正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Border/Durand line ke sher ! 💪 SSG night ops unit deployment Free fall 22,000 ft from C-130 .
257,296 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)
0 条评论
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
相关视频
0:57
Sensitive content
🚨 CAPTURED - PATERSON CITY HALL SURRENDERS TO PALESTINE - TAXPAYER-FUNDED HAMAS CHEERLEADING ON AMERICAN SOIL Here we go again....we are watching America fall to Islam in real time.... June 5, 2026 - Mayor Andre Sayegh and his entire council turned Paterson City Hall into a full-blown Palestinian propaganda circus. Palestinian flags everywhere. Kids chanting “Free Palestine.” Controversial Imams praying to Allah. And elected officials clapping like trained seals while the radical Palestinian-American Community Center (PACC) ran the show. 🚨The traitors who showed up to celebrate: 🔺 Mayor Andre Sayegh — bragged about his re-election, renamed Main Street “Palestine Way,” appointed the first Palestinian-American councilmen and cabinet members, and declared Paterson “a better place because Palestinians call our city home.” He called the entire council up to stand with the flag and cheered, “Free and sovereign state of Palestine.” 🔺 Council President Dr. Melissa Mims, Vice President Marissa Davila, Councilman Ibrahim “Ibby” Omar, Shahin Khalique, and the rest — all lined up like props while the crowd screamed “Free Palestine.” They openly bragged about their Muslim political machine taking over: First Palestinian-American (and Muslim) in the mayor’s cabinet (Aman Abushi - “one of the best appointments I ever made”). First Palestinian-American city councilman (Alaa Abdelaziz - now Assemblyman and “first Muslim” in the NJ legislature). Second Palestinian-American councilman (Ibrahim “Ibby” Omar). Councilman Omar boasted: “My council colleagues support Palestinians… not just here in Paterson, but 6,000 miles away in Palestine.” They bragged it’s “spreading throughout our state” — other NJ towns now raising the flag too 🔺 The speeches were straight eliminationist poison: Bessma Sharat (PACC Programs Director): “Today we raise the flag in the shadow of an ongoing genocide in Gaza… settler violence in the West Bank… end to military funding to Israel, end to the occupation, sanctions for war crimes.” She called it the “Naksa” (1967 “setback” = Israel’s victory) and vowed “Palestine will be free.” 🔺 The Imam (Islamic Center of Central County): Praised the mayor, then unloaded: “Nakba 1948, Naksa 1967… occupation still in Palestine… free free Palestine… right of return… We ask the White House to stop the occupation… Let Netanyahu and Israel pull out right now today from West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza.” Delivered straight from City Hall steps. 🔺 Parker Dia (ICE detainee, fresh out of jail, cheered by council): Equated U.S. border enforcement to “Palestinian genocide,” called ICE conditions “the same playbook” as Gaza, invented the “Palestine exception” to free speech, and screamed the flag represents “resistance” against America. 🔺 Youth brainwashing: Little kids reciting poems and singing Arabic songs about “my blood… my war… give it back to me” - ending every line with “Free, free Palestine!” 🔺 Followed by dabke dancing and free Palestinian flags handed out to children. They even had tables with coloring books, crafts, desserts from Chocolate House (Palestinian-owned), and coffee, all while demanding America defund Israel and open the borders. These frauds endlessly whine and cry about “Palestine” because it’s the perfect mobilization tool 0 exactly as spelled out in the Muslim Brotherhood’s secret 1982 blueprint “The Project.” That document calls Palestine the keystone of the entire worldwide Islamic plan: use it to rally the ummah, radicalize the next generation, forge the Red-Green Axis with leftists, fund jihad, build parallel societies that reject assimilation, and turn American cities into mini-Gazas. This is a calculated weapon to conquer from within - and Paterson is Exhibit A. Paterson isn’t America anymore. It’s the Muslim Brotherhood’s test case - and it’s spreading. Your politicians chose Palestine over America. Islam over America....
Amy Mek
147,248 次观看 • 1 个月前
![HOW THE U.N. FOOLED THE WORLD ABOUT CHINA Westerners took over control of a United Nations body to claim the Chinese locked up a million or millions of people—but they had no evidence. The “MILLIONS” number was extrapolated from interviews with just 40 people, and they were not randomly selected, said Australian lawyer and researcher Jaq James from Geolaw Narratives. These clearly untrustworthy findings were then amplified by mainstream media reports quoting people from US groups paid to demonize China—with their membership and funding hidden from readers, our own research shows. The result is a massive scam on the world’s public. Four points: . 1. THEY HIDE THE NEED FOR DERADICALIZATION Point one: In mainstream reports about terrorist deradicalization efforts after the 9/11 attack, the 9/11 act of terrorism is mentioned. Same with the deradicalization efforts after the 7/7 terrorism act in London. But there were more than 130 brutal, acts of terror in China—that’s correct, more than 130 murderous acts in which large numbers of innocent people were killed by Uyghur separatists. But these are simply not mentioned in typical reports. Only the response is mentioned. By deliberately removing the huge number of acts of terror to which the Chinese are responding, western journalists make the Chinese look like they are taking arbitrary actions against the Uyghurs. Yet the truth is that they were doing what westerners also did, responding to terrorist acts. [Image shows clip of “French re-education camps” headline] You can see how unfair that is. . 2. ORIGIN OF ‘MILLION LOCKED UP’ CLAIMS Point two: The first claim that China had arbitrarily locked up a million people was exposed by independent journalists at The Grayzone, as coming from an extrapolation from just eight people. More damning still, that extrapolation came from CHRD, a notorious US-based demonization-of-China outfit funded by the US government. The second claim that million people had been locked up came from the UNOHCR, the UN's human rights office. They took interviews from just 40 people and extrapolated what they heard to claim one million people had been unfairly locked up, as Jaq James’ research shows. Ms James points out that the UN should have interviewed randomly selected individuals to get a fair picture. But by interviewing politically networked ones, they are guaranteed to get a biased image. Again, fundamentally unfair. . 3. JUSTICE AND FAIRNESS Point three: This UN department had a leader, Michelle Bachelet, known for her appetite for justice and fairness. This meant she struggled with her staff—westerners who really controlled the operation. She insisted that their report be released alongside a response from China. Here we can see two reports – one from the UN group’s staff, and the response from China. The staff report was just 48 pages long. China’s reply was 120 pages long. How many western mainstream media outlets quoted the Chinese report, or even acknowledged its existence? Zero. Not one. Not. A. Single. One. . 4. IN WHICH WE DESTROY THE FINANCIAL TIMES Point four: The mainstream media write-ups about this subject hid the truth from readers in a shockingly deceitful way. Let’s take a look at a Financial Times article, which is fairly typical. It reinforces the UN group’s dubious findings with evidence which comes from “human rights experts and activists” – in other words, people paid by the US government to demonize China. The writers do NOT provide their names, just calling them “experts”. As Kyle Feranna said in his 2024 book: “Western NGOs, ostensibly concerned with human rights, disproportion¬ately focused on alleged violations in China despite much worse abuses occurring elsewhere in the world.” In other words, they weaponize human rights as tool to use against the Chinese. . GUANTANAMO BAY Then we get a quote from “Rushan Abbas of the Campaign for Uyghurs”. The Financial Times hides from its readers the fact that Ms Abbas was at the notorious Guantanamo Bay – not as a Muslim victim, but on the US side there. And the paper hides the fact that the Campaign for Uyghurs is financed by the NED, the CIA’s regime change spin off. These are absolutely key facts which change the whole tenor of the piece – and the FT is cheerfully deceiving its paying readers by omitting them. Abbas is quoted as saying, of the UN group’s western office staff, “without them, it would not have been released”. This reinforces many reports which say that Commissioner Michelle Bachelet did not want to release such an unfair report, but her staff, mostly westerners, pushed the unfair report out on her last day. . ANONYMOUS SOURCES Then the FT feature article quotes yet another person described as “an activist” and declines to provide his or her name. Then we go to yet another unnamed “human rights” officer. And then yes, a further unnamed “human rights” officer. And then we get a quote from an unnamed “person with knowledge”. And here we have another anonymous quote – a senior European diplomat. No name. I mean, there are so many unnamed sources in this piece, it would have been rejected at any decent journalism school. . OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY Now the FT piece breezily passes over a reference to the other side of the story by quote “China and 68 other countries”. This is hilarious. So if you are a demonizer, paid by the US State Department, you can get as many column inches in the FT as you like, with your name and funding hidden. But if you are 69 actual named countries defending China, giving the other side of the story—well, they’ll just mention it in passing. . THE REAL STORY Now, right at the bottom of the article we actually have a named person – and he actually tells the real story. “Bachelet was never really in full control of her office,” said Marc Limon. Now any journalist worth their salt would realize that that is the key quote in the whole article – and they would ask – okay, if she was not in charge of that UN group, WHO WAS? But the FT writers choose not to ask that awkward question. They don’t want to know. And they definitely don’t want their readers to know. . CLOSING LINE The FT writers close the article with a line from a quote “Uyghur journalist” who actually is named. She is Nuriman Abdureshid. So the reader is left thinking – oh, so they actually did manage to discuss this with someone in Xinjiang, someone with a name and a job. But what the FT "journalists" omit to tell the paper's long-suffering readers is that Ms Nuriman Abdureshid is associated with a group called Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, a Washington DC group which demonizes China to such an extreme extent that even other anti-China groups avoid them out of sheer embarrassment. Do I have proof that Victims of Communism is backed by the government? Well, the AI which has taken over Google tells us that Victims of Communism has received funding from the US State Department to deal with human rights issues. Here’s what happens when we look up their funding to check the details. [CLICKS LINK] “SORRY YOU HAVE BEEN BLOCKED’. Ah yes, the famous US “free speech”. . A QUESTION I’m going to close with a question. Why is the political and media class in the west working so hard to fool the world about the Chinese? Why work so hard to demonize a country that is working hard to lift itself out of starvation level poverty? What don’t they want the world to know? Could it be that China is actually doing something right? Think about that – and we may all, one day, be on the road to peace. .](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2070014240581431742/amplify_video_thumb/2070012930083758080/img/U1NzaDJxmLJBcpd4.jpg)
