 months ago

Backyard football rules are not NFL rules. If a receiver does not make a common action (aka football move) in the act of a catch, he’s then required to maintain possession throughout the entire motion on the ground. Cooks made no such prior football move, and when he rolled the back was stripped away. It doesn’t matter that his knee was down, he kept rolling. Not a catch, an interception.

Chandler28138's profile picture
Chandler281388 months ago

Your the one still crying better luck next year haha

Related Videos