Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

"Bioethicist" S. Matthew Liao proposes that to stop the climate from changing, humans should be genetically engineered and have their immune systems programmed to make them allergic to meat. We could artificially induce intolerance to meat, and in this way, we can create an aversion to eating eco unfriendly food."

67,348 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 9

Фото профиля Paul Z ☦️
Paul Z ☦️2 лет назад

@Jay_D007 To get a degree in bioethics one must have no ethics.

Фото профиля WeimericanBarlaam, Purveyor of Malinformation
WeimericanBarlaam, Purveyor of Malinformation2 лет назад

4'11" manlet seeks to create conditions of impossibility that any future generations will produce people taller than himself

Фото профиля karaleenichols
karaleenichols2 лет назад

Alpha gal syndrome.

Фото профиля Elder Millennial
Elder Millennial2 лет назад

@Jay_D007 Why not just forbid anyone besides Tibetans & Nepalese from breeding? It would get a similar effect. Let’s see how he’d enforce that.

Фото профиля Dr. Nick's Red Pills 💊™
Dr. Nick's Red Pills 💊™2 лет назад

@Jay_D007 The funny part is, they put alpha-gal in the vaccines... it recodes your genes to reject meat. Look it up...

Фото профиля βασιλεος
βασιλεος2 лет назад

We should generically engineer a hammer and create an attraction to his head

Фото профиля 𒐪𒐪𒐪𒐪𒐪⬢4️⃣2️⃣⬢ 𒐪𒐪𒐪𒐪𒐪forty-two 𒐪𒐪𒐪𒐪𒐪
𒐪𒐪𒐪𒐪𒐪⬢4️⃣2️⃣⬢ 𒐪𒐪𒐪𒐪𒐪forty-two 𒐪𒐪𒐪𒐪𒐪2 лет назад

@DickMangold "bioethicist" reads like an Epstein Acolyte job description

Фото профиля Frog 🥛 (schizo)
Frog 🥛 (schizo)2 лет назад

@Jay_D007 What's wrong with his facial features. Literally looks insane when he talks

Фото профиля Michael Stanwyck
Michael Stanwyck2 лет назад

I’d like to make humans allergic to bioethicists

Похожие видео

The Disturbing Push for "Moral Enhancement" & Meat Intolerance via Science In 2016, a bioethicist at the World Science Festival floated a chilling idea: What if we engineered humans to be intolerant to meat—like those with lactose intolerance—to "save the planet"? His reasoning? People lack the "willpower" to stop eating steak, so science should force them. Fast forward to 2024, and the same dystopian idea is back—but worse. A recent paper argues that if eating meat is "immoral," then preventing the spread of tick-borne alpha-gal syndrome (AGS)—which makes people allergic to meat—is also immoral. Worse, they claim: "It is morally obligatory to genetically modify ticks to spread AGS, forcing meat intolerance on humanity." The author? Parker Crutchfield, who wrote Moral Enhancement for the Public Good (2021), arguing that: ➡️ Humans are too "morally deficient" to handle crises like pandemics & climate change. ➡️ Everyone should be secretly dosed with "moral enhancers"—without consent—to make them "better people." This isn’t science—it’s 21st-century eugenics. The elite don’t just want to control behavior; they want to rewire humanity itself. From lockdowns to climate mandates to forced meat allergies, the pattern is clear: A small group of "experts" believes they have the right to alter human biology—by any means necessary. The question isn’t "Could they?"—but "Will we let them?" Wake up. Push back. Or lose the right to choose what you eat—or even who you are.

Camus

14,500 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад