正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Bouncing-ball physics tests by @forwardeditor from the same prompt, Sonnet 5 vs Sonnet 5.5.

Claude

1,843,756 subscribers

98,690 次观看 • 15 天前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Opus 5.5 Max vs Sonnet 5.5 Max

Opus 5.5 Max vs Sonnet 5.5 Max

0xMarioNawfal

75,807 次观看 • 10 天前

Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5, the second model in the Claude 5.5 family. It’s a clear upgrade over Sonnet 5, runs more than 30% faster, and costs up to 30% less for most work.

Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5, the second model in the Claude 5.5 family. It’s a clear upgrade over Sonnet 5, runs more than 30% faster, and costs up to 30% less for most work.

Claude

12,751,835 次观看 • 16 天前

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5. Another comparison.

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5. Another comparison.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

350,141 次观看 • 3 个月前

Took the Mario test one step further. GPT Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5, all on the exact same prompt. Really interesting results here, especially considering the massive spread in cost. Which one wins? OpenAI or Anthropic?

Took the Mario test one step further. GPT Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5, all on the exact same prompt. Really interesting results here, especially considering the massive spread in cost. Which one wins? OpenAI or Anthropic?

Luckey Faraday

171,539 次观看 • 10 天前

🚨 Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Pro vs GPT 6 Sol & Luna Same voxel pagoda prompt across all 4 OpenAI models seem to have a drastically different style though, also Gemini 4 pro is from checkpoint 2 when it was in arena a couple days ago

🚨 Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Pro vs GPT 6 Sol & Luna Same voxel pagoda prompt across all 4 OpenAI models seem to have a drastically different style though, also Gemini 4 pro is from checkpoint 2 when it was in arena a couple days ago

Lumina

43,098 次观看 • 16 天前

Antigravity is now quite insane You can use Claude Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 directly inside it... in addition to Gemini 3.8 Flash. So basically my workflow is now: - Opus 5.5 for planning - Sonnet 5.5 for frontend - Gemini 3.8 Flash to execute Everything in the same place and without paying an additional subscription.

Antigravity is now quite insane You can use Claude Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 directly inside it... in addition to Gemini 3.8 Flash. So basically my workflow is now: - Opus 5.5 for planning - Sonnet 5.5 for frontend - Gemini 3.8 Flash to execute Everything in the same place and without paying an additional subscription.

Paul Couvert

47,079 次观看 • 10 天前

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 on agentic prompting. Both videos generated using Seedance 2.0.

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 on agentic prompting. Both videos generated using Seedance 2.0.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

65,134 次观看 • 3 个月前

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5. Both videos were generated with Seedance 2.0 in 4K.

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5. Both videos were generated with Seedance 2.0 in 4K.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

267,940 次观看 • 3 个月前

Fable 5 vs Sonnet on Arcads MCP Fable 5 is definitely smarter for video creation:

Fable 5 vs Sonnet on Arcads MCP Fable 5 is definitely smarter for video creation:

Romain Torres

374,807 次观看 • 3 个月前

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 in fantasy game development. Two takes on a prince’s quest to battle monsters with Higgsfield.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 in fantasy game development. Two takes on a prince’s quest to battle monsters with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

66,045 次观看 • 14 天前

Everyone is dunking on Sonnet 5 for losing to Opus 4.8 on benchmarks. They're all making the same mistake, judging a teammate by a solo test. Sonnet 5 was never built to win alone. Set the model to Sonnet 5, effort to Ultracode, and any complex task auto-kicks a dynamic workflow where it plans, spawns agents, executes and checks its own work, fast and cheap. When Fable 5 comes back, the setup gets stupid good. Fable 5 decides what to build, Sonnet 5 actually builds it. You stop paying flagship prices to do grunt work.

Everyone is dunking on Sonnet 5 for losing to Opus 4.8 on benchmarks. They're all making the same mistake, judging a teammate by a solo test. Sonnet 5 was never built to win alone. Set the model to Sonnet 5, effort to Ultracode, and any complex task auto-kicks a dynamic workflow where it plans, spawns agents, executes and checks its own work, fast and cheap. When Fable 5 comes back, the setup gets stupid good. Fable 5 decides what to build, Sonnet 5 actually builds it. You stop paying flagship prices to do grunt work.

0xMarioNawfal

98,313 次观看 • 3 个月前

Sonnet 5.5 is smarter, more efficient, and 30% faster than Sonnet 5. It costs up to 30% less for most work, so your Claude Code usage goes further too. Use it for well-scoped everyday tasks like fixing bugs and quickly iterating on features.

Sonnet 5.5 is smarter, more efficient, and 30% faster than Sonnet 5. It costs up to 30% less for most work, so your Claude Code usage goes further too. Use it for well-scoped everyday tasks like fixing bugs and quickly iterating on features.

