Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

breaking $100k be like

Pledditor

31,021 subscribers

679,621 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Comments

Hermes Psychopomp, JD.1 year ago

The last candle to 100k:

degenius1 year ago

@CardilloSamuel This is like trying to fight in your dreams

Denis Nyakundi1 year ago

Jim Cramer endorsed $BTC at 99K. Explains everything.

Montreal Hodl ⚡️1 year ago

😂😂😂

Pedro Martinez1 year ago

Totally accurate

Bitcopath1 year ago

Or this 😂😂😂

Sean Austin1 year ago

This makes me start sweating

Vikingo1 year ago

except the last part

Plan Marcus ⚡️🧡🍀1 year ago

Ok this one had me almost spit my drink 😂🤣

Related Videos

Looks like there's going to be no shortage of affinity scamming at Bitcoin 2025

Looks like there's going to be no shortage of affinity scamming at Bitcoin 2025

Pledditor

14,956 views • 1 year ago

Crypto investors waiting for $100K Bitcoin be like:

Crypto investors waiting for $100K Bitcoin be like:

Lark Davis

58,497 views • 1 year ago

BREAKING: #Bitcoin back above 100k priced in the Shitcoin called EURO. Don’t be a Laggard. Stack sats ASAP.

BREAKING: #Bitcoin back above 100k priced in the Shitcoin called EURO. Don’t be a Laggard. Stack sats ASAP.

Carl ₿ MENGER ⚡️🇸🇻

179,806 views • 8 months ago

.CoinDesk workers don't like bitcoiners

.CoinDesk workers don't like bitcoiners

Pledditor

77,527 views • 2 years ago

During yesterday's earnings call, @Saylor was asked about PoR again The real reason they don't want to give PoR appears to be they want retail poors to be the last to know when they start to sell off their BTC stack, so that way the insiders can be the first to the exits

During yesterday's earnings call, @Saylor was asked about PoR again The real reason they don't want to give PoR appears to be they want retail poors to be the last to know when they start to sell off their BTC stack, so that way the insiders can be the first to the exits

Pledditor

74,403 views • 10 months ago

Breaking up with a guy in 2025 be like 😂

Breaking up with a guy in 2025 be like 😂

Enriched

54,435 views • 7 months ago

Saylor said "we can point to the 500,000 bitcoin we own, it's verifiable, you can see it, it's 2.6% of the network" That would be a great talking point, if Strategy actually provided PoR 🫣🫣

Saylor said "we can point to the 500,000 bitcoin we own, it's verifiable, you can see it, it's 2.6% of the network" That would be a great talking point, if Strategy actually provided PoR 🫣🫣

Pledditor

50,352 views • 1 year ago

Saylor proudly boasts that Strategy's preferred securities weren't designed by actual economists who know what they are doing, but instead by his personal ChatGPT queries, as if that's something that's supposed to be reassuring 🥴🥴

Saylor proudly boasts that Strategy's preferred securities weren't designed by actual economists who know what they are doing, but instead by his personal ChatGPT queries, as if that's something that's supposed to be reassuring 🥴🥴

Pledditor

75,382 views • 8 months ago

If you read between the lines, what Saylor is suggesting here is that our MoE shouldn't be BTC, but a USD stablecoin backed by STRC. It's becoming clearer by the day that Strategy (not governments) will end up being bitcoin's final boss. Slay your heroes.

If you read between the lines, what Saylor is suggesting here is that our MoE shouldn't be BTC, but a USD stablecoin backed by STRC. It's becoming clearer by the day that Strategy (not governments) will end up being bitcoin's final boss. Slay your heroes.

Pledditor

38,502 views • 4 months ago

100k Rt,Like, Rep, End 19.00

100k Rt,Like, Rep, End 19.00

•.¸♡ WAK_Emil ♡¸.•

44,953 views • 3 years ago

I'm not happy about the OP_RETURN change in v30 as much as the next guy, but I also recognize it's not a significant change to bitcoin because 1) these transactions were _already_ consensus valid and were _already_ getting mined with libre relay and slipstream and 2) arbitrary data storage in other fields, such the witness signature, already allowed sizes larger than this and are 4x cheaper per byte than OP_RETURNs. Even post v30, arbitrary data storage in OP_RETURN fails to be economically competitive with them Don't get me wrong, anti-spam is a rational position, but Luke and Mechanic have been terrible leaders of this movement. They've transformed what was originally an anti-spam movement, into what is now clearly an anti-bitcoin movement. Many of you guys' entire internet identities now revolves around hating bitcoin, hating its developers, and spreading FUD like a bunch of deranged bcashers. Throwing out the baby with the bath water and getting bitcoin derangement syndrome over a benign change like this is retarded. Maybe in an ideal world I wouldn't have made this change either, but bitcoin is not a utopia. You need to accept that bitcoin is not about you. The nature of rough consensus is that it's full of philosophical compromises, and you can't always get what you want.

I'm not happy about the OP_RETURN change in v30 as much as the next guy, but I also recognize it's not a significant change to bitcoin because 1) these transactions were _already_ consensus valid and were _already_ getting mined with libre relay and slipstream and 2) arbitrary data storage in other fields, such the witness signature, already allowed sizes larger than this and are 4x cheaper per byte than OP_RETURNs. Even post v30, arbitrary data storage in OP_RETURN fails to be economically competitive with them Don't get me wrong, anti-spam is a rational position, but Luke and Mechanic have been terrible leaders of this movement. They've transformed what was originally an anti-spam movement, into what is now clearly an anti-bitcoin movement. Many of you guys' entire internet identities now revolves around hating bitcoin, hating its developers, and spreading FUD like a bunch of deranged bcashers. Throwing out the baby with the bath water and getting bitcoin derangement syndrome over a benign change like this is retarded. Maybe in an ideal world I wouldn't have made this change either, but bitcoin is not a utopia. You need to accept that bitcoin is not about you. The nature of rough consensus is that it's full of philosophical compromises, and you can't always get what you want.

Pledditor

21,379 views • 6 months ago

It's time to get tough with short term letting platforms like Airbnb who profit from widespread law breaking. Short term letting regulations must be enforced in Rent Pressure Zones and platforms like Airbnb should be fined where they are facilitating law breaking.

It's time to get tough with short term letting platforms like Airbnb who profit from widespread law breaking. Short term letting regulations must be enforced in Rent Pressure Zones and platforms like Airbnb should be fined where they are facilitating law breaking.

Eoin Ó Broin

13,435 views • 1 year ago

they be letting anybody get 100k now 🥸 congrats bilux on first power 1 account to reach 100k :)

they be letting anybody get 100k now 🥸 congrats bilux on first power 1 account to reach 100k :)

Ori 🎀

25,316 views • 1 year ago

Andrew Tate explains why The Real World’s profit distribution via the $TRW token will be the next easy money play like $BTC to $100k:

Andrew Tate explains why The Real World’s profit distribution via the $TRW token will be the next easy money play like $BTC to $100k:

The Real World

30,042 views • 1 year ago

BTW, many Saylor apologists were giving Michael Saylor the benefit of the doubt, making excuses for how he didn't mean to call STRC "the risk-free rate" at his speech at Consensus by CoinDesk. So I rewatched his The Bitcoin Conference speech and he made very similar claims. "Now what you see is we've created the short end of the yield curve, like the one month bitcoin bond, the risk-free rate in the crypto ecosystem. So what is the free-market cost of capital? It's 11.5% right now. And you can see what the risk-free rate is in every other currency right now...3, 2, 1, 0."

BTW, many Saylor apologists were giving Michael Saylor the benefit of the doubt, making excuses for how he didn't mean to call STRC "the risk-free rate" at his speech at Consensus by CoinDesk. So I rewatched his The Bitcoin Conference speech and he made very similar claims. "Now what you see is we've created the short end of the yield curve, like the one month bitcoin bond, the risk-free rate in the crypto ecosystem. So what is the free-market cost of capital? It's 11.5% right now. And you can see what the risk-free rate is in every other currency right now...3, 2, 1, 0."

Pledditor

14,769 views • 26 days ago

Should be a felony and $100k fine for this

Should be a felony and $100k fine for this

Crime Net

12,166,595 views • 2 years ago