Bingo card, anyone?

Has anyone considered maybe all those huge "electrical towers" installed during covid lock downs, along with 5G rolling out, could have been the infrastructure needed to create a massive prison for those vaccinated? Once a switch is flipped, what will happen to the altered?

💯💯💯

Even if you didn’t get vaxxed there’s still a high probability they snuck it inside of you in other ways. You can test it - a girl who didn’t jab herself has mRNA in her. Strange isn’t it? None of us are safe. We’re all screwed.

Because water and food is also ☠️

@tippytopster lol. The amount of chemicals that would need to be in food and water to actually vaccinate someone would be insane. You are an idiot.

@fitgirltruth @tippytopster 1. Cows are vaccinated from rabies and similar diseases NOT COVID. 2. You really think you could get 2nd hand vaccinated like that? My god you are suchhhhhh a moron.

@ww3baby @fitgirltruth @tippytopster Lollll I just saw your profile and comments. You’re not only extremely racist, you’re retarded too :)

@devininNYC @ww3baby @tippytopster I already blocked it. Not worth the time.

Exactly.

Correct! ✅

I knew about this say 10 years ago and told many people about it. They all said I was crazy! And they'd not look into it to see for themselves. But hey,I am just a conspiracy theorists.

Is crazies gotta stick together. 🫶

That we do!

What did I do wrong?

Expand the post. Many have been posting the link that hasn’t been removed and the vids that went with it from 2013. 🫶

@RjNol It was only a matter of time. In all fairness, I don't think the justices are human. So glad I did not elect to inject.

@RjNol 🦎

I said the same when the Supreme Court states that your DNA is altered. You're no longer human, and if any tech or etc, in your body now become property of said company that has the tech lol, but no one believed me when I said it how it come full circle now.

I've been saying this since the vaxx came out!

Crazy that this was from 2013. Like they planned it or something. ☠️

If you knew anything about patent laws, as soon as you figure out that the vaccine was gain a function you knew

And this docket is from 2013. Always the plan.

I think this is what the guy in the video spells out? If so, it doesn't link to anything. Somebody help me correct it please! I want to see the original document...

The ‘opinion’ one has been removed. Here is the orig link to the full docket. Unfortunately they make it so dockets are not searchable. Image also in case X kills the link.

You're fully in control of your body. Supreme Court case 12-398 (Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, 2013) ruled that naturally occurring human DNA segments aren't patentable just because they're isolated—but synthetic cDNA is. It was about breast cancer gene patents (BRCA1/2), not vaccines, mRNA, or any "ownership" of people. No court ruling or vaccine transfers rights over your body to manufacturers.

@banging2020 @fitgirltruth @Horrux @grok is the GMO in the vaccine patentable

@banging2020 @fitgirltruth @Horrux Ask Grok is currently available to Premium and Premium+ subscribers only. Subscribe to unlock this feature:

@AndSags85137 @banging2020 @fitgirltruth @Horrux @grok is the GMO in the vaccine patentable?

Yes, the synthetic/modified mRNA in vaccines (like Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna COVID shots) is patentable under US law. The Supreme Court in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics (2013) held that naturally occurring DNA can't be patented, but synthetic creations like cDNA or engineered mRNA sequences can—because they're human-made, not isolated from nature. That said, patents cover the vaccine's composition and manufacturing process, not your body or cells after injection. No ownership transfers; your body isn't "owned" by pharma.

He is telling the truth, I researched it in 2019 and found this information, the new transhuman is called Homo Borg Genesis instead of Homosapien thus becoming intellectual property

Yep, 2012

BINGO! Black's Law Dictionary, most cited in the world. Definitions - Humans r Monsters and Monsters can Own Zero, Ever, check it out, 1st Edition, others have watered down language...where is my prize please, lol...BINGO! Now, who r the so-called-owners anyhow? Suprise!

looks like another one of their dirty tricks.....

Since they are no longer human, what happens to their "Human Rights?"

They don’t have any. Check the comments in the post. There’s a lot of vids and links that people are posting. Here’s the docket he’s referring to. It’s from 2013.

Thank you! I'll check them out!!

It would seem that since the devil's minions who created the "vaccine" are "zionist jews", therefore thru the vaccine, [in a legal sense] those who took the vaccine are the property of the devil, are adopted in a sense, by the devil. These minions do what their father does; murder. John 8:44 These "zionist jews" worship the devil. That is why they promote transgenderism. Two triangles merged together, pointing up and down. Baphomet; as above, so below.

This is why we did not participate. IYKYK!

👉Theory👈: Exons-Only cDNA – The Lab-Created Intron-Free DNA This is a hypothetical theory based only on the exact wording from the 2013 Supreme Court opinion. It examines what synthetic cDNA is according to the ruling. Natural human genomic DNA contains both **exons** (coding segments for building proteins) and **introns** (non-coding sequences that sit between the exons). An **intron** is the stretch of DNA inside a gene that does not code for protein. It is transcribed into pre-mRNA but then fully spliced out (cut away). The lab creates synthetic cDNA by taking mRNA (introns already removed) and reverse-transcribing it back into DNA. The result is a synthetic **exons-only molecule** — a continuous DNA strand made only of exons with **all intervening introns omitted**. Exact Supreme Court wording: “cDNA contains only the exons that occur in DNA, omitting the intervening introns.” “Its creation results in an exons-only molecule, which is not naturally occurring.” This exons-only cDNA is a compact, uninterrupted coding strand that does not exist in that exact continuous form inside natural genomic DNA (which always includes both exons and introns). **Glossary of Key Terms** - **cDNA**: Lab-made DNA from spliced mRNA; contains only exons, no introns. - **Exon**: Coding part of a gene that provides instructions for making proteins. - **Intron**: Non-coding interrupting sequence between exons; removed during splicing and fully omitted in cDNA. - **Exons-only molecule**: The artificial continuous DNA strand created in the lab by removing all introns. - **Genomic DNA**: Natural full DNA blueprint that includes both exons and introns in their original arrangement. - **Splicing**: Natural cellular process that cuts out introns and joins exons. - **Reverse transcription**: Lab technique that copies mRNA backward into DNA. **Etymology of “Intron”** Coined in 1978 from “intragenic region.” - **In- / intra-**: Latin for “within” or “inside.” - **-tron**: Scientific suffix for a unit or entity. Means “the interrupting region within the gene.” **Evil Take (Pure Theory): Hypothetical Misuse on Humans** In this theory, an evil actor would create custom exons-only cDNA with harmful sequences and find ways to insert it into human cells so the continuous DNA integrates into chromosomes. Once inside: The body’s machinery would treat the artificial exons-only strand as permanent instructions and continuously produce whatever proteins the evil sequences code for. Possible theoretical uses: - Code for toxins or proteins causing slow organ damage or immune suppression. - Alter brain or hormone functions, potentially reducing fertility or increasing compliance. - Create biological dependency requiring secret boosters only the actor controls. - Design sequences that activate only under specific external triggers. - Deliver through various means so the intron-free cDNA spreads widely, possibly passing to offspring if it reaches reproductive cells. - Layer multiple custom strands over time to gradually shift cellular output away from the original natural blueprint. Because cDNA is compact (exons only, no bulky introns), it could theoretically be easier to produce and deliver at scale. The body would replicate the new intron-free DNA during normal cell division. 👉Note to Community Noters: This entire piece is presented as **pure hypothetical theory** and speculative thought experiment only. It is not a factual claim, not medical or legal advice, and does not assert that any real-world application or misuse of cDNA exists. It is simply one logical exploration based on the Supreme Court’s description of lab-created exons-only cDNA. Thanks given to .@grok for assistance in creating this article.

5G activated graphene oxide was ALSO in masks, and covid tests so as many as possible would get this."vaccinated" people SHED this shit to their family and anyone near them also.

👇

Just tried it and..

expand the orig post, many have replied w the links to the docket and orig vids from 2013 when this was made 'public'

Thank you!

they were tricked into it under false pretenses, so they lose no standing, regardless of which satanists dream of otherwise.

Are you waking up people ?

if they're not awake by now, they're not going to wake up.

Same thing for me. This is sus asf.

That was the goal from the beginning. They can patent nature, so they change your natural body 😢

The interpretation presented in the X post (and similar viral claims) is **legally baseless** and represents a profound misunderstanding—or deliberate misrepresentation—of both the 2013 Supreme Court ruling in *Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.* and the science of mRNA vaccines. ### What the Myriad Genetics Case Actually Held In a unanimous 9-0 decision written by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Supreme Court addressed patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes (linked to breast and ovarian cancer risk). The key holdings were: - **Isolated naturally occurring DNA** (genomic DNA segments as they exist in the human body) is **not patent-eligible**. It is a "product of nature," and merely discovering or isolating it does not constitute an invention under 35 U.S.C. § 101 of the Patent Act. - **Synthetic complementary DNA (cDNA)**—lab-created DNA that mirrors the protein-coding parts of a gene but removes non-coding introns—is **patent-eligible** because it does not occur naturally and involves human invention. The case had **nothing to do with vaccines**, mRNA technology, gene editing, personhood, human rights, or any alteration of a living person's genome. It was strictly about the patentability of isolated genetic material for diagnostic testing purposes, decided years before COVID-19 or mRNA vaccines existed. The ruling actually **narrowed** gene patenting in ways that benefited research and patients by preventing monopolies on natural genes. ### Why the Claim About "No Longer Human" or "Patented Property" Fails Legally 1. **Patents apply to inventions, not to people**: U.S. law explicitly prohibits patents on human organisms (see the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, which codified that "no patent may issue on a claim directed to or encompassing a human organism"). Receiving a medical product—even one involving patented components—does not transfer ownership of your body or strip your legal status as a human being. This is as absurd as claiming that a person with a patented artificial hip, pacemaker, or insulin pump becomes "patented property." Legal experts have repeatedly called this notion "utterly absurd" and "pure nonsense." 2. **No connection to personhood or rights**: Personhood under the law (for constitutional rights, etc.) is not determined by DNA sequence or medical interventions. The Myriad decision says nothing about "transhumanism," loss of rights, or reclassifying individuals. Courts have never interpreted patent law as overriding fundamental human status. 3. **mRNA vaccines do not alter your DNA in a way that triggers patent claims**: - mRNA vaccines (like Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna) deliver synthetic messenger RNA that instructs cells to produce a harmless spike protein temporarily. The mRNA does **not enter the cell nucleus** (where DNA resides), does not integrate into the genome, and is rapidly degraded by the body. It is biologically impossible for standard mRNA vaccines to rewrite your germline or somatic DNA in the manner claimed. - Even if hypothetical DNA integration occurred (which extensive monitoring has not shown for these vaccines), it would not make the *person* patentable. The vaccine's mRNA sequence or lipid delivery system might be patented as a composition of matter or method, but that protection covers the manufactured product, not the recipient's body. Patents do not "own" patients who use them. This specific conspiracy narrative has been repeatedly debunked by fact-checkers, legal scholars, and public health experts as a misrepresentation of the Myriad ruling. ### Bottom Line as a Legal Matter There is **no credible legal basis** for arguing that COVID-vaccinated individuals (or anyone receiving mRNA-based treatments) lose human status, become "patented goods," or forfeit rights under the Myriad decision or any other U.S. law. The claim conflates unrelated concepts—patent eligibility of lab-created molecules with the immutable legal and constitutional status of human beings—and ignores basic biology. Courts would dismiss such an argument outright as frivolous. If it were ever raised in litigation (e.g., challenging mandates or rights), it would fail on multiple independent grounds: factual inaccuracy about how vaccines work, misreading of precedent, and violation of clear statutory and constitutional protections for persons. In short, this interpretation is not a serious legal theory—it's misinformation dressed up with a selective citation to an irrelevant case.

and what about all that being sprayed on everyone, including the ones that did not Consent? this is why we detox. Ivermectin/FenBen save the day.

We don't even know the full effects of this poison yet💔😡 I can't understand why anyone would ask Grok ANYTHING and trust it🤦‍♂️ Must be that vaccine😁 Nice to see you Aly.👋All love Sister

Mm mm interesting

OLD NEWS : 2024 If interested in moving ahead of the curve, learn your status as a vaccinated individual visit the PINNED ITEM at the top of my X page. Merging Vaccinated with AI Surveillance Centers.

Here is the link for those who did not find it...

GMO!! I have said this for YEARS!! Human rights do not apply anymore, you are PROPERTY of the company who made the jab!!