Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Body language breakdown: Neither guy showing anything unusual, both seem comfortable, expect war or Ank KO #UFC320

Kenny Okoye🇳🇬

20,104 subscribers

413,952 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung Sport #UFC320

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Body Language Breakdown: Both guys seemingly very confident with this intense stare down, expect nothing but WAR #NocheUFC

Body Language Breakdown: Both guys seemingly very confident with this intense stare down, expect nothing but WAR #NocheUFC

Kenny Okoye🇳🇬

68,787 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Body Language Breakdown: Both guys exuding confidence, Usman not giving an inch, Buckley showing respect THIS WILL BE A WAR‼️🙏🏾

Body Language Breakdown: Both guys exuding confidence, Usman not giving an inch, Buckley showing respect THIS WILL BE A WAR‼️🙏🏾

Kenny Okoye🇳🇬

298,353 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇺🇸🇷🇺 BODY LANGUAGE EXPERT: PUTIN SMILED GENUINELY, TRUMP SHOWED REAL WARMTH "Neither of them is doing anything too overt. It’s all very subtle. Both seem to have really positive intentions. They came in, based on the body language, they both want a deal. And they both respected one another. The smiles again, you can see that they're genuine smiles by both sides… It shows the old buddies. Trump tap[ped] him on the back of the hand. To me, that wasn’t a sign of dominance… just trying to continue to show warmth." Dr. G Explains

🇺🇸🇷🇺 BODY LANGUAGE EXPERT: PUTIN SMILED GENUINELY, TRUMP SHOWED REAL WARMTH "Neither of them is doing anything too overt. It’s all very subtle. Both seem to have really positive intentions. They came in, based on the body language, they both want a deal. And they both respected one another. The smiles again, you can see that they're genuine smiles by both sides… It shows the old buddies. Trump tap[ped] him on the back of the hand. To me, that wasn’t a sign of dominance… just trying to continue to show warmth." Dr. G Explains

Mario Nawfal

54,601 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Secretary of State Marco Rubio says “both sides are going to have to make concessions” to reach a peace deal and end the war in Ukraine, telling Margaret Brennan: “If there aren't concessions, if one side gets everything they want, that's called surrender. That's called the end of the war through surrender. And that's not what we're close to doing, because neither side here is on the verge of surrender or anything close to it.”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio says “both sides are going to have to make concessions” to reach a peace deal and end the war in Ukraine, telling Margaret Brennan: “If there aren't concessions, if one side gets everything they want, that's called surrender. That's called the end of the war through surrender. And that's not what we're close to doing, because neither side here is on the verge of surrender or anything close to it.”

Face The Nation

27,673 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨 Body language experts just confirmed Donald Trump is CRUSHING IT on the world stage with President Xi! "Body language experts say Trump showed gravitas and stayed focused: 'I think that Trump feels the power, feels like this is a formidable meeting. He is not intimidated by Xi at all. He's showing kind of like a peacock or a lion. He's showing his power.'" "It was a long handshake. Both men stood still, no one leaned in. Who won? Some call it a draw, but Xi did release first. Then Trump hit him with a little pat on the back. Body language experts say that was a POWER MOVE." "The fashion police noticed that POTUS rocked a red tie, which experts say aligned visually with the dominant ceremonial palette of China." "Xi even had his musicians play an instrumental version of the YMCA!" — Jesse Watters

🚨 Body language experts just confirmed Donald Trump is CRUSHING IT on the world stage with President Xi! "Body language experts say Trump showed gravitas and stayed focused: 'I think that Trump feels the power, feels like this is a formidable meeting. He is not intimidated by Xi at all. He's showing kind of like a peacock or a lion. He's showing his power.'" "It was a long handshake. Both men stood still, no one leaned in. Who won? Some call it a draw, but Xi did release first. Then Trump hit him with a little pat on the back. Body language experts say that was a POWER MOVE." "The fashion police noticed that POTUS rocked a red tie, which experts say aligned visually with the dominant ceremonial palette of China." "Xi even had his musicians play an instrumental version of the YMCA!" — Jesse Watters

Eric Daugherty

59,190 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🇺🇦🇷🇺 "ZELENSKY IS JUST A PUPPET OF THE PRO-WAR AGENDA" Whether we're thinking about the prospect of a Ukraine ceasefire or the strikes that just occurred on Putin's properties, Larry Johnson believes you have to look far beyond anything Zelensky says to glean anything meaningful about the war's trajectory. "What we need to know is who's pulling the strings on Zelensky. He is not Vladimir Lenin. He's not a Joseph Stalin. He's not the guy who always wanted to lead Ukraine, that he was a political genius. I mean, he was tabbed to do this by Kolomoisky initially. So I describe Zelensky as the highest-paid actor in the world right now, if not in history. His job has been to keep the money flowing into Ukraine. The minimum that can be proven is $48 billion has been pilfered. There are a lot of people who have been paid off in that process. Zelensky, though, is expendable. And that's what I think is lingering in the back of his mind. He's still trying to stay relevant. The fact that he talked about Putin perishing. That's not unusual in war. But what is unusual is that they have Zelensky in Mar-a-Lago. That meeting with Trump ended at 4.30 yesterday. That means the attack on the Putin residents was already underway." Former CIA analyst, Larry Johnson

🇺🇦🇷🇺 "ZELENSKY IS JUST A PUPPET OF THE PRO-WAR AGENDA" Whether we're thinking about the prospect of a Ukraine ceasefire or the strikes that just occurred on Putin's properties, Larry Johnson believes you have to look far beyond anything Zelensky says to glean anything meaningful about the war's trajectory. "What we need to know is who's pulling the strings on Zelensky. He is not Vladimir Lenin. He's not a Joseph Stalin. He's not the guy who always wanted to lead Ukraine, that he was a political genius. I mean, he was tabbed to do this by Kolomoisky initially. So I describe Zelensky as the highest-paid actor in the world right now, if not in history. His job has been to keep the money flowing into Ukraine. The minimum that can be proven is $48 billion has been pilfered. There are a lot of people who have been paid off in that process. Zelensky, though, is expendable. And that's what I think is lingering in the back of his mind. He's still trying to stay relevant. The fact that he talked about Putin perishing. That's not unusual in war. But what is unusual is that they have Zelensky in Mar-a-Lago. That meeting with Trump ended at 4.30 yesterday. That means the attack on the Putin residents was already underway." Former CIA analyst, Larry Johnson

Mario Nawfal

30,298 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸 SEATTLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS TEACHES KINDERGARTENERS THEY CAN BE TRANSGENDER VIA TEDDY BEAR STORY This is what your tax dollars fund. Since 2017, Seattle Public Schools has offered K-5 lessons on gender identity, starting with kindergarteners. Five-year-olds are shown a video of a book called "Introducing Teddy," where a teddy bear announces: "In my heart, I've always known that I'm a girl teddy, not a boy teddy. I wish my name was Tilly, not Thomas." The lesson defines "gender" for kindergarteners as "a person's feeling about being either a boy or a girl, neither, both, or somewhere in between." First graders read "Princess Boy" with instructions for teachers to avoid gender-specific language. These are five and six-year-olds. They're learning to tie their shoes and count to twenty. They don't need adults planting questions about whether they were "born in the wrong body." This isn't inclusion. It's indoctrination of children too young to understand what's being suggested to them. Source: Libs of TikTok

🚨🇺🇸 SEATTLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS TEACHES KINDERGARTENERS THEY CAN BE TRANSGENDER VIA TEDDY BEAR STORY This is what your tax dollars fund. Since 2017, Seattle Public Schools has offered K-5 lessons on gender identity, starting with kindergarteners. Five-year-olds are shown a video of a book called "Introducing Teddy," where a teddy bear announces: "In my heart, I've always known that I'm a girl teddy, not a boy teddy. I wish my name was Tilly, not Thomas." The lesson defines "gender" for kindergarteners as "a person's feeling about being either a boy or a girl, neither, both, or somewhere in between." First graders read "Princess Boy" with instructions for teachers to avoid gender-specific language. These are five and six-year-olds. They're learning to tie their shoes and count to twenty. They don't need adults planting questions about whether they were "born in the wrong body." This isn't inclusion. It's indoctrination of children too young to understand what's being suggested to them. Source: Libs of TikTok

Mario Nawfal

18,441 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The ceasefire expires tomorrow and the situation couldn’t be more fragile. The U.S. has spent the past few days seizing and boarding Iranian ships, which Iran has calls a violation, warning it will respond. They are also saying there will be no further talks until the U.S. Navy leaves the region, just as U.S. representatives are ready to sit down in Islamabad. Trump has made clear that if no deal is reached by tomorrow, U.S. strikes on Iranian infrastructure are back on the table. Bridges. Power plants. And who knows what else. Both sides seem convinced the other has broken the ceasefire, the strait remains a problem, and Iran hasn’t confirmed it’s showing up to talk at all. A deal, an extension, or a resumption of war: one of those three happens within 24 hours. Stay tuned. Source: Beyond GeoQuest YT

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The ceasefire expires tomorrow and the situation couldn’t be more fragile. The U.S. has spent the past few days seizing and boarding Iranian ships, which Iran has calls a violation, warning it will respond. They are also saying there will be no further talks until the U.S. Navy leaves the region, just as U.S. representatives are ready to sit down in Islamabad. Trump has made clear that if no deal is reached by tomorrow, U.S. strikes on Iranian infrastructure are back on the table. Bridges. Power plants. And who knows what else. Both sides seem convinced the other has broken the ceasefire, the strait remains a problem, and Iran hasn’t confirmed it’s showing up to talk at all. A deal, an extension, or a resumption of war: one of those three happens within 24 hours. Stay tuned. Source: Beyond GeoQuest YT

Mario Nawfal

351,165 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Krishnan Guru-Murthy, "As we speak tonight.. Israel has hit a school, a hospital, a food distribution centre, its fired on UN troops, and is said to be considering starving northern Gaza.. Should there be any red lines for Britain's political support of Israel?" Emily Thornberry, "Israel has the right to defend itself.. Within the confines of international law.. And proportionate.. All civilian life is equal" KGM, "That policy isn't working... Is there anything Israel can do which would mean Britain's political and diplomatic support for Israel should be withdrawn?" ET, "The question I think should be asked, how do we get this to stop.. I'm not interested in gestures.. I want invasion of Lebanon to stop.. A ceasefire in Gaza.. Not cutting off the top third of Gaza which looks like Israel general plans are" KGM, "Do you agree that would be a war crime if northern Gaza is starved?" ET, "It is a war crime to forcibly move a population from one part of a country to another.. It is a war crime to starve people.. Any war crimes should go before the courts.. There are war crimes on both sides.. By Hamas.. By Iran" "The European Union has been right to condemn Israel attacking UN in Lebanon" Disappointing Emily Thornberry you were able to say Iran and Hamas commit war crimes but were unable to say Israel has as well - From your body language it's obvious what you think, but you can't say it. It's almost as if you're a hostage unable to speak your mind, when you're actually the chair of our Foreign Affairs Committee, but can't express yourself - sad for us as a country and sad for the people of Gaza and Lebanon who continue to suffer

Krishnan Guru-Murthy, "As we speak tonight.. Israel has hit a school, a hospital, a food distribution centre, its fired on UN troops, and is said to be considering starving northern Gaza.. Should there be any red lines for Britain's political support of Israel?" Emily Thornberry, "Israel has the right to defend itself.. Within the confines of international law.. And proportionate.. All civilian life is equal" KGM, "That policy isn't working... Is there anything Israel can do which would mean Britain's political and diplomatic support for Israel should be withdrawn?" ET, "The question I think should be asked, how do we get this to stop.. I'm not interested in gestures.. I want invasion of Lebanon to stop.. A ceasefire in Gaza.. Not cutting off the top third of Gaza which looks like Israel general plans are" KGM, "Do you agree that would be a war crime if northern Gaza is starved?" ET, "It is a war crime to forcibly move a population from one part of a country to another.. It is a war crime to starve people.. Any war crimes should go before the courts.. There are war crimes on both sides.. By Hamas.. By Iran" "The European Union has been right to condemn Israel attacking UN in Lebanon" Disappointing Emily Thornberry you were able to say Iran and Hamas commit war crimes but were unable to say Israel has as well - From your body language it's obvious what you think, but you can't say it. It's almost as if you're a hostage unable to speak your mind, when you're actually the chair of our Foreign Affairs Committee, but can't express yourself - sad for us as a country and sad for the people of Gaza and Lebanon who continue to suffer

