Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Obscure Youtuber Gary Melton Just Exposed Himself AGAIN — He Casually ADMITTED On His Live That He Was Taking To Brian Harpole Just 7 Days After Charlie Kirk’s Assassination😳 Gary Melton Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton went on his livestream last night and accidentally exposed himself yet...

ProjectConstitu's profile picture

Project Constitution

261,213 subscribers

215,834 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨EXPOSED: How Did The ATF "Match" Evidence That Wasn't Even at the Scene— Plus Gary Admits Candace was Right All Along😳 Buckle up, because the "Official Narrative" just tripped over its own shoelaces on INFOWARS. Gary Melton from Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton sat down with Alex Jones and managed to drop a bombshell that is as hilarious as it is terrifying. The Magic Shell Casing 🪄🐚 Gary claims the ATF testing "positively confirmed" the spent shell casing found at the scene matched the murder weapon. One teeny, tiny, microscopic problem, Gary: The rifle was BOLT-ACTION. The spent casing was found STILL IN THE CHAMBER, not ejected. THE GUN WASN’T EVEN FOUND AT THE SCENE. 🚫🔫 So, how exactly did they match a "casing found at the scene" when there was no casing on the ground and no gun in sight? Is the FBI hiring street magicians now? Or are we just supposed to believe in teleporting brass? 🎩✨ Welcome to the "Side of Truth," Gary! 🤝👀 But wait, it gets better. Gary is finally ditching the "Fed-slop" narrative. He now admits he doesn't think Tyler Robinson acted alone and—get this—he says it could "ABSOLUTELY HAVE FOREIGN TIES" Wait, what’s that, Gary? Foreign ties? 🌍🛰️ Does that mean you're admitting Candace Owens Was Right? It’s almost like Candace Owens has been saying exactly that for months while YOU and the rest of the "Shady Bunch" at TPUSA called her a "maniac." The "New Gary" Effect 🔄😂 I have to wonder... does this sudden moment of clarity have anything to do with TPUSA trying to replace him with "New Gary"? Nothing clears the head quite like getting ghosted and swapped out by the very people you were protecting. Side note, check out the clip in the post below of New Gary's segment on the Charlie Kirk Show from earlier this week. 🏃‍♂️💨 Gary just accidentally admitted that the "conspiracy theorists" were right all along. The forensic math isn't mathing, the casings are imaginary, and the "Foreign Ties" are officially on the table. They are overthinking again. And it is glorious to watch. 🍿🎥
1:18

🚨EXPOSED: How Did The ATF "Match" Evidence That Wasn't Even at the Scene— Plus Gary Admits Candace was Right All Along😳 Buckle up, because the "Official Narrative" just tripped over its own shoelaces on INFOWARS. Gary Melton from Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton sat down with Alex Jones and managed to drop a bombshell that is as hilarious as it is terrifying. The Magic Shell Casing 🪄🐚 Gary claims the ATF testing "positively confirmed" the spent shell casing found at the scene matched the murder weapon. One teeny, tiny, microscopic problem, Gary: The rifle was BOLT-ACTION. The spent casing was found STILL IN THE CHAMBER, not ejected. THE GUN WASN’T EVEN FOUND AT THE SCENE. 🚫🔫 So, how exactly did they match a "casing found at the scene" when there was no casing on the ground and no gun in sight? Is the FBI hiring street magicians now? Or are we just supposed to believe in teleporting brass? 🎩✨ Welcome to the "Side of Truth," Gary! 🤝👀 But wait, it gets better. Gary is finally ditching the "Fed-slop" narrative. He now admits he doesn't think Tyler Robinson acted alone and—get this—he says it could "ABSOLUTELY HAVE FOREIGN TIES" Wait, what’s that, Gary? Foreign ties? 🌍🛰️ Does that mean you're admitting Candace Owens Was Right? It’s almost like Candace Owens has been saying exactly that for months while YOU and the rest of the "Shady Bunch" at TPUSA called her a "maniac." The "New Gary" Effect 🔄😂 I have to wonder... does this sudden moment of clarity have anything to do with TPUSA trying to replace him with "New Gary"? Nothing clears the head quite like getting ghosted and swapped out by the very people you were protecting. Side note, check out the clip in the post below of New Gary's segment on the Charlie Kirk Show from earlier this week. 🏃‍♂️💨 Gary just accidentally admitted that the "conspiracy theorists" were right all along. The forensic math isn't mathing, the casings are imaginary, and the "Foreign Ties" are officially on the table. They are overthinking again. And it is glorious to watch. 🍿🎥

Project Constitution

42,932 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

‼️EXPOSED: Candace Owens Just ENDED Obscure Youtuber Gary Melton's Career—Proving Once And For All He Is A FED! 😱 Candace Owens just dropped the financial receipts on Gary Melton from Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton tonight, and the timeline is staggering. Here is exactly what the contracts show: The September Payouts: Exactly 14 days after the September tragedy, Gary received a $39,000 DoD contract for "individual equipment." Five days later on September 29th, he was hit with another $151,000 for "night vision equipment." He doesn't even manufacture this gear. Why is the Department of Defense bypassing direct manufacturers to funnel nearly $200,000 through a third-party YouTuber's storefront at the exact moment he becomes the loudest defender of the establishment narrative? This isn't an isolated incident. As Candace points out, the father of "Decoy Boy #2" also secured a massive federal contract right before the event took place. It is not a coincidence. They aren't independent defenders; they are government-funded assets reading from a script. Watch the financial breakdown for yourself. 👇 FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch the FULL episode linked below. 👇 ⚠️Right now, my channel is facing targeted attacks to bankrupt me and silence the truth surrounding the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want to ensure this investigation stays alive, your support makes all the difference. 💪🔗
2:17

‼️EXPOSED: Candace Owens Just ENDED Obscure Youtuber Gary Melton's Career—Proving Once And For All He Is A FED! 😱 Candace Owens just dropped the financial receipts on Gary Melton from Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton tonight, and the timeline is staggering. Here is exactly what the contracts show: The September Payouts: Exactly 14 days after the September tragedy, Gary received a $39,000 DoD contract for "individual equipment." Five days later on September 29th, he was hit with another $151,000 for "night vision equipment." He doesn't even manufacture this gear. Why is the Department of Defense bypassing direct manufacturers to funnel nearly $200,000 through a third-party YouTuber's storefront at the exact moment he becomes the loudest defender of the establishment narrative? This isn't an isolated incident. As Candace points out, the father of "Decoy Boy #2" also secured a massive federal contract right before the event took place. It is not a coincidence. They aren't independent defenders; they are government-funded assets reading from a script. Watch the financial breakdown for yourself. 👇 FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch the FULL episode linked below. 👇 ⚠️Right now, my channel is facing targeted attacks to bankrupt me and silence the truth surrounding the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want to ensure this investigation stays alive, your support makes all the difference. 💪🔗

Project Constitution

60,733 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 Gary Melton’s UNHINGED 18-Minute MELTDOWN Just Gave Us All the Receipts PROVING Collusion— Gary ADMITS Turning Point ViIOLATED The Truce And Activated Him😱 Last night, Obscure YouTuber Gary Melton (Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton) completely unraveled on his own livestream. All it took was one calm, good-faith Super Chat from me:: “There is ample evidence supporting the exploding mic theory in the Charlie Kirk investigation.” That was it.😂 For the next 18 minutes straight, Gary had a full-blown public meltdown. He attacked my weight, my looks, called me “the biggest grifter piece of shit on the planet,” threatened to sue me, admitted he’s already looked into where I live, and said he’s “coming after me.” I know creepy right... There were multiple moments of dead air while his face turned beet red and you could practically see the steam coming out of his ears. It was glorious. But here’s what’s actually revealing: He spent the entire rant ATTACKING me and Candace Owens And accusing us of doing exactly what he’s been caught doing: lying, fabricating stories, running a psychological operation on the American people, pushing false narratives, and lacking any morals, integrity, or basic human empathy. Then came the real tell: “I’ll tell you… I am more on Israel’s side than I’ve ever been before at this point.”🤡 The mask didn’t just slip. It shattered. Even better? Gary walked straight into the trap I set and gave us fresh receipts in real time: 🔘He admitted Andrew Kolvet from Turning Point USA DM’d him during the supposed “ceasefire” (while Candace was literally in Nashville meeting with Erika Kirk) and asked him to go on the Charlie Kirk show to bash Candace — deliberately violating the truce and blindsiding her. CONFIRMING he was their activated proxy. 🔘He pinned the exact date he first spoke to Brian Harpole: November 2nd. The timeline of this coordinated operation just got a lot clearer.✅ This is what happens when the controlled opposition can’t handle sunlight. They don’t debate the evidence — they scream, threaten, and expose themselves. Full 18-minute crash-out is down below. Grab popcorn. Watch it for yourself. 👇 What did you notice first when the mask came off? 👀 Drop your thoughts below. RT if you’re tired of the shills. And tag Candace Owens — this one’s for the file. The truth always comes out.
18:45

🚨 Gary Melton’s UNHINGED 18-Minute MELTDOWN Just Gave Us All the Receipts PROVING Collusion— Gary ADMITS Turning Point ViIOLATED The Truce And Activated Him😱 Last night, Obscure YouTuber Gary Melton (Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton) completely unraveled on his own livestream. All it took was one calm, good-faith Super Chat from me:: “There is ample evidence supporting the exploding mic theory in the Charlie Kirk investigation.” That was it.😂 For the next 18 minutes straight, Gary had a full-blown public meltdown. He attacked my weight, my looks, called me “the biggest grifter piece of shit on the planet,” threatened to sue me, admitted he’s already looked into where I live, and said he’s “coming after me.” I know creepy right... There were multiple moments of dead air while his face turned beet red and you could practically see the steam coming out of his ears. It was glorious. But here’s what’s actually revealing: He spent the entire rant ATTACKING me and Candace Owens And accusing us of doing exactly what he’s been caught doing: lying, fabricating stories, running a psychological operation on the American people, pushing false narratives, and lacking any morals, integrity, or basic human empathy. Then came the real tell: “I’ll tell you… I am more on Israel’s side than I’ve ever been before at this point.”🤡 The mask didn’t just slip. It shattered. Even better? Gary walked straight into the trap I set and gave us fresh receipts in real time: 🔘He admitted Andrew Kolvet from Turning Point USA DM’d him during the supposed “ceasefire” (while Candace was literally in Nashville meeting with Erika Kirk) and asked him to go on the Charlie Kirk show to bash Candace — deliberately violating the truce and blindsiding her. CONFIRMING he was their activated proxy. 🔘He pinned the exact date he first spoke to Brian Harpole: November 2nd. The timeline of this coordinated operation just got a lot clearer.✅ This is what happens when the controlled opposition can’t handle sunlight. They don’t debate the evidence — they scream, threaten, and expose themselves. Full 18-minute crash-out is down below. Grab popcorn. Watch it for yourself. 👇 What did you notice first when the mask came off? 👀 Drop your thoughts below. RT if you’re tired of the shills. And tag Candace Owens — this one’s for the file. The truth always comes out.

Project Constitution

126,011 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

‼️SMOKING GUN: Gary Melton Had To Get His INTEL On Mitch Snow From Fort Huachuca—The Smoking Gun PROOF He's A Fed Asset?! 👀 This is the smoking gun. The question that Gary Melton from Paramount Tactical cannot answer, and the silence proves he's an intelligence asset trying to take down a true American hero, Mitch Snow. Let's lay out the facts. THE LIE: Gary Melton, Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton, brought a man onto his show to discredit Mitch Snow. This man claimed to be Mitch's long-lost son, painting Mitch as a liar and a deadbeat to undermine his bombshell testimony about Fort Huachuca. THE TRUTH: That man is NOT Mitch Snow's son. Period. Here's the undisputed timeline: When the boy was born, Mitch was put on the birth certificate. He immediately contested it and demanded a DNA test. The mother refused. To end the legal battle, Mitch signed over his parental rights. He has never met this person. He wouldn't know him from Adam. Because of this, the man is not listed on Mitch's background check, his military records, his veterans records, or anywhere else as a son or relative. As far as any public or private database is concerned, they are strangers. THE IMPOSSIBLE QUESTION: So how in God's name did Gary Melton find him? Think about it. You're a podcaster. You're trying to dig up dirt on a former Green Beret. Where do you look? Family. But Mitch Snow has no known connection to this man. There are no records. No paper trail. No social media links. They are ghosts to each other. The only way to find this needle in a haystack is with intelligence-grade access. The same kind of access the military and federal agencies have at Fort Huachuca. Gary Melton, an obscure youtuber did not "skip trace" a man who is officially and legally unrelated to Mitch Snow. That's not how it works. He was handed this man. He was given the name, the location, and the talking points by his handlers. This was a coordinated, intelligence-backed operation to assassinate the character of the man who exposed the CIA's human trafficking tunnel infrastructure. @Justice4Gr8Nate was an enemy of the state the moment he found those tunnels. And now the state, using assets like Gary Melton and Brian Harpool, is trying to destroy him. Gary Melton will never answer the question of how he found this guy, because the answer is "The FBI gave me his file." This isn't just a smear campaign. It's a confession. Gary Melton is a fed. His actions prove it. Gary Melton, did not "skip trace" a man who is officially and legally unrelated to Mitch Snow. That's not how it works. Be sure to FOLLOW Stew Peters below. ⚠️They want this investigation shut down. Right now, my channel is facing targeted attacks to bankrupt me and silence the truth surrounding the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want to ensure this investigation stays alive, your support makes all the difference 💪 🔗:
2:51

‼️SMOKING GUN: Gary Melton Had To Get His INTEL On Mitch Snow From Fort Huachuca—The Smoking Gun PROOF He's A Fed Asset?! 👀 This is the smoking gun. The question that Gary Melton from Paramount Tactical cannot answer, and the silence proves he's an intelligence asset trying to take down a true American hero, Mitch Snow. Let's lay out the facts. THE LIE: Gary Melton, Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton, brought a man onto his show to discredit Mitch Snow. This man claimed to be Mitch's long-lost son, painting Mitch as a liar and a deadbeat to undermine his bombshell testimony about Fort Huachuca. THE TRUTH: That man is NOT Mitch Snow's son. Period. Here's the undisputed timeline: When the boy was born, Mitch was put on the birth certificate. He immediately contested it and demanded a DNA test. The mother refused. To end the legal battle, Mitch signed over his parental rights. He has never met this person. He wouldn't know him from Adam. Because of this, the man is not listed on Mitch's background check, his military records, his veterans records, or anywhere else as a son or relative. As far as any public or private database is concerned, they are strangers. THE IMPOSSIBLE QUESTION: So how in God's name did Gary Melton find him? Think about it. You're a podcaster. You're trying to dig up dirt on a former Green Beret. Where do you look? Family. But Mitch Snow has no known connection to this man. There are no records. No paper trail. No social media links. They are ghosts to each other. The only way to find this needle in a haystack is with intelligence-grade access. The same kind of access the military and federal agencies have at Fort Huachuca. Gary Melton, an obscure youtuber did not "skip trace" a man who is officially and legally unrelated to Mitch Snow. That's not how it works. He was handed this man. He was given the name, the location, and the talking points by his handlers. This was a coordinated, intelligence-backed operation to assassinate the character of the man who exposed the CIA's human trafficking tunnel infrastructure. @Justice4Gr8Nate was an enemy of the state the moment he found those tunnels. And now the state, using assets like Gary Melton and Brian Harpool, is trying to destroy him. Gary Melton will never answer the question of how he found this guy, because the answer is "The FBI gave me his file." This isn't just a smear campaign. It's a confession. Gary Melton is a fed. His actions prove it. Gary Melton, did not "skip trace" a man who is officially and legally unrelated to Mitch Snow. That's not how it works. Be sure to FOLLOW Stew Peters below. ⚠️They want this investigation shut down. Right now, my channel is facing targeted attacks to bankrupt me and silence the truth surrounding the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want to ensure this investigation stays alive, your support makes all the difference 💪 🔗:

Project Constitution

102,922 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Gary Melton of Paramount Tactical says he has been shown a different surveillance angle from the Losee Center roof—one supposedly so clear that you can positively identify the individual as Tyler Robinson. Really, Gary? Then answer some very simple questions: Who showed you the video? Where did it come from? When did you see it? Is it part of the official evidence? And most importantly—why hasn’t the public seen it? If this footage is really as definitive as you’re claiming, SHOW IT. Don’t tell us there’s some crystal-clear video sitting somewhere that proves the identity of the person on that roof while providing nothing for the public to independently examine. Extraordinary claims require evidence. Show us the video, Gary. Show us the evidence. Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton
0:29

Gary Melton of Paramount Tactical says he has been shown a different surveillance angle from the Losee Center roof—one supposedly so clear that you can positively identify the individual as Tyler Robinson. Really, Gary? Then answer some very simple questions: Who showed you the video? Where did it come from? When did you see it? Is it part of the official evidence? And most importantly—why hasn’t the public seen it? If this footage is really as definitive as you’re claiming, SHOW IT. Don’t tell us there’s some crystal-clear video sitting somewhere that proves the identity of the person on that roof while providing nothing for the public to independently examine. Extraordinary claims require evidence. Show us the video, Gary. Show us the evidence. Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

The Black Line Brief

70,195 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

If a narrative requires constant lies, deceptive edits, and instant censorship, the narrative is completely broken. Last night on Sulaiman Ahmed’s Space, Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton got caught fabricating facts four separate times, and was forced to concede. Today, instead of standing on the truth, he doubles down: running selectively chopped audio to twist Lance’s words, blatantly inventing a story that the defense "conceded" seeing a gun outline in the pants, and booting me the second he’s called out. I remain open-minded on the outcome here (40/60 split). But when the primary voice pushing one side relies entirely on dishonesty and manipulation, the entire narrative becomes suspect. Why is Gary spending all his energy desperately trying to discredit Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 and Candace Owens? They don't have the power of the FBI or the state, yet he holds them to a higher standard of evidence. They are simply seeking true justice for Charlie. Yet Gary’s entire focus is blocking them at every turn. Why?
0:33

If a narrative requires constant lies, deceptive edits, and instant censorship, the narrative is completely broken. Last night on Sulaiman Ahmed’s Space, Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton got caught fabricating facts four separate times, and was forced to concede. Today, instead of standing on the truth, he doubles down: running selectively chopped audio to twist Lance’s words, blatantly inventing a story that the defense "conceded" seeing a gun outline in the pants, and booting me the second he’s called out. I remain open-minded on the outcome here (40/60 split). But when the primary voice pushing one side relies entirely on dishonesty and manipulation, the entire narrative becomes suspect. Why is Gary spending all his energy desperately trying to discredit Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 and Candace Owens? They don't have the power of the FBI or the state, yet he holds them to a higher standard of evidence. They are simply seeking true justice for Charlie. Yet Gary’s entire focus is blocking them at every turn. Why?

𝙹𝚘𝚊𝚑

12,679 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

.Candace Owens intentionally didn’t play the part where Blake Neff explained why he doesn’t give out people’s names: these psychos literally doxx and stalk them, and that’s why. Candace also intentionally didn’t play the part where Blake explained why he wasn’t paying attention to where he was going, because he was texting with Charlie, helping/preparing him for the event. Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton The brain captures and preserves memories connected to things that are highly important, emotional, or meaningful to us. So, it is understandable that he remembers what they were texting about if the conversation held personal significance, rather than focusing on who was in the car or where they were going.
1:47

.Candace Owens intentionally didn’t play the part where Blake Neff explained why he doesn’t give out people’s names: these psychos literally doxx and stalk them, and that’s why. Candace also intentionally didn’t play the part where Blake explained why he wasn’t paying attention to where he was going, because he was texting with Charlie, helping/preparing him for the event. Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton The brain captures and preserves memories connected to things that are highly important, emotional, or meaningful to us. So, it is understandable that he remembers what they were texting about if the conversation held personal significance, rather than focusing on who was in the car or where they were going.

Jinet Gharibian

39,762 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨REVEALED: Candace Reveals Charlie Kirk’s FINAL Text The Night Before He Was Taken Out —She Exposes the Spiritual Journey They Tried to Hide 🙏 Candace Owens reveals the truth about Charlie Kirk’s final days. The "Zionist donors" were squeezing him. They threatened his funding. They forced him to cut ties with friends like Candace. Charlie Kirk was changing. And the people who controlled his money hated it. In this emotional clip, Candace Owens reveals the spiritual journey Charlie was on in his final year. He was asking deep philosophical and spiritual questions. He was moving away from the Zionist agenda. He was disgusted by what the Daily Wire did to Candace. "Israel was trying to control his legacy and pretend that transition wasn't happening. "Candace says it was crucial for her to speak up because they were trying to rewrite history. They wanted you to remember him as a Zionist puppet. Candace wants you to remember him as a man who finally broke free. "He was done with Israel... and the next thing you know, he was gone. "Coincidence? Candace doesn't think so. FOLLOW Hodgetwins and go watch their FULL INTERVIEW with Candace Owens linked below.👇
2:12

🚨REVEALED: Candace Reveals Charlie Kirk’s FINAL Text The Night Before He Was Taken Out —She Exposes the Spiritual Journey They Tried to Hide 🙏 Candace Owens reveals the truth about Charlie Kirk’s final days. The "Zionist donors" were squeezing him. They threatened his funding. They forced him to cut ties with friends like Candace. Charlie Kirk was changing. And the people who controlled his money hated it. In this emotional clip, Candace Owens reveals the spiritual journey Charlie was on in his final year. He was asking deep philosophical and spiritual questions. He was moving away from the Zionist agenda. He was disgusted by what the Daily Wire did to Candace. "Israel was trying to control his legacy and pretend that transition wasn't happening. "Candace says it was crucial for her to speak up because they were trying to rewrite history. They wanted you to remember him as a Zionist puppet. Candace wants you to remember him as a man who finally broke free. "He was done with Israel... and the next thing you know, he was gone. "Coincidence? Candace doesn't think so. FOLLOW Hodgetwins and go watch their FULL INTERVIEW with Candace Owens linked below.👇

Project Constitution

58,333 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Gary Melton Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton has been caught in countless lies. Time and time again, his own words have contradicted his previous claims, from insisting that he works alone and he was just a YouTuber to later exposing that he has been working with multiple people behind the scenes. He's changed his story whenever it suited him and has been caught lying over and over again. Eventually, even members of his own community reached their breaking point. He accused Nate of being a liar, yet Gary is the one who has repeatedly been caught lying. Repeatedly!!! Now, one of his own community members publicly called him out! Nate is one of the most honorable men out there. He never attacked this piece of crap and he has the audacity to call him a liar after all the benefit of the doubt Nate gave him. So what will Gary do? Will he finally admit what happened? Of course not. Will he accept Nate's invitation to settle it face-to-face? No. He'll run, do what he always does, ignore Nate, avoid direct confrontation, and continue taking shit on all of us. That who Gary is a clown! As Tucker Carlson said, "He's a weak man." Tucker knows! Gary is a weak men. watch him avoid Nate forever now! Tucker Carlson Ian Carroll RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅 theleahfiles MIA Baron Coleman Baron Coleman Candace Owens ADN1776
7:05

Gary Melton Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton has been caught in countless lies. Time and time again, his own words have contradicted his previous claims, from insisting that he works alone and he was just a YouTuber to later exposing that he has been working with multiple people behind the scenes. He's changed his story whenever it suited him and has been caught lying over and over again. Eventually, even members of his own community reached their breaking point. He accused Nate of being a liar, yet Gary is the one who has repeatedly been caught lying. Repeatedly!!! Now, one of his own community members publicly called him out! Nate is one of the most honorable men out there. He never attacked this piece of crap and he has the audacity to call him a liar after all the benefit of the doubt Nate gave him. So what will Gary do? Will he finally admit what happened? Of course not. Will he accept Nate's invitation to settle it face-to-face? No. He'll run, do what he always does, ignore Nate, avoid direct confrontation, and continue taking shit on all of us. That who Gary is a clown! As Tucker Carlson said, "He's a weak man." Tucker knows! Gary is a weak men. watch him avoid Nate forever now! Tucker Carlson Ian Carroll RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅 theleahfiles MIA Baron Coleman Baron Coleman Candace Owens ADN1776

ELIZABETH LANE

82,525 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“I can’t speak on whether he was close to converting…I do think from what I’ve been told that he was planning on signing up and starting that process [of becoming Catholic]. But I did not personally have that conversation with him…” A few things: Candace says she can’t speak on whether Charlie was close to converting to Catholicism—and then immediately goes on to speak about how she thinks he was close to converting. 🙄 Additionally, the first time she ever spoke about this (September 15th, see the 2nd clip below) she suggested he was close to converting. Because it’s Candace, she didn’t come right out and say, but she said he “was on the verge of changing some of his beliefs” and then went on to speak about how he was praying the rosary and attending mass. She also referenced him “taking that last step.” All of those things paired together imply (again without outright saying) he was close to converting. She also said in the same episode he was “too smart to be Protestant.” Mind you, this was FIVE DAYS after Charlie had been murdered. Charlie’s parents are Protestant. His wife was raised Catholic but is now Protestant. And whether you think he was close to converting or not, Charlie died Protestant. Her saying that FIVE DAYS after his murder was callous and tone deaf. This is how Candace makes things always and all about herself. This was in fact the first thing that clued me in that something was seriously wrong, after previously being her fan. Today, she doubled down on her implications that Charlie was close to converting (even though again she’d just said she couldn’t speak on that). She said she and Charlie were having conversations about it, but the only evidence she’s ever presented is a single vague text allegedly from him and dated February 2024. The problem is that Charlie went on to reiterate he was evangelical and all of his issues with the Catholic faith this year, in the months leading up to his death. Indeed, one of the final things he said on this earth the day he died was that he was evangelical. So even if he sent that text to Candace in February of 2024, it’s clear he wasn’t that convicted and that she read more into it than was actually meant. Because again, this year, in 2025, he was reaffirming his evangelical faith. Lastly, Candace admitted today that she heard from someone else that Charlie was becoming Catholic (likely Bishop Joseph Brennan). But if she and Charlie were already having conversations about the possibility of him converting (as she claims they were), why wouldn’t he tell Candace directly? Especially when again they allegedly were already having conversations about it? Please listen to what this woman actually says from one month, one week, one day to the next. And parse it out. Hear what she’s saying and also what she’s not saying. Determine what she’s implying. Compare herself to herself. And see if she makes sense to you, if she provides clarity to you, if she provides evidence. Not just on the subject of Charlie converting but on all subjects pertaining to this “investigation.” Finally, this has NOTHING to do with who murdered Charlie and why. I’m tired of talking about it, but she keeps being dishonest about what she actually said, again a mere five days after his murder.
1:26

“I can’t speak on whether he was close to converting…I do think from what I’ve been told that he was planning on signing up and starting that process [of becoming Catholic]. But I did not personally have that conversation with him…” A few things: Candace says she can’t speak on whether Charlie was close to converting to Catholicism—and then immediately goes on to speak about how she thinks he was close to converting. 🙄 Additionally, the first time she ever spoke about this (September 15th, see the 2nd clip below) she suggested he was close to converting. Because it’s Candace, she didn’t come right out and say, but she said he “was on the verge of changing some of his beliefs” and then went on to speak about how he was praying the rosary and attending mass. She also referenced him “taking that last step.” All of those things paired together imply (again without outright saying) he was close to converting. She also said in the same episode he was “too smart to be Protestant.” Mind you, this was FIVE DAYS after Charlie had been murdered. Charlie’s parents are Protestant. His wife was raised Catholic but is now Protestant. And whether you think he was close to converting or not, Charlie died Protestant. Her saying that FIVE DAYS after his murder was callous and tone deaf. This is how Candace makes things always and all about herself. This was in fact the first thing that clued me in that something was seriously wrong, after previously being her fan. Today, she doubled down on her implications that Charlie was close to converting (even though again she’d just said she couldn’t speak on that). She said she and Charlie were having conversations about it, but the only evidence she’s ever presented is a single vague text allegedly from him and dated February 2024. The problem is that Charlie went on to reiterate he was evangelical and all of his issues with the Catholic faith this year, in the months leading up to his death. Indeed, one of the final things he said on this earth the day he died was that he was evangelical. So even if he sent that text to Candace in February of 2024, it’s clear he wasn’t that convicted and that she read more into it than was actually meant. Because again, this year, in 2025, he was reaffirming his evangelical faith. Lastly, Candace admitted today that she heard from someone else that Charlie was becoming Catholic (likely Bishop Joseph Brennan). But if she and Charlie were already having conversations about the possibility of him converting (as she claims they were), why wouldn’t he tell Candace directly? Especially when again they allegedly were already having conversations about it? Please listen to what this woman actually says from one month, one week, one day to the next. And parse it out. Hear what she’s saying and also what she’s not saying. Determine what she’s implying. Compare herself to herself. And see if she makes sense to you, if she provides clarity to you, if she provides evidence. Not just on the subject of Charlie converting but on all subjects pertaining to this “investigation.” Finally, this has NOTHING to do with who murdered Charlie and why. I’m tired of talking about it, but she keeps being dishonest about what she actually said, again a mere five days after his murder.

Natalie Jean Beisner

42,540 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

It’s time to share something that Charlie said to his pilot the day he was assassinated. “As he came down the aircraft stairs he shook my hand as he normally does and then he stopped. He looked at me with a huge smile and said "(Pilots name), today is going to be a great day". For Charlie, it was prophetic. That was the day that he got to meet his creator and all of the Bible mysteries were revealed to him. I truly believe Charlie was Gods messenger to us and the world.” This pilot then flew back to pick up Erika in Charlie’s plane when he was killed. We need to start taking this very seriously that Charlie knew what was going to happen to him the day he was assassinated. I believe Candace caught onto this very early. Charlie was manipulated by everyone around him like a cult, to carry out this mission. Candace Owens
10:48

It’s time to share something that Charlie said to his pilot the day he was assassinated. “As he came down the aircraft stairs he shook my hand as he normally does and then he stopped. He looked at me with a huge smile and said "(Pilots name), today is going to be a great day". For Charlie, it was prophetic. That was the day that he got to meet his creator and all of the Bible mysteries were revealed to him. I truly believe Charlie was Gods messenger to us and the world.” This pilot then flew back to pick up Erika in Charlie’s plane when he was killed. We need to start taking this very seriously that Charlie knew what was going to happen to him the day he was assassinated. I believe Candace caught onto this very early. Charlie was manipulated by everyone around him like a cult, to carry out this mission. Candace Owens

Honest Ash

184,310 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

👉OK, soooo we have just been told by Ben Shapiro, that Charlie WAS still ALIVE…as he was been carried… to the SUV, and that he himself… was informed of this by The Security “Team” AS they were in route to the hospital… SO NOW…WHAT’S THE DEAL WITH ZERO BLOOD DRIPPING ON THE GROUND…IN THE CLOCKED (33 SECOND) TRIP FROM THE TABLE TO THE SUV?.. 👉JUST A QUESTION?…..
0:48

👉OK, soooo we have just been told by Ben Shapiro, that Charlie WAS still ALIVE…as he was been carried… to the SUV, and that he himself… was informed of this by The Security “Team” AS they were in route to the hospital… SO NOW…WHAT’S THE DEAL WITH ZERO BLOOD DRIPPING ON THE GROUND…IN THE CLOCKED (33 SECOND) TRIP FROM THE TABLE TO THE SUV?.. 👉JUST A QUESTION?…..

Selina Anne

128,669 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

‼️EXPOSED: Andrew Tried to Claim Charlie Feared the Left — Charlie Was Warning About the Deep State/ Israel👀 In the Candace Owens vs Andrew Wilson debate, Andrew pushed the idea that Charlie was primarily worried the left was going to kill him. That is not what Charlie was saying in the months and even weeks before his assassination. Charlie was clear: the imminent threat to the republic was the Deep State, the oligarchs, and the establishment — not transgenders, not “the left,” and not the recycled Cold War communism talking points now being pushed by the White House and certain influencers. He was challenging the narrative on Greater Israel and the Israel lobby. He was aligning with the hard questions. And right as he was about to pull the mask further off that issue, he was killed. Now watch the same people who told everyone to “pick up the mic” and carry on Charlie’s legacy send cease-and-desists, attack Candace for asking questions, and blacklist anyone who refuses to shut up. The 180 is transparent. This is not about protecting Charlie’s legacy. It’s about controlling the narrative he was threatening to expose.
1:53

‼️EXPOSED: Andrew Tried to Claim Charlie Feared the Left — Charlie Was Warning About the Deep State/ Israel👀 In the Candace Owens vs Andrew Wilson debate, Andrew pushed the idea that Charlie was primarily worried the left was going to kill him. That is not what Charlie was saying in the months and even weeks before his assassination. Charlie was clear: the imminent threat to the republic was the Deep State, the oligarchs, and the establishment — not transgenders, not “the left,” and not the recycled Cold War communism talking points now being pushed by the White House and certain influencers. He was challenging the narrative on Greater Israel and the Israel lobby. He was aligning with the hard questions. And right as he was about to pull the mask further off that issue, he was killed. Now watch the same people who told everyone to “pick up the mic” and carry on Charlie’s legacy send cease-and-desists, attack Candace for asking questions, and blacklist anyone who refuses to shut up. The 180 is transparent. This is not about protecting Charlie’s legacy. It’s about controlling the narrative he was threatening to expose.

Project Constitution

15,137 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

THE MYSTERIOUS CASE OF THE OTHER MICROPHONE MAN: COOPER BROWN—AND THE ORIGINAL WITNESS TESTIMONY THAT CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT IN THE CHEST Candace Owens Baron Coleman Jimmy Dore 18 minutes after Charlie Kirk was k*lled, Cooper Brown infamously physically stopped Jeb Jacobi from telling us Charlie had been shot in the neck. That was at 12:42 PM MDT. And then Cooper himself went on Fox News later that day to tell us the exact same thing at about 6:35 PM MDT. Have you ever wondered what explains this sequence of events? It might have something to do with the fact that there seemed to be an original narrative earlier in the afternoon that Charlie had been shot in the chest, but which was soon changed to the story we know now that he'd been shot in the neck. Shot in the chest = Narrative 1.0 Shot in the neck = Narrative 2.0 One witness, "Sarah from Draper", went on national TV at 1:17 PM MDT to tell us that Charlie had been shot in the chest (Narrative 1.0). Then she went on TV again at 2:08 PM MDT, just 51 minutes later, and changed her story to Charlie having been shot in the neck (Narrative 2.0). When Jeb Jacobi told everyone that Charlie had been shot in the neck, it's possible that Cooper Brown was still operating on the pre-established Narrative 1.0, "Shot in the chest," and Cooper intervened to stop Jeb's narrative from getting out. At that moment in time, from Cooper's POV (allegedly), the official Narrative (1.0) was supposed to be a chest shot. Later, after the Narrative had to be modified to 2.0, Cooper went on national news to help establish the new version—along with the rest of the fake narrative: that Charlie had been taken out by a disgruntled Leftist. Nevermind that Tyler Robinson hadn't yet been captured. ONE POSSIBLE EXPLANATION SCENARIO (ALLEGEDLY): Charlie's mic or necklace was supposed to explode, simulating a .30-06 shot to the chest. Something unanticipated happened creating a neck wound. Cooper's back was to the scene as it happened, so he didn't see the neck wound. But he did inadvertently tell us that he turned around due to the sound of the "POP!" (which must have come from behind him to his right). This was the Rode Mic (or maybe necklace) exploding. Once the police herded everyone into the Sorenson Student Center, that's where we got the confrontation between him and Jeb Jacobi. Cooper didn't yet know the shifted narrative: he hadn't seen what happened, and was still programmed to enforce Narrative 1.0, the chest shot. About 35 minutes after the Brown/Jacobi altercation, "Sarah From Draper"—herself still operating on Narrative 1.0—went on TV to tell us Charlie was shot in the chest. Sometime after that, whomever was orchestring this narrative control and cover-up, issued the new directive: Narrative 2.0, Charlie was shot in the neck. And just 51 minutes later, Sarah was paraded out on TV again to establish the new tall tale. And then Cooper Brown was sent onto Fox News, not once but twice: once the evening of the 10th, and another time in the early afternoon on September 11th. The second time, he helped parrot the other critical part of the anchoring narrative: that Charlie had been taken out by a disgruntled Leftist. And then, "ABRACADABRA!" a few hours later, Tyler Robinson would turn himself in. And the rest, as they say, is history. NOTES ON JEB JACOBI: Some have observed Jeb Jacobi's odd video rehearsal with Phil Lyman a few minutes after Charlie's death, just before the altercation with Cooper Brown. Why was he rehearsing his testimony that Charlie had been shot in the neck? Is it because it was different from the original narrative he was supposed to give us? It's also been noted that Jacobi was the only other person known to have covered his ears or grabbed his head, besides Hunter Kozak, when Charlie was killed. Why were they the only ones in the crowd that reacted this way? Then, somehow, Jacobi appeared on "60 Minutes" with Hunter Kozak, where they both helped anchor the original narrative that Leftist violence is the problem and that we need more open dialogue. This helped reinforce the "trans-furry Leftist Tyler Robinson did it" patsy narrative. Was the Jacobi-Brown altercation a case of two different hands of the same corrupt body reacting on the fly to a situation that had gone awry—not realizing that they were each playing a movie role for the same Director? DISCLAIMER: This is just a possible theoretical interpretation of events, given the information we have, and no actual guilt is being imputed, nor am I making any accusations. H/t: Charliesangels47 for finding the before and after Sarah footage.
9:30

THE MYSTERIOUS CASE OF THE OTHER MICROPHONE MAN: COOPER BROWN—AND THE ORIGINAL WITNESS TESTIMONY THAT CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT IN THE CHEST Candace Owens Baron Coleman Jimmy Dore 18 minutes after Charlie Kirk was k*lled, Cooper Brown infamously physically stopped Jeb Jacobi from telling us Charlie had been shot in the neck. That was at 12:42 PM MDT. And then Cooper himself went on Fox News later that day to tell us the exact same thing at about 6:35 PM MDT. Have you ever wondered what explains this sequence of events? It might have something to do with the fact that there seemed to be an original narrative earlier in the afternoon that Charlie had been shot in the chest, but which was soon changed to the story we know now that he'd been shot in the neck. Shot in the chest = Narrative 1.0 Shot in the neck = Narrative 2.0 One witness, "Sarah from Draper", went on national TV at 1:17 PM MDT to tell us that Charlie had been shot in the chest (Narrative 1.0). Then she went on TV again at 2:08 PM MDT, just 51 minutes later, and changed her story to Charlie having been shot in the neck (Narrative 2.0). When Jeb Jacobi told everyone that Charlie had been shot in the neck, it's possible that Cooper Brown was still operating on the pre-established Narrative 1.0, "Shot in the chest," and Cooper intervened to stop Jeb's narrative from getting out. At that moment in time, from Cooper's POV (allegedly), the official Narrative (1.0) was supposed to be a chest shot. Later, after the Narrative had to be modified to 2.0, Cooper went on national news to help establish the new version—along with the rest of the fake narrative: that Charlie had been taken out by a disgruntled Leftist. Nevermind that Tyler Robinson hadn't yet been captured. ONE POSSIBLE EXPLANATION SCENARIO (ALLEGEDLY): Charlie's mic or necklace was supposed to explode, simulating a .30-06 shot to the chest. Something unanticipated happened creating a neck wound. Cooper's back was to the scene as it happened, so he didn't see the neck wound. But he did inadvertently tell us that he turned around due to the sound of the "POP!" (which must have come from behind him to his right). This was the Rode Mic (or maybe necklace) exploding. Once the police herded everyone into the Sorenson Student Center, that's where we got the confrontation between him and Jeb Jacobi. Cooper didn't yet know the shifted narrative: he hadn't seen what happened, and was still programmed to enforce Narrative 1.0, the chest shot. About 35 minutes after the Brown/Jacobi altercation, "Sarah From Draper"—herself still operating on Narrative 1.0—went on TV to tell us Charlie was shot in the chest. Sometime after that, whomever was orchestring this narrative control and cover-up, issued the new directive: Narrative 2.0, Charlie was shot in the neck. And just 51 minutes later, Sarah was paraded out on TV again to establish the new tall tale. And then Cooper Brown was sent onto Fox News, not once but twice: once the evening of the 10th, and another time in the early afternoon on September 11th. The second time, he helped parrot the other critical part of the anchoring narrative: that Charlie had been taken out by a disgruntled Leftist. And then, "ABRACADABRA!" a few hours later, Tyler Robinson would turn himself in. And the rest, as they say, is history. NOTES ON JEB JACOBI: Some have observed Jeb Jacobi's odd video rehearsal with Phil Lyman a few minutes after Charlie's death, just before the altercation with Cooper Brown. Why was he rehearsing his testimony that Charlie had been shot in the neck? Is it because it was different from the original narrative he was supposed to give us? It's also been noted that Jacobi was the only other person known to have covered his ears or grabbed his head, besides Hunter Kozak, when Charlie was killed. Why were they the only ones in the crowd that reacted this way? Then, somehow, Jacobi appeared on "60 Minutes" with Hunter Kozak, where they both helped anchor the original narrative that Leftist violence is the problem and that we need more open dialogue. This helped reinforce the "trans-furry Leftist Tyler Robinson did it" patsy narrative. Was the Jacobi-Brown altercation a case of two different hands of the same corrupt body reacting on the fly to a situation that had gone awry—not realizing that they were each playing a movie role for the same Director? DISCLAIMER: This is just a possible theoretical interpretation of events, given the information we have, and no actual guilt is being imputed, nor am I making any accusations. H/t: Charliesangels47 for finding the before and after Sarah footage.

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

64,882 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

‼️Candace Owens Just Exposed ANOTHER Major Contradiction: Was CPR Performed on Charlie Kirk or NOT?🤔 In her latest episode, Candace Owens highlighted yet another glaring inconsistency in the official story — this time regarding whether CPR was actually performed on Charlie Kirk in the car on the way to the hospital. Here’s what we know so far: Frank Turek has said he attempted CPR in the backseat but that it wasn’t effective. Brian Harpole directly contradicted that, saying no CPR was being done because they were focused on stopping the bleeding. Rob McCoy went on stage and claimed Frank Turek was giving Charlie CPR and was covered in blood. Andrew Kolvet implied CPR was happening when he spoke about the necklace being removed “as they tried to save his life.” These stories don’t line up. Either CPR was happening, or it wasn’t. Yet multiple people who were in that car are telling conflicting versions of events. She asked the obvious question: Why are the people involved refusing to clear up these basic contradictions? Instead of answering, Candace noted they’ve chosen to attack questioners with lawsuits and cease-and-desists. FOLLOW Candace Owens — she continues to highlight the inconsistencies that nobody else is willing to address. This case is full of holes. ⚠️My channel is under coordinated attack to bankrupt and silence this investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE Here:
5:51

‼️Candace Owens Just Exposed ANOTHER Major Contradiction: Was CPR Performed on Charlie Kirk or NOT?🤔 In her latest episode, Candace Owens highlighted yet another glaring inconsistency in the official story — this time regarding whether CPR was actually performed on Charlie Kirk in the car on the way to the hospital. Here’s what we know so far: Frank Turek has said he attempted CPR in the backseat but that it wasn’t effective. Brian Harpole directly contradicted that, saying no CPR was being done because they were focused on stopping the bleeding. Rob McCoy went on stage and claimed Frank Turek was giving Charlie CPR and was covered in blood. Andrew Kolvet implied CPR was happening when he spoke about the necklace being removed “as they tried to save his life.” These stories don’t line up. Either CPR was happening, or it wasn’t. Yet multiple people who were in that car are telling conflicting versions of events. She asked the obvious question: Why are the people involved refusing to clear up these basic contradictions? Instead of answering, Candace noted they’ve chosen to attack questioners with lawsuits and cease-and-desists. FOLLOW Candace Owens — she continues to highlight the inconsistencies that nobody else is willing to address. This case is full of holes. ⚠️My channel is under coordinated attack to bankrupt and silence this investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE Here:

Project Constitution

173,256 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The most SICKENING thing is how Charlie Kirk's entire show and company moved on like nothing ever even happened. Also, come to find out that Charlie Kirk had a CATHOLIC funeral and was buried in a CATHOLIC cemetery. Strange how they hid this information. Almost like it ruins their narrative and agenda that Charlie didn't just "like the architecture of Catholic churches," and shows that maybe Charlie was about to convert to Catholicism like we were told in the first place, but was then covered up. I will tell you that you first need to understand who these people really are and the control and funding behind them. Charlie started to steer away from what they wanted him to do. Charlie started to notice the TRUTH and the LIES and he started to tell the world. The people funding Charlie's company didn't like that and neither did the people under Charlie who were getting paid. Charlie chose the road of TRUTH, while the others chose not to lose the FUNDING of the DONORS and a plan was made that did not include Charlie, but Charlie owned the company. This was a major problem. Charlie was then eliminated and removed and TPUSA continues the direction that THEY wanted to go. Not CHARLIE'S direction or to push the TRUTH... The direction that the MONEY tells them to go and the agenda and narratives they are told to push. It's time to wake up from your slumber and understand that Charlie was assassinated for telling the truth and calling out the lies and corruption. They couldn't afford to be exposed, so they killed him. It's clear as day. cc: Candace Owens
5:29

The most SICKENING thing is how Charlie Kirk's entire show and company moved on like nothing ever even happened. Also, come to find out that Charlie Kirk had a CATHOLIC funeral and was buried in a CATHOLIC cemetery. Strange how they hid this information. Almost like it ruins their narrative and agenda that Charlie didn't just "like the architecture of Catholic churches," and shows that maybe Charlie was about to convert to Catholicism like we were told in the first place, but was then covered up. I will tell you that you first need to understand who these people really are and the control and funding behind them. Charlie started to steer away from what they wanted him to do. Charlie started to notice the TRUTH and the LIES and he started to tell the world. The people funding Charlie's company didn't like that and neither did the people under Charlie who were getting paid. Charlie chose the road of TRUTH, while the others chose not to lose the FUNDING of the DONORS and a plan was made that did not include Charlie, but Charlie owned the company. This was a major problem. Charlie was then eliminated and removed and TPUSA continues the direction that THEY wanted to go. Not CHARLIE'S direction or to push the TRUTH... The direction that the MONEY tells them to go and the agenda and narratives they are told to push. It's time to wake up from your slumber and understand that Charlie was assassinated for telling the truth and calling out the lies and corruption. They couldn't afford to be exposed, so they killed him. It's clear as day. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

203,485 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Wow. Joe Kent just revealed the last thing Charlie Kirk said to him: “The last time I saw Charlie Kirk on this Earth was in June, in the West Wing.” “He looked me in the eye and he said … Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran.” “One of President Trump’s closest advisors was vocally advocating for us to not go to war with Iran and for us to rethink, at least, our relationship with the Israelis.” “And then he’s suddenly publicly assassinated and we’re not allowed to ask any questions about that?” “The investigation that I was a part of [with] the National Counterterrorism Center, we were stopped from continuing to investigate.” “But there was still a lot for us to look into that I can’t really get into.” “There’s unanswered questions.” “We know, because of the text messages that have been made public, that Charlie was under a lot of pressure from a lot of pro-Israel donors.” Joe Kent Tucker Carlson
2:09

Wow. Joe Kent just revealed the last thing Charlie Kirk said to him: “The last time I saw Charlie Kirk on this Earth was in June, in the West Wing.” “He looked me in the eye and he said … Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran.” “One of President Trump’s closest advisors was vocally advocating for us to not go to war with Iran and for us to rethink, at least, our relationship with the Israelis.” “And then he’s suddenly publicly assassinated and we’re not allowed to ask any questions about that?” “The investigation that I was a part of [with] the National Counterterrorism Center, we were stopped from continuing to investigate.” “But there was still a lot for us to look into that I can’t really get into.” “There’s unanswered questions.” “We know, because of the text messages that have been made public, that Charlie was under a lot of pressure from a lot of pro-Israel donors.” Joe Kent Tucker Carlson

Holden Culotta

4,668,754 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

‼️Candace Owens REVEALS That Brian Harpole Cut Off Charlie’s Freedom SHIRT At The Hospital — Was Charlie's Assassination An INSIDE Job?😳 Candace Owens just dropped a major detail about what happened to Charlie Kirk’s white “Freedom” shirt after the assassination. According to Brian Harpole’s own account on the Shawn Ryan Show, he personally cut the shirt off Charlie’s body once they arrived at the hospital. Candace points out how suspicious this is. If Charlie was killed by an explosive device in his microphone, that shirt would have been covered in residue and become one of the most important pieces of evidence. Instead, it appears to have vanished. She questions why Brian Harpole, who is not medical personnel, was allowed to cut the shirt off and remove it in the first place. This lines up with the growing pattern of evidence conveniently disappearing — from the soil at the scene being dug up and replaced within days, to the necklace being handed over, and now the shirt. Hey Andrew Kolvet and FBI Salt Lake City Where is the clothing Charlie Kirk was wearing that day??? FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇 ⚠️If you value our work and want to help us financially, your support is what helps us stay independent and keep the lights on. DONATE Here:
10:07

‼️Candace Owens REVEALS That Brian Harpole Cut Off Charlie’s Freedom SHIRT At The Hospital — Was Charlie's Assassination An INSIDE Job?😳 Candace Owens just dropped a major detail about what happened to Charlie Kirk’s white “Freedom” shirt after the assassination. According to Brian Harpole’s own account on the Shawn Ryan Show, he personally cut the shirt off Charlie’s body once they arrived at the hospital. Candace points out how suspicious this is. If Charlie was killed by an explosive device in his microphone, that shirt would have been covered in residue and become one of the most important pieces of evidence. Instead, it appears to have vanished. She questions why Brian Harpole, who is not medical personnel, was allowed to cut the shirt off and remove it in the first place. This lines up with the growing pattern of evidence conveniently disappearing — from the soil at the scene being dug up and replaced within days, to the necklace being handed over, and now the shirt. Hey Andrew Kolvet and FBI Salt Lake City Where is the clothing Charlie Kirk was wearing that day??? FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇 ⚠️If you value our work and want to help us financially, your support is what helps us stay independent and keep the lights on. DONATE Here:

Project Constitution

53,010 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад