正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Secretary Rubio just stated that he believes the War Powers Act, which Democrats keep trying to invoke to stop President Trump's Iran operations, is UNCONSTITUTIONAL "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of the President of... show more

Nick Sortor

1,565,241 subscribers

111,283 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

.Secretary Marco Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional—100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of President Donald J. Trump now, this is the position of every single president that has occupied this position since the day that law passed... We comply with it in terms of like notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress... but even as a senator, I would say that the war powers act is 100% unconstitutional."

.Secretary Marco Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional—100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of President Donald J. Trump now, this is the position of every single president that has occupied this position since the day that law passed... We comply with it in terms of like notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress... but even as a senator, I would say that the war powers act is 100% unconstitutional."

Rapid Response 47

204,981 次观看 • 3 个月前

SECRETARY RUBIO: The War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional. This has been the position of every single presidential administration since this law passed. It’s an infringement on the president’s constitutional powers.

SECRETARY RUBIO: The War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional. This has been the position of every single presidential administration since this law passed. It’s an infringement on the president’s constitutional powers.

Department of State

72,872 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio deems the War Powers Act UNCONSTITUTIONAL Democrats have failed again. "I want to be clear on the War Powers Act: it's unconstitutional, and EVERY presidential administration has taken that position." 🔥

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio deems the War Powers Act UNCONSTITUTIONAL Democrats have failed again. "I want to be clear on the War Powers Act: it's unconstitutional, and EVERY presidential administration has taken that position." 🔥

Eric Daugherty

24,061 次观看 • 3 个月前

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Secretary Marco Rubio said he would “love” to comment on the War Powers Act before declaring it unconstitutional: “The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%.” It’s worth noting that Thomas Massie Thomas Massie recently co-sponsored the War Powers Act with Ilhan Omar Ilhan Omar. Massie, Omar, and the elected Dems are completely lawless.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Secretary Marco Rubio said he would “love” to comment on the War Powers Act before declaring it unconstitutional: “The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%.” It’s worth noting that Thomas Massie Thomas Massie recently co-sponsored the War Powers Act with Ilhan Omar Ilhan Omar. Massie, Omar, and the elected Dems are completely lawless.

Loomer Unleashed

69,791 次观看 • 3 个月前

BREAKING: Marco Rubio is NOT BACKING DOWN to the threats of a democratic lead War Powers resolution over their actions in Iran: "We've OVER COMPLIED with the law and what it requires." "Congress votes on those. They can if they want. There are mechanisms for it and we've complied with the war powers act even though we believe it's unconstitutional as has every other administration. Every other president has found the war powers act to be unconstitutional and nonetheless we notified the gang of eight which was an appropriate mechanism by which to notify congress. We sent a notification within 48 hours the way the law requires." Rubio is NUKING them from orbit!

BREAKING: Marco Rubio is NOT BACKING DOWN to the threats of a democratic lead War Powers resolution over their actions in Iran: "We've OVER COMPLIED with the law and what it requires." "Congress votes on those. They can if they want. There are mechanisms for it and we've complied with the war powers act even though we believe it's unconstitutional as has every other administration. Every other president has found the war powers act to be unconstitutional and nonetheless we notified the gang of eight which was an appropriate mechanism by which to notify congress. We sent a notification within 48 hours the way the law requires." Rubio is NUKING them from orbit!

Gunther Eagleman™

19,107 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨NEW: Jonathan Turley *TAKES SLEDGEHAMMER* to Dems' claim Trump violated War Powers Act in Iran🚨 "The position of senior Democrats is not just HYPOCRITICAL — it's now INCOMPREHENSIBLE ... Trump is in COMPLIANCE with that act." Daily Caller

🚨NEW: Jonathan Turley TAKES SLEDGEHAMMER to Dems' claim Trump violated War Powers Act in Iran🚨 "The position of senior Democrats is not just HYPOCRITICAL — it's now INCOMPREHENSIBLE ... Trump is in COMPLIANCE with that act." Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

66,364 次观看 • 5 个月前

VP Vance: "Every president, Democrat or Republican, believes the war powers act is fundamentally a fake and unconstitutional law. It's not going to change anything about how we conduct foreign policy over the next couple of weeks, the next couple of months."

VP Vance: "Every president, Democrat or Republican, believes the war powers act is fundamentally a fake and unconstitutional law. It's not going to change anything about how we conduct foreign policy over the next couple of weeks, the next couple of months."

CSPAN

22,266 次观看 • 7 个月前

.Vice President JD Vance: “... every president, Democrat or Republican, believes the War Powers Act is fundamentally a fake and unconstitutional law – it's not going to change anything about how we conduct foreign policy over the next couple of weeks or the next couple of months and that will continue to be how we approach things.”

.Vice President JD Vance: “... every president, Democrat or Republican, believes the War Powers Act is fundamentally a fake and unconstitutional law – it's not going to change anything about how we conduct foreign policy over the next couple of weeks or the next couple of months and that will continue to be how we approach things.”

Department of State

56,716 次观看 • 7 个月前

You keep hearing that the president’s military actions are “unconstitutional” because of the War Powers Act of 1973. I break down the facts. No president — Democrat or Republican — has ever accepted the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and the Constitution clearly divides authority: Congress can declare war, but the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The framers intentionally rejected giving Congress the power to “make war,” limiting it instead to declaring war, while the president executes military operations and foreign policy. In this clip, I explain the real constitutional structure behind war powers and why the political debate you’re hearing is often more about politics than law. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

You keep hearing that the president’s military actions are “unconstitutional” because of the War Powers Act of 1973. I break down the facts. No president — Democrat or Republican — has ever accepted the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and the Constitution clearly divides authority: Congress can declare war, but the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The framers intentionally rejected giving Congress the power to “make war,” limiting it instead to declaring war, while the president executes military operations and foreign policy. In this clip, I explain the real constitutional structure behind war powers and why the political debate you’re hearing is often more about politics than law. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

44,094 次观看 • 5 个月前

"We've complied with the War Powers Act even though we believe its unconstitutional." Sec'y Rubio refutes claims from members of Congress that the Trump administration required their authorization before launching Iran strikes.

"We've complied with the War Powers Act even though we believe its unconstitutional." Sec'y Rubio refutes claims from members of Congress that the Trump administration required their authorization before launching Iran strikes.

MS NOW

45,079 次观看 • 6 个月前

Graham: The War Powers Act was passed in 1973 by a bunch of liberal Democrats. It's a power grab by the congress against the commander in chief. Every president has rejected the idea that congress can substitute our judgment for theirs. This is an unconstitutional power grab. To my colleagues, you're doing a lot of damage. You're emboldening our enemies. Stop it.

Graham: The War Powers Act was passed in 1973 by a bunch of liberal Democrats. It's a power grab by the congress against the commander in chief. Every president has rejected the idea that congress can substitute our judgment for theirs. This is an unconstitutional power grab. To my colleagues, you're doing a lot of damage. You're emboldening our enemies. Stop it.

Acyn

174,215 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨🇺🇸BERNIE SANDERS: TRUMP DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO TAKE THE U.S TO WAR “Not only is this news that I just heard alarming, but it is so grossly unconstitutional. All of you know that the only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S Congress. The President does not have the right.”

🚨🇺🇸BERNIE SANDERS: TRUMP DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO TAKE THE U.S TO WAR “Not only is this news that I just heard alarming, but it is so grossly unconstitutional. All of you know that the only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S Congress. The President does not have the right.”

Mario Nawfal

402,034 次观看 • 1 年前

💢 Rubio Says “Epic Fury” Is Over, Calls War Powers Act “Unconstitutional” 🔹Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. considers “Operation Epic Fury” concluded and claimed Washington achieved all of its objectives, while saying Trump prefers a deal with Iran that would reopen the Strait of Hormuz and establish a framework for negotiations on “all the key topics.” 🔹He said: “What the president would prefer is a deal. He would prefer to sit down and work out a memorandum of understanding for future negotiations that touches on all the key topics that have to be addressed. A full opening of the Straits [so] the world can get back to normal…” 🔹He then added that Trump would prefer this be negotiated through the route “Steve [Witkoff] and Jared [Kushner] have been working” and that “so far that is not the route that Iran has chosen.” 🔹Rubio suggested that Iran faces “generational destruction” to its economy if it continues its current course. 🔹Pressed on whether renewed fighting would fall under “Project Freedom” and how that relates to Congress and the War Powers Act, Rubio said the law is “100% unconstitutional,” but added that the administration complies with some notification requirements to preserve relations with Congress.

💢 Rubio Says “Epic Fury” Is Over, Calls War Powers Act “Unconstitutional” 🔹Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. considers “Operation Epic Fury” concluded and claimed Washington achieved all of its objectives, while saying Trump prefers a deal with Iran that would reopen the Strait of Hormuz and establish a framework for negotiations on “all the key topics.” 🔹He said: “What the president would prefer is a deal. He would prefer to sit down and work out a memorandum of understanding for future negotiations that touches on all the key topics that have to be addressed. A full opening of the Straits [so] the world can get back to normal…” 🔹He then added that Trump would prefer this be negotiated through the route “Steve [Witkoff] and Jared [Kushner] have been working” and that “so far that is not the route that Iran has chosen.” 🔹Rubio suggested that Iran faces “generational destruction” to its economy if it continues its current course. 🔹Pressed on whether renewed fighting would fall under “Project Freedom” and how that relates to Congress and the War Powers Act, Rubio said the law is “100% unconstitutional,” but added that the administration complies with some notification requirements to preserve relations with Congress.

Drop Site

52,904 次观看 • 3 个月前

As the Senate failed to advance a war powers measure for the seventh time on Wednesday that would limit President Trump’s ability to use military force against Iran, Sen. Lindsey Graham called the War Powers Resolution “patently unconstitutional.” “The whole concept of a war powers act is dangerous, absurd, and will lead to just chaos,” Graham (R-SC) said. "You can't have Congress running wars," he added. "If you want to stop war, stop the funding.”

As the Senate failed to advance a war powers measure for the seventh time on Wednesday that would limit President Trump’s ability to use military force against Iran, Sen. Lindsey Graham called the War Powers Resolution “patently unconstitutional.” “The whole concept of a war powers act is dangerous, absurd, and will lead to just chaos,” Graham (R-SC) said. "You can't have Congress running wars," he added. "If you want to stop war, stop the funding.”

CBS News

28,592 次观看 • 3 个月前

In the middle of a major military campaign, critics claim the president must first ask permission from Congress. I explain why that claim is misleading — and why presidents from both parties have rejected the War Powers Act as unconstitutional. I break down the constitutional truth about presidential war powers and why politicians keep using the War Powers Act of 1973 to attack the Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but it gives the president the authority to command the military and protect the country. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

In the middle of a major military campaign, critics claim the president must first ask permission from Congress. I explain why that claim is misleading — and why presidents from both parties have rejected the War Powers Act as unconstitutional. I break down the constitutional truth about presidential war powers and why politicians keep using the War Powers Act of 1973 to attack the Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but it gives the president the authority to command the military and protect the country. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

36,223 次观看 • 5 个月前

Tomorrow the Iran war becomes illegal under US law unless Congress votes to authorize it. 🚨 The 60 day War Powers Act deadline hits April 29. Under the 1973 law, the president must get congressional authorization to continue military operations or begin withdrawing troops. Congress has not authorized this war. The House failed to end it by a single vote. But Trump has not requested authorization yet. VP Vance has called the War Powers Act "a fake and unconstitutional law." Tomorrow could be big.

Tomorrow the Iran war becomes illegal under US law unless Congress votes to authorize it. 🚨 The 60 day War Powers Act deadline hits April 29. Under the 1973 law, the president must get congressional authorization to continue military operations or begin withdrawing troops. Congress has not authorized this war. The House failed to end it by a single vote. But Trump has not requested authorization yet. VP Vance has called the War Powers Act "a fake and unconstitutional law." Tomorrow could be big.

Crypto Rover

391,423 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: President Trump informs Congress he does NOT NEED any war authorization for Iran under the War Powers Act — which he considers unconstitutional — because hostilities ended when the ceasefire began Trump told Speaker Johnson and Sen. Grassley he will CONTINUE positioning forces in the region as needed for national security The DEMOCRATS just don't want Trump negotiating from a position of strength! They are AIDING OUR ENEMIES

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: President Trump informs Congress he does NOT NEED any war authorization for Iran under the War Powers Act — which he considers unconstitutional — because hostilities ended when the ceasefire began Trump told Speaker Johnson and Sen. Grassley he will CONTINUE positioning forces in the region as needed for national security The DEMOCRATS just don't want Trump negotiating from a position of strength! They are AIDING OUR ENEMIES

Eric Daugherty

125,367 次观看 • 4 个月前

Q: "So is it your position now that the Vice President, Delcy Rodríguez, is now the legitimate President of Venezuela?" Rubio: "This is not about the legitimate president. We don't believe that this regime in place is legitimate

Q: "So is it your position now that the Vice President, Delcy Rodríguez, is now the legitimate President of Venezuela?" Rubio: "This is not about the legitimate president. We don't believe that this regime in place is legitimate

Open Source Intel

107,767 次观看 • 7 个月前