Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Booked a private massage… and things got a little more interesting than expected 😏🔥 See full story here #Asian #chudai #Sexy #Tease #AdultContent #ExclusiveContent #Fansly #SoftErotic #Sensual #Baddie #pronebone #ContentCreator #18Plus #wataa #massage

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

.John Roberts: “Why is Michael Wolff counseling Jeffrey Epstein on how to hang Donald Trump out to dry?” Mollie: “Yeah. That’s what I thought was so interesting in these emails there were many journalists who were coaching Jeffrey Epstein in how to handle things which is a weird thing to see anybody doing, much less a journalist. But back to the original point, like, that this is even a story today is something of a scandal, meaning Democrats — they went out of their way to obstruct the name of the individual in question, to make it seem like Donald Trump might have some secret here that needs to be exposed. And the reason why they obstructed the name is because Virginia Giuffre, the victim of Epstein, has had publicly and repeatedly said that Donald Trump had never witnessed or participated in any bad activity. So, this is just hard to take people seriously that they care about this. There are multiple people that have relationships with Epstein. Reid Hoffman, a Democrat super donor a very lengthy and sustained and intimate relationship with Jeffrey Epstein it would be interesting to learn more about that. Bill Clinton the former president of the United States had a relationship. We even had — Barack had a relationship. These are interesting things. But, when you make it just about Donald Trump, when we already know about it, and we already know that they had a falling out because of how Epstein was handling the situation at Mar-a-Lago, that he got kicked out, is just — I agree there is, like, stuff to know, but it’s not being handled in any way responsibly here.”

Curtis Houck

96,233 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

So A16Z GAMES speedrun is in the books. It has been quite a ride for Avataros (story below) but since most won't read that far, huge shout out to our cohort lead Troy Kirwin for just being awesome, and andrew chen and the whole A16Z GAMES team for a truly excellent program. In August of last year we got accepted to Speedrun 2 in SF. My wife and I were expecting our 3rd child and we realized the little guy would be due to pop during the program. This was such an amazing opportunity that we moved heaven and earth to make it happen (shout out to the most amazing wife and mom in the world Meron Bratzel). But as things go, the day before I was set to get on a plane to San Francisco, I got a call from my wife. She was at a check-up with her OB. We were still more than 5 weeks away from the due date but they were going to keep her at the hospital indefinitely. I got to the hospital, spoke with my wife and the doctors, and then when I had a minute I called Troy and told him the situation. The A16Z Team got back to me nearly instantly and told me not to give it a second thought - come to Speedrun 3 instead. Little RoRo was born just a few days later, and he and his Mama were both in perfect health. And it turned out Speedrun 3 was held in my own backyard of LA at the new A16Z office, making it much more convenient for us with a newborn. Having this come full circle, with such an amazing response and result on all fronts is truly remarkable, and I'm so appreciative of everyone that has supported us along the way.

Isaac Bratzel

35,773 просмотров • 2 лет назад

New: Annie Jacobsen on Rogan "Extraterrestrial beings [are] certainly going to be a lot more [intelligent] than us. It wouldn't be visible to our spectrum." ~AJ "A lot of really legitimate-thinker people that didn't have an opinion about [UFOs] before, [are now] more open to the idea." ~AJ (Most of the full segment (cued up in the replies) is AJ expressing her skepticism, leaning towards government deception and disinformation, and her disinterest in the UFO subject. But this was interesting.) ~ Annie Jacobsen: "I find the most interesting concept is something that Jacques Vallée explained to me. This has to be a decade ago, where he said, 'The problem with UFOs is they're not a military problem; they're an intelligence-community problem,' for precisely the reason you're talking about. "Like, if you're actually talking about extraterrestrial beings, their certainly going to be a lot more [intelligent] than us, and certainly if they got here. And that's where I think a lot of that idea of invisibility. And again, that's like - I'm using the word poetically - comes up, right? That an extraterrestrial being would be, would be intel(ligent). You know, it wouldn't be visible to our spectrum. It's not like hardware, like military hardware." Rogan: "Right. What is your take on all these videos then, of these objects? You think these things are some top-secret military program?" AJ: "I mean, I've seen them, but again, I enter into it... You know, sometimes when you have a bias, and mine is certainly biased towards disinformation. So I'm just totally aware of it. And it's also...it's not that interesting to me. It just actually really isn't. I've got all these other serious interests. "But I do call up people I know who might have a more interesting take than me, who do not have the horse in the race of absolutely being convinced that aliens are among us. So, I would, for example, I'll call up fighter pilots and talk to them, or I'll talk to someone, an astronaut who is on the ISS, Jeff Ashby, who's married to my cousin Mary. "And it's interesting to hear them talk about the possibility. And these are people who do look at the objects more, also sometimes from their military-training background. And I will say that there has been a shift from 15, 18 years ago when I first wrote 'Area 51' and was reporting it, where it was definitely like a like a stigmatized subject. To a lot of really legitimate thinker people that didn't have an opinion about it before, being more open to the idea. And that kind of thing I find really interesting. Those are conversations I like having." Rogan: "Well, that really changed with the New York Times article, right?" AJ: "I don't know because I felt like that article was written by a lot of, and interviewed a lot of, people who already were very serious believers." Rogan: "Yes, but it was in the New York Times."

Joe Murgia

24,876 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Scottie Scheffler elaborated on the Bryson DeChambeau rule incident from Friday and echoed Harris English’s comments about Bryson always being on TV and camera angles being different to what’s happening: “No. I've been really focused on the tournament. I think that opens up a greater discussion that -- all I can really say is I think maybe we need to be a little bit more strict in the way that we are policing guys, but it's a little bit of a balance because you've got certain guys like a Bryson who every shot he hits is going to be shown on TV. When you have camera angles that are far away, things can look different than they do when you're right there. “We've done a good job of -- I don't know, I hate saying stuff out here because I don't want anything to get taken out of context. All I'll say is Bryson, I've known him for a long time, and he's a lot of things, but he's definitely not a cheater. I've never seen him cheat once, whether we were having a putting contest on the putting green or chipping contest, or anytime we played amateur golf, I never saw anything suspicious. “When you're watching him there from that camera angle, maybe he was a touch careless around his ball, but I don't think he did anything intentionally. “We've seen penalties happen with -- like you remember Jon Rahm a couple years ago at the Memorial when his ball moved in the rough, and it's like to the naked eye, can you really tell that? “I think sometimes it's just a difficult position in the game of golf. When I was growing up, if this was the line between things that were -- like if this was the line, here are the rules and this was the right side of it and this is when you're doing things against the rule, you always tried to stray really far that way. I feel like at times, sometimes you see players maybe push it a little bit further than they should. “I think we need to kind of get back to the traditions of the game and maybe we do need to police things a little bit more stricter in the game. “But like I said, it's a tough line to kind of cross. So that's why it's hard for me to say anything like this. Bryson is a guy that I've known for a really long time. Like I said, he's not a cheater.” The Open

Flushing It

1,026,161 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Emma Came To Talk Business. Meghan Came To Talk Meghan. After sitting through the full Emma Grede podcast with Meghan Markle, here’s my brief take. Emma asked good questions. Not gossip questions. Not royal questions. Business questions. Questions about pivots, imposter syndrome, criticism, building a brand, and what Meghan had learned from speaking to other female founders. Meghan had every opportunity to give people a real look at how she approaches business. Instead, we got the familiar stories. The childhood scrunchies. The jam. Faith over fear. The baby mama dance. The media. The noise. Time and again, questions that could have led somewhere interesting circled back to the same themes and the same carefully polished version of Meghan. Emma was trying to have a conversation about business. Meghan seemed far more interested in talking about Meghan. We learned a lot about the story she wants people to believe. We learned very little about the business itself. Most founders can talk for hours about the things that went wrong. Failed launches. Bad decisions. Partnerships that didn’t work out. Customer complaints. Unexpected problems. Expensive mistakes. The lessons that come from getting things wrong. Those are the stories that teach people something. Those are the stories that make people credible. Their absence here was noticeable. The contradictions didn’t help either. Meghan talks a lot about truth, authenticity and correcting false narratives, yet there seems to be very little reflection on her own changing stories over the years. She presents herself as a fearless risk-taker, but As Ever launched with advantages most entrepreneurs could only dream of: global name recognition, celebrity connections, media attention and a royal title. The humble beginnings narrative sits awkwardly beside all of that. The As Ever journey was also a missed opportunity. It could have been a chance to talk honestly about what didn’t work, what had to change, what she misjudged and what she learned along the way. Instead, obstacles mostly appeared as things that happened around her rather than things she might have contributed to or learned from. One answer summed up the entire interview for me. When Emma asked what Meghan had learned from the female founders she’d interviewed on her own podcast, I expected something specific. After all those conversations with successful women, surely there would be a lesson that changed her thinking, a mistake she saw repeated over and over, or advice she applied to her own business. Instead, the takeaway seemed to boil down to the idea that building a business is hard and people have regrets. Well… yes. That’s hardly a groundbreaking insight. After an entire season interviewing founders, entrepreneurs and business leaders, that’s the conclusion? Not a lesson that changed the way she operates. Not a mistake she was determined to avoid. Not a piece of advice she applied to As Ever. Just that building a business is difficult and people have regrets. By the end of the interview, the difference between Emma and Meghan couldn’t have been clearer. Emma was talking business. Meghan was talking narrative. The more the conversation went on, the more it felt like Meghan was sidestepping the substance of Emma’s questions and steering everything back to familiar talking points and personal stories. For someone positioning herself as a founder, she spent remarkably little time discussing the realities of building a business. Emma gave Meghan multiple opportunities to move beyond the carefully managed public image and show people how she thinks as a businesswoman. She never really did. What we got instead was another polished chapter in the ongoing Meghan Markle story.

Queen Esther

66,638 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад