Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Bitcoin 101: What makes #bitcoin valuable? This is a great question that stumps many people, and it is somewhat confusing at first. How can a digital rock be worth $70,000 or one day even $7,000,000? Let me explain.

76,447 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Joe Burnett, MSBA
Joe Burnett, MSBAvor 2 Jahren

If you liked this video, subscribe on YouTube for more: Thanks all!

Profilbild von AntiCanciller
AntiCancillervor 2 Jahren

Excelente video!

Profilbild von Marvin Gamero
Marvin Gamerovor 2 Jahren

Cool explanation.

Profilbild von Sean ₿uckley
Sean ₿uckleyvor 2 Jahren

Hardest and best money ever

Profilbild von 🧡NEEDcreations is stacking sats & jamming to EDM
🧡NEEDcreations is stacking sats & jamming to EDMvor 2 Jahren

Great and informative video!

Profilbild von Joe Burnett, MSBA
Joe Burnett, MSBAvor 2 Jahren

Thank you!

Profilbild von giacolmo
giacolmovor 2 Jahren

good content

Profilbild von Pat Yoes
Pat Yoesvor 2 Jahren

Joe, you bring out critical points about Bitcoin without getting lost in the details. People need to start out getting the main point then dyor. Bitcoin is money, the best money. We're at 1% adoption. Done 👍

Profilbild von Joe Burnett, MSBA
Joe Burnett, MSBAvor 2 Jahren

Yep. It's simple. There may be many questions that stem from that, but that is the key idea that 99.99% haven't grasped quite yet.

Profilbild von Givepad
Givepadvor 2 Jahren

The double coincidence of wants *is an economic phenomenon where two parties each hold an item that the other wants, so they exchange these items directly. 👏

Ähnliche Videos

Did Epstein influence Bitcoin core development? Short answer: No. This is not how Bitcoin works. Here’s what happened: Epstein donated to MIT Media Lab…who in turn supported MIT Digital Currency Initiative…which in turn funded Bitcoin developers. These devs used to be funded by The Bitcoin Foundation (which I used to run as volunteer Executive Director) there are many devs and no dev or team had power or control over Bitcoin. Under MIT’s patronage the devs had the same deal they had with us at The Bitcoin Foundation: that they could work on the code and not have direction from the org. More importantly — how Bitcoin works is that *even if* a dev was compromised then the nodes and miners would still have to run that code to make it included in Bitcoin. So for example if I had somehow asked the devs paid by Bitcoin Foundation to “add 1000 coins for Bruce” 1) they wouldn’t have done this / it would have been counter to our agreement 2) no miners would run that code & no nodes would recognize it. It would be a laughing stock and completely rejected. Does this mean code dev is not an attack vector? No. It’s still a risk. Particularly with nation state style actors and very careful efforts to co-opt which are much more sophisticated than “give Bruce coins” or something. This is one reason I’m cautious of Bitcoin core funding - especially from actors who’ve had bad judgment in the past. I think we should be cautious of who does the dev and view it as an attack vector. Bitcoin code is transparent and has lots of eyes on it. So in this case especially there isn’t even a solid accusation, let alone evidence that MIT directed nefarious code changes. If that was an allegation the first question should be: well what code specifically did MIT direct and what proof is there and how was it harmful? I think claims around this would collapse. There’s obviously plenty to criticize about Epstein and MIT working with him — and when it comes to digital assets MIT’s work with Gensler and especially its work on CBDCs is much more suspect than the chance that malicious code was pushed through on Bitcoin. Be cautious but this is a nothing burger

Bruce Fenton

231,796 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten