Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

BREAKING: A Google engineer just got arrested for insider trading. But not on stocks... On ONE specific bet, using data that only a handful of Google employees were allowed to see. Meet Michele Spagnuolo. 36 years old. Italian national. Long-serving Google security engineer based in Zurich. One of a...

InsiderTrackers's profile picture

Insider Trackers

11,685 subscribers

20,246 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

BREAKING: The soldier who captured Maduro just got arrested. Not for what he did in Venezuela. For what he did on his phone the week before. He bet $33,000 on his own classified mission and won $410,000. And the federal government just made history charging him for it. Meet Master Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke. 38 years old. Active duty U.S. Army Special Forces since 2008. Stationed at Fort Bragg. A communications specialist supporting Joint Special Operations Command. The unit that oversees Delta Force and SEAL Team Six. On December 8, 2025, Van Dyke received a "Classified Information Security Briefing." He signed a nondisclosure agreement. He promised to never reveal classified information about U.S. Army Special Operations. Then he was read into Operation Absolute Resolve. The covert mission to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. 18 days later, on December 26, he opened a Polymarket account. He used a VPN to make it look like he was logging in from a foreign country. He funded it with about $35,000 from his personal bank account. And he started buying. 13 separate "YES" bets between December 27 and January 2. All on Venezuela. "Maduro out by January 31." "U.S. Forces in Venezuela by January 31." "Will the U.S. invade Venezuela by January 31." "Trump invokes War Powers against Venezuela by January 31." The market gave those outcomes a 17% chance. Long-shot bets that Wall Street wouldn't touch. Van Dyke went all in. Total wagered: $33,034. On January 2, the day before the raid, he placed $26,000 of those bets in a single afternoon. Hours before the operation kicked off. In the predawn hours of January 3, U.S. forces stormed a residence in Caracas. Maduro and his wife were captured. Hours later, Trump posted the announcement on Truth Social. Polymarket resolved the contracts to "YES." Van Dyke's $33,000 became $409,881. A 1,141% return in seven days. The same day Maduro hit American soil, Van Dyke withdrew most of his winnings. He sent the proceeds to a foreign cryptocurrency vault. Then to a brand new brokerage account. Three days later, on January 6, he asked Polymarket to delete his account. He told the platform he had "lost access to the email." He changed the email on his cryptocurrency exchange to one not registered in his name. An email he had created on December 14. Twelve days before the bets. He knew exactly what he was doing. Here's the part that should infuriate every American: A photo was uploaded to his Google account on the day of the raid. The picture, according to the indictment, shows him on the deck of a ship at sea at sunrise. Wearing combat fatigues. Carrying a rifle. Standing alongside three other soldiers. That ship was the USS Iwo Jima. The same vessel where Maduro was held after the operation. He didn't just have classified information. He WAS the operation. For weeks, the trade was an internet mystery. CNN and on-chain analytics firms flagged the suspicious wallet. An anonymous account had turned $33K into $410K on the longest of long shots. Federal prosecutors started watching Polymarket directly. The platform handed over the records, and they pointed to Van Dyke. On April 23, 2026, the Department of Justice unsealed the indictment. Five charges. Unlawful use of confidential government information for personal gain. Theft of nonpublic government information. Commodities fraud. Wire fraud. Engaging in a monetary transaction in property derived from specified unlawful activity. Maximum sentence: 20 years on the wire fraud count alone. 10 years on each of the others. The CFTC filed a parallel civil complaint. They want every dollar back. Plus penalties. Plus a permanent ban from regulated markets. This is the first time in U.S. history a person has been criminally charged for insider trading on a prediction market. The first time.
6:50

BREAKING: The soldier who captured Maduro just got arrested. Not for what he did in Venezuela. For what he did on his phone the week before. He bet $33,000 on his own classified mission and won $410,000. And the federal government just made history charging him for it. Meet Master Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke. 38 years old. Active duty U.S. Army Special Forces since 2008. Stationed at Fort Bragg. A communications specialist supporting Joint Special Operations Command. The unit that oversees Delta Force and SEAL Team Six. On December 8, 2025, Van Dyke received a "Classified Information Security Briefing." He signed a nondisclosure agreement. He promised to never reveal classified information about U.S. Army Special Operations. Then he was read into Operation Absolute Resolve. The covert mission to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. 18 days later, on December 26, he opened a Polymarket account. He used a VPN to make it look like he was logging in from a foreign country. He funded it with about $35,000 from his personal bank account. And he started buying. 13 separate "YES" bets between December 27 and January 2. All on Venezuela. "Maduro out by January 31." "U.S. Forces in Venezuela by January 31." "Will the U.S. invade Venezuela by January 31." "Trump invokes War Powers against Venezuela by January 31." The market gave those outcomes a 17% chance. Long-shot bets that Wall Street wouldn't touch. Van Dyke went all in. Total wagered: $33,034. On January 2, the day before the raid, he placed $26,000 of those bets in a single afternoon. Hours before the operation kicked off. In the predawn hours of January 3, U.S. forces stormed a residence in Caracas. Maduro and his wife were captured. Hours later, Trump posted the announcement on Truth Social. Polymarket resolved the contracts to "YES." Van Dyke's $33,000 became $409,881. A 1,141% return in seven days. The same day Maduro hit American soil, Van Dyke withdrew most of his winnings. He sent the proceeds to a foreign cryptocurrency vault. Then to a brand new brokerage account. Three days later, on January 6, he asked Polymarket to delete his account. He told the platform he had "lost access to the email." He changed the email on his cryptocurrency exchange to one not registered in his name. An email he had created on December 14. Twelve days before the bets. He knew exactly what he was doing. Here's the part that should infuriate every American: A photo was uploaded to his Google account on the day of the raid. The picture, according to the indictment, shows him on the deck of a ship at sea at sunrise. Wearing combat fatigues. Carrying a rifle. Standing alongside three other soldiers. That ship was the USS Iwo Jima. The same vessel where Maduro was held after the operation. He didn't just have classified information. He WAS the operation. For weeks, the trade was an internet mystery. CNN and on-chain analytics firms flagged the suspicious wallet. An anonymous account had turned $33K into $410K on the longest of long shots. Federal prosecutors started watching Polymarket directly. The platform handed over the records, and they pointed to Van Dyke. On April 23, 2026, the Department of Justice unsealed the indictment. Five charges. Unlawful use of confidential government information for personal gain. Theft of nonpublic government information. Commodities fraud. Wire fraud. Engaging in a monetary transaction in property derived from specified unlawful activity. Maximum sentence: 20 years on the wire fraud count alone. 10 years on each of the others. The CFTC filed a parallel civil complaint. They want every dollar back. Plus penalties. Plus a permanent ban from regulated markets. This is the first time in U.S. history a person has been criminally charged for insider trading on a prediction market. The first time.

Insider Trackers

49,736 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

.Google Cloud killed its own opening video 3 weeks before Google Cloud Next. In rehearsals, VP of Marketing Sarah Kennedy Ellis looked at the opener her team had built and called it. It was using AI, but not enough of it to actually showcase what the product could do. So they rebuilt it from scratch. In 3 weeks. Here's how it came together, straight from her SaaStr AI 2026 session: - It started on a napkin. A creative director sketched the concept by hand, then fed it into Nano Banana to generate the source images and inspiration. - The story was Google's own history. The 1998 origin garage. Dino. The original server rack that was actually built out of Legos. 138 Easter eggs packed into the video, prompted from Google's own lore. - Then they added motion with Veo and stitched it all together with a few custom agents built on the Gemini Enterprise platform. - The agents improvised. They prompted for balls representing customers, and the model added a burst of water that was nowhere in the brief. It injected its own creativity into a physical, on-stage moment. - The hardest part was the most physical: resolution. Max output was 4K. The screen at Next is the size of a 737. They had to upres from 4K to 12K using a custom Deep Mind model, the same one used for the Wizard of Oz production at the Sphere. Top Takeaways: 1️⃣ The old version of this project needed an agency, a much bigger budget, and a lot more than 3 weeks. That whole path collapsed into an internal team using their own tools. 2️⃣ And the same video was impossible a year earlier. They tried similar work the prior year and it was too early, mostly because of the upres wall. Twelve months later it shipped on the biggest screen they had.
1:32

.Google Cloud killed its own opening video 3 weeks before Google Cloud Next. In rehearsals, VP of Marketing Sarah Kennedy Ellis looked at the opener her team had built and called it. It was using AI, but not enough of it to actually showcase what the product could do. So they rebuilt it from scratch. In 3 weeks. Here's how it came together, straight from her SaaStr AI 2026 session: - It started on a napkin. A creative director sketched the concept by hand, then fed it into Nano Banana to generate the source images and inspiration. - The story was Google's own history. The 1998 origin garage. Dino. The original server rack that was actually built out of Legos. 138 Easter eggs packed into the video, prompted from Google's own lore. - Then they added motion with Veo and stitched it all together with a few custom agents built on the Gemini Enterprise platform. - The agents improvised. They prompted for balls representing customers, and the model added a burst of water that was nowhere in the brief. It injected its own creativity into a physical, on-stage moment. - The hardest part was the most physical: resolution. Max output was 4K. The screen at Next is the size of a 737. They had to upres from 4K to 12K using a custom Deep Mind model, the same one used for the Wizard of Oz production at the Sphere. Top Takeaways: 1️⃣ The old version of this project needed an agency, a much bigger budget, and a lot more than 3 weeks. That whole path collapsed into an internal team using their own tools. 2️⃣ And the same video was impossible a year earlier. They tried similar work the prior year and it was too early, mostly because of the upres wall. Twelve months later it shipped on the biggest screen they had.

Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin

18,937 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Google just pulled off the biggest theft in the history of AI. And their OWN documents exposed it... Three of the largest publishers on Earth, Hachette, Cengage, and Elsevier, just sued Google in federal court, alongside best-selling author Scott Turow. Their claim is that Google built Gemini, its flagship AI, on millions of copyrighted works it never paid for or licensed. This is one of the biggest copyright cases ever aimed at an AI company: Before they trained Gemini, an internal Google document allegedly spelled out the risk directly. Using this material could expose the company to "$10Bs-$100Bs in potential fines." Google's own people put a number on the theft, in the tens of billions, but the company moved ahead anyway. Then it allegedly tried to DELETE the evidence... The complaint says Google stripped the copyright information off the works before feeding them into Gemini, so nobody could trace what the model had actually been trained on. Pull the fingerprints off first, and the theft gets much harder to prove later. And there's a second betrayal underneath the first: Most of this material was not scraped from some random corner of the internet. Publishers had handed it to Google years earlier for a narrow purpose, to make their catalogs searchable inside Google's own services. The lawsuit says Google took that trust and repurposed the content to build a machine that now competes directly with the people who supplied it. And that machine is the entire point. The complaint describes Gemini producing a full-length substitute for a copyrighted work in about 20 minutes. Something an author spent years writing can now be cloned in an afternoon by the company that trained on the original. No writer or publisher survives that. So why does this case matter more than the dozen other AI copyright fights? Because most of them turn on a fuzzy fair-use question argued years after the fact. This one arrives with an internal document that allegedly SHOWS Google weighed the cost of getting caught and trained on the material anyway. A jury does not need a law degree to read that. The fight now moves toward discovery, where Google's internal emails and training records get dragged into the open. If those files back up what the complaint claims, that $100 billion will turn into a real liability. Google spent years telling the world it was organizing information for everyone. Its own documents show it knew exactly whose information it was taking, and what the price of getting caught would be.
1:15

Google just pulled off the biggest theft in the history of AI. And their OWN documents exposed it... Three of the largest publishers on Earth, Hachette, Cengage, and Elsevier, just sued Google in federal court, alongside best-selling author Scott Turow. Their claim is that Google built Gemini, its flagship AI, on millions of copyrighted works it never paid for or licensed. This is one of the biggest copyright cases ever aimed at an AI company: Before they trained Gemini, an internal Google document allegedly spelled out the risk directly. Using this material could expose the company to "$10Bs-$100Bs in potential fines." Google's own people put a number on the theft, in the tens of billions, but the company moved ahead anyway. Then it allegedly tried to DELETE the evidence... The complaint says Google stripped the copyright information off the works before feeding them into Gemini, so nobody could trace what the model had actually been trained on. Pull the fingerprints off first, and the theft gets much harder to prove later. And there's a second betrayal underneath the first: Most of this material was not scraped from some random corner of the internet. Publishers had handed it to Google years earlier for a narrow purpose, to make their catalogs searchable inside Google's own services. The lawsuit says Google took that trust and repurposed the content to build a machine that now competes directly with the people who supplied it. And that machine is the entire point. The complaint describes Gemini producing a full-length substitute for a copyrighted work in about 20 minutes. Something an author spent years writing can now be cloned in an afternoon by the company that trained on the original. No writer or publisher survives that. So why does this case matter more than the dozen other AI copyright fights? Because most of them turn on a fuzzy fair-use question argued years after the fact. This one arrives with an internal document that allegedly SHOWS Google weighed the cost of getting caught and trained on the material anyway. A jury does not need a law degree to read that. The fight now moves toward discovery, where Google's internal emails and training records get dragged into the open. If those files back up what the complaint claims, that $100 billion will turn into a real liability. Google spent years telling the world it was organizing information for everyone. Its own documents show it knew exactly whose information it was taking, and what the price of getting caught would be.

Ricardo

26,108 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Alex Hormozi is worth over $100 million. ten years ago he was sleeping on the floor of his own gym, eating canned tuna, and showering at the YMCA he had a Vanderbilt degree and a safe consulting job. he quit it, drove across the country, and opened a gym -> then nearly went bankrupt. by 26 he was back at zero then it clicked: he wasn't in the gym business. he was in the business of fixing gyms. so he sold all six of his and started licensing his system to other owners that company, Gym Launch, made $17 million in profit in its first year -> with $0 spent on ads. he scaled it to 4,500 gyms across 13 countries, then sold it for $46.2 million the day that deal closed, he started Acquisition..com -> today a portfolio doing over $200 million a year the strange part: he gives the entire playbook away for free. no course, no paywall. his bet is that attention is worth more than the secret his whole story, in one interview, bookmark this ↓
25:19

Alex Hormozi is worth over $100 million. ten years ago he was sleeping on the floor of his own gym, eating canned tuna, and showering at the YMCA he had a Vanderbilt degree and a safe consulting job. he quit it, drove across the country, and opened a gym -> then nearly went bankrupt. by 26 he was back at zero then it clicked: he wasn't in the gym business. he was in the business of fixing gyms. so he sold all six of his and started licensing his system to other owners that company, Gym Launch, made $17 million in profit in its first year -> with $0 spent on ads. he scaled it to 4,500 gyms across 13 countries, then sold it for $46.2 million the day that deal closed, he started Acquisition..com -> today a portfolio doing over $200 million a year the strange part: he gives the entire playbook away for free. no course, no paywall. his bet is that attention is worth more than the secret his whole story, in one interview, bookmark this ↓

Ridark

10,215 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Indore, MP | SHO Chandra Bhal Singh says, "A 13-year-old child was missing from the house since last night and the family members filed a complaint... Today the police found his jacket on the roof of an apartment and the bag was found in the garbage. The CCTV showed the child entering the apartment, but he did not exit. We searched all the flats and inquired and with the suspicious movement of one of the residents Rehan - the accused, it was found that he had killed the child and hid the body in the bed box. It seems from the primary investigation that he was suffocated using a rope and there were wounds of bricks on the face... The reason is not clear... The investigation is going on..."
2:03

#WATCH | Indore, MP | SHO Chandra Bhal Singh says, "A 13-year-old child was missing from the house since last night and the family members filed a complaint... Today the police found his jacket on the roof of an apartment and the bag was found in the garbage. The CCTV showed the child entering the apartment, but he did not exit. We searched all the flats and inquired and with the suspicious movement of one of the residents Rehan - the accused, it was found that he had killed the child and hid the body in the bed box. It seems from the primary investigation that he was suffocated using a rope and there were wounds of bricks on the face... The reason is not clear... The investigation is going on..."

ANI

64,387 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Demis Hassabis says he sold DeepMind in 2014 because staying independent needed $7 billion, and he could barely raise $10 million: "He saw Google as an AI company. The reason I sold was I knew it would require 7 billion dollars of investment in order to take on, try and become one of those companies." "And I was barely able to scrape together 10 million dollar rounds at that point." "And the problem was is that we'd done enough, the Atari thing, we had alerted enough of the Silicon Valley titans. They were coming after my people." "We had no business, we didn't even have a product, obviously not, because I was trying to make the core technology." "I was paying myself zero and people were being paid like 100k a year and then they were getting offers of 10 million a year." "And then if that didn't work, they could afford to come back and say, here's 50 million a year." "So at some point, that was going to go wrong." P.S: I'm hosting the AI Assurance & Governance Summit 2026 on October 1 at the Stanford Faculty Club, one day and one track, to work on the part of this that money did not solve. Frontier labs, regulated industries, insurers and investors in the room. Link in the reply. - Demis Hassabis (Demis Hassabis), co-founder and CEO of Google DeepMind, at the Worshipful Company of Information Technologists Annual Lecture.
0:58

Demis Hassabis says he sold DeepMind in 2014 because staying independent needed $7 billion, and he could barely raise $10 million: "He saw Google as an AI company. The reason I sold was I knew it would require 7 billion dollars of investment in order to take on, try and become one of those companies." "And I was barely able to scrape together 10 million dollar rounds at that point." "And the problem was is that we'd done enough, the Atari thing, we had alerted enough of the Silicon Valley titans. They were coming after my people." "We had no business, we didn't even have a product, obviously not, because I was trying to make the core technology." "I was paying myself zero and people were being paid like 100k a year and then they were getting offers of 10 million a year." "And then if that didn't work, they could afford to come back and say, here's 50 million a year." "So at some point, that was going to go wrong." P.S: I'm hosting the AI Assurance & Governance Summit 2026 on October 1 at the Stanford Faculty Club, one day and one track, to work on the part of this that money did not solve. Frontier labs, regulated industries, insurers and investors in the room. Link in the reply. - Demis Hassabis (Demis Hassabis), co-founder and CEO of Google DeepMind, at the Worshipful Company of Information Technologists Annual Lecture.

Karl Mehta

302,818 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Sergey Brin retired in 2020 with enough money to do anything on earth. Within weeks he felt himself mentally spiraling. The thing that pulled him back became Gemini. He said staying retired would have been a big mistake. The plan was simple sit in cafes, study physics, decompress after decades of building one of the most consequential companies in history. He had earned it. Then COVID shut every cafe on earth the month after he retired. He was stuck. No intellectual outlet. No creative problem to solve. No team to build with. Just time. And he said something happened to him in that time that scared him. He felt himself losing sharpness. Spiraling. Not being as sharp as he was used to being. So he went back. Not because he had to. Not because Google needed him. Because he needed it. He started coming into the office when almost nobody else was. Spent more and more time on a project that at the time did not have a name. That project eventually became Gemini, Google's flagship AI model, the thing they are now betting their next hundred years on. He said it plainly: staying retired would have been a big mistake. Most people think the goal is to stop working. Sergey Brin had the money to stop working and learned within months that the work was not the burden. The absence of it was. --- Watch the full interview YT. Search: "Big ideas begin here: Sergey Brin at Stanford"
1:05

Sergey Brin retired in 2020 with enough money to do anything on earth. Within weeks he felt himself mentally spiraling. The thing that pulled him back became Gemini. He said staying retired would have been a big mistake. The plan was simple sit in cafes, study physics, decompress after decades of building one of the most consequential companies in history. He had earned it. Then COVID shut every cafe on earth the month after he retired. He was stuck. No intellectual outlet. No creative problem to solve. No team to build with. Just time. And he said something happened to him in that time that scared him. He felt himself losing sharpness. Spiraling. Not being as sharp as he was used to being. So he went back. Not because he had to. Not because Google needed him. Because he needed it. He started coming into the office when almost nobody else was. Spent more and more time on a project that at the time did not have a name. That project eventually became Gemini, Google's flagship AI model, the thing they are now betting their next hundred years on. He said it plainly: staying retired would have been a big mistake. Most people think the goal is to stop working. Sergey Brin had the money to stop working and learned within months that the work was not the burden. The absence of it was. --- Watch the full interview YT. Search: "Big ideas begin here: Sergey Brin at Stanford"

Ihtesham Ali

230,652 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Regarding these latest bombshell disclosures about the FBI falsely labeling people as Russian agents in order to shut down the Hunter Biden investigation, one point is often overlooked. This was never just about Hunter taking $1 million a year for a no-show job. That was only a small part of it. I went to see someone who had a firsthand view of what was happening, Andrii Telizhenko, to get the fuller story, which you can watch below. The Ukrainian Prosecutor General’s Office had extensive files relating to Hunter Biden. There was a money-laundering investigation involving him and Latvia. There were allegations of cash payments in various locations outside Ukraine. The list goes on, and that is only the Ukraine-related material. But the FBI helped shut the entire thing down. Andrii was sanctioned, forced out of the United States, and effectively turned into a non-person who cannot work, bank, or travel, and now lives in hiding. His Google account, where he stored a lot of these files, was also shut down. Perhaps the worst part if that most of what was done to Andrii was carried out under Trump by Trump appointees. And now, under Trump again, it is Trump appointees who are standing in the way of finally undoing it.
1:43:13

Regarding these latest bombshell disclosures about the FBI falsely labeling people as Russian agents in order to shut down the Hunter Biden investigation, one point is often overlooked. This was never just about Hunter taking $1 million a year for a no-show job. That was only a small part of it. I went to see someone who had a firsthand view of what was happening, Andrii Telizhenko, to get the fuller story, which you can watch below. The Ukrainian Prosecutor General’s Office had extensive files relating to Hunter Biden. There was a money-laundering investigation involving him and Latvia. There were allegations of cash payments in various locations outside Ukraine. The list goes on, and that is only the Ukraine-related material. But the FBI helped shut the entire thing down. Andrii was sanctioned, forced out of the United States, and effectively turned into a non-person who cannot work, bank, or travel, and now lives in hiding. His Google account, where he stored a lot of these files, was also shut down. Perhaps the worst part if that most of what was done to Andrii was carried out under Trump by Trump appointees. And now, under Trump again, it is Trump appointees who are standing in the way of finally undoing it.

Hans Mahncke

13,435 просмотров • 18 дней назад

Google is making $62 billion a quarter destroying the websites it NEEDS to survive. This is literally a death spiral that ends with Google killing itself. Let me explain what's going on... Google added AI summaries to the top of every search result in 2024. When you Google something now, the answer sits right there on Google's page. You never have to click anywhere. Google took the information from someone else's website, summarized it, and kept you inside Google's ecosystem. The result: 60% of all Google searches now end without a single click to any website. Small publishers lost 60% of their traffic in one year. Medium publishers lost 47%. Even the biggest names in media, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Business Insider, all saw traffic fall between 22% and 55%. The Axios CEO called it "a referral extinction event for the ad-supported web." Google's response to all of this was to tell publishers they can "opt out" of having their content summarized. But opting out also REMOVES your description from normal search results. So the choice Google gives you is let us steal your content for free, or become invisible on the internet. That's extortion. The Washington Post laid off another round of journalists this year because of it. Stereogum, one of the most respected music publications on the internet, had to BEG readers for donations. Business Insider cut 21% of its staff. Dozens of smaller publishers have shut down entirely. The people who actually CREATE the information Google summarizes are going bankrupt while Google posts record revenue. But here's where this gets interesting and where everyone stops thinking: Google's AI summaries are only as good as the content they summarize. If the publishers who write the original articles, run the original investigations, and create the original data go out of business, there is nothing left for Google to summarize. The AI starts recycling old information, the answers get stale, the quality drops, and users start noticing that Google's summaries are increasingly wrong, outdated, or useless. Google is essentially strip-mining the internet for short-term revenue. They are extracting all the value from content creators without paying for it, driving those creators out of business, and then wondering why the quality of their own product is declining. This is exactly what Napster did to the music industry in the early 2000s: Made content free, creators went broke, and quality collapsed. It took a decade to rebuild. Google is doing the same thing to the entire internet at 100x the scale. Rolling Stone, Variety, Deadline, The Hollywood Reporter, and Billboard are now suing Google for antitrust violations. Chegg, the education platform, lost 49% of its traffic and is suing too. The UK's competition authority just ordered Google to let publishers opt out without being punished. The DOJ already ruled Google is an illegal monopoly. And Google's defense in court is genuinely unbelievable. They argue that publishers CHOOSE to let Google index their content and can leave anytime they want. That's like saying you choose to pay protection money to the mob because technically you could close your business and move to another city. Google controls 90% of search. Leaving Google means leaving the internet. Meanwhile Google is investing billions in custom AI chips to make these summaries cheaper at scale. Every quarter the problem gets worse. The internet as we've known it for 25 years ran on a simple deal: Publishers make content. Google sends traffic. Advertisers pay for the traffic. Everyone wins. But Google just BROKE that deal and kept all the money.
4:13

Google is making $62 billion a quarter destroying the websites it NEEDS to survive. This is literally a death spiral that ends with Google killing itself. Let me explain what's going on... Google added AI summaries to the top of every search result in 2024. When you Google something now, the answer sits right there on Google's page. You never have to click anywhere. Google took the information from someone else's website, summarized it, and kept you inside Google's ecosystem. The result: 60% of all Google searches now end without a single click to any website. Small publishers lost 60% of their traffic in one year. Medium publishers lost 47%. Even the biggest names in media, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Business Insider, all saw traffic fall between 22% and 55%. The Axios CEO called it "a referral extinction event for the ad-supported web." Google's response to all of this was to tell publishers they can "opt out" of having their content summarized. But opting out also REMOVES your description from normal search results. So the choice Google gives you is let us steal your content for free, or become invisible on the internet. That's extortion. The Washington Post laid off another round of journalists this year because of it. Stereogum, one of the most respected music publications on the internet, had to BEG readers for donations. Business Insider cut 21% of its staff. Dozens of smaller publishers have shut down entirely. The people who actually CREATE the information Google summarizes are going bankrupt while Google posts record revenue. But here's where this gets interesting and where everyone stops thinking: Google's AI summaries are only as good as the content they summarize. If the publishers who write the original articles, run the original investigations, and create the original data go out of business, there is nothing left for Google to summarize. The AI starts recycling old information, the answers get stale, the quality drops, and users start noticing that Google's summaries are increasingly wrong, outdated, or useless. Google is essentially strip-mining the internet for short-term revenue. They are extracting all the value from content creators without paying for it, driving those creators out of business, and then wondering why the quality of their own product is declining. This is exactly what Napster did to the music industry in the early 2000s: Made content free, creators went broke, and quality collapsed. It took a decade to rebuild. Google is doing the same thing to the entire internet at 100x the scale. Rolling Stone, Variety, Deadline, The Hollywood Reporter, and Billboard are now suing Google for antitrust violations. Chegg, the education platform, lost 49% of its traffic and is suing too. The UK's competition authority just ordered Google to let publishers opt out without being punished. The DOJ already ruled Google is an illegal monopoly. And Google's defense in court is genuinely unbelievable. They argue that publishers CHOOSE to let Google index their content and can leave anytime they want. That's like saying you choose to pay protection money to the mob because technically you could close your business and move to another city. Google controls 90% of search. Leaving Google means leaving the internet. Meanwhile Google is investing billions in custom AI chips to make these summaries cheaper at scale. Every quarter the problem gets worse. The internet as we've known it for 25 years ran on a simple deal: Publishers make content. Google sends traffic. Advertisers pay for the traffic. Everyone wins. But Google just BROKE that deal and kept all the money.

