Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Bitcoin 101: What makes #bitcoin valuable? This is a great question that stumps many people, and it is somewhat confusing at first. How can a digital rock be worth $70,000 or one day even $7,000,000? Let me explain.

76,447 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Joe Burnett, MSBA
Joe Burnett, MSBA2 лет назад

If you liked this video, subscribe on YouTube for more: Thanks all!

Фото профиля AntiCanciller
AntiCanciller2 лет назад

Excelente video!

Фото профиля Marvin Gamero
Marvin Gamero2 лет назад

Cool explanation.

Фото профиля Sean ₿uckley
Sean ₿uckley2 лет назад

Hardest and best money ever

Фото профиля 🧡NEEDcreations is stacking sats & jamming to EDM
🧡NEEDcreations is stacking sats & jamming to EDM2 лет назад

Great and informative video!

Фото профиля Joe Burnett, MSBA
Joe Burnett, MSBA2 лет назад

Thank you!

Фото профиля giacolmo
giacolmo2 лет назад

good content

Фото профиля Pat Yoes
Pat Yoes2 лет назад

Joe, you bring out critical points about Bitcoin without getting lost in the details. People need to start out getting the main point then dyor. Bitcoin is money, the best money. We're at 1% adoption. Done 👍

Фото профиля Joe Burnett, MSBA
Joe Burnett, MSBA2 лет назад

Yep. It's simple. There may be many questions that stem from that, but that is the key idea that 99.99% haven't grasped quite yet.

Фото профиля Givepad
Givepad2 лет назад

The double coincidence of wants *is an economic phenomenon where two parties each hold an item that the other wants, so they exchange these items directly. 👏

Похожие видео

Did Epstein influence Bitcoin core development? Short answer: No. This is not how Bitcoin works. Here’s what happened: Epstein donated to MIT Media Lab…who in turn supported MIT Digital Currency Initiative…which in turn funded Bitcoin developers. These devs used to be funded by The Bitcoin Foundation (which I used to run as volunteer Executive Director) there are many devs and no dev or team had power or control over Bitcoin. Under MIT’s patronage the devs had the same deal they had with us at The Bitcoin Foundation: that they could work on the code and not have direction from the org. More importantly — how Bitcoin works is that *even if* a dev was compromised then the nodes and miners would still have to run that code to make it included in Bitcoin. So for example if I had somehow asked the devs paid by Bitcoin Foundation to “add 1000 coins for Bruce” 1) they wouldn’t have done this / it would have been counter to our agreement 2) no miners would run that code & no nodes would recognize it. It would be a laughing stock and completely rejected. Does this mean code dev is not an attack vector? No. It’s still a risk. Particularly with nation state style actors and very careful efforts to co-opt which are much more sophisticated than “give Bruce coins” or something. This is one reason I’m cautious of Bitcoin core funding - especially from actors who’ve had bad judgment in the past. I think we should be cautious of who does the dev and view it as an attack vector. Bitcoin code is transparent and has lots of eyes on it. So in this case especially there isn’t even a solid accusation, let alone evidence that MIT directed nefarious code changes. If that was an allegation the first question should be: well what code specifically did MIT direct and what proof is there and how was it harmful? I think claims around this would collapse. There’s obviously plenty to criticize about Epstein and MIT working with him — and when it comes to digital assets MIT’s work with Gensler and especially its work on CBDCs is much more suspect than the chance that malicious code was pushed through on Bitcoin. Be cautious but this is a nothing burger

Bruce Fenton

231,841 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад