Bitget CEO: $350M Hack Very Likely Linked to North Korea On September 24, Bitget detected unauthorized transfers from several hot wallets. Bitget CEO Gracie Chen Gracy Chen @Bitget said the team identified IP addresses whose VPN usage patterns matched those associated with a specific DPRK-linked group, making a North... Korea connection “very likely.” She added that the attackers did not obtain private keys for Bitget’s hot, warm or cold wallets, but instead breached the exchange’s internal system and transferred funds directly. Bitget has previously said its user protection fund exceeds $464 million, which it says is sufficient to cover the loss.show more

@GracyBitget She thinks she is him, who's gonna tell her? 💀

@GracyBitget Not very likely, it is such.

@GracyBitget all leads to North Korea

@GracyBitget Any word on whether this involved the kind of AI-assisted social engineering we’ve seen targeting other firms? The human element will always be the hardest vulnerability to eliminate.

@GracyBitget $350m internal breach is a massive red flag for security protocols

@GracyBitget já vi exchange segurar investigação interna por 3 dias antes de admitir que foi invasão de sistema, não chave

@GracyBitget That's my girl

@GracyBitget This probably wasn't North Korea btw. Think about it logically. BitGet is a Chinese exchange. North Korea has close to ties to China. North Korea would not bite the hand that feeds them.

@GracyBitget 3.5亿美元黑客案还指向朝鲜，热钱包安全太吓人了😥 但落到代币交易还是得看流动性，Sync支持自由交易，卖出触发AMM sync+销毁，把卖压转成通缩，不做貔貅。

@GracyBitget 金将军今晚开香槟

@GracyBitget lazarus treating exchange hot wallets like their personal direct deposit again

@GracyBitget If DPRK is confirmed, expect a long laundering tail. The ~68k ETH will get chopped through bridges for weeks.

@GracyBitget That’s not good at all 😢

@GracyBitget Thanks, Stay vigilant

@GracyBitget Very likely" là cách nói mơ hợp để tạo sự chú ý. Nếu bằng chứng thực sự rõ ràng thì đã dùng từ mạnh hơn. 🤔

@GracyBitget 臭婊子

@GracyBitget Polygraph yourself and prove it.

@GracyBitget Ví nào cũng không thoát được nhóm này.

@GracyBitget This is not new, why always got hacked are we not learned from the fast mistake by other exchanger like @Bybit_Official crypto security is concerning tbh if it's easy to get hack, or this is just a 🍿🎥 😆

@GracyBitget

@GracyBitget If it is Lazarus again, that's Bybit and now Bitget in under two years. They've clearly figured out the signing pipeline is softer than the keys.

@GracyBitget 监守自盗监守自盗

@GracyBitget 北边黑客手法越来越离谱了这谁敢存钱啊

@GracyBitget A $350M breach is a serious reminder that exchange security goes beyond protecting private keys. The internal-system compromise makes strong access controls and monitoring critical. 🔐⚠️

@GracyBitget yeah that ip pattern is pretty damning tbh

@GracyBitget A useful lead, but I’d keep the attribution provisional until the investigation is complete. Bitget’s public wording still centers on unauthorized transfers and an ongoing review, so the report should distinguish evidence from conclusion.

@GracyBitget The $464M+ protection fund matters, but the bigger lesson is operational security. You can have secure cold storage and still have a massive incident if the systems controlling hot wallet transfers are compromised.

@GracyBitget vụ hack thật đáng lo ngại đấy