ClaudeDevs

586,933 次观看 • 16 天前

o3-mini might be the best LLM for real-world physics. Prompt: "write a python script of a ball bouncing inside a tesseract"

o3-mini might be the best LLM for real-world physics. Prompt: "write a python script of a ball bouncing inside a tesseract"

Yuchen Jin

1,222,309 次观看 • 1 年前

an Anthropic engineer just showed a cleaner way to run Sonnet 5.5 + Opus 5.5 without wasting turns the expensive mistake is letting the wrong model stay in the loop too long. so I turned the routing logic into a prompt: → clear, scoped work stays on Sonnet 5.5 → failed checks trigger escalation → Opus gets a clean handoff, not the full transcript → cache stays warm whenever possible the numbers get weird fast: → 20K context: Opus is 1.88x per turn → 150K: 1.49x → 400K: 1.26x a late 300K switch costs $1.50 just to rebuild cache. the same handoff at 20K costs $0.10. the point is not to use Opus more. it is to make Claude prove when Opus is actually needed ↓ ↳

an Anthropic engineer just showed a cleaner way to run Sonnet 5.5 + Opus 5.5 without wasting turns the expensive mistake is letting the wrong model stay in the loop too long. so I turned the routing logic into a prompt: → clear, scoped work stays on Sonnet 5.5 → failed checks trigger escalation → Opus gets a clean handoff, not the full transcript → cache stays warm whenever possible the numbers get weird fast: → 20K context: Opus is 1.88x per turn → 150K: 1.49x → 400K: 1.26x a late 300K switch costs $1.50 just to rebuild cache. the same handoff at 20K costs $0.10. the point is not to use Opus more. it is to make Claude prove when Opus is actually needed ↓ ↳

fleyta

14,951 次观看 • 8 天前

People are saying Opus 5.5 might have been nerfed. So I reran the exact same Mario and Mickey Mouse tests with September 30th Opus 5.5 vs. October 3rd Opus 5.5. Same prompts, just three days apart. What do you think? Is Opus 5.5 nerfed?

People are saying Opus 5.5 might have been nerfed. So I reran the exact same Mario and Mickey Mouse tests with September 30th Opus 5.5 vs. October 3rd Opus 5.5. Same prompts, just three days apart. What do you think? Is Opus 5.5 nerfed?

Luckey Faraday

95,225 次观看 • 11 天前

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has taken over the world... Never been easier to design + build cool websites. It's so over... Copy my prompt 👇

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has taken over the world... Never been easier to design + build cool websites. It's so over... Copy my prompt 👇

Daniel Ch

42,377 次观看 • 7 个月前

Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 Made them fight on the same prompt. 🌸 "Cherry blossom" challenge Both models took exactly 41s to deliver, no retries Oh boy 🤯 Crazier part is that I used Unsloth AI's UD-IQ3_XXS gguf to make it fit in 16GB VRAM...

Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 Made them fight on the same prompt. 🌸 "Cherry blossom" challenge Both models took exactly 41s to deliver, no retries Oh boy 🤯 Crazier part is that I used Unsloth AI's UD-IQ3_XXS gguf to make it fit in 16GB VRAM...

left curve dev

69,512 次观看 • 5 个月前

Gemini 3 Pro (left) vs ChatGPT 5.1 thinking vs Claude Opus 4.5 (right) Prompt: Multi-ball heptagon physics Write html, css, and javascript to display 20 balls bouncing inside a spinning heptagon. each ball should have a unique color, a number label, gravity, and collision detection with the walls. all code in one file.

Gemini 3 Pro (left) vs ChatGPT 5.1 thinking vs Claude Opus 4.5 (right) Prompt: Multi-ball heptagon physics Write html, css, and javascript to display 20 balls bouncing inside a spinning heptagon. each ball should have a unique color, a number label, gravity, and collision detection with the walls. all code in one file.

God of Prompt

105,823 次观看 • 10 个月前

Sonnet 5 is here. It's worse than Opus 4.8 on nearly every benchmark... Does that mean it's useless? Absolutely not. Use it with Claude Code Dynamic Workflows! 1. /model set to Sonnet 5 2. /effort set to Ultracode 3. Any complex task will kick off a dynamic workflow This will only become more powerful when Fable is back. You'll use Fable 5 as the superintelligent advisor and Sonnet 5 as the fast and efficient implementer.

Sonnet 5 is here. It's worse than Opus 4.8 on nearly every benchmark... Does that mean it's useless? Absolutely not. Use it with Claude Code Dynamic Workflows! 1. /model set to Sonnet 5 2. /effort set to Ultracode 3. Any complex task will kick off a dynamic workflow This will only become more powerful when Fable is back. You'll use Fable 5 as the superintelligent advisor and Sonnet 5 as the fast and efficient implementer.

Dan McAteer

666,124 次观看 • 3 个月前