Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

💥BPD Commissioner Cox claimed In this July 2025 interview, that he didn’t know Kelly Dever was involved in the Karen Read case. 💥Newly discovered records by @Marbury_v_Mad prove otherwise. So did Cox help fellow BPD Officer Brian Albert cover up the MURDER of one of their own?

JoeyBagaD🍩nuts

9,554 subscribers

31,326 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Music Arts Comedy

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

💥NEW VIDEO DROP!! 💥Commissioner Cox claims he didn’t even know Kelly Dever was involved in the Karen Read case! 💥HIS EMAILS SAY DIFFERENTLY! #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

💥NEW VIDEO DROP!! 💥Commissioner Cox claims he didn’t even know Kelly Dever was involved in the Karen Read case! 💥HIS EMAILS SAY DIFFERENTLY! #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

JoeyBagaD🍩nuts

11,806 views • 11 days ago

“Nothing Malicious” You can’t even make up some of this shit up anymore. The commissioner of the BPD claims that he never discussed the Karen Read trial with Officer Dever. She said he did. The part I don’t get..Cox knew this question would come up- but he acts shocked? Why ?

“Nothing Malicious” You can’t even make up some of this shit up anymore. The commissioner of the BPD claims that he never discussed the Karen Read trial with Officer Dever. She said he did. The part I don’t get..Cox knew this question would come up- but he acts shocked? Why ?

Joe Flipperhead

94,465 views • 1 year ago

Boston Police Commissioner Michael Cox: "..it doesn't have anything to do with the (Boston Police) department.." Meanwhile in the Karen Read trials ⤵️ - John O'Keefe, the victim, was a 16 year veteran of the department - Brian Albert, whose home where the victim was found, is a 31 year veteran of the department - Michael Proctor, the Massachusetts State Police Officer lead investigator of the murder, has family and deep connections within the department - Kelly Dever, working Canton dispatch the evening of the murder, worked for the department and had a one-on-one meeting with the Commissioner which was testified to under oath during the second Karen Read trial and confirmed via FOIA requests that showed email communications with the Feds and a calendar invite of said meeting But tell us again how the Boston Police Department isn't involved with the murder of John O'Keefe.

Boston Police Commissioner Michael Cox: "..it doesn't have anything to do with the (Boston Police) department.." Meanwhile in the Karen Read trials ⤵️ - John O'Keefe, the victim, was a 16 year veteran of the department - Brian Albert, whose home where the victim was found, is a 31 year veteran of the department - Michael Proctor, the Massachusetts State Police Officer lead investigator of the murder, has family and deep connections within the department - Kelly Dever, working Canton dispatch the evening of the murder, worked for the department and had a one-on-one meeting with the Commissioner which was testified to under oath during the second Karen Read trial and confirmed via FOIA requests that showed email communications with the Feds and a calendar invite of said meeting But tell us again how the Boston Police Department isn't involved with the murder of John O'Keefe.

BoozeyBeauty

35,133 views • 9 months ago

The lie detector test determined.. that was a lie 🚨 On July 10th 2025, Boston Police Commissioner Michael Cox stated that he had no idea "that person" (one of his employees, Kelly Dever) was associated with the Karen Read trial. Many of us thought that the top Boston cop wasn't being truthful but we had no evidence of such.. that is until now. Via FOIA requests by Marbury v. Mad and Laura Kornacka to the Boston Police Department, we now have evidence that Cox also suffers from "false memories". In an email dated February 22nd 2024, a Federal employee answers an email from Cox confirming the 3,074 pages were released to the Norfolk County DA's office the evening prior and that they had interviewed Dever. The next morning, on February 23rd 2024, Cox's calendar was updated to reflect a meeting with Dever. Kelly Dever testified on June 2nd 2025 to the exact sentiment that she had a private, one-on-one meeting with Cox before trial one and around the time the Federal documents were released. A call out to mainstream media: could we have an update on your original story? Perhaps get a statement from Commissioner Cox and Boston Police?

The lie detector test determined.. that was a lie 🚨 On July 10th 2025, Boston Police Commissioner Michael Cox stated that he had no idea "that person" (one of his employees, Kelly Dever) was associated with the Karen Read trial. Many of us thought that the top Boston cop wasn't being truthful but we had no evidence of such.. that is until now. Via FOIA requests by Marbury v. Mad and Laura Kornacka to the Boston Police Department, we now have evidence that Cox also suffers from "false memories". In an email dated February 22nd 2024, a Federal employee answers an email from Cox confirming the 3,074 pages were released to the Norfolk County DA's office the evening prior and that they had interviewed Dever. The next morning, on February 23rd 2024, Cox's calendar was updated to reflect a meeting with Dever. Kelly Dever testified on June 2nd 2025 to the exact sentiment that she had a private, one-on-one meeting with Cox before trial one and around the time the Federal documents were released. A call out to mainstream media: could we have an update on your original story? Perhaps get a statement from Commissioner Cox and Boston Police?

BoozeyBeauty

20,773 views • 9 months ago

🚨UPDATE: The first hearing was held today in Barnstable District Court regarding the lawsuit filed by Jen McCabe, Brian Albert, Brian Higgins, and Colin Albert, which includes claims of defamation, civil conspiracy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and other related allegations against Karen Read and Aidan Kearney. Noticeably absent were Karen Read and Aidan Kearney. Kearney was a no-show for the first hearing in the defamation case he’s been begging for, nonstop hyping, and supposedly couldn’t wait to face. He claimed he was unaware of the hearing this am, if you buy that, you might be in a cult.

🚨UPDATE: The first hearing was held today in Barnstable District Court regarding the lawsuit filed by Jen McCabe, Brian Albert, Brian Higgins, and Colin Albert, which includes claims of defamation, civil conspiracy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and other related allegations against Karen Read and Aidan Kearney. Noticeably absent were Karen Read and Aidan Kearney. Kearney was a no-show for the first hearing in the defamation case he’s been begging for, nonstop hyping, and supposedly couldn’t wait to face. He claimed he was unaware of the hearing this am, if you buy that, you might be in a cult.

Mama Llama

24,940 views • 2 months ago

Hey, Commissioner Michael Cox, we have questions!!! Boston Police Dept. FBI Boston FBI What was the reason that you requested a meeting with Officer Dever to discuss her testimony in the Karen Read trial? Did you tell her to "Do the right thing"? If so, what did you mean by that? Do you typically call rookies into your office to prep them before testimony? Would you agree that a meeting with the Commissioner and an ambiguous statement like "do the right thing" could be taken as a threat or witness intimidation? Prior to her testimony, were you aware of Dever's statement to the feds about Brian Higgins and Ken Berkowicz being present and alone in the sallyport with Read's SUV for a "wildly long time"? Have the feds spoken with you? Was Officer Dever hired, promoted, or given any kind of kickbacks of any kind to testify in a manner favorable to the Commonwealth? Anyone watching could see that Officer Dever's behavior and attitude on the stand was disgraceful and unbecoming of someone who swore an oath to serve the public. Do you condone that type of behavior from your BPD officers? Has Dever been reprimanded at all for her disgusting behavior on the witness stand? #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOkeefe #KarenReadWasFramed #KarenReadTrial2 #KellyDever

Hey, Commissioner Michael Cox, we have questions!!! Boston Police Dept. FBI Boston FBI What was the reason that you requested a meeting with Officer Dever to discuss her testimony in the Karen Read trial? Did you tell her to "Do the right thing"? If so, what did you mean by that? Do you typically call rookies into your office to prep them before testimony? Would you agree that a meeting with the Commissioner and an ambiguous statement like "do the right thing" could be taken as a threat or witness intimidation? Prior to her testimony, were you aware of Dever's statement to the feds about Brian Higgins and Ken Berkowicz being present and alone in the sallyport with Read's SUV for a "wildly long time"? Have the feds spoken with you? Was Officer Dever hired, promoted, or given any kind of kickbacks of any kind to testify in a manner favorable to the Commonwealth? Anyone watching could see that Officer Dever's behavior and attitude on the stand was disgraceful and unbecoming of someone who swore an oath to serve the public. Do you condone that type of behavior from your BPD officers? Has Dever been reprimanded at all for her disgusting behavior on the witness stand? #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOkeefe #KarenReadWasFramed #KarenReadTrial2 #KellyDever

Crime & Court

24,063 views • 1 year ago

Kelly Dever testifies that the Boston Police Dept. Commissioner, Michael Cox, aka her boss and certainly her higher up, called her to his office to tell her to “do the right thing” and as she puts it “he just wanted me to tell the truth up here”. According to the Massachusetts State Police, this is witness intimidation—a felony crime which they’ve used similar “probable cause” to charge Journalists like Aidan Kearney Aidan Kearney with witness intimidation over. Except Kearney is not the boss or higher up over any of the individuals who he’s charged with witness intimidating. Further, Kearney is not the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department. Why is it that Commissioner Michael Cox had such an interest in conveying this message of influence and intimidation to Kelly Dever for this case—a case which his Department has/had no investigative involvement in? But no such meetings have occurred for any of her other cases which the Department was actually involved in? Will the Massachusetts State Police or DA Michael Morrissey’s Office open up a witness intimidation investigation into Commissioner Michael Cox? #MichaelCox #KellyDever #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Kelly Dever testifies that the Boston Police Dept. Commissioner, Michael Cox, aka her boss and certainly her higher up, called her to his office to tell her to “do the right thing” and as she puts it “he just wanted me to tell the truth up here”. According to the Massachusetts State Police, this is witness intimidation—a felony crime which they’ve used similar “probable cause” to charge Journalists like Aidan Kearney Aidan Kearney with witness intimidation over. Except Kearney is not the boss or higher up over any of the individuals who he’s charged with witness intimidating. Further, Kearney is not the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department. Why is it that Commissioner Michael Cox had such an interest in conveying this message of influence and intimidation to Kelly Dever for this case—a case which his Department has/had no investigative involvement in? But no such meetings have occurred for any of her other cases which the Department was actually involved in? Will the Massachusetts State Police or DA Michael Morrissey’s Office open up a witness intimidation investigation into Commissioner Michael Cox? #MichaelCox #KellyDever #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

41,375 views • 1 year ago

One of the victims in the John O'Keefe case is Colin Albert. There is not One shred of evidence that he was even at 34 Fairview when John and Karen Read pulled up in her SUV. In fact, all the evidence indicates he wasn't there. No one with any respectable credentials would argue that he killed John. It's an insane, immoral, and despicable assertion. Read and Read alone is charged with John's murder. Let's hear what Vinnie's guests think. #KarenRead

One of the victims in the John O'Keefe case is Colin Albert. There is not One shred of evidence that he was even at 34 Fairview when John and Karen Read pulled up in her SUV. In fact, all the evidence indicates he wasn't there. No one with any respectable credentials would argue that he killed John. It's an insane, immoral, and despicable assertion. Read and Read alone is charged with John's murder. Let's hear what Vinnie's guests think. #KarenRead

Jennifer Coffindaffer

65,388 views • 1 year ago

PROOF AIDAN KEARNEY DID PRINT PROPAGANDA ON KAREN READ'S BEHALF WHICH HE KNEW WAS NOT TRUE On September 27, 2023, Aidan Kearney published Part 164 of the Canton Cover Up in which he claims that a screenshot provided to MSP and reporter Gretchen Voss demonstrating what time Colin Albert left 34 Fairview had been "altered" and "doctored." He did so in response to Karen Read asking him to call out Voss on the "manipulated" text. This morning, Kearney admitted that he "always" thought the text was "real" thereby admitting he knowingly published information he believed to be FALSE in order to sway public opinion of the witnesses. Further, the Signal messages prove this was at the direction of Karen Read. The legitimacy of the text screenshot has been the source of harassment directed at Colin Albert and Allie McCabe for years and continues to this day. This folks seems to be a confession by Kearney to what may be an implied conspiracy between the pair. Oopsie!!

PROOF AIDAN KEARNEY DID PRINT PROPAGANDA ON KAREN READ'S BEHALF WHICH HE KNEW WAS NOT TRUE On September 27, 2023, Aidan Kearney published Part 164 of the Canton Cover Up in which he claims that a screenshot provided to MSP and reporter Gretchen Voss demonstrating what time Colin Albert left 34 Fairview had been "altered" and "doctored." He did so in response to Karen Read asking him to call out Voss on the "manipulated" text. This morning, Kearney admitted that he "always" thought the text was "real" thereby admitting he knowingly published information he believed to be FALSE in order to sway public opinion of the witnesses. Further, the Signal messages prove this was at the direction of Karen Read. The legitimacy of the text screenshot has been the source of harassment directed at Colin Albert and Allie McCabe for years and continues to this day. This folks seems to be a confession by Kearney to what may be an implied conspiracy between the pair. Oopsie!!

Julie Carpenter

15,840 views • 1 month ago

If you believe that Brian Albert and Brian Higgins would murder or help cover up the murder of a fellow brother in blue, you’re either a grifter or delusional and not thinking rationally. But let’s entertain the absurd notion that they did-let’s pretend they are evil killers. If that were the case, John would still be missing and never seen again. These are not ordinary, everyday men, as should be plainly evident. Do you honestly think they would leave a body on their front lawn and casually go to bed? 💥 Brian Higgins is currently an ATF Agent. He was previously a lieutenant on The Cambridge fire department and an EMT. He was a Combat medic in the Army. He worked on fellow infantry men in his unit. He served in both the Iraq and Afghanistan war. In 2010, while on surveillance, his partner was shot by a suspect. Higgins render aid and was credited with keeping his partner alive long enough so he could receive life saving care. In 2011 he was awarded the Trooper George L. Hanna award, the highest honor a Massachusetts law enforcement officer can receive, for bravery In the field. In 2013 he was awarded the Law Enforcement Congressional badge of bravery. 💥 Brian Albert is a 30-year retired veteran of the Boston Police Department. He is a U.S. Marine and a combat veteran of the gulf War. As the commander of the BPD fugitive unit, he has arrested literally hundreds of violent murderers and felons. He is a two-time recipient of the Trooper George L. Hanna Award, One of the Hanna awards is for Valor in the Face of an armed assault. Additionally, he has earned multiple Boston Police Department Medals of Honor. During his stellar career, he tracked down and apprehended the Craigslist Killer. He also tracked down and helped captured Victor Peña, a kidnapper and rapist. Furthermore, he arrested and extradited Clark Rockefeller, he supervised the investigation that lead to the recovery of the discarded water bottle that confirmed a 99.9% DNA match to Albert DeSalvo, the Boston Strangler suspect. Again, if you believe the nonsensical conspiracy theory that Karen Read, her defense team, and her PR-driven Twitter and YouTube supporters have been promoting for the past two years, you’re either delusional and not thinking rationally or simply a conspiracy theorist. There is no middle ground. #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

If you believe that Brian Albert and Brian Higgins would murder or help cover up the murder of a fellow brother in blue, you’re either a grifter or delusional and not thinking rationally. But let’s entertain the absurd notion that they did-let’s pretend they are evil killers. If that were the case, John would still be missing and never seen again. These are not ordinary, everyday men, as should be plainly evident. Do you honestly think they would leave a body on their front lawn and casually go to bed? 💥 Brian Higgins is currently an ATF Agent. He was previously a lieutenant on The Cambridge fire department and an EMT. He was a Combat medic in the Army. He worked on fellow infantry men in his unit. He served in both the Iraq and Afghanistan war. In 2010, while on surveillance, his partner was shot by a suspect. Higgins render aid and was credited with keeping his partner alive long enough so he could receive life saving care. In 2011 he was awarded the Trooper George L. Hanna award, the highest honor a Massachusetts law enforcement officer can receive, for bravery In the field. In 2013 he was awarded the Law Enforcement Congressional badge of bravery. 💥 Brian Albert is a 30-year retired veteran of the Boston Police Department. He is a U.S. Marine and a combat veteran of the gulf War. As the commander of the BPD fugitive unit, he has arrested literally hundreds of violent murderers and felons. He is a two-time recipient of the Trooper George L. Hanna Award, One of the Hanna awards is for Valor in the Face of an armed assault. Additionally, he has earned multiple Boston Police Department Medals of Honor. During his stellar career, he tracked down and apprehended the Craigslist Killer. He also tracked down and helped captured Victor Peña, a kidnapper and rapist. Furthermore, he arrested and extradited Clark Rockefeller, he supervised the investigation that lead to the recovery of the discarded water bottle that confirmed a 99.9% DNA match to Albert DeSalvo, the Boston Strangler suspect. Again, if you believe the nonsensical conspiracy theory that Karen Read, her defense team, and her PR-driven Twitter and YouTube supporters have been promoting for the past two years, you’re either delusional and not thinking rationally or simply a conspiracy theorist. There is no middle ground. #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Mama Llama