Ricardo

251,003 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

On Friday in Evanston, Illinois, chaos ensued when a red car slammed into the back of a DHS vehicle. The car had been tailing the agents in their SUV to warn neighbors of their presence. After the car rear-ended DHS, the driver of the car, passenger, and one other person were arrested. The Trump administration confirmed all three are US citizens. At one point during the arrests, a woman tried to help an arrested woman escape. An agent caught that attempt in the act and threw the helper to the side so he could shove the arrested woman back in the SUV. He then pulled his gun out to defend himself. The man in the green shirt on the ground was handcuffed and arrested. During his arrest, he resisted and was subdued by agents on top of him. Eventually the SUV sped off with the agents and the arrested Americans. The red car was towed away. The crowd had been completely out of control. They were not only screaming at the agents, but reportedly also spitting on them and trying to rush into the SUV from both sides to retrieve the arrested people. Pepper spray was used and multiple people were thrown to the ground. Afterwards, the mayor of Evanston, and other anti-ICE activists, spoke and completely misrepresented what happened in order to disparage DHS. (kimkatieusavietnam on TT)
0:37

On Friday in Evanston, Illinois, chaos ensued when a red car slammed into the back of a DHS vehicle. The car had been tailing the agents in their SUV to warn neighbors of their presence. After the car rear-ended DHS, the driver of the car, passenger, and one other person were arrested. The Trump administration confirmed all three are US citizens. At one point during the arrests, a woman tried to help an arrested woman escape. An agent caught that attempt in the act and threw the helper to the side so he could shove the arrested woman back in the SUV. He then pulled his gun out to defend himself. The man in the green shirt on the ground was handcuffed and arrested. During his arrest, he resisted and was subdued by agents on top of him. Eventually the SUV sped off with the agents and the arrested Americans. The red car was towed away. The crowd had been completely out of control. They were not only screaming at the agents, but reportedly also spitting on them and trying to rush into the SUV from both sides to retrieve the arrested people. Pepper spray was used and multiple people were thrown to the ground. Afterwards, the mayor of Evanston, and other anti-ICE activists, spoke and completely misrepresented what happened in order to disparage DHS. (kimkatieusavietnam on TT)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

618,707 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

TikTok just got caught running a secret experiment on 15 million Americans to find out how much money their dangerous version could make them. In 2021 the company rewrote part of its recommendation algorithm so users would stop getting buried under harmful content over and over. Then it held back 10% of its American users and left them on the OLD version. At the time that was roughly 15 million people. None of them were told. They opened the same app, saw the same logo, and scrolled a feed the company had already replaced for everyone else. Internally the practice has a clean name. It is called a backtest, and it is the same A/B test any company runs when it wants to prove a change actually worked. Companies normally run those on button colors and checkout flows. TikTok ran one on what happens to people when the app stops protecting them. Why would a business do that? Because a safer feed is a less sticky feed, and stickiness is the product. One of the 15 million was a 16 year old named Chase Nasca. He had no history of mental health issues. He committed s*icide in February 2022. In March 2023, a Bloomberg Businessweek reporter emailed the company asking about Chase for a story on teenagers and the algorithm. Only then did TikTok's algorithm and safety teams go back and reconstruct his account. They found he had been assigned to the control group. The same report notes that most of what he actually searched for on the app was sports and comedy - but he was regularly shown s*icide and other harmful content. Their findings became a 14 page internal report on youth safety and filter bubbles. Its key contacts list shows it went to 10 teams inside the company, including communications, legal response, policy, security and search. So the lawyers knew about it. The communications team knew. Policy, security and search all got a copy. Then came the recommendations, and this is where it gets genuinely ugly... The report proposed two fixes: The first was to shrink the control group from 10% of American users to under 1%. The second was to cut how long the same users sit inside it, from as long as a full year down to seven days. Nobody proposed stopping. And the report ran the numbers on its own suggestion. Even at 1%, it said, at least 1.8 million users would still be excluded from the safety change, and it warned those people would be left "at risk for falling into bubbles." Someone typed that sentence, sent it to 10 teams, and the practice continued. A former TikTok trust and safety team leader who worked there while the experiment was live said he had never heard of it. After seeing the details he said the control group was far too big, and that the test should have excluded minors and suicide content entirely. The staff paid to protect users did not know the experiment on users existed. TikTok's answer this week is that the 2022 test was routine, and that its purpose was to check whether safety changes were working as intended. The internal report describes its own recommendations as a way to prevent future incidents. Chase's parents sued for wrongful death. A judge dismissed the case last year after TikTok argued that Section 230 protects it from liability for what its algorithm recommends. The appeal is still pending. So the company's legal position is that it is not responsible for the videos its algorithm served a teenager, while its OWN document confirms it chose which version of that algorithm he received. Every large platform runs tests like this one. But not one of them publishes how many users are sitting in the old version at any given moment. TikTok's number was never supposed to become public.
1:31

TikTok just got caught running a secret experiment on 15 million Americans to find out how much money their dangerous version could make them. In 2021 the company rewrote part of its recommendation algorithm so users would stop getting buried under harmful content over and over. Then it held back 10% of its American users and left them on the OLD version. At the time that was roughly 15 million people. None of them were told. They opened the same app, saw the same logo, and scrolled a feed the company had already replaced for everyone else. Internally the practice has a clean name. It is called a backtest, and it is the same A/B test any company runs when it wants to prove a change actually worked. Companies normally run those on button colors and checkout flows. TikTok ran one on what happens to people when the app stops protecting them. Why would a business do that? Because a safer feed is a less sticky feed, and stickiness is the product. One of the 15 million was a 16 year old named Chase Nasca. He had no history of mental health issues. He committed s*icide in February 2022. In March 2023, a Bloomberg Businessweek reporter emailed the company asking about Chase for a story on teenagers and the algorithm. Only then did TikTok's algorithm and safety teams go back and reconstruct his account. They found he had been assigned to the control group. The same report notes that most of what he actually searched for on the app was sports and comedy - but he was regularly shown s*icide and other harmful content. Their findings became a 14 page internal report on youth safety and filter bubbles. Its key contacts list shows it went to 10 teams inside the company, including communications, legal response, policy, security and search. So the lawyers knew about it. The communications team knew. Policy, security and search all got a copy. Then came the recommendations, and this is where it gets genuinely ugly... The report proposed two fixes: The first was to shrink the control group from 10% of American users to under 1%. The second was to cut how long the same users sit inside it, from as long as a full year down to seven days. Nobody proposed stopping. And the report ran the numbers on its own suggestion. Even at 1%, it said, at least 1.8 million users would still be excluded from the safety change, and it warned those people would be left "at risk for falling into bubbles." Someone typed that sentence, sent it to 10 teams, and the practice continued. A former TikTok trust and safety team leader who worked there while the experiment was live said he had never heard of it. After seeing the details he said the control group was far too big, and that the test should have excluded minors and suicide content entirely. The staff paid to protect users did not know the experiment on users existed. TikTok's answer this week is that the 2022 test was routine, and that its purpose was to check whether safety changes were working as intended. The internal report describes its own recommendations as a way to prevent future incidents. Chase's parents sued for wrongful death. A judge dismissed the case last year after TikTok argued that Section 230 protects it from liability for what its algorithm recommends. The appeal is still pending. So the company's legal position is that it is not responsible for the videos its algorithm served a teenager, while its OWN document confirms it chose which version of that algorithm he received. Every large platform runs tests like this one. But not one of them publishes how many users are sitting in the old version at any given moment. TikTok's number was never supposed to become public.

Ricardo

31,047 просмотров • 26 дней назад

Michael Caputo is a former Trump administration official who was secretly surveilled by Biden's weaponized DOJ for YEARS. Back in 2020, Caputo created a documentary that aired on One America News Network. This documentary was called "The Ukraine Hoax," and it was about Joe Biden and his family's corruption in Ukraine. "Apparently, as soon as Biden was sworn in on inauguration Day January 2021, the FBI opened a federal criminal investigation to me, my family, and every person listed in the credit in the credits of my movie. Every single one...They didn't accuse me of a crime. They accused me of taking Russian-connected money to make the movie...It's a First Amendment issue, right? But the fact is I did not take any money from Russians or Russian-connected money..." "They issued a broad search warrant for all my information, bank accounts, emails, everything, right after Donald Trump was elected in 2024...They issued a search warrant and they started surveilling me...You know what they asked for in that search warrant? The same thing they asked for since 2016—my connections to Russia. They surveilled me until the president shut it down on December 8th, 2025. Google had just sent me a user notice and said, Sir, you have had a classified subpoena against all of your data, emails, locations, services, search prompts, and everything since 2023. They sent the same subpoenas to Verizon and all my other technology companies and the only one that told me...was Google. The rest of them were too afraid to say anything..." -Michael Caputo In addition to secretly subpoenaing Google and Verizon, Biden's weaponized DOJ also secretly subpoenaed Apple and Bank of America for all of Michael's information and data. Michael is one of the thousands of reasons why we MUST stand the $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund back up. Those politically persecuted by the Biden administration deserve JUSTICE.
2:56

Michael Caputo is a former Trump administration official who was secretly surveilled by Biden's weaponized DOJ for YEARS. Back in 2020, Caputo created a documentary that aired on One America News Network. This documentary was called "The Ukraine Hoax," and it was about Joe Biden and his family's corruption in Ukraine. "Apparently, as soon as Biden was sworn in on inauguration Day January 2021, the FBI opened a federal criminal investigation to me, my family, and every person listed in the credit in the credits of my movie. Every single one...They didn't accuse me of a crime. They accused me of taking Russian-connected money to make the movie...It's a First Amendment issue, right? But the fact is I did not take any money from Russians or Russian-connected money..." "They issued a broad search warrant for all my information, bank accounts, emails, everything, right after Donald Trump was elected in 2024...They issued a search warrant and they started surveilling me...You know what they asked for in that search warrant? The same thing they asked for since 2016—my connections to Russia. They surveilled me until the president shut it down on December 8th, 2025. Google had just sent me a user notice and said, Sir, you have had a classified subpoena against all of your data, emails, locations, services, search prompts, and everything since 2023. They sent the same subpoenas to Verizon and all my other technology companies and the only one that told me...was Google. The rest of them were too afraid to say anything..." -Michael Caputo In addition to secretly subpoenaing Google and Verizon, Biden's weaponized DOJ also secretly subpoenaed Apple and Bank of America for all of Michael's information and data. Michael is one of the thousands of reasons why we MUST stand the $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund back up. Those politically persecuted by the Biden administration deserve JUSTICE.

Liz Wheeler

31,466 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A hedge fund manager put a jar of 1,776 jelly beans in front of a room at Google and proved in two rounds why most investors will always lose money. for free. His name is Joel Greenblatt. Gotham Capital. 50% a year for a decade. he asked the room to guess how many jelly beans were in the jar. First round: everyone wrote their guess silently. no talking. no looking around. the average was 1,771. five off. almost perfect. Second round: people said their guesses out loud. heard each other. adjusted. the average collapsed to 850. same room. same jar. the only thing that changed was influence. He told the room: the second guess is the stock market. everyone knows what they just read in the paper. what the guy next to them said. what they saw in the news. the cold independent guess was better. that is not how the market works. but that is where the opportunity is. Then he showed 20 years of data. the cheapest 20% of stocks averaged 38% a year. the most expensive averaged the least. the strategy is simple. the reason it still works is that people are still crazy. and they always will be. 55 minutes. one jar. still free.
55:04

A hedge fund manager put a jar of 1,776 jelly beans in front of a room at Google and proved in two rounds why most investors will always lose money. for free. His name is Joel Greenblatt. Gotham Capital. 50% a year for a decade. he asked the room to guess how many jelly beans were in the jar. First round: everyone wrote their guess silently. no talking. no looking around. the average was 1,771. five off. almost perfect. Second round: people said their guesses out loud. heard each other. adjusted. the average collapsed to 850. same room. same jar. the only thing that changed was influence. He told the room: the second guess is the stock market. everyone knows what they just read in the paper. what the guy next to them said. what they saw in the news. the cold independent guess was better. that is not how the market works. but that is where the opportunity is. Then he showed 20 years of data. the cheapest 20% of stocks averaged 38% a year. the most expensive averaged the least. the strategy is simple. the reason it still works is that people are still crazy. and they always will be. 55 minutes. one jar. still free.

Tigerflow

534,092 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Air Ambulance Lands in Leeds Following Double Machete Attack Police are investigating following a violent altercation involving a number of people in the Kirkgate area of Leeds city centre. At 5:04pm yesterday (Tuesday, 18 March) officers were called to Kirkgate Market to a report of a man with a head injury. It is understood that there had been a violent altercation in and around Kirkgate Market and the NCP The Markets car park. The man was taken to hospital where he has been receiving treatment for injuries to the head and hand, which are not understood to be life-threatening. A further report was received of an injured male at a property on Atkinson Street, Hunslet, at 5:39pm. From enquiries, it is understood that he was also injured in the incident in the city centre and made his way to the address in Hunslet. He was taken to hospital by road ambulance under police escort with injuries to his hand and hip which again are not being treated as life-threatening. Three people, a 21-year-old woman, a 22-year-old man and a 17-year-old male have been arrested.
0:40

Air Ambulance Lands in Leeds Following Double Machete Attack Police are investigating following a violent altercation involving a number of people in the Kirkgate area of Leeds city centre. At 5:04pm yesterday (Tuesday, 18 March) officers were called to Kirkgate Market to a report of a man with a head injury. It is understood that there had been a violent altercation in and around Kirkgate Market and the NCP The Markets car park. The man was taken to hospital where he has been receiving treatment for injuries to the head and hand, which are not understood to be life-threatening. A further report was received of an injured male at a property on Atkinson Street, Hunslet, at 5:39pm. From enquiries, it is understood that he was also injured in the incident in the city centre and made his way to the address in Hunslet. He was taken to hospital by road ambulance under police escort with injuries to his hand and hip which again are not being treated as life-threatening. Three people, a 21-year-old woman, a 22-year-old man and a 17-year-old male have been arrested.

Yapp

16,174 просмотров • 1 год назад

BREAKING: FBI Whistleblower has submitted the below statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee alleging that the FBI suppressed investigations into Rudy Giuliani and other Trump allies. - As detailed in the Whistleblower statement below (video), and reported on by Business Insider, this current agent was told repeatedly by his superiors to stop investigating multiple individuals in Trump's orbit. - According to the statement, the FBI agent acquired intelligence from undisclosed sources, indicating that Giuliani had purportedly undertaken compensated assignments for Pavel Fuks, a Ukrainian oligarch and a designated "asset of the Russian intelligence services." (Note that Rolling Stone had reported this previously.) - The agent reports that he had also provided material to the FBI regarding Hunter Biden and Burisma. He reports that superiors were "delighted that I had collected this information about Burisma." This same superior is who allegedly shut down his investigations into Giuliani and others. - In January of last year, he filed an internal complaint under the Whistleblower Protection Act which alleged that "numerous acts of intelligence suppression of my reporting related to foreign influence and the Capital riots, retaliatory acts and defamation of my own character." - The agent also alleged that Giuliani raised money to create a film about Joe Biden prior to the election, but never created it. - The agent alleged that the New York field office of the FBI was upset about the material he was reporting: "In the midst of my reporting involving Giuliani, which had previously been identified by my supervisor as 'high impact,' my management told me they received a call from a supervisor in [the New York field office], who they did not identify," the statement says. "This supervisor had taken issue with my reporting." I think we can all agree that transparency is important and all whistleblower claims, both about Biden and Trump investigations should thoroughly be examined. Thoughts?
1:17

BREAKING: FBI Whistleblower has submitted the below statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee alleging that the FBI suppressed investigations into Rudy Giuliani and other Trump allies. - As detailed in the Whistleblower statement below (video), and reported on by Business Insider, this current agent was told repeatedly by his superiors to stop investigating multiple individuals in Trump's orbit. - According to the statement, the FBI agent acquired intelligence from undisclosed sources, indicating that Giuliani had purportedly undertaken compensated assignments for Pavel Fuks, a Ukrainian oligarch and a designated "asset of the Russian intelligence services." (Note that Rolling Stone had reported this previously.) - The agent reports that he had also provided material to the FBI regarding Hunter Biden and Burisma. He reports that superiors were "delighted that I had collected this information about Burisma." This same superior is who allegedly shut down his investigations into Giuliani and others. - In January of last year, he filed an internal complaint under the Whistleblower Protection Act which alleged that "numerous acts of intelligence suppression of my reporting related to foreign influence and the Capital riots, retaliatory acts and defamation of my own character." - The agent also alleged that Giuliani raised money to create a film about Joe Biden prior to the election, but never created it. - The agent alleged that the New York field office of the FBI was upset about the material he was reporting: "In the midst of my reporting involving Giuliani, which had previously been identified by my supervisor as 'high impact,' my management told me they received a call from a supervisor in [the New York field office], who they did not identify," the statement says. "This supervisor had taken issue with my reporting." I think we can all agree that transparency is important and all whistleblower claims, both about Biden and Trump investigations should thoroughly be examined. Thoughts?

Brian Krassenstein

381,607 просмотров • 3 лет назад

14 year old arrested for assaulting a teacher in school catches resisting charges for swinging on the police. Anderson township Ohio sheriff were Called out to the school as a teacher reported they were assaulted by one of the female students. Deputy arrived on the scene and was shown security footage of the event and spoke with the teacher that was involved. The teacher stated that they did wish to pursue charges being filed on the 14 year old. The deputy had the staff call the student out of the classroom so they would not cause a disruption in class. Once the deputy caught up with the student she immediately began to resist to the point where she tried to swing on the deputy. With the help of the principal the deputy was able to take the student into custody with no harm to anyone. The student was charged with assault and resisting arrest. You can bet that this behavior is not something this child learned naturally. You can bet this is a direct result of the upbringing of the kid and I'm betting that when she did get home instead of this being a learning moment, she was probably giving the impression that this was not her fault. Would love to hear your thoughts on this.
4:37

14 year old arrested for assaulting a teacher in school catches resisting charges for swinging on the police. Anderson township Ohio sheriff were Called out to the school as a teacher reported they were assaulted by one of the female students. Deputy arrived on the scene and was shown security footage of the event and spoke with the teacher that was involved. The teacher stated that they did wish to pursue charges being filed on the 14 year old. The deputy had the staff call the student out of the classroom so they would not cause a disruption in class. Once the deputy caught up with the student she immediately began to resist to the point where she tried to swing on the deputy. With the help of the principal the deputy was able to take the student into custody with no harm to anyone. The student was charged with assault and resisting arrest. You can bet that this behavior is not something this child learned naturally. You can bet this is a direct result of the upbringing of the kid and I'm betting that when she did get home instead of this being a learning moment, she was probably giving the impression that this was not her fault. Would love to hear your thoughts on this.

Giggling Ganon

390,922 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Islamabad, 18 August 2026. Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif unveiled the foundation plaque of Google's Pakistan office, and described it as a significant milestone in the country’s digital transformation journey. Addressing the delegation at the Prime Minister’s Office, PM Shehbaz Sharif said it was the delegation's first visit to Pakistan, adding that he hoped it would be followed by many more in the times to come. He said Google was a household name not only in Pakistan but across the world, and that there existed great scope for building a wonderful partnership with the company to enhance bilateral engagement in multiple areas. The prime minister termed it an interesting coincidence that the visit was taking place at a time when Pakistan was undergoing a major digital transformation across various areas of governance, and noted that the country's youth bulge could be leveraged to turn around Pakistan's economic fortunes. Vice President of Google, Wilson L. White, said it was a profound honour to be on his first visit to Pakistan, calling it a great milestone achieved on the day. He said the occasion marked the culmination of a long-standing commitment, as Google had been investing in and committed to Pakistan for over a decade, and that the opening of its local office was a very special moment. He said the prime minister's ambition of making Pakistan a US$30-billion IT export hub was very much aligned with Google's own goals. He informed the meeting that over the past ten years, Google had contributed to more than Rs 3.9 trillion of economic activity for local Pakistani businesses and households, supporting over 960,000 jobs, adding that this was just the beginning. The Google Vice President said the company was committing to Pakistan's IT export goals in three major ways: by investing in Pakistani people, in manufacturing and infrastructure around export hardware, and in local businesses. He said Pakistan's digital transformation was only possible through investment in its people, and that Google had already contributed to the upskilling of over one million Pakistanis through its career certificate programmes, in collaboration with schools and teachers, to prepare them for the digital transformation ahead. He further announced that Google Gemini subscriptions would be made free for all students in Pakistan for one year, with a formal announcement to follow later in the week. The prime minister, along with the Google delegation, was flanked by United States Charge d'Affaires Natalie Baker and Federal Minister for Information Technology and Telecommunication, Shaza Fatima Khawaja during the unveiling of the foundation plaque of the Google Pakistan office. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif felicitated the Google team and Pakistani officials on the occasion, calling it a wonderful day for the partnership and a stepping stone towards a long journey of collaboration in a field he described as both attractive and the need of the hour. He said the government would empower Pakistan's youth through modern tools, techniques and technology, and thanked Google Vice President Wilson for visiting Pakistan, expressing hope that the visit would translate into dozens of such visits every year. He remarked that the partnership would blossom like a beautiful flower. United States Charge d'Affaires Natalie Baker also felicitated the prime minister on the occasion.
5:38

