Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Bonks has postpartum fatigue
338,136 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)
33 Kommentare

as far as i know woman's rights were funded by company's so the work force would increase and decrease in value. now we need two workers in A house hold unlike back then.

Money printing the main reason

What the fuck is she doing here?

That wouldn’t have changed anything, feminism is a tool that is working as intended.

Feminism started as a organized social and political movement in the 19th century known as first wave feminism focused on gaining basic legal rights, property ownership, access to higher education, and the right to vote for women. Sadly as time has gone by to many have perverted feminism and turned it in to something not at all what it was intended. Similar to how when Mothers Day first was made a holiday the following year and the for the rest of her life the one that started it petitioned to remove it as a holiday because it was nothing as she had intended. Greed ruined it with in the first year. Also interesting fact but did you know that in the USA before the 19th Amendment granted nationwide voting rights in 1920, several western states and territories led by Wyoming and Utah pioneered equal voting and civil rights for women. Early Equal Suffrage States and Territories Wyoming: Granted women the right to vote and hold office as a territory in 1869, becoming a state in 1890. Utah: Enfranchised women in 1870; after a temporary federal repeal, it secured equal suffrage in its 1895 state constitution. Colorado: Enacted equal suffrage by a popular vote of citizens in 1893. Idaho: Granted full voting rights to women in 1896. Other Western & Midwestern States: Washington (1910), California (1911), Oregon (1912), Arizona (1912), Kansas (1912), Montana (1914), and Nevada (1914) allowed women to vote years before the federal change.

No they wouldn't. Their goal was the destruction of humanity. It's going according to plan, actually.

Good joke. but sadly untrue, because this is exactly what they were going for. Those damn witches, literally.

No, they wouldn't. Feminists are a particular type of woman that just simply can't be trusted. If anything, the anti-suffragettes would double their efforts seeing that.

OG feminists did literal terrorist bombings in the late 1800s, I doubt it

No, feminists all the way back then were just as crazy as they are now.

The leaders of feminism hated men and the family structure and were hardcore into the occult. So no they wouldn't hate it. The majority of women at that time opposed feminism because they actually foresaw the consequences. But the feminist leaders ignored the majority of women.

Why are you stealing my video ?

This from President Curtis series

Is tha Reagan? What is that serie?

Democrats were the ones that did it. This is exactly what they wanted. Women are easily influenced and that is why they vote democrat. Facts and statistics mean nothing to emotion.

Inside Job Cameo???

Was that Reagan from Inside Job

Stupid argument. That is not cause and effect. You really want women to loose their voting rights? 😕

I hate gender, why don't we make human asexually reproducing organisms that clone themselves

Nah they would be really proud This was their end goal

Weird joke. Every human should be equal, regardless of gender

They could’ve showed a lot more in this video and why women shouldn’t vote. But this was enough

Remember that many of these activists were hardcore Marxists.

😭

I almost didn't realize this was AI.

Using ai to fulfill your little fantasy so cute

This post is disgusting lol

Hey yo. Is that a possible Inside Job new season hint?

No they wouldn't. They would be cheering for having won.

Ron Manwes

Jeez man raegan robot got crazy

Bruh low key . 19th gone .

ahahahhahahahhaahahaha