73,939 views • 1 year ago

So you mean to tell me, the one "gotcha" Michael Proctor used on the stand to try and persuade the jury in Karen Read Trial 1, that he "was already scheduled to be on call" so he wasn't chosen to take the John O'Keefe case, was all a LIE?? Why did Bukake call Proctor to take the case if he WASN'T EVEN ON CALL THAT MORNING?? And how did he know that Lank was already on scene? It is so obvious to anyone with a brain that this was a setup. I would be willing to bet my life that Kevin Albert was informed about what happened and asked Bukake to call Proctor and make him lead investigator so that the cover up for his brother, Brian Albert, could be set in motion. Proctor is a FUCKING FOOL and a POS for doing what he did. He was, in fact, NOT ON CALL that morning, but Buhkenik wants everyone to believe the schedule is made the month prior, "well in advance" of the day Proctor was "on call". Except THIS SCHEDULE SAYS OTHERWISE. Liars, all liars. #KarenReadWasFramed #MichaelProctor #Buhkenik #Bukake #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #NCDAO #Corruption

So you mean to tell me, the one "gotcha" Michael Proctor used on the stand to try and persuade the jury in Karen Read Trial 1, that he "was already scheduled to be on call" so he wasn't chosen to take the John O'Keefe case, was all a LIE?? Why did Bukake call Proctor to take the case if he WASN'T EVEN ON CALL THAT MORNING?? And how did he know that Lank was already on scene? It is so obvious to anyone with a brain that this was a setup. I would be willing to bet my life that Kevin Albert was informed about what happened and asked Bukake to call Proctor and make him lead investigator so that the cover up for his brother, Brian Albert, could be set in motion. Proctor is a FUCKING FOOL and a POS for doing what he did. He was, in fact, NOT ON CALL that morning, but Buhkenik wants everyone to believe the schedule is made the month prior, "well in advance" of the day Proctor was "on call". Except THIS SCHEDULE SAYS OTHERWISE. Liars, all liars. #KarenReadWasFramed #MichaelProctor #Buhkenik #Bukake #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #NCDAO #Corruption

That Girl T

26,008 views • 3 months ago

How does Karen Read feel as she waits for a verdict in her own murder trial? And how does her attorney, Alan Jackson, feel about 4 witnesses in the case (3 of whom he suggested were involved in O'Keefe's death) showing up with the O'Keefe family today? #WBZ

How does Karen Read feel as she waits for a verdict in her own murder trial? And how does her attorney, Alan Jackson, feel about 4 witnesses in the case (3 of whom he suggested were involved in O'Keefe's death) showing up with the O'Keefe family today? #WBZ

Kristina Rex

198,083 views • 2 years ago

Let this sink in: We have all of the existing records of communications between the defense and the ARCCA experts, who were hired by the Feds, but we don’t have ANY of the phone records of communications for Brian Albert, the homeowner whose property John O’Keefe’s body was found on, Brian Higgins or Colin Albert. Daniel Wolfe—the ARCCA experts—were not present during nor did they have anything to do with Officer John O’Keefe’s murder. But apparently Wolfe’s communications with the defense about his report he did for the Feds, which the Commonwealth also has had in its possession, are more important than the actual evidence in the murder of John O’Keefe that could shed light on who his true killers are. Can you imagine if Wolfe came in with a packet of printed out screenshots that he claimed were real because he destroyed his phone around the time that the court ordered his communications? Oh wait, that’s what the third party culprits did. And then the Commonwealth actually entered that in as legitimate evidence in a murder trial. Go figure! Priorities. Justice? Anything but. #ARCCA #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Let this sink in: We have all of the existing records of communications between the defense and the ARCCA experts, who were hired by the Feds, but we don’t have ANY of the phone records of communications for Brian Albert, the homeowner whose property John O’Keefe’s body was found on, Brian Higgins or Colin Albert. Daniel Wolfe—the ARCCA experts—were not present during nor did they have anything to do with Officer John O’Keefe’s murder. But apparently Wolfe’s communications with the defense about his report he did for the Feds, which the Commonwealth also has had in its possession, are more important than the actual evidence in the murder of John O’Keefe that could shed light on who his true killers are. Can you imagine if Wolfe came in with a packet of printed out screenshots that he claimed were real because he destroyed his phone around the time that the court ordered his communications? Oh wait, that’s what the third party culprits did. And then the Commonwealth actually entered that in as legitimate evidence in a murder trial. Go figure! Priorities. Justice? Anything but. #ARCCA #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

54,273 views • 1 year ago

David Yannetti claims that the afternoon Karen Read was arraigned a "tipster" called his office and named "Brian Albert and his nephew" as being responsible for John O'Keefe's death. The story has been told ad nauseam by the Read team replete with meticulous details. It has been repeated in interview after interview and put on the record in open court. But, I have a few questions for David Yannetti. Why sir, at 6:49pm that day, after the time you've claimed that call took place did you post on Twitter that the case was "overreach" if you had knowledge he was murdered by Brian Albert? Why did you call it a "horrible tragedy"? Why did you say it "was not a crime"? Why did you say "it is certainly not manslaughter"? Strange things to say in defense of your client if you were aware, as you claimed oh so many times, in so many stories, in so many variations, that your client had been framed., that the people in the house killed John. That's the thing about the truth, David. No matter how many times you try to push it down, it always seems to rise to the surface. Sometimes, in the littlest of details. You opened Pandora's box with your antics. Good luck shutting it.

David Yannetti claims that the afternoon Karen Read was arraigned a "tipster" called his office and named "Brian Albert and his nephew" as being responsible for John O'Keefe's death. The story has been told ad nauseam by the Read team replete with meticulous details. It has been repeated in interview after interview and put on the record in open court. But, I have a few questions for David Yannetti. Why sir, at 6:49pm that day, after the time you've claimed that call took place did you post on Twitter that the case was "overreach" if you had knowledge he was murdered by Brian Albert? Why did you call it a "horrible tragedy"? Why did you say it "was not a crime"? Why did you say "it is certainly not manslaughter"? Strange things to say in defense of your client if you were aware, as you claimed oh so many times, in so many stories, in so many variations, that your client had been framed., that the people in the house killed John. That's the thing about the truth, David. No matter how many times you try to push it down, it always seems to rise to the surface. Sometimes, in the littlest of details. You opened Pandora's box with your antics. Good luck shutting it.

Julie Carpenter

11,361 views • 16 days ago

"Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Mad might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department." - Towel, November 6, 2025 Rule #1 in Massachusetts politics right now; Do not mess with Attorney Corey Hopkins. She's going to get barred here just to reform the government (then I'll become her paralegal and we'll submit public records requests all day). Good plan. TRANSCRIPT (from Towel's coverage of the letter in question, uncovered by Attorney Hopkins); Hello and good evening. It is just past 6 p.m. on Monday, November 3rd, 2025. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis, and I'm back with you again for another developing news update, this time related to Boston Police Commissioner Cox responding to a developing series of scandals, in particular related to former Boston Police Officer—well, first former Canton Police Officer, then former Boston Police Officer—Kelly Dever. Now, Kelly Dever was an integral witness during the John O'Keefe and Karen Read trial about one specific series of events in the early morning of January 29, 2022—not really related to John's death per se, but related to the then-chief of the Canton Police Department, Ken Berkowitz, who was also potentially the person that went to the FBI about Brian Tully's MSP unit, Massachusetts State Police unit, detailed to the Norfolk DA, who were the same people that investigated Karen Read for John's death. Berkowitz was the same person who apparently went to the FBI in 2022 about Tully's unit through John Fanning covering up Sandra Birchmore's death at the hands of former Stoughton PD officer Matthew Farwell. Okay, Ken Berkowitz and Brian Higgins—then undercover ATF agent who himself had been in a relationship of some kind, we'll call it that, with Karen in the months before John's death. That's a whole story we will not get into. The point is, Higgins and Berkowitz go into the sally port. Now, Kelly Dever had been working since, I think it was 12 a.m. on January 28th. She worked—let me make sure I get this right now—she worked at 12 p.m., noon on January 28th to 8 p.m. Then she worked the 8 p.m. to 4 a.m. shift. Okay, she was doing 16 hours over those two days. At like 1:30 a.m., she saw Berkowitz and Higgins—or around there, maybe a little later—go into the area, an area of the Canton PD. Then—and we're going to find out—she had a meeting with Boston Police Commissioner Cox. Now, why did Commissioner Cox get himself in trouble? Well, not because of the interview we're going to watch, but instead because of an interview about a year ago where he said he knew nothing about the Kelly Dever situation or the Karen Read case. All right, now we're going to quickly come to find out that what we're about to hear from the commissioner is not the best answer in light of this little document found by the incredible Marbury v. Madison on X, Corey A. Hopkins, a business litigator based in North Carolina. Towel really likes Marbury v. Madison because, first of all, Marbury v. Madison is an awesome case, and it entrenched the supremacy of the judiciary as to saying what the law is by virtue of the Constitution. Solved a very complex problem related to the Judiciary Act of 1789 and, in particular, the emergence of political parties in 1796 and, in particular, 1800, and a slew of last-minute appointments by President Adams and a refusal by President Jefferson to commission—or one of the refusal by Jefferson's Secretary of State Madison to commission a justice of the peace. But it really was about the supremacy of the judiciary branch. Marbury v. Madison uses a lot of FOIAs, and what you're going to see right here is a FOIA request that resulted in this wonderful little document. And what does this show? All right, this document shows, folks, a letter from Stephen J. Kelleher, who's with the White Collar Public Corruption and Civil Rights Division of the FBI in Boston. It is a letter that Marbury v. Madison obtained via a FOIA, and it shows the DOJ reaching out to Commissioner Cox and saying, "Sir, hope all is well. Just a reminder—this was on February 22nd, 2024. The documents were released to the DA's office late last night." This has to do with federal documents about the investigation of John's death by the MSP unit run by Brian Tully working for the Norfolk DA. "The officer we spoke about is Kelly Dever. If you have any questions at all, feel free to call me. Vr. Steve." Okay, folks, this proves that Commissioner Cox was told about Kelly Dever and documents related to her testimony and what she saw Higgins and Berkowitz doing—which I don't think was related to John's death, but it's just embarrassing for Higgins. He was an undercover ATF agent, and embarrassing for Berkowitz. And although Berkowitz is now dead, he was either dying or not dead in 2024. And clearly, this was embarrassing, okay, to the Canton Police Chief, to the Boston Police, to Higgins, to all these people. All right. And so we see here, Cox knows about it. Cox then goes on a few months later—I think it was either after, I think it was right after Karen's second trial, but it was some months after this initial email was sent to Cox. And Cox, in his infinite wisdom, tells Boston 25 or Channel 5 or whatever it was at a news conference that he's basically never heard of Kelly Dever or the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case. Okay, that was a stupid thing to say because then this FOIA comes out in recent weeks. That leads to Alan Jackson to send a Brady letter to Mayor Michelle Wu, the Democratic mayor of Boston running unopposed in the coming election, saying that Cox should be on the Brady list. I think it was—yes, because Cox was not forthcoming about what he was told by the feds about Dever. Okay, now this is Cox's response. I just want to show you how bad of a response this is. Okay, this is a clip via Boston 25, just Cox's comment on these new developments, which—although Alan Jackson's Brady letter is what Cox was asked for comment on—even Alan Jackson himself has rightfully so given credit to Marbury v. Madison for their excellent find on this FOIA document that was unearthed. And this could cost Cox his position. All right, the Democrats in Boston already have the eye of President Trump. The DOJ is all over this unit, in my opinion, and the cover-up of Birchmore's death. Look at the DOJ's pattern of indictments, okay? Recently, not just the Jessica LeClair leaks, but also Sheriff Tompkins and other major Democrats. Look at what's going on here, folks. Think about the larger picture—the most recent indictment, the superseding indictment of Matt Farwell for the murder of Sandra Birchmore's unborn child. It's all coming together. And Commissioner Cox's answer is bad. And that's why I want to analyze it. It's not just like inappropriate. It is a bad, bad, bad answer. When I heard it, I had to immediately make a video to analyze it because that's how bad this answer is. It's short, but I'm going to tell you how bad it is after we listen to it. "But what I need, you know, it's not to be asked this question ever again because it's not—it has to pertain to anything to do with the police department. My condolences to the O'Keefe family for, you know, what they've gone through. And because we did lose a department member. But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us. And I'm not going to speak with this again." Okay, let me just make something clear. I'm not saying he was wrong. It's not wrong to invoke John's name. But doing it that way—that's grotesque. Okay, he didn't answer the question. He basically refused to do so. And again, if you didn't hear the statement—although I'm sure you did—he said, "What I need is to not be asked this question ever again pertaining to anything to do with the police department." What? "My condolences to the O'Keefe family for what they've gone through because we did lose a department member." John O'Keefe was an honorable member of the Boston PD and the SA offenders unit. "But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us, the Boston PD, and I'm not going to speak on this again." No, no, no, no—that you just cost yourself your job right there. I'm sorry. That was a terrible, terrible answer. I'm sorry for the volume. I'm just running it back. Terrible answer. The worst possible answer. You may well have just cost yourself your job because you ducked the question. Everyone knows that the question is about this document. Anyone following this knows. The implications are what Dever knew about Berkowitz and Higgins, and maybe that's not the most serious thing. But as President Nixon said, it is not the crime, it's the cover-up. Dever, whatever she did—not wanting to talk about certain things about Higgins and Berkowitz, unrelated to John's death, just because it's kind of embarrassing—that is not a problem really. It's a minor thing. You know what's a big deal? Dever definitely got Brady-listed or whatever because her testimony was a little weird. I think Alan Jackson also pressured her a little bit. But whatever, that's not the point here. Cox's response—that was bad. That was bad PR. That's like the kind of thing when Prince Andrew was forced to go out and do an interview with BBC One about Epstein, and it just cost him all his titles because he got no PR help; he got sandbagged. That kind of thing—somebody didn't prep him, or the people he was talking to didn't even think this would come up. That's a horrible answer. Twenty seconds can cost you your career if you have done something bad and you answer a tough question like that. It's defensive; it shows you have something to hide; it undermines people's faith in your ability to answer those kind of questions. That's the biggest problem for Commissioner Cox here. Instead of inspiring confidence and making it look like it was nothing or it was just a routine, he couldn't even address the fact that he was made aware in February, in particular, about Kelly Dever and he had knowledge—he had a meeting with her. Let's be clear: He put her on his schedule the very next day. Not only did he have recipient knowledge of what was going on with the federal investigation and the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case—Dever got called into his office the next day, which of course Cox initially tried to play off as just some routine meeting, as if he meets with all 2,600 or whatever of the Boston police force. No. Come on, folks. Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Madison might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Enjoy the rest of your Monday. We'll see what other news comes in today. Sean Good on suspension. Michael Proctor's cell phone gate engulfing the world in a conflagration. Little towel basically running down the street from the masses, trying to insulate himself from the fallout of this God-forsaken situation. Institutional reform is coming—to the Norfolk DA, hopefully throughout the state police—so that the good people in law enforcement can keep helping the vulnerable and that the exploited, no matter how much pressure they come under, continue to speak their truth. And let me just say this: Whenever we stand against the flow of opinion on hotly contested issues, a man, a woman, and a Towel—do what they must in spite of the personal consequences, in spite of the dangers and obstacles and pressures. For that is the basis of all human morality. We will be there for each other in times of struggle. We will be side by side in times of joy. And when everything is on the line and when our principles matter the most, there will be no price too high to pay to center the voices of the unheard, to bring justice to the vulnerable, and to reform this God-forsaken justice system in Massachusetts so that we can all hand down a structural system to our future generations that is worthy of our Constitution, that is worthy of our collective intelligence, and that is worthy of the due reverence we all should be providing to the pursuit of justice. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Until next time, you're a towel, I am as well. Be well. God bless.

"Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Mad might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department." - Towel, November 6, 2025 Rule #1 in Massachusetts politics right now; Do not mess with Attorney Corey Hopkins. She's going to get barred here just to reform the government (then I'll become her paralegal and we'll submit public records requests all day). Good plan. TRANSCRIPT (from Towel's coverage of the letter in question, uncovered by Attorney Hopkins); Hello and good evening. It is just past 6 p.m. on Monday, November 3rd, 2025. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis, and I'm back with you again for another developing news update, this time related to Boston Police Commissioner Cox responding to a developing series of scandals, in particular related to former Boston Police Officer—well, first former Canton Police Officer, then former Boston Police Officer—Kelly Dever. Now, Kelly Dever was an integral witness during the John O'Keefe and Karen Read trial about one specific series of events in the early morning of January 29, 2022—not really related to John's death per se, but related to the then-chief of the Canton Police Department, Ken Berkowitz, who was also potentially the person that went to the FBI about Brian Tully's MSP unit, Massachusetts State Police unit, detailed to the Norfolk DA, who were the same people that investigated Karen Read for John's death. Berkowitz was the same person who apparently went to the FBI in 2022 about Tully's unit through John Fanning covering up Sandra Birchmore's death at the hands of former Stoughton PD officer Matthew Farwell. Okay, Ken Berkowitz and Brian Higgins—then undercover ATF agent who himself had been in a relationship of some kind, we'll call it that, with Karen in the months before John's death. That's a whole story we will not get into. The point is, Higgins and Berkowitz go into the sally port. Now, Kelly Dever had been working since, I think it was 12 a.m. on January 28th. She worked—let me make sure I get this right now—she worked at 12 p.m., noon on January 28th to 8 p.m. Then she worked the 8 p.m. to 4 a.m. shift. Okay, she was doing 16 hours over those two days. At like 1:30 a.m., she saw Berkowitz and Higgins—or around there, maybe a little later—go into the area, an area of the Canton PD. Then—and we're going to find out—she had a meeting with Boston Police Commissioner Cox. Now, why did Commissioner Cox get himself in trouble? Well, not because of the interview we're going to watch, but instead because of an interview about a year ago where he said he knew nothing about the Kelly Dever situation or the Karen Read case. All right, now we're going to quickly come to find out that what we're about to hear from the commissioner is not the best answer in light of this little document found by the incredible Marbury v. Madison on X, Corey A. Hopkins, a business litigator based in North Carolina. Towel really likes Marbury v. Madison because, first of all, Marbury v. Madison is an awesome case, and it entrenched the supremacy of the judiciary as to saying what the law is by virtue of the Constitution. Solved a very complex problem related to the Judiciary Act of 1789 and, in particular, the emergence of political parties in 1796 and, in particular, 1800, and a slew of last-minute appointments by President Adams and a refusal by President Jefferson to commission—or one of the refusal by Jefferson's Secretary of State Madison to commission a justice of the peace. But it really was about the supremacy of the judiciary branch. Marbury v. Madison uses a lot of FOIAs, and what you're going to see right here is a FOIA request that resulted in this wonderful little document. And what does this show? All right, this document shows, folks, a letter from Stephen J. Kelleher, who's with the White Collar Public Corruption and Civil Rights Division of the FBI in Boston. It is a letter that Marbury v. Madison obtained via a FOIA, and it shows the DOJ reaching out to Commissioner Cox and saying, "Sir, hope all is well. Just a reminder—this was on February 22nd, 2024. The documents were released to the DA's office late last night." This has to do with federal documents about the investigation of John's death by the MSP unit run by Brian Tully working for the Norfolk DA. "The officer we spoke about is Kelly Dever. If you have any questions at all, feel free to call me. Vr. Steve." Okay, folks, this proves that Commissioner Cox was told about Kelly Dever and documents related to her testimony and what she saw Higgins and Berkowitz doing—which I don't think was related to John's death, but it's just embarrassing for Higgins. He was an undercover ATF agent, and embarrassing for Berkowitz. And although Berkowitz is now dead, he was either dying or not dead in 2024. And clearly, this was embarrassing, okay, to the Canton Police Chief, to the Boston Police, to Higgins, to all these people. All right. And so we see here, Cox knows about it. Cox then goes on a few months later—I think it was either after, I think it was right after Karen's second trial, but it was some months after this initial email was sent to Cox. And Cox, in his infinite wisdom, tells Boston 25 or Channel 5 or whatever it was at a news conference that he's basically never heard of Kelly Dever or the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case. Okay, that was a stupid thing to say because then this FOIA comes out in recent weeks. That leads to Alan Jackson to send a Brady letter to Mayor Michelle Wu, the Democratic mayor of Boston running unopposed in the coming election, saying that Cox should be on the Brady list. I think it was—yes, because Cox was not forthcoming about what he was told by the feds about Dever. Okay, now this is Cox's response. I just want to show you how bad of a response this is. Okay, this is a clip via Boston 25, just Cox's comment on these new developments, which—although Alan Jackson's Brady letter is what Cox was asked for comment on—even Alan Jackson himself has rightfully so given credit to Marbury v. Madison for their excellent find on this FOIA document that was unearthed. And this could cost Cox his position. All right, the Democrats in Boston already have the eye of President Trump. The DOJ is all over this unit, in my opinion, and the cover-up of Birchmore's death. Look at the DOJ's pattern of indictments, okay? Recently, not just the Jessica LeClair leaks, but also Sheriff Tompkins and other major Democrats. Look at what's going on here, folks. Think about the larger picture—the most recent indictment, the superseding indictment of Matt Farwell for the murder of Sandra Birchmore's unborn child. It's all coming together. And Commissioner Cox's answer is bad. And that's why I want to analyze it. It's not just like inappropriate. It is a bad, bad, bad answer. When I heard it, I had to immediately make a video to analyze it because that's how bad this answer is. It's short, but I'm going to tell you how bad it is after we listen to it. "But what I need, you know, it's not to be asked this question ever again because it's not—it has to pertain to anything to do with the police department. My condolences to the O'Keefe family for, you know, what they've gone through. And because we did lose a department member. But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us. And I'm not going to speak with this again." Okay, let me just make something clear. I'm not saying he was wrong. It's not wrong to invoke John's name. But doing it that way—that's grotesque. Okay, he didn't answer the question. He basically refused to do so. And again, if you didn't hear the statement—although I'm sure you did—he said, "What I need is to not be asked this question ever again pertaining to anything to do with the police department." What? "My condolences to the O'Keefe family for what they've gone through because we did lose a department member." John O'Keefe was an honorable member of the Boston PD and the SA offenders unit. "But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us, the Boston PD, and I'm not going to speak on this again." No, no, no, no—that you just cost yourself your job right there. I'm sorry. That was a terrible, terrible answer. I'm sorry for the volume. I'm just running it back. Terrible answer. The worst possible answer. You may well have just cost yourself your job because you ducked the question. Everyone knows that the question is about this document. Anyone following this knows. The implications are what Dever knew about Berkowitz and Higgins, and maybe that's not the most serious thing. But as President Nixon said, it is not the crime, it's the cover-up. Dever, whatever she did—not wanting to talk about certain things about Higgins and Berkowitz, unrelated to John's death, just because it's kind of embarrassing—that is not a problem really. It's a minor thing. You know what's a big deal? Dever definitely got Brady-listed or whatever because her testimony was a little weird. I think Alan Jackson also pressured her a little bit. But whatever, that's not the point here. Cox's response—that was bad. That was bad PR. That's like the kind of thing when Prince Andrew was forced to go out and do an interview with BBC One about Epstein, and it just cost him all his titles because he got no PR help; he got sandbagged. That kind of thing—somebody didn't prep him, or the people he was talking to didn't even think this would come up. That's a horrible answer. Twenty seconds can cost you your career if you have done something bad and you answer a tough question like that. It's defensive; it shows you have something to hide; it undermines people's faith in your ability to answer those kind of questions. That's the biggest problem for Commissioner Cox here. Instead of inspiring confidence and making it look like it was nothing or it was just a routine, he couldn't even address the fact that he was made aware in February, in particular, about Kelly Dever and he had knowledge—he had a meeting with her. Let's be clear: He put her on his schedule the very next day. Not only did he have recipient knowledge of what was going on with the federal investigation and the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case—Dever got called into his office the next day, which of course Cox initially tried to play off as just some routine meeting, as if he meets with all 2,600 or whatever of the Boston police force. No. Come on, folks. Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Madison might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Enjoy the rest of your Monday. We'll see what other news comes in today. Sean Good on suspension. Michael Proctor's cell phone gate engulfing the world in a conflagration. Little towel basically running down the street from the masses, trying to insulate himself from the fallout of this God-forsaken situation. Institutional reform is coming—to the Norfolk DA, hopefully throughout the state police—so that the good people in law enforcement can keep helping the vulnerable and that the exploited, no matter how much pressure they come under, continue to speak their truth. And let me just say this: Whenever we stand against the flow of opinion on hotly contested issues, a man, a woman, and a Towel—do what they must in spite of the personal consequences, in spite of the dangers and obstacles and pressures. For that is the basis of all human morality. We will be there for each other in times of struggle. We will be side by side in times of joy. And when everything is on the line and when our principles matter the most, there will be no price too high to pay to center the voices of the unheard, to bring justice to the vulnerable, and to reform this God-forsaken justice system in Massachusetts so that we can all hand down a structural system to our future generations that is worthy of our Constitution, that is worthy of our collective intelligence, and that is worthy of the due reverence we all should be providing to the pursuit of justice. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Until next time, you're a towel, I am as well. Be well. God bless.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,006 views • 7 months ago

Starmer claimed that he didn’t know the true relationship of Mandelson & Epstein, but The Times had published several pages on it in 2025... He claims he didn’t know that Mandelson failed vetting, yet The Independent had it on their front page last year…and it was disclosed in Parliament ⬇️ HE’S A GONER

Starmer claimed that he didn’t know the true relationship of Mandelson & Epstein, but The Times had published several pages on it in 2025... He claims he didn’t know that Mandelson failed vetting, yet The Independent had it on their front page last year…and it was disclosed in Parliament ⬇️ HE’S A GONER

Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧

29,652 views • 3 months ago

NEW OVERNIGHT: AIDAN KEARNEY ADMITS HE & KAREN READ WORKED IN CONJUNCTION TO DEFAME WITNESSES In yet ANOTHER display of stunning stupidity Aidan Kearney admitted to a live audience last night that he and Karen Read worked together in order to defame the witnesses and destroy their reputations. According to Kearney, neither one of them could have done it on their own. He also admitted their activities had nothing to do with petitioning the government and everything to do with attacking the witnesses personally as individuals. Kearney and Read are currently being sued for defamation by Jen McCabe, Brian Albert, Brian Higgins, and Colin Albert by circulating vicious lies manufactured by Read regarding their involvement in John O'Keefe's death. Read concocted the stories and Kearney broadcast them on his blog and YouTube lives. Kearney also repeatedly verbally harassed the witnesses and their families at their homes, their places of business, and their social activities. Most recently, Kearney called on his followers to protest a private fundraising event being held on the witnesses' behalf.

NEW OVERNIGHT: AIDAN KEARNEY ADMITS HE & KAREN READ WORKED IN CONJUNCTION TO DEFAME WITNESSES In yet ANOTHER display of stunning stupidity Aidan Kearney admitted to a live audience last night that he and Karen Read worked together in order to defame the witnesses and destroy their reputations. According to Kearney, neither one of them could have done it on their own. He also admitted their activities had nothing to do with petitioning the government and everything to do with attacking the witnesses personally as individuals. Kearney and Read are currently being sued for defamation by Jen McCabe, Brian Albert, Brian Higgins, and Colin Albert by circulating vicious lies manufactured by Read regarding their involvement in John O'Keefe's death. Read concocted the stories and Kearney broadcast them on his blog and YouTube lives. Kearney also repeatedly verbally harassed the witnesses and their families at their homes, their places of business, and their social activities. Most recently, Kearney called on his followers to protest a private fundraising event being held on the witnesses' behalf.

Julie Carpenter

22,604 views • 2 months ago