Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

‼️BOMBSHELL: Candace Reveals SOMEONE ELSE Was On The Losee Rooftop That Could Have PLANTED The Screwdriver AFTER The Alleged Shooter Jumped — But BEFORE Bagley Claims To Have “FOUND” It. The official screwdriver story has never added up, and Candace just made it worse for the state’s narrative. Within...

15,434 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

‼️BOMBSHELL: CNN Originally Reported That The Screwdriver Was FOUND "Near The Rifle" In The Woods — Then The Story Changed To The ROOF.🤔 On September 11, CNN claimed the investigators found the screwdriver in the woods with the gun. Evan Perez said the suspect dumped the rifle, there was a towel, and they also found a screwdriver. Pamela Brown said authorities recovered it “right near the rifle they found.” The Telegraph and New York Magazine repeated it: woodland, next to the bolt-action, used to take the stock off. Four days later Kash Patel put the same screwdriver on the Losee roof and tied DNA to it. That is the version that eventually stuck. That flip is the problem. Officer Bagley later testified he found a red-and-black screwdriver on that roof about 10 to 15 feet inside the guardrail. His body camera, according to the record iand his testimony, cuts out before he claims he found it. And in the Losee rooftop CCTV Cfootage Candace Owens released, the figure on that roof never pulls a screwdriver and never assembles a rifle on camera. You are asked to believe a tool jumped from the woods to the sniper pad, that the camera died at the exact moment it mattered, and that the assembly happened in a blind spot the public is not allowed to see. If the official story is airtight, release the uncut roof cam, the Bagley body-cam file, and the original evidence log that shows where that screwdriver was first tagged. Until then the September 11 CNN line and the September 15 roof line cannot both be true. From: jESSiLEE* FOLLOW Her!

Project Constitution

108,563 views • 24 days ago

Candace haters… PLEASE quote tweet this one. 😂 Because I have QUESTIONS. Not conclusions. Not accusations. QUESTIONS. And if the answers are obvious, this should be easy. 1️⃣ Could the man reaching into the trunk of Charlie’s SUV have been retrieving the screwdriver that was later recovered and attributed to the alleged shooter? I’m asking because THAT TIMELINE deserves an explanation. 2️⃣ And what about the backpack? If that backpack fell out of Charlie’s SUV and ultimately ended up at the bus stop along the route the alleged shooter supposedly took… could the contents of that backpack explain why a screwdriver could have been inside it too? Because when you look at what was reportedly inside the backpack, that possibility is exactly the kind of thing investigators should have been able to definitively rule IN or OUT. And apparently, the backpack was initially treated as potentially connected to the shooter before investigators were told it belonged to someone connected to Charlie’s detail. (Podcasts - Your Podcast Transcripts) So let me get this straight: We’re supposed to believe asking these questions is “crazy”… but NOT asking them is somehow responsible? 😂😂😂 I don’t need you to believe Candace Owens. I need somebody to explain the timeline. Explain the backpack. Explain the screwdriver. Explain what happened in that SUV. And explain why every time someone asks a question about the evidence, the response seems to be an attack on the person asking instead of an answer. So PLEASE… Quote tweet me. Tell me I’m a conspiracy theorist. Tell me I’m stupid. Tell me I need to “move on.” Because every single one of those quote tweets is going to put MORE eyes on the questions. If the answers are simple, give us the answers. I’ll gladly shut up. But until then? I’m looking at the timeline. 👀

Sam’sFamReacts

33,172 views • 24 days ago