Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Blanche’s Top 5 DOJ highlights: -Botched the Epstein files. -Created Jan. 6 fund. -Granted Trump IRS immunity. -Charged Seashells “threat,” Sandwich “assault” and Reflecting pool “vandalism.” -Fired career public servants. And Republicans confirmed him.
12,825 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen •via X (Twitter)
0 Kommentare
Keine Kommentare verfügbar
Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt
Ähnliche Videos
13:08
Sensitive content
🚨MUST WATCH: Candace Owens Reacts To The News That Pam Bondi Was FIRED; But NOT For The Reason You May Think— Epstein Is Still ALIVE! 🤯 If you thought Pam Bondi was fired because she fumbled the Epstein files, think again. Candace Owens just peeled back the curtain on the real drama at the DOJ, and it’s a masterclass in petty elite infighting and "sleazy" loyalty tests. Don't be fooled by the public narrative. Candace is clear: Bondi and Trump were on the same team regarding the Epstein files. They protected those files together. "Pam Bondi was doing as she was instructed to do... by Trump’s orbit of friends who are all in the Epstein files." And the kicker? Jeffrey Epstein is alive. Candace reveals that the "suicide" video released over Christmas was a deepfake that got clocked and scrubbed. The exclusive photos? All part of an Israeli operation involving the New York Post to get him out. The Real Motive: The Swalwell Tip-Off So why is she actually out? Loyalty. Trump reportedly believes Bondi intervened and tipped off Eric Swalwell regarding the FBI investigation into his relationship with Chinese spy Christine Fang. In Trump's world, you either "worship the ground he walks on" or you're out. Bondi’s failure to be a 100% "loyal dog" on the Swalwell matter outweighed her protection of the Epstein circle. Trump is replacing her with Todd Blanche, but don't expect a "white knight." Candace warns that the goal isn't to "do the right thing"—it’s to find someone who is a better dog and will attack on command. The Verdict: The elites ruling us are "deranged and disgusting." The firing isn't a victory for justice; it’s a personnel shift in a "tremendously fake" system where everyone is compromised post-Epstein. 🏗️⚔️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below. 👇
Project Constitution
232,898 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten
![🚨 BREAKING: Trump DOJ official caught on tape calling conservative parents “terrorists” over email demanding accountability In a stunning leaked recording, a top legal adviser to Acting AG Todd Blanche - former judge Vance Day - referred to conservative parents as "terrorists" and declared: "We don't negotiate with terrorists." The remark was made in response to a December 23rd email from parents demanding action by January 15th to address alleged DOJ inaction and misconduct. The email, described by insiders as a "desperate plea" for accountability, was instead interpreted by DOJ officials as a threat. That label was directed at a group of conservative parents pushing U.S. Department of Justice to investigate what they say is ongoing government weaponization against families, whistleblowers, and dissidents. They were later warned not to go public or they would “suffer consequences.” According to sources, following that meeting (which referenced an active investigation) DOJ officials blocked further action after removing Eagle Ed Martin, former head of the DOJ’s Weaponization Group. A White House source confirmed: “Todd Blanche didn’t tell the White House he was removing Ed [Martin] from the Weaponization Group,” - despite President Donald J. Trump Trump personally appointing him. Kelly Walker joined Emerald Robinson to expose what he called internal sabotage against conservative parents: “This isn’t a threat, it’s reality. Angry parents will show up. We’ve begged DOJ and the Trump administration to act… Parents have taken their own lives.” Kelly J Walker’s FreedomTalk also revealed DOJ leadership told him directly: “Don’t expect any justice from DOJ… You can sue if you want to.” As Blanche faces mounting scrutiny, the deeper concern is this: Biden-era holdovers and entrenched insiders are rotting the DOJ from the inside - sabotaging Trump’s agenda while hiding in plain sight.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2019057884689318291/amplify_video_thumb/2019057744641482752/img/k1gXnnUKgCV52iP9.jpg)
![Failure To Release Epstein Files “Could Cost Us The Majority,” Worry Republicans “The people telling the president he could stop this [legislation] gave him awful advice,” says member of Congress Many in the MAGA movement responded with outrage and upset last July, following President Trump’s declaration in a cabinet meeting, and in subsequent social media posts, that there was nothing of importance in the large number of Jeffrey Epstein files that the FBI and Department of Justice are still holding. Those files allegedly include the names of individuals who participated in or were trapped in a sex blackmail operation tied to the US Intelligence Community, the CIA, and Israeli intelligence. Now, Rep. Thomas Massie’s (R-Ky.) is close to gathering a final needed 218th signature on a “discharge petition,” which would require a vote on the H.R.4405 - Epstein Files Transparency Act. That Act would mandate the FBI and Justice Department release the Epstein files as early as next month. The legislation explicitly states that personal embarrassment is not a reason for the FBI or DOJ to withhold documents from the public. “This vote is coming,” a Republican member of Congress told Public, “and it will pass the House with flying colors. This is inevitable. The people telling the president he could stop this gave him awful advice.” All of the individuals who spoke to Public were Republicans, and several suggested they feared the impact of the White House’s strategy on their party. “This is sucking the air out of the room and taking attention away from the other great things the administration is doing,” one member of the Republican conference said. Said another, “This is the behavior that could cost us the majority.” These comments were made to Public before the release of an interview with a former Justice Department investigator who claimed, to an undercover reporter working with James O’Keefe, that former President Bill Clinton was on Epstein’s plane when girls were being raped, and that Epstein worked for both the CIA and the Israeli government. In response to a query from Public, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said, “Democrats and the media knew about Epstein and his victims for years and did nothing to help them while President Trump was calling for transparency, and is now delivering on it with thousands of pages of documents as part of the ongoing Oversight investigation.” It is possible that the Files do not contain any significant new information. FBI Director Kash Patel last week told the Senate that he had no evidence that Epstein was trafficking women for anyone other than himself. And some journalists have pointed out inconsistencies in claims made by alleged Epstein victims. But if there is nothing of significance in the Epstein Files, then it is not clear why the Trump administration has sought to prevent their release. The explanation from the Trump administration for why the files can’t be released has shifted. Patel told Congress that the Epstein files were constrained by limited search warrants from 2006 to 2007, and that non-prosecution agreements hindered future investigations. However, those constraints only apply to the Southern District of Florida, not to the Southern District of New York. Epstein had homes in both states. In the hearing, Rep. Massie said he had evidence that the FBI had documents naming at least 20 men, including Jess Staley, CEO of Barclay’s Bank, and a “Hollywood producer worth a few hundred million dollars, one royal prince, one high profile individual in the music industry, one very prominent banker, one high profile government official, one high profile former politician, one owner of a car company in Italy, one rock star, one magician, at least six billionaires.” In August, the New York Times published photographs showing two hidden surveillance cameras in Epstein’s New York apartment. One of them pointed at a bed in a bedroom. Republicans and Democrats alike panned FBI Director Kash Patel’s testimony relating to Epstein last week. “Patel either doesn’t have operational control over this or he does and is using terms of art like ‘credible evidence’ to get around it,” said a House member. Earlier this month, Republicans on the House Rules Committee rejected an effort to put the Epstein Files Transparency Act to a floor vote. And, notes Axios, House Speaker Mike Johnson has, in the past, “tucked language in party-line procedural measures to kill” past petitions, and could try to do so again. But Johnson “faced blowback when he employed the tactic” last spring, said Axios, and the House Rules Committee Chair told reporters that her panel would not block a floor vote on the petition. According to another Republican member of Congress, “The members who voted against [allowing a vote on the Epstein Files bill] got hammered back home and were pissed. They don’t want to take a ‘no’ vote again.” In response, “West Wing staffers” at the White House have been aggressively demanding and threatening the handful of Republican Congressmembers who have joined Massie in signing the discharge opinion.... Please subscribe now to support Public's independent investigative journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1970987084233179208/amplify_video_thumb/1970986265664430080/img/RdUcozf-_pkLmHjm.jpg)