Islamabad, 18 August 2026. Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif unveiled the foundation plaque of Google's Pakistan office, and described it as a significant milestone in the country’s digital transformation journey. Addressing the delegation at the Prime Minister’s Office, PM Shehbaz Sharif said it was the delegation's first visit to Pakistan, adding that he hoped it would be followed by many more in the times to come. He said Google was a household name not only in Pakistan but across the world, and that there existed great scope for building a wonderful partnership with the company to enhance bilateral engagement in multiple areas. The prime minister termed it an interesting coincidence that the visit was taking place at a time when Pakistan was undergoing a major digital transformation across various areas of governance, and noted that the country's youth bulge could be leveraged to turn around Pakistan's economic fortunes. Vice President of Google, Wilson L. White, said it was a profound honour to be on his first visit to Pakistan, calling it a great milestone achieved on the day. He said the occasion marked the culmination of a long-standing commitment, as Google had been investing in and committed to Pakistan for over a decade, and that the opening of its local office was a very special moment. He said the prime minister's ambition of making Pakistan a US$30-billion IT export hub was very much aligned with Google's own goals. He informed the meeting that over the past ten years, Google had contributed to more than Rs 3.9 trillion of economic activity for local Pakistani businesses and households, supporting over 960,000 jobs, adding that this was just the beginning. The Google Vice President said the company was committing to Pakistan's IT export goals in three major ways: by investing in Pakistani people, in manufacturing and infrastructure around export hardware, and in local businesses. He said Pakistan's digital transformation was only possible through investment in its people, and that Google had already contributed to the upskilling of over one million Pakistanis through its career certificate programmes, in collaboration with schools and teachers, to prepare them for the digital transformation ahead. He further announced that Google Gemini subscriptions would be made free for all students in Pakistan for one year, with a formal announcement to follow later in the week. The prime minister, along with the Google delegation, was flanked by United States Charge d'Affaires Natalie Baker and Federal Minister for Information Technology and Telecommunication, Shaza Fatima Khawaja during the unveiling of the foundation plaque of the Google Pakistan office. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif felicitated the Google team and Pakistani officials on the occasion, calling it a wonderful day for the partnership and a stepping stone towards a long journey of collaboration in a field he described as both attractive and the need of the hour. He said the government would empower Pakistan's youth through modern tools, techniques and technology, and thanked Google Vice President Wilson for visiting Pakistan, expressing hope that the visit would translate into dozens of such visits every year. He remarked that the partnership would blossom like a beautiful flower. United States Charge d'Affaires Natalie Baker also felicitated the prime minister on the occasion.

Prime Minister's Office

43,848 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Someone on Reddit asked has anyone actually made real money on Polymarket? and one comment led me to a wallet that turned 8 trades into $900,000 profit. The thread had 200+ replies, mostly people sharing their $50 wins and $200 losses, the usual stories about bad beats and lucky streaks that every prediction market attracts. But buried somewhere in the middle, one user dropped a single link without explanation just the wallet address and three words: this guy did. → Wallet: I clicked expecting another account with thousands of trades and a modest profit curve that took years to build. What I found instead made me close the tab, reopen it and stare at the numbers for a solid five minutes trying to understand what I was looking at. $900,091 in profit. Not from grinding hundreds of positions over months of careful risk management. From exactly 8 predictions total. For anyone new to prediction markets, let me put this in perspective most successful traders on Polymarket consider a 60% win rate exceptional and they achieve it across hundreds or thousands of small bets that slowly compound into meaningful profit over time. Maze8 has a 100% win rate across 8 bets averaging over $100,000 each, with a biggest single win of $325,100 that most professional traders will never see in their entire career on the platform. The account was created in January 2026, which means this person walked onto the platform less than a month ago and immediately started placing bets larger than what most people have in their retirement accounts. There is no learning curve visible here, no progression from small test bets to larger positions as confidence builds the very first trades were already six figure commitments made with the certainty of someone who already knew the outcomes. Right now the wallet holds $785,000 in active positions, meaning whoever controls this account extracted nearly a million dollars in profit and then decided that was not enough, loading up again for whatever comes next. I went back to that Reddit thread to find more discussion about this wallet but the comment had maybe 3 upvotes and zero replies. 2,700 people have viewed this profile according to Polymarket, yet somehow the internet has almost nothing to say about a wallet printing money at this rate. The profile remains public, the positions are visible in real time, and every future bet will appear on the blockchain the moment it happens. Eight predictions placed. Eight predictions won. $900,000 extracted while everyone else argued about $50 bets in Reddit comments. Some people discuss prediction markets. Others quietly empty them.
0:55

Someone on Reddit asked has anyone actually made real money on Polymarket? and one comment led me to a wallet that turned 8 trades into $900,000 profit. The thread had 200+ replies, mostly people sharing their $50 wins and $200 losses, the usual stories about bad beats and lucky streaks that every prediction market attracts. But buried somewhere in the middle, one user dropped a single link without explanation just the wallet address and three words: this guy did. → Wallet: I clicked expecting another account with thousands of trades and a modest profit curve that took years to build. What I found instead made me close the tab, reopen it and stare at the numbers for a solid five minutes trying to understand what I was looking at. $900,091 in profit. Not from grinding hundreds of positions over months of careful risk management. From exactly 8 predictions total. For anyone new to prediction markets, let me put this in perspective most successful traders on Polymarket consider a 60% win rate exceptional and they achieve it across hundreds or thousands of small bets that slowly compound into meaningful profit over time. Maze8 has a 100% win rate across 8 bets averaging over $100,000 each, with a biggest single win of $325,100 that most professional traders will never see in their entire career on the platform. The account was created in January 2026, which means this person walked onto the platform less than a month ago and immediately started placing bets larger than what most people have in their retirement accounts. There is no learning curve visible here, no progression from small test bets to larger positions as confidence builds the very first trades were already six figure commitments made with the certainty of someone who already knew the outcomes. Right now the wallet holds $785,000 in active positions, meaning whoever controls this account extracted nearly a million dollars in profit and then decided that was not enough, loading up again for whatever comes next. I went back to that Reddit thread to find more discussion about this wallet but the comment had maybe 3 upvotes and zero replies. 2,700 people have viewed this profile according to Polymarket, yet somehow the internet has almost nothing to say about a wallet printing money at this rate. The profile remains public, the positions are visible in real time, and every future bet will appear on the blockchain the moment it happens. Eight predictions placed. Eight predictions won. $900,000 extracted while everyone else argued about $50 bets in Reddit comments. Some people discuss prediction markets. Others quietly empty them.

Marlow

10,133 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад