Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Boris Cherny, head of Claude Code at Anthropic, on optimizing token cost and model use. “I use Fable for everything" There is probably a 50% opportunity to reduce the investment (on token cost). However, there may be a 1,000%, 10,000%, or even 100,000% opportunity to increase the return. Therefore,...

57,774 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

33 Comments

Breck Yunits's profile picture
Breck Yunits1 month ago

"Carpenters shouldn't waste time measuring cuts when they can be building. Just buy more wood. Also, I work at a lumber company."

Kristoph's profile picture
Kristoph1 month ago

You can't use Fable for everything. Fable won't discuss middle school level biology. It also won't work with content you own if it thinks the content is copyright and with the most recent version it won't work on content it disagrees with morally.

Minh Nhat Nguyen's profile picture
Minh Nhat Nguyen1 month ago

guy who doesnt eat the cost: i dont think about cost

UnsoldBanana's profile picture
UnsoldBanana1 month ago

Yeah, "I use Fable for everything" because it's free for you. I understand the point he's trying to get across, but the tokens have become really expensive. The focus becomes cost-cutting if the subscriptions do not produce anything of value and continue to hemorrhage dollars.

Rohan Paul's profile picture
Rohan Paul1 month ago

Full video

Charbs's profile picture
Charbs1 month ago

Boris’ views are so removed from his customers’ reality it’s not funny. There’s a huge cost associated with this, not the mention the countless things you can’t do with fable because it refuses to. I love fable, but this is actually terrible advice

DanT's profile picture
DanT1 month ago

Boris is great, but this is an area that he has blinders on. “Fable for everything” at enterprise scale and current pricing would require large layoffs for sufficient ROI in most places.

Marco Rotili's profile picture
Marco Rotili1 month ago

A weird thing to say from someone selling tokens.

Rahim Siddiq's profile picture
Rahim Siddiq1 month ago

The philosophical views of someone who doesn't pay token costs. Enterprises already made this mistake and decided to pull models due to cost overruns.

promethean's profile picture
promethean1 month ago

Person who gets unlimited compute from their employer loves using the most expensive compute, more at 11 ET.

George Paul Chijioke's profile picture
George Paul Chijioke1 month ago

So true, the massive return you get from a top-tier model easily scales past whatever you save by cost-cutting.

Luis Manrique's profile picture
Luis Manrique1 month ago

boris also drives his ferrari to the supermarket

justinhj 🇬🇧🇨🇦👾's profile picture
justinhj 🇬🇧🇨🇦👾1 month ago

lol who cares what he says about cost optimization. his tokens are free. are tokens line his pockets.

shaped's profile picture
shaped1 month ago

true when the task actually has 1000x upside, most tasks do not, and using fable to reformat a csv is the ai version of a lambo grocery run

Ξdo's profile picture
Ξdo1 month ago

Wine maker says he uses wine for everything including washing the dishes

ESchwaa's profile picture
ESchwaa1 month ago

this is an abundance mindset

Austin Ray's profile picture
Austin Ray1 month ago

It’s a reasonable argument for individuals/businesses with uncapped growth potential. And there’s an argument to be made that Fable+ models can help unlock uncapped growth potential. Important to note that Boris’s tokens don’t have the same cost dynamics as yours or mine

Arch Valmiki's profile picture
Arch Valmiki1 month ago

i use the most expensive product our company sells for everything. 😁 j/k i love fable and opus

Richie's profile picture
Richie1 month ago

"Guys don't save your money, put more money in the slot machine because you'll increase your chance of eventually winning! Yes, I do own the slot machine, what's your point?"

Huysolo's profile picture
Huysolo1 month ago

Using the most advanced model to maximize returns is a smart strategy!

rp's profile picture
rp1 month ago

Of course thats what he will say. He’s in the business of selling you his expensive models.

Frederick Zimmerman's profile picture
Frederick Zimmerman1 month ago

Not the same thing as an expected value calculation of > 50% + desired IRR. Anthropic's pricing is indifferent to actual value generated by end user. To their credit, OpenAI rather bravely has tried to address this issue.

AI Mastery Guide's profile picture
AI Mastery Guide1 month ago

Focus on return not cost, underrated mindset

泰多宝's profile picture
泰多宝1 month ago

Boris's math held for about a week — then Opus 5 halved the price of 'the most expensive model' while beating it. How does the advice update when the ceiling keeps moving?

Mikadzyki🌙's profile picture
Mikadzyki🌙1 month ago

cheap model habit dies hard

Anindya's profile picture
Anindya1 month ago

Mine is a skeptical take but coming from the brand ambassador of coding from Anthropic, what else could we expect? He wouldn't say anything that can reduce the token premium paid by users.

George Paul Chijioke's profile picture
George Paul Chijioke1 month ago

Focusing entirely on maximizing the output instead of penny-pinching token costs changes everything.

Manna Code's profile picture
Manna Code1 month ago

The upside framing is right. On the savings side, the win comes from not re-paying for history you already sent. Tokens per turn is the number worth watching, and model routing is the step after that.

Aladdin Kaya's profile picture
Aladdin Kaya1 month ago

This is easy to forget when everyone is obsessed with making AI cheaper. Sometimes the bigger question is what you can actually do with it.

Steven Huang's profile picture
Steven Huang1 month ago

cost reduction is just reclaiming what you spent. the upside is what you never would have attempted without the agent there in the first place.

MBK's profile picture
MBK1 month ago

Solid take. The return question gets harder when you're locked into one model's lens. Comparing a few perspectives can surface assumptions the "best" model quietly buries.

Jay Ballentine's profile picture
Jay Ballentine1 month ago

That was a well executed pitch.

Andre Buckingham 🧙‍♂️'s profile picture
Andre Buckingham 🧙‍♂️1 month ago

pretty happy with the cache hit rate after the last updates to ApexOS... 😅

Related Videos

Claude Code cracked something open for us Every 🧱. Now I ship to codebases I barely know, every feature we ship makes the next one easier, and non-technical members of the team use the terminal. I’m genuinely grateful. So I brought its creators, Cat Wu (cat) and Boris Cherny (Boris Cherny) from Anthropic, on AI & I to say thank you—and to talk about everything they’ve learned from building Claude Code. We get into: • The workflows Anthropic’s smartest engineers use to push Claude Code to its limits. Why they pit subagents against each other to get cleaner results, how they turn past code into leverage, and the slash commands and MCPs they rely on most. • The product lessons behind one of the most loved AI agents in the world. How the team balances simplicity and power—building a tool that anyone can use, but that experts can bend to their will—and their philosophy of “unshipping,” or cutting back whenever there’s a simpler, more intuitive path to user intent. • A peek into the future of coding with AI. The new form factors they’re experimenting with to make Claude Code more autonomous, more reliable, and more accessible to non-technical users This is a must-watch for anyone—both technical and non-technical—who wants to learn how to use Claude Code like the people who built it. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:26 Claude Code’s origin story: 00:02:25 How Anthropic dogfoods Claude Code: 00:07:03 Boris and Cat’s favorite slash commands: 00:14:06 How Boris uses Claude Code to plan feature development: 00:15:49 Everything Anthropic has learned about using sub-agents well: 00:21:53 Use Claude Code to turn past code into leverage: 00:26:16 The product decisions for building an agent that’s simple and powerful: 00:33:14 Making Claude Code accessible to the non-technical user: 00:36:38 The next form factor for coding with AI: 00:45:12

Dan Shipper 📧

57,619 views • 10 months ago