Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Bills fans have a pointđ
84,222 views ⢠8 months ago â˘via X (Twitter)
33 Comments

Bills fans are the biggest crybabies in the NFL now lol good lord.

Your video does not show the backside of the play where the ball moves almost immediately after it bounces all over cooks helmet and padsâŚnot a catch.

No they don't. The game should have ended before this ever happened.

lol he has to survive the ground.. Adamâs had already taken a couple steps after catching it very clean. Start your replay of Adamâs a little further back.

Itâs an INT and not a hard call even. I have 0 dog in the hunt as a Bengals fan and Iâm here to tell you itâs a Pick

Too bad this happened earlier in the drive.

How do you not see the ball moving the whole way down?

âWhat is cooks supposed to do?â .. complete the catch by holding onto the ball to the ground.

A travesty with Cooks/Buffalo ruling. I will put it at number two. Here is number one.

But do they though? They did the same exact thing and didnât complain then

I find it really interesting that the ball is moving in Cooks hand during the process of the catch(you can tell from the red gloves in his left hand) while at the same time he doesn't survive the ground!

Rolling to avoid the ball hitting the ground is a football move. Everyday I get more upset about all of this.

Game was already Over....

âBills fans have a pointâ like youâre some neutral person dissecting the play from an unbiased standpoint while youâre wearing a buffalo bills long sleeveđđđđ¤Ąđ¤Ąđ¤Ą

No, they do not. Itâs not a catch by any stretch of the imagination.

So are we just ignoring the fact that when a receiver in the process of a catch immediately goes to the ground, that the ball has to survive the ground? For one to believe that it was a catch, one would need to be ignorant of the rules or, just making up their own, in which case, nobody cares.

Canât change shit now so shut yo bitch ass up Iâm tired of seeing you all still crying get over it

They donât have a point lmfao you lost cope

This video does nothing but show that it was a clear int

Hey, Bills fans, where is the âfootball moveâ after possession? Thatâs what the rule requires, and there wasnât any. Easy call, which the officials got right.

Same exact play. Ruled an interception and you can pause and freeze frame a live play to find the perfect screen shot of what looks like âpossessionâ but the word youâre supposed to be using is control because you canât have possession until the catch is finished. It never was.

Iâll take things that donât matter for 500 Alex

Itâs gross in so many ways. Not to mention that ding dong removed his helmet to celebrate after the âinterception.â That is an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty that wasnât called.

âIf you take all the nfl rules out of the equation itâs a catchâ great argument. Tbf bills will probably get this rule changed this spring.

No they donât. This angle clearly shows Cooks didnât survive the ground and thatâs how Macmillan made the pick. It wasnât a catch.

So what about the holding penalty that was never called on the Bills in the end zone that started that drive that would have ended the game 32-30 Denver before this play even happened? Do we just forget about that one?

Yall need to get over this. This didn't decide the game. The five turnovers were why they lost.

You donât know the rules. The refs got both of these calls right. Adams secured possession and then âperform(ed) an act common to the gameâ (Rule 8-1-3(c)). He took a step with his left foot. That makes it a completion and he became a ball carrier. He was then down by contact (knee hit) before the ball came loose. Cooks did secure possession before going to the ground. He still had it when he hit the ground. But, in order to satisfy Rule 8-1-3(c), he has to âmaintain control of the ball long enough to (perform an act common to the game). He did not do this, so it was never a completed pass. But it was still a live ball because it didnât hit the ground. Had it hit the ground after being stripped, it wouldâve been incomplete. But McMillian secured the live ball. Interception.

There is one group of people who call this a catch. Bills fans. The VAST majority of people recognize this is an interception. When the only group of ppl who are saying differently are the ones hurt, thatâs called cope. Literally cope.

Good gawd the amount of people who âknow ballâ donât really know ball. Cooks had to survive the ground, and didnât. Adams had both feet on the ground and then down to one knee. I donât see how itâs that hard for yall to understand. But wait.. there was still time on the clock..

Refs ruled this also not a catch for the same reason they ruled this an Interception

Backyard football rules are not NFL rules. If a receiver does not make a common action (aka football move) in the act of a catch, heâs then required to maintain possession throughout the entire motion on the ground. Cooks made no such prior football move, and when he rolled the back was stripped away. It doesnât matter that his knee was down, he kept rolling. Not a catch, an interception.

Your the one still crying better luck next year haha

