Bitcoin: Dubious Speculation

Bro, Bitcoin has been “dubious speculation” for like 15 years now. At this point it’s either the longest scam in history or the slowest mispricing correction ever.

We don’t need to speculate Ben. We will put the most high reward, low risk probabilities in our favor. And win together 🏆

Thanks for the perspectives sir. I’m curious to hear your thoughts on the following. Setting technical analysis aside, there is a distinct nuance I’ve noticed that, to my knowledge, you haven’t covered in your videos: the comparison between BTC/USD and BTC/EUR charts In my view, this is a critical feature of this market. Even without mastering timing tracking based on Ichimoku and its Time Theory (the best system for the TIME imo), analyzing the BTC/EUR chart provides unique insights. For instance, looking back at the October 6th, 2025 top (the HTF chart structure for both FX charts), the behavior of the BTC/EUR chart clearly signaled that the upside potential was significantly limited than what the BTC/USD chart might have suggested

I hope 1 more drop and we can start to move up

every dip is "obvious" once someone puts a moving average under it

We have the same hairline Benjamin

What's the short version of this video in point form? @grok

51k is the end of the year highest probability

Unfortunately the dump we had / and the price we went back doesn't indicate (yet) the BTC buy back / re-enter.

This is my chill pill

👀

Always a question of what's behind the narrative. $13.4B in 24h volume and a +4%/yr funding rate tell a story of their own.

👌🏻👏🏻👍🏻🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷

When euphemisms target Bitcoin, risk appetite is peaking not bottoming.

What’s your opinion on @jasonpizzino view that #bitcoin may not make a new ATH in the next Bull Market?

I won't touch BTC for now. I am patiently waiting October and then I will start DCA unless we get a flush crash before.

Hawkish all the way

@ITC_Crypto @grok does Ben still think we bottom in Q4 of 2026

Your thoughts makes sense Ben

That's one perspective.

Liquidity still drives BTC more than ideology. When real yields rise and dollar funding tightens, marginal buyers step back fast. The clean read is not valuation, it is sponsorship: spot demand, ETF flows, and leverage appetite need to stay aligned.

☕️☕️🔥🔥

dubious speculation is just the retail version of a bull run waiting to happen. guess i'll keep my stop losses wide and my optimism wider.

@cryptolover288

Kardeeşşşş @cihan0xeth

Top Don at calling Bitcoin price movement in the market 👍. There will be another Alt-season man. It would help if you announce it too

VEAERO!! Just get paid bros

the conviction is proportional to video length this week

You are all being farmed BlackRock/IBIT is the regulated Wall Street wrapper. Strategy/Saylor is the largest corporate treasury plus the public signal layer. Put those together, and they may not control Bitcoin the protocol, but they can heavily influence the liquidity layer retail trades against. Bitcoin is decentralized at the protocol layer. But the market layer is a different beast. BlackRock/IBIT is the regulated Wall Street wrapper.Strategy/Saylor is the largest corporate treasury plus the public signal layer. One controls the institutional access pipe. The other controls the loudest treasury narrative in the market Together, they do not need to “control Bitcoin” to influence the liquidity layer. They can shape sentiment They can shape flows They can shape leverage behavior. They can shape where retail thinks safety is They can shape when panic looks like opportunity. Because retail does not get liquidated by Bitcoin’s whitepaper. Retail gets liquidated by leverage, flows, timing, narratives, and wicks. I don’t care if Saylor and Fink are friends. BlackRock/IBIT is the Wall Street wrapper. Strategy/Saylor is the corporate treasury signal layer. When those incentives align, retail needs to watch the liquidity layer, not their personal relationship. We have known for a long time that the $16k–$18k zone is a major protected structure layer. When BTC dominance drops hard toward the 40% area and the market breaks down, that lower BTC layer becomes the level everyone watches. That is where you fill bags. So when Saylor sold BTC around that zone and people called it tax strategy, fine. Maybe it was. But that also means he understood exactly where he was selling. That was not some random level. That was the deep structure layer. So now the question becomes fair: Was it just tax-loss harvesting? Or did he, and possibly others, understand the protected layer better than retail realized? Because if someone knows where the deepest liquidity sits, knows where retail gets liquidated, and has enough influence to move sentiment, then every “strategy” becomes a signal. Then a year later, we see another unusual dominance cycle while ETFs are being approved. That does not feel like normal old-cycle behavior. Maybe I am wrong. But if you knew ETFs were coming, and you wanted clients, friends, institutions, and treasury players positioned near the deepest BTC layer before the Wall Street wrapper arrived, that would be a very convenient time for it. Then BTC gets wrapped into the stock market through ETFs, treasury companies, preferred shares, leverage, and institutional products. At that point Bitcoin may still be decentralized at the protocol layer, but the market layer becomes a farm. BTC is Wall streets top players farm.