Farrukh

317,305 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The verses in "All Out" and "Victory" are both Makaveli's and Biggie's last verses that they ever recorded. They both went out with a bang and executed three incredible verses. Ironically, they both dissed each other in their last songs; Makaveli did it while Biggie was still alive, but Biggie subliminally dissed him in the track "Victory" after his death. That Vic guy, aka the guy who put 50 Cent in the same tier as Pac lyrically, claimed that Makaveli could never write a verse like Biggie's "Victory" verses in a million years. He highlighted Biggie's film references; yes, movie references, wordplay, and a few other things. I can tell you right now that "All Out" clears these Biggie verses when it comes to motif, wordplay, and overall literary device mastery, and he's doing it with more depth/substance, which is generally more difficult to do. Overall, it's more complex than Biggie's verses. The average listener does not understand how deep Makaveli got into his literary device bag in this verse and how well he's using each device. He was very sneaky with it, and he hid things in plain sight. I'll give you an example of what I'm referring to. He's making figurative language appear to be non-figurative at face value, but when you look beyond the surface, it's not. The average listener doesn't have a high understanding of his poetry, and the false narratives make it even harder for them to elevate their understanding because they're severely brainwashed by them. A lot of so-called 2Pac fans are not true students of him and his work, and that has to do with false narratives. Let's remove names, narratives, bias, and personal agendas and only focus on what's being displayed. Let's examine the lyrics on paper closely, carefully, and objectively and breakdown what they're both doing lyrically overall. This has absolutely nothing to do with flow or anything related to the vocal performance of either artist; this is strictly about the lyrics on paper. This doesn't even have anything to do with which track is better or if you like either song by either artist; it's strictly about what they're doing lyrically on paper. I challenge the dope technician Rapsody , “SAMURAI DX” & “SAMURAI” OUT NOW! , the suspect 2Pac fan J. Cole and the fake 2Pac fan Joe Budden to get deep into the details with me. I challenge only serious individuals to get deep into the details with me. I have time. Sidenote: Both Biggie and 2Pac were great poets.

The verses in "All Out" and "Victory" are both Makaveli's and Biggie's last verses that they ever recorded. They both went out with a bang and executed three incredible verses. Ironically, they both dissed each other in their last songs; Makaveli did it while Biggie was still alive, but Biggie subliminally dissed him in the track "Victory" after his death. That Vic guy, aka the guy who put 50 Cent in the same tier as Pac lyrically, claimed that Makaveli could never write a verse like Biggie's "Victory" verses in a million years. He highlighted Biggie's film references; yes, movie references, wordplay, and a few other things. I can tell you right now that "All Out" clears these Biggie verses when it comes to motif, wordplay, and overall literary device mastery, and he's doing it with more depth/substance, which is generally more difficult to do. Overall, it's more complex than Biggie's verses. The average listener does not understand how deep Makaveli got into his literary device bag in this verse and how well he's using each device. He was very sneaky with it, and he hid things in plain sight. I'll give you an example of what I'm referring to. He's making figurative language appear to be non-figurative at face value, but when you look beyond the surface, it's not. The average listener doesn't have a high understanding of his poetry, and the false narratives make it even harder for them to elevate their understanding because they're severely brainwashed by them. A lot of so-called 2Pac fans are not true students of him and his work, and that has to do with false narratives. Let's remove names, narratives, bias, and personal agendas and only focus on what's being displayed. Let's examine the lyrics on paper closely, carefully, and objectively and breakdown what they're both doing lyrically overall. This has absolutely nothing to do with flow or anything related to the vocal performance of either artist; this is strictly about the lyrics on paper. This doesn't even have anything to do with which track is better or if you like either song by either artist; it's strictly about what they're doing lyrically on paper. I challenge the dope technician Rapsody , “SAMURAI DX” & “SAMURAI” OUT NOW! , the suspect 2Pac fan J. Cole and the fake 2Pac fan Joe Budden to get deep into the details with me. I challenge only serious individuals to get deep into the details with me. I have time. Sidenote: Both Biggie and 2Pac were great poets.

9-FO Tha Negus

23,381 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🌍 SERBS AND POLES: DIFFERENT COUNTRIES, SAME SLAVIC ROOTS 🇷🇸🇵🇱🇨🇿🇸🇰🇭🇷🇸🇮🇧🇬🇲🇰🇷🇺🇧🇾🇺🇦🇧🇦🇲🇪 A viral video recorded in Belgrade has sparked a wider discussion about Slavic identity after a Serbian and a Polish speaker compared everyday words — and discovered how similar their languages still are. Words such as rzeka/reka (river), nos (nose), pas/pojas (belt), and niebo/nebo (sky) differ only slightly in spelling or pronunciation. Linguists say this is no coincidence. Serbian and Polish both belong to the Slavic language family, which originates from Proto-Slavic, spoken over 1,500 years ago. Shared origin, documented history According to historical and linguistic research, the Slavs began expanding across Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe between the 5th and 7th centuries. Over time, different groups formed what we now call: • West Slavs – Poles, Czechs, Slovaks • South Slavs – Serbs, Croats, Slovenes, Bulgarians • East Slavs – Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians Despite later political borders and religious divisions (Catholic, Orthodox, Uniate), the core linguistic structure remains strikingly similar. Studies show Slavic languages retain 60–80% lexical similarity, far higher than between most European language families. Linguistic proof Modern linguistics confirms that Serbian and Polish share: • Similar grammar cases • Nearly identical verb structures • Shared roots for basic words (body parts, nature, family terms) • Parallel sentence construction This is why speakers can often understand each other without formal study — a phenomenon called passive mutual intelligibility. Historical parallels Both nations experienced long periods of foreign domination: • Poland was partitioned by Prussia, Austria and Russia in the 18th century • Serbia spent centuries under Ottoman rule • Both suffered devastating losses in World War II • Both faced pressure from external powers during the Cold War Historians frequently note the parallel political trajectories of Slavic nations — fighting for sovereignty, cultural survival and independence. A deeper identity While modern Europe classifies Slavs into separate sub-groups, anthropologists emphasize that these divisions are recent in historical terms. From a civilizational perspective, Poles and Serbs descend from the same early Slavic tribes that later branched out geographically. That shared origin explains: • Language similarities • Cultural patterns • Folk traditions • Collective historical memory Why this matters today In an era of geopolitical division, this viral clip reminds people of something older than modern politics: shared roots and shared heritage. Not ideology. Not alliances. But history. 👇 Question to our audience: How do you say river, sky, nose, belt in your Slavic language? Write it below and show how deep this connection goes. — 🔔 Follow Slavic Networks for independent coverage Nirali VVeles SlavicFreeSpirit #SlavicWorld #PanSlavic #SlavicIdentity #Serbia #Poland #SlavicLanguages #History #CulturalRoots #SlavicNetworks

🌍 SERBS AND POLES: DIFFERENT COUNTRIES, SAME SLAVIC ROOTS 🇷🇸🇵🇱🇨🇿🇸🇰🇭🇷🇸🇮🇧🇬🇲🇰🇷🇺🇧🇾🇺🇦🇧🇦🇲🇪 A viral video recorded in Belgrade has sparked a wider discussion about Slavic identity after a Serbian and a Polish speaker compared everyday words — and discovered how similar their languages still are. Words such as rzeka/reka (river), nos (nose), pas/pojas (belt), and niebo/nebo (sky) differ only slightly in spelling or pronunciation. Linguists say this is no coincidence. Serbian and Polish both belong to the Slavic language family, which originates from Proto-Slavic, spoken over 1,500 years ago. Shared origin, documented history According to historical and linguistic research, the Slavs began expanding across Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe between the 5th and 7th centuries. Over time, different groups formed what we now call: • West Slavs – Poles, Czechs, Slovaks • South Slavs – Serbs, Croats, Slovenes, Bulgarians • East Slavs – Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians Despite later political borders and religious divisions (Catholic, Orthodox, Uniate), the core linguistic structure remains strikingly similar. Studies show Slavic languages retain 60–80% lexical similarity, far higher than between most European language families. Linguistic proof Modern linguistics confirms that Serbian and Polish share: • Similar grammar cases • Nearly identical verb structures • Shared roots for basic words (body parts, nature, family terms) • Parallel sentence construction This is why speakers can often understand each other without formal study — a phenomenon called passive mutual intelligibility. Historical parallels Both nations experienced long periods of foreign domination: • Poland was partitioned by Prussia, Austria and Russia in the 18th century • Serbia spent centuries under Ottoman rule • Both suffered devastating losses in World War II • Both faced pressure from external powers during the Cold War Historians frequently note the parallel political trajectories of Slavic nations — fighting for sovereignty, cultural survival and independence. A deeper identity While modern Europe classifies Slavs into separate sub-groups, anthropologists emphasize that these divisions are recent in historical terms. From a civilizational perspective, Poles and Serbs descend from the same early Slavic tribes that later branched out geographically. That shared origin explains: • Language similarities • Cultural patterns • Folk traditions • Collective historical memory Why this matters today In an era of geopolitical division, this viral clip reminds people of something older than modern politics: shared roots and shared heritage. Not ideology. Not alliances. But history. 👇 Question to our audience: How do you say river, sky, nose, belt in your Slavic language? Write it below and show how deep this connection goes. — 🔔 Follow Slavic Networks for independent coverage Nirali VVeles SlavicFreeSpirit #SlavicWorld #PanSlavic #SlavicIdentity #Serbia #Poland #SlavicLanguages #History #CulturalRoots #SlavicNetworks

Slavic Networks

30,758 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Chris Cuomo says neither Trump/Harris are gonna save us: “We’re doing what’s easy and cheap and getting drowned in division and fear.” “I realize now Trump, Harris, no politician, no party, no one’s going to save you.” “Howard Beale was right, you cannot put fate in the hands of the system or political party or politician. The only thing that can make things different in America is bottom power from the people.” If either Trump or Harris get elected in 2024, not much will change. The media will make it seem like the world will end if their candidate doesn’t get in, but in reality not much will change. Even if RFK is elected, at the national level a lot will change but your life in reality probably won’t change very much. That’s because one person can only do so much. Trump/Harris will both just let the Uniparty thrive in DC and RFK can only do so much to change DC and the change he enacts will be at a national level not local. If we want real change we need to make the change happen in our communities. A thousands communities throughout the nation being changed through more people getting involved locally/statewide will have more affect than almost anything our politicians do at a national level. We have the power to change the system, we just have to put in the effort to use it.

Chris Cuomo says neither Trump/Harris are gonna save us: “We’re doing what’s easy and cheap and getting drowned in division and fear.” “I realize now Trump, Harris, no politician, no party, no one’s going to save you.” “Howard Beale was right, you cannot put fate in the hands of the system or political party or politician. The only thing that can make things different in America is bottom power from the people.” If either Trump or Harris get elected in 2024, not much will change. The media will make it seem like the world will end if their candidate doesn’t get in, but in reality not much will change. Even if RFK is elected, at the national level a lot will change but your life in reality probably won’t change very much. That’s because one person can only do so much. Trump/Harris will both just let the Uniparty thrive in DC and RFK can only do so much to change DC and the change he enacts will be at a national level not local. If we want real change we need to make the change happen in our communities. A thousands communities throughout the nation being changed through more people getting involved locally/statewide will have more affect than almost anything our politicians do at a national level. We have the power to change the system, we just have to put in the effort to use it.

End Tribalism in Politics

113,166 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

On this day, 57 years ago, Luis Buñuel's "The Milky Way" (1969) was released in Italy. Luis Buñuel on the theme of the movie & the conflicting reactions it created: "Despite the difficulty of the subject, the public seemed to like the film, thanks largely to Silberman's superlative public relations work. Like 'Nazarin' (1959), however, it provoked conflicting reactions. Carlos Fuentes saw it as an antireligious war movie, while Julio Cortázar went so far as to suggest that the Vatican must have put up the money for it. These arguments over intention leave me finally indifferent, since in my opinion 'The Milky Way' is neither for nor against anything at all. Besides the situation itself and the authentic doctrinal dispute it evokes, the film is above all a journey through fanaticism, where each person obstinately clings to his own particle of truth, ready if need be to kill or to die for it. The road traveled by the two pilgrims can represent, finally, any political or even aesthetic ideology. Just after the movie opened in Copenhagen (in French, with Danish subtitles), a caravan of gypsies-men, women, and children who spoke neither Danish nor French drove up to the theatre, and everyone piled out and bought tickets. They returned several days in a row to see the movie, until finally, beside himself with curiosity, the owner of the theatre did his best to find out why they kept coming back. He tried several times to ask them, but since he didn't speak their language, they couldn't communicate. In the end, he let them in free." ("My Last Breath", Luis Buñuel, translated by Abigail Israel, 1983)

On this day, 57 years ago, Luis Buñuel's "The Milky Way" (1969) was released in Italy. Luis Buñuel on the theme of the movie & the conflicting reactions it created: "Despite the difficulty of the subject, the public seemed to like the film, thanks largely to Silberman's superlative public relations work. Like 'Nazarin' (1959), however, it provoked conflicting reactions. Carlos Fuentes saw it as an antireligious war movie, while Julio Cortázar went so far as to suggest that the Vatican must have put up the money for it. These arguments over intention leave me finally indifferent, since in my opinion 'The Milky Way' is neither for nor against anything at all. Besides the situation itself and the authentic doctrinal dispute it evokes, the film is above all a journey through fanaticism, where each person obstinately clings to his own particle of truth, ready if need be to kill or to die for it. The road traveled by the two pilgrims can represent, finally, any political or even aesthetic ideology. Just after the movie opened in Copenhagen (in French, with Danish subtitles), a caravan of gypsies-men, women, and children who spoke neither Danish nor French drove up to the theatre, and everyone piled out and bought tickets. They returned several days in a row to see the movie, until finally, beside himself with curiosity, the owner of the theatre did his best to find out why they kept coming back. He tried several times to ask them, but since he didn't speak their language, they couldn't communicate. In the end, he let them in free." ("My Last Breath", Luis Buñuel, translated by Abigail Israel, 1983)

DepressedBergman

31,589 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

‘I’m Junho’ includes actor, singer & 2PM…everything in one. Owning his roots and his growth, all of it is #LeeJunho: 🙎🏻‍♀️After TRS, u filmed a variety show, & u greeted like, ‘Hello, I’m 2PM Junho,’ even though u were there as ‘actor Junho.’ Was that habit, or did u want both identities? What do you use/say today? 🐧I’m Lee Junho 🙎🏻‍♀️Actor, singer, 2PM, it’s all included in ‘Lee Junho.’ 🐧Yes. So back then, it was really good timing to proudly say where I came from. Because ‘My House’ went viral again, it became good momentum for 2PM’s comeback. So I thought, ‘This is the best timing.’ Also, more people, especially younger gen, didn’t even know I was a singer anymore. So I wanted to say: ‘I started as 2PM, & I’m still 2PM.’ And to new teen fans: ‘Yes, your oppa used to be in 2PM🤣’ These days we’re already into 5th gen, so liking a 2nd gen group might seem a bit unusual, but still… that’s who we were. We were that kind of group. After that, I’m really grateful that people came to recognize both sides of me. So now I feel much more comfortable, rather than ‘singer,’ ‘actor,’ or ‘2PM,’ I just say, ‘Lee Junho.’ I’m Lee Junho. These days I tend to talk more about Lee Junho the person. Even within myself, the boundaries or distinctions. Things I didn’t do before because I worried people might judge me based on where I came from, I’ve let all of that go now. Honestly, I feel proud of that. And these days, there are so many actors like me. One of the reasons I decided to start a new company was because I wanted there to be more artists/entertainers like me to exist. Right now it’s just me, but if I meet people who share the same values someday, I’d like to work together like a real team, a collective. That was the mindset behind it. So now, I can confidently say, ‘I’m an actor, and I’m also a singer.’ The way people see that has been changing too. And honestly… if you do well, isn’t that what really matters?

‘I’m Junho’ includes actor, singer & 2PM…everything in one. Owning his roots and his growth, all of it is #LeeJunho: 🙎🏻‍♀️After TRS, u filmed a variety show, & u greeted like, ‘Hello, I’m 2PM Junho,’ even though u were there as ‘actor Junho.’ Was that habit, or did u want both identities? What do you use/say today? 🐧I’m Lee Junho 🙎🏻‍♀️Actor, singer, 2PM, it’s all included in ‘Lee Junho.’ 🐧Yes. So back then, it was really good timing to proudly say where I came from. Because ‘My House’ went viral again, it became good momentum for 2PM’s comeback. So I thought, ‘This is the best timing.’ Also, more people, especially younger gen, didn’t even know I was a singer anymore. So I wanted to say: ‘I started as 2PM, & I’m still 2PM.’ And to new teen fans: ‘Yes, your oppa used to be in 2PM🤣’ These days we’re already into 5th gen, so liking a 2nd gen group might seem a bit unusual, but still… that’s who we were. We were that kind of group. After that, I’m really grateful that people came to recognize both sides of me. So now I feel much more comfortable, rather than ‘singer,’ ‘actor,’ or ‘2PM,’ I just say, ‘Lee Junho.’ I’m Lee Junho. These days I tend to talk more about Lee Junho the person. Even within myself, the boundaries or distinctions. Things I didn’t do before because I worried people might judge me based on where I came from, I’ve let all of that go now. Honestly, I feel proud of that. And these days, there are so many actors like me. One of the reasons I decided to start a new company was because I wanted there to be more artists/entertainers like me to exist. Right now it’s just me, but if I meet people who share the same values someday, I’d like to work together like a real team, a collective. That was the mindset behind it. So now, I can confidently say, ‘I’m an actor, and I’m also a singer.’ The way people see that has been changing too. And honestly… if you do well, isn’t that what really matters?

milzy

28,226 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

[NOEUL: ME AND BOSS REALLY LOVE EACHOTHER, WE NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEM. AND THAT IS TRUTH] *Noeul talking about recently he got (someone) follow him Warning: It's long translate Noeul: Lately, I've been feeling like I'm being followed. I will not to mention names. It's like, I have people following me and someone is invading my privacy. I'm really not ok (uncomfortable) with that" By the way, I also want to say something, because there are many things I've been holding back for a long time. You don't need to worry for me. You don't need to speculate about whether Boss and I are still in love or what. I want to confirm here that ME & BOSS STILL LOVE EACHOTHER, and there are absolutely no problems. Our relationship is very comfortable. We've been together for a long time, so we're like friends, like siblings. I always wish the best for Boss, and Boss wants the same. Anything that benefits or is good for Boss, I'm always ready to support wholeheartedly This is proof, I'm saying this live on livestream for everyone to hear. Boss and I are still loving as well, so don't worry too much about 'why this, why that" We're just as affectionate in front of the camera as we are off-camera; there's absolutely no conflict. I meet Boss very often. Even when we don't have work schedules, we still go out to eat and hang out together because we're really close. Maybe I know..both me and Boss not show off too much on social media, because neither of us are the type of people who are addicted to social media Actually, it's not great for artists not to keep up with trends on TikTok or other platforms, but I'm someone who rarely posts or goes online often. There was a time when I 'disappeared' from Instagram for a whole month without posting photos So I want to say that we might not be a couple who are good at showing off photos or interacting online, and we're not the type to always shower everyone with 100% sweetness. But at least, whether in front of or behind the camera, you can rest assured that we truly love each other That's the truth. I don't want people to impose expectations on us. Our companionship and affection for each other doesn't mean we have to be together 24 hours. Not being together all the time doesn't mean we don't love each other anymore. I hope people can clearly distinguish between these two things #Bosschaikamon #Noeulnuttarat #BossNoeul #BoNoh

[NOEUL: ME AND BOSS REALLY LOVE EACHOTHER, WE NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEM. AND THAT IS TRUTH] *Noeul talking about recently he got (someone) follow him Warning: It's long translate Noeul: Lately, I've been feeling like I'm being followed. I will not to mention names. It's like, I have people following me and someone is invading my privacy. I'm really not ok (uncomfortable) with that" By the way, I also want to say something, because there are many things I've been holding back for a long time. You don't need to worry for me. You don't need to speculate about whether Boss and I are still in love or what. I want to confirm here that ME & BOSS STILL LOVE EACHOTHER, and there are absolutely no problems. Our relationship is very comfortable. We've been together for a long time, so we're like friends, like siblings. I always wish the best for Boss, and Boss wants the same. Anything that benefits or is good for Boss, I'm always ready to support wholeheartedly This is proof, I'm saying this live on livestream for everyone to hear. Boss and I are still loving as well, so don't worry too much about 'why this, why that" We're just as affectionate in front of the camera as we are off-camera; there's absolutely no conflict. I meet Boss very often. Even when we don't have work schedules, we still go out to eat and hang out together because we're really close. Maybe I know..both me and Boss not show off too much on social media, because neither of us are the type of people who are addicted to social media Actually, it's not great for artists not to keep up with trends on TikTok or other platforms, but I'm someone who rarely posts or goes online often. There was a time when I 'disappeared' from Instagram for a whole month without posting photos So I want to say that we might not be a couple who are good at showing off photos or interacting online, and we're not the type to always shower everyone with 100% sweetness. But at least, whether in front of or behind the camera, you can rest assured that we truly love each other That's the truth. I don't want people to impose expectations on us. Our companionship and affection for each other doesn't mean we have to be together 24 hours. Not being together all the time doesn't mean we don't love each other anymore. I hope people can clearly distinguish between these two things #Bosschaikamon #Noeulnuttarat #BossNoeul #BoNoh

◇★ ℭ𝒽𝓊𝒾𝒾𝒾 ♛◇

98,499 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Q: If, say, 20 or even 100 people came into your life, would you ever come across someone like this? #EmiBonnie #เอมี่บอนนี่ 🧡+💜: I don’t think I’d ever meet someone like this. 🧡: Seriously! Never. I’ve never met anyone like this. 🧡: I really haven’t met anyone like this. 💜: Me neither. I’ve never met anyone like P’Mii. 🧡: Is that a good thing? 💜: It is. 🧡: (laughs) 💜: I don’t even talk this much with my friends. 🧡: Mmm hmm. 💜: With my friends, I’d usually just talk like… this amount, and not go beyond that. But with P’Mii, I feel like when I start talking, she gives me space to keep going about the things I love. That makes me talk to her so much more than anyone else. That’s how I feel. 💜: Maybe it’s because… she’s herself with me, and she lets me be myself too. 🧡: I feel like there’s uniqueness, there’s sense of being ourselves, being natural, and not forcing anything. I feel like… just do it. If we want to do something, just go for it. I mean both of us. I think that’s a really good thing to have in this industry. Because everything around us, external factors, they can come at us anytime. But if we’re like this, if we’re not forcing anything, if we just want to be who we are… 💜: Which is a good thing. 🧡: Yeah. And I feel comfortable working. Like, I’m working but it doesn’t feel like I’m “going to work”. But I want to come to work because I want to be myself. And if the audience likes it, that’s great. But if they don’t, that’s okay too. Because we probably can’t change who we are.

Q: If, say, 20 or even 100 people came into your life, would you ever come across someone like this? #EmiBonnie #เอมี่บอนนี่ 🧡+💜: I don’t think I’d ever meet someone like this. 🧡: Seriously! Never. I’ve never met anyone like this. 🧡: I really haven’t met anyone like this. 💜: Me neither. I’ve never met anyone like P’Mii. 🧡: Is that a good thing? 💜: It is. 🧡: (laughs) 💜: I don’t even talk this much with my friends. 🧡: Mmm hmm. 💜: With my friends, I’d usually just talk like… this amount, and not go beyond that. But with P’Mii, I feel like when I start talking, she gives me space to keep going about the things I love. That makes me talk to her so much more than anyone else. That’s how I feel. 💜: Maybe it’s because… she’s herself with me, and she lets me be myself too. 🧡: I feel like there’s uniqueness, there’s sense of being ourselves, being natural, and not forcing anything. I feel like… just do it. If we want to do something, just go for it. I mean both of us. I think that’s a really good thing to have in this industry. Because everything around us, external factors, they can come at us anytime. But if we’re like this, if we’re not forcing anything, if we just want to be who we are… 💜: Which is a good thing. 🧡: Yeah. And I feel comfortable working. Like, I’m working but it doesn’t feel like I’m “going to work”. But I want to come to work because I want to be myself. And if the audience likes it, that’s great. But if they don’t, that’s okay too. Because we probably can’t change who we are.

Mami Penguin

82,299 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

$🚨🇺🇦🇷🇺 TWO ANALYSTS CLASH ON UKRAINE'S ENDGAME: REGIME COLLAPSE, NUCLEAR RED LINES, AND THE INCREASING RISK OF A DIRECT EU RUSSIAN WAR Two analysts with very different reads on how this war ends. Paul Warburg says Ukraine can hold out for years. Russia's economy is cracking in the regions while Moscow pretends everything is fine, with police forces being replaced by vigilante groups and recruitment bonuses slashed because the money simply isn't there. Eurasien Gesellschaft warns that if the war drags on, European troops will enter Ukraine, not by accident but intentionally, and that's when the nuclear calculus changes. Both agree on one thing: Putin needs the entire Donbass or he's got a serious problem at home. Here's what most people are missing. Alexander believes two factions are battling inside the Kremlin right now. One wants to keep fighting for Odessa. The other is urging Putin to take Trump's deal before the midterms while he still has leverage. The business community wants out of the sanctions regime Paul isn't buying the China-Russia alliance either. The US threatens secondary sanctions and China immediately stops buying from Rosneft and Lukoil. Beijing has been beating Moscow up on pipeline prices for years because they want Russian energy at cost, leaving Russia with nothing. On nukes, Paul says the only real red line is a nuclear missile fired at Russian territory. Everything else is leverage. Alexander disagrees and believes Crimea is the line. If Ukraine threatens to take it back, expect escalation. Ukraine's path to victory? Paul says it's not military, it's regime collapse. Hold out long enough and the empire fractures from the edges inward, just like Afghanistan broke the Soviets. We get into: * Why Alexander believes European troops will intentionally enter Ukraine if the war continues * The two factions inside Putin's inner circle fighting over whether to take Trump's deal * How Russia's economy is designed to shield Moscow while the regions collapse * Why Paul says China is using Russia, not saving it * What both analysts believe is Putin's real nuclear red line * How Ukraine could flip the kill switch on Russian oil revenues overnight * Why the body of evidence points to regime fracture starting in Russia's outer regions Putin's trying to outlast the West. The West is betting his own system collapses first. Someone's clock is running out. The next twelve months will tell us whose. 03:15 - Territory vs security guarantees: why Donbas is the real sticking point 04:03 - Ukraine’s trust problem: Budapest Memorandum and broken guarantees 05:04 - Putin’s core war aims: defeating NATO and carving a buffer zone 07:55 - Why Putin cannot stop without taking all of Donbas 10:49 - Russia advancing on the battlefield and what it means for negotiations 12:27 - Ukraine trading land for time while fortifying key cities 13:57 - Putin’s strategy to exhaust the West politically and economically 16:00 - Ukraine’s manpower crisis: casualties, desertions, and army strain 18:00 - Ukrainian public opinion flips toward ending the war 19:26 - Why claims that “the war has gone on too long” are a myth 21:19 - Is Trump really pulling away from Ukraine or just pressuring Russia? 22:58 - Risk of wider war: continued fighting could pull NATO troops in 27:06 - Inside Russia’s elite split: war faction vs deal-with-America faction 29:31 - Europe entering the war: nuclear risks vs strategic necessity 35:21 - Crimea as the true red line for nuclear escalation 39:11 - Why economic pressure won’t force Putin to sign a deal 41:30 - The war as existential for Putin’s personal survival 42:56 - What victory looks like for Russia vs Ukraine 56:58 - Endgame forecast: U.S. and China as the real winners$

🚨🇺🇦🇷🇺 TWO ANALYSTS CLASH ON UKRAINE'S ENDGAME: REGIME COLLAPSE, NUCLEAR RED LINES, AND THE INCREASING RISK OF A DIRECT EU RUSSIAN WAR Two analysts with very different reads on how this war ends. Paul Warburg says Ukraine can hold out for years. Russia's economy is cracking in the regions while Moscow pretends everything is fine, with police forces being replaced by vigilante groups and recruitment bonuses slashed because the money simply isn't there. Eurasien Gesellschaft warns that if the war drags on, European troops will enter Ukraine, not by accident but intentionally, and that's when the nuclear calculus changes. Both agree on one thing: Putin needs the entire Donbass or he's got a serious problem at home. Here's what most people are missing. Alexander believes two factions are battling inside the Kremlin right now. One wants to keep fighting for Odessa. The other is urging Putin to take Trump's deal before the midterms while he still has leverage. The business community wants out of the sanctions regime Paul isn't buying the China-Russia alliance either. The US threatens secondary sanctions and China immediately stops buying from Rosneft and Lukoil. Beijing has been beating Moscow up on pipeline prices for years because they want Russian energy at cost, leaving Russia with nothing. On nukes, Paul says the only real red line is a nuclear missile fired at Russian territory. Everything else is leverage. Alexander disagrees and believes Crimea is the line. If Ukraine threatens to take it back, expect escalation. Ukraine's path to victory? Paul says it's not military, it's regime collapse. Hold out long enough and the empire fractures from the edges inward, just like Afghanistan broke the Soviets. We get into: * Why Alexander believes European troops will intentionally enter Ukraine if the war continues * The two factions inside Putin's inner circle fighting over whether to take Trump's deal * How Russia's economy is designed to shield Moscow while the regions collapse * Why Paul says China is using Russia, not saving it * What both analysts believe is Putin's real nuclear red line * How Ukraine could flip the kill switch on Russian oil revenues overnight * Why the body of evidence points to regime fracture starting in Russia's outer regions Putin's trying to outlast the West. The West is betting his own system collapses first. Someone's clock is running out. The next twelve months will tell us whose. 03:15 - Territory vs security guarantees: why Donbas is the real sticking point 04:03 - Ukraine’s trust problem: Budapest Memorandum and broken guarantees 05:04 - Putin’s core war aims: defeating NATO and carving a buffer zone 07:55 - Why Putin cannot stop without taking all of Donbas 10:49 - Russia advancing on the battlefield and what it means for negotiations 12:27 - Ukraine trading land for time while fortifying key cities 13:57 - Putin’s strategy to exhaust the West politically and economically 16:00 - Ukraine’s manpower crisis: casualties, desertions, and army strain 18:00 - Ukrainian public opinion flips toward ending the war 19:26 - Why claims that “the war has gone on too long” are a myth 21:19 - Is Trump really pulling away from Ukraine or just pressuring Russia? 22:58 - Risk of wider war: continued fighting could pull NATO troops in 27:06 - Inside Russia’s elite split: war faction vs deal-with-America faction 29:31 - Europe entering the war: nuclear risks vs strategic necessity 35:21 - Crimea as the true red line for nuclear escalation 39:11 - Why economic pressure won’t force Putin to sign a deal 41:30 - The war as existential for Putin’s personal survival 42:56 - What victory looks like for Russia vs Ukraine 56:58 - Endgame forecast: U.S. and China as the real winners

Mario Nawfal

1,985,138 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸 INTERVIEW: ALEX CHRISTOFOROU ON TRUMP’S UKRAINE FLIP… OR ESCAPE PLAN? Just months ago, Trump blasted Zelensky as a “dictator” who “should have never started” the war and was “gambling with World War III.” Now - after meeting Putin in Alaska - he’s suddenly talking about Ukraine retaking all its lost territory from Russia… and maybe more. So is Washington gearing up to throw its weight behind Kyiv again? Alex Christoforou says no. In fact, he argues the exact opposite: that the U.S. is stepping back, leaving Ukraine - and Europe - to face Russia on their own. 02:55 – Trump signals he’s walking away from Ukraine: “Good luck to both countries.” 04:22 – Why Trump’s weapons-for-NATO plan is smoke and mirrors. 06:38 – Trump offers zero security guarantees or sanctions: “He committed nothing.” 07:00 – Zelensky appears optimistic, but Christoforou says he’s quietly panicking. 07:58 – Even Trump’s closest hawkish advisors now admit Ukraine can’t win. 08:14 – Trump’s language paints the U.S. as detached from NATO entirely. 09:27 – The 1991 borders comment signals Trump’s full strategic disengagement. 12:01 – U.S. has zero leverage over China and India on Russian oil. 13:29 – Russia is producing more weapons than the entire West combined. 16:10 – The West’s dream that energy sanctions would collapse Russia is dead. 17:13 – Russia’s economy is outperforming the UK, France, and Germany. 19:12 – Trump’s stance: sell weapons, let NATO deal with the fallout. 20:23 – “When NATO is defeated, don’t blame Trump.” 21:00 – The U.S. has nothing left to give Ukraine outside of nukes or boots on the ground. 23:27 – U.S. saving firepower for Asia and the Middle East – not Europe. 24:09 – Christoforou: Russia is “way ahead” on drones, hypersonics, and missile tech. 30:43 – Europe’s recent panic: “fake Russian provocations” timed for UN leverage. 35:08 – U.S. officials privately told Baltics in August: expect reduced support. 36:40 – Europe is terrified of peace – because it means negotiating from weakness. 46:55 – Russia will demilitarize Ukraine “one way or the other.” 47:47 – A NATO no-fly zone would be “fair game” for Russia to strike. 48:53 – Saudi-Pakistani defense pact signals a major shift away from U.S. protection.

🚨🇺🇸 INTERVIEW: ALEX CHRISTOFOROU ON TRUMP’S UKRAINE FLIP… OR ESCAPE PLAN? Just months ago, Trump blasted Zelensky as a “dictator” who “should have never started” the war and was “gambling with World War III.” Now - after meeting Putin in Alaska - he’s suddenly talking about Ukraine retaking all its lost territory from Russia… and maybe more. So is Washington gearing up to throw its weight behind Kyiv again? Alex Christoforou says no. In fact, he argues the exact opposite: that the U.S. is stepping back, leaving Ukraine - and Europe - to face Russia on their own. 02:55 – Trump signals he’s walking away from Ukraine: “Good luck to both countries.” 04:22 – Why Trump’s weapons-for-NATO plan is smoke and mirrors. 06:38 – Trump offers zero security guarantees or sanctions: “He committed nothing.” 07:00 – Zelensky appears optimistic, but Christoforou says he’s quietly panicking. 07:58 – Even Trump’s closest hawkish advisors now admit Ukraine can’t win. 08:14 – Trump’s language paints the U.S. as detached from NATO entirely. 09:27 – The 1991 borders comment signals Trump’s full strategic disengagement. 12:01 – U.S. has zero leverage over China and India on Russian oil. 13:29 – Russia is producing more weapons than the entire West combined. 16:10 – The West’s dream that energy sanctions would collapse Russia is dead. 17:13 – Russia’s economy is outperforming the UK, France, and Germany. 19:12 – Trump’s stance: sell weapons, let NATO deal with the fallout. 20:23 – “When NATO is defeated, don’t blame Trump.” 21:00 – The U.S. has nothing left to give Ukraine outside of nukes or boots on the ground. 23:27 – U.S. saving firepower for Asia and the Middle East – not Europe. 24:09 – Christoforou: Russia is “way ahead” on drones, hypersonics, and missile tech. 30:43 – Europe’s recent panic: “fake Russian provocations” timed for UN leverage. 35:08 – U.S. officials privately told Baltics in August: expect reduced support. 36:40 – Europe is terrified of peace – because it means negotiating from weakness. 46:55 – Russia will demilitarize Ukraine “one way or the other.” 47:47 – A NATO no-fly zone would be “fair game” for Russia to strike. 48:53 – Saudi-Pakistani defense pact signals a major shift away from U.S. protection.

Mario Nawfal

1,832,166 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten