Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨BREAKING🚨: A mysterious billionaire paid a PhD half a million dollars for proving that the soul survives the death of the body. Jeffrey Mishlove (Jeffrey Mishlove), holder of the only accredited PhD in parapsychology in history, awarded by UC Berkeley, was the recipient. And he has spent five decades...

AlchemyAmerican's profile picture

Jesse Michels

134,463 subscribers

239,690 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieGesundheit & WellnessNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Amit Chaudhary was the only son of his parents and only brother of his three elder sisters. He was about to gt married in Jan 2024. On the evening of 14th Sep he called his uncle and told him that the wife of the colonel at whose house he is posted as a House Help under Buddy system of Army is going to murder him. After three days the family received a call from SM of the unit who informed them that they are sending the dead body of Amit to Jammu. The family received the Body on 19th Sep and even now no one from the Army bothered to inform them about the cause and reason of his death. Family is alleging that Wife of the Colonel was forcing Amit to do things with her which he was not comfortable with. And that leads to his murder. Its such a serious allegation and if this is true its a shame for the entire force.
7:19

Amit Chaudhary was the only son of his parents and only brother of his three elder sisters. He was about to gt married in Jan 2024. On the evening of 14th Sep he called his uncle and told him that the wife of the colonel at whose house he is posted as a House Help under Buddy system of Army is going to murder him. After three days the family received a call from SM of the unit who informed them that they are sending the dead body of Amit to Jammu. The family received the Body on 19th Sep and even now no one from the Army bothered to inform them about the cause and reason of his death. Family is alleging that Wife of the Colonel was forcing Amit to do things with her which he was not comfortable with. And that leads to his murder. Its such a serious allegation and if this is true its a shame for the entire force.

NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs

31,195 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The man who invented modern fantasy didn't publish his first novel until he was forty-five. By that age, J.R.R. Tolkien had already built a respectable life. He was an Oxford professor, an expert in ancient languages, with a wife and four children and a settled academic career. He was exactly the kind of man who might reasonably have decided that the shape of his life was already fixed. The work he would be remembered for, he had not yet even begun... The story, which Tolkien told himself, is that one summer he was grading examination papers, when he turned a page and found that a student had left it blank. Without quite knowing why, he wrote a single sentence on it: "In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit." He did not know what a hobbit was. He had spent years inventing languages and mythologies as a private passion, and telling stories to his own children, never imagining any of it would reach the world. But that one line began to grow. It became a story, and then a book, and in 1937, at the age of forty-five, Tolkien published The Hobbit. It was a success, and his publisher asked for a sequel. Tolkien warned them it might take some time. It took 17 years... He wrote it in the margins of a demanding full-time job, revising endlessly, doubting it often. When The Lord of the Rings was finally published, in 1954 and 1955, he was in his early sixties. That book, begun as a middle-aged professor's private side project, went on to sell well over a hundred million copies, to invent modern fantasy as we know it, and to reshape the imagination of the entire world. Tolkien already had a full and respectable life behind him. And still, the thing he is remembered for, the thing that outlived him and reached hundreds of millions of people, was something he began at forty-five, at an age when it would have been the easiest thing in the world to tell himself he had already missed his chance. He didn't. It's never as late as it feels.
3:01

The man who invented modern fantasy didn't publish his first novel until he was forty-five. By that age, J.R.R. Tolkien had already built a respectable life. He was an Oxford professor, an expert in ancient languages, with a wife and four children and a settled academic career. He was exactly the kind of man who might reasonably have decided that the shape of his life was already fixed. The work he would be remembered for, he had not yet even begun... The story, which Tolkien told himself, is that one summer he was grading examination papers, when he turned a page and found that a student had left it blank. Without quite knowing why, he wrote a single sentence on it: "In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit." He did not know what a hobbit was. He had spent years inventing languages and mythologies as a private passion, and telling stories to his own children, never imagining any of it would reach the world. But that one line began to grow. It became a story, and then a book, and in 1937, at the age of forty-five, Tolkien published The Hobbit. It was a success, and his publisher asked for a sequel. Tolkien warned them it might take some time. It took 17 years... He wrote it in the margins of a demanding full-time job, revising endlessly, doubting it often. When The Lord of the Rings was finally published, in 1954 and 1955, he was in his early sixties. That book, begun as a middle-aged professor's private side project, went on to sell well over a hundred million copies, to invent modern fantasy as we know it, and to reshape the imagination of the entire world. Tolkien already had a full and respectable life behind him. And still, the thing he is remembered for, the thing that outlived him and reached hundreds of millions of people, was something he began at forty-five, at an age when it would have been the easiest thing in the world to tell himself he had already missed his chance. He didn't. It's never as late as it feels.

James Lucas

93,539 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The beauty of Ragnar’s character is the constant war between his curiosity and his crown. He wasn’t just a raider; he was a father and a farmer who saw the humanity in his enemies. By covering that boy, he chose a quiet act of mercy that defied the beast his people expected him to be. He understood that a true legacy isn't built solely on the bodies of the fallen, but on the survival of the future. It takes a different kind of strength to hold onto your soul while building an empire.
0:55

The beauty of Ragnar’s character is the constant war between his curiosity and his crown. He wasn’t just a raider; he was a father and a farmer who saw the humanity in his enemies. By covering that boy, he chose a quiet act of mercy that defied the beast his people expected him to be. He understood that a true legacy isn't built solely on the bodies of the fallen, but on the survival of the future. It takes a different kind of strength to hold onto your soul while building an empire.

SAMWISE

43,201 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

on June 28, 2001, a one-legged man sat down at a shortwave radio in the Arizona desert and told his listeners a major attack was coming, and that the government would hand them Osama bin Laden to blame for it. 75 days later the towers fell. years earlier the Navy had put him on an intelligence briefing team and handed him a folder full of secrets. recovered craft, dead bodies, treaties with visitors from another world. he believed all of it, and he built his whole career on it. but then he went back on the air years later and called the folders a lie. he said the government had fed it to him on purpose, real stamps over false cargo, so that when it broke it would take truthers down with it. so he spent the rest of his life telling his own audience to believe no one, including him. go get the documents. check who signed them. prove me wrong. AKA: DYOR 8 weeks after 9/11 he was dead in his own driveway. His name was Milton William Cooper.
1:05:18

on June 28, 2001, a one-legged man sat down at a shortwave radio in the Arizona desert and told his listeners a major attack was coming, and that the government would hand them Osama bin Laden to blame for it. 75 days later the towers fell. years earlier the Navy had put him on an intelligence briefing team and handed him a folder full of secrets. recovered craft, dead bodies, treaties with visitors from another world. he believed all of it, and he built his whole career on it. but then he went back on the air years later and called the folders a lie. he said the government had fed it to him on purpose, real stamps over false cargo, so that when it broke it would take truthers down with it. so he spent the rest of his life telling his own audience to believe no one, including him. go get the documents. check who signed them. prove me wrong. AKA: DYOR 8 weeks after 9/11 he was dead in his own driveway. His name was Milton William Cooper.

EKO

34,098 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

RFK Jr. on psychedelics and how his son’s ayahuasca experience opened his mind to legalization “My inclination would be to make them available, at least in therapeutic settings and maybe more generally, but in ways that would discourage the corporate control and exploitation of it. My wife in 2012 took her own life… and one of [my kids] was worrying to me because he never processed his mom’s death in a way that I could observe. About five years ago… he went to Patagonia to kayak a white water river that I kayaked for many, many years… The night my son arrived there, the guy [he stayed with] said to him ‘I’m doing an ayahuasca trip tonight’… so my kid ended up doing this. After he drank the ayahuasca… he felt himself sinking through all the geological strata of the Earth, and he told me… he had a total understanding of all of the processes that had laid them out through the eons. He ended up being propelled out the other side of the Earth and then floating through space for what he experienced as hundreds of years. He would focus on a distant planet and be transported there, and on each planet he would have an adventure and at the end there would be a lesson that he was supposed to remember. The last planet he visited, his mother was there. And she started passing through him, in and out of him again and again and every time she did that, he felt all these experiences of forgiveness, of love, of understanding, of comprehension, of empathy and compassion. When he came back from that trip, he was completely changed. He was very open about talking about his feelings, [but] the reason I really know that it changed him is he started taking out the garbage and doing the dishes. I have a friend who’s a Navy SEAL who had severe PTSD and he went to Costa Rica and had the same kind of experience. I have a couple of other friends who are in the NFL and they also had severe brain injuries and depression, and the same thing happened. So, my mind is open to the idea that there may be things that I don’t know about and that people ought to have the freedom and liberty to experiment with these things.”
8:05

RFK Jr. on psychedelics and how his son’s ayahuasca experience opened his mind to legalization “My inclination would be to make them available, at least in therapeutic settings and maybe more generally, but in ways that would discourage the corporate control and exploitation of it. My wife in 2012 took her own life… and one of [my kids] was worrying to me because he never processed his mom’s death in a way that I could observe. About five years ago… he went to Patagonia to kayak a white water river that I kayaked for many, many years… The night my son arrived there, the guy [he stayed with] said to him ‘I’m doing an ayahuasca trip tonight’… so my kid ended up doing this. After he drank the ayahuasca… he felt himself sinking through all the geological strata of the Earth, and he told me… he had a total understanding of all of the processes that had laid them out through the eons. He ended up being propelled out the other side of the Earth and then floating through space for what he experienced as hundreds of years. He would focus on a distant planet and be transported there, and on each planet he would have an adventure and at the end there would be a lesson that he was supposed to remember. The last planet he visited, his mother was there. And she started passing through him, in and out of him again and again and every time she did that, he felt all these experiences of forgiveness, of love, of understanding, of comprehension, of empathy and compassion. When he came back from that trip, he was completely changed. He was very open about talking about his feelings, [but] the reason I really know that it changed him is he started taking out the garbage and doing the dishes. I have a friend who’s a Navy SEAL who had severe PTSD and he went to Costa Rica and had the same kind of experience. I have a couple of other friends who are in the NFL and they also had severe brain injuries and depression, and the same thing happened. So, my mind is open to the idea that there may be things that I don’t know about and that people ought to have the freedom and liberty to experiment with these things.”

Holden Culotta

345,980 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

One of the most heartbreaking moments in TV history: the origin and sacrifice of Hodor. 💔 It depicts a tragic "time-loop" where his entire life was a result of his own future death. ⏳⚔️ Hodor’s identity—the only word he could speak—was actually a distress signal from the moment he died. He spent his whole life carrying the command that would eventually kill him. 🚪
1:59

One of the most heartbreaking moments in TV history: the origin and sacrifice of Hodor. 💔 It depicts a tragic "time-loop" where his entire life was a result of his own future death. ⏳⚔️ Hodor’s identity—the only word he could speak—was actually a distress signal from the moment he died. He spent his whole life carrying the command that would eventually kill him. 🚪

SAMWISE

175,217 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

In 1950 a scientist at Bell Labs admitted, out loud, that he was envious of the geniuses in the offices around him. He was sharing an attic with Claude Shannon. So instead of resenting them, he spent the rest of his career studying exactly what separated the great ones from everyone else, and near the end of his life he laid the whole answer out in a single talk. His name was Richard Hamming. He was honest about where he started. At Los Alamos, he called himself a janitor of science, one of the people who kept things running while the important decisions happened without him. He was, in his own words, plain envious. And rather than swallow it, he turned it into a question. What actually is the difference between the first-class people and the rest of us? His first answer is uncomfortable, because it removes every excuse. It is not luck, though luck plays a part. It is not raw IQ, since plenty of the greats did not test especially well, and Einstein spent seven years in a patent office before anyone noticed him. What it comes down to, again and again, is that the able people simply work on important problems, and they work on them relentlessly, while everyone else stays busy with whatever happens to be in front of them. Then he tells the story that stays with you. For years he ate lunch with the physicists, the Nobel winners, and learned how they thought. One day he turned to a chemist at the table and asked, if what you are working on is not important, and not likely to lead to anything important, why are you working on it? The man was offended. But months later he stopped Hamming in the hallway and admitted the question had gotten under his skin. That chemist went on to run his department and join the National Academy. Of everyone else at that table, Hamming says, he never heard of a single one again. He noticed the same pattern in something as small as an office door. The people who worked with their doors closed got more done in the moment, but ten years later they no longer knew what was worth doing. The ones who left their doors open stayed connected to what actually mattered, even at the cost of constant interruption. And underneath all of it was a habit most people never build. He set aside Friday afternoons, every week, for nothing but great thoughts. No task, no email, just the question of what the important problems in his field really were, and whether he was working on any of them. He was not claiming to be the smartest man in the building. He knew he was not. That was the entire point. He watched the smartest men closely, took what he could use, and made himself into someone who did work that lasted. As he put it near the end, no one ever told him these things. He had to find them alone. You have no such excuse.
44:02

In 1950 a scientist at Bell Labs admitted, out loud, that he was envious of the geniuses in the offices around him. He was sharing an attic with Claude Shannon. So instead of resenting them, he spent the rest of his career studying exactly what separated the great ones from everyone else, and near the end of his life he laid the whole answer out in a single talk. His name was Richard Hamming. He was honest about where he started. At Los Alamos, he called himself a janitor of science, one of the people who kept things running while the important decisions happened without him. He was, in his own words, plain envious. And rather than swallow it, he turned it into a question. What actually is the difference between the first-class people and the rest of us? His first answer is uncomfortable, because it removes every excuse. It is not luck, though luck plays a part. It is not raw IQ, since plenty of the greats did not test especially well, and Einstein spent seven years in a patent office before anyone noticed him. What it comes down to, again and again, is that the able people simply work on important problems, and they work on them relentlessly, while everyone else stays busy with whatever happens to be in front of them. Then he tells the story that stays with you. For years he ate lunch with the physicists, the Nobel winners, and learned how they thought. One day he turned to a chemist at the table and asked, if what you are working on is not important, and not likely to lead to anything important, why are you working on it? The man was offended. But months later he stopped Hamming in the hallway and admitted the question had gotten under his skin. That chemist went on to run his department and join the National Academy. Of everyone else at that table, Hamming says, he never heard of a single one again. He noticed the same pattern in something as small as an office door. The people who worked with their doors closed got more done in the moment, but ten years later they no longer knew what was worth doing. The ones who left their doors open stayed connected to what actually mattered, even at the cost of constant interruption. And underneath all of it was a habit most people never build. He set aside Friday afternoons, every week, for nothing but great thoughts. No task, no email, just the question of what the important problems in his field really were, and whether he was working on any of them. He was not claiming to be the smartest man in the building. He knew he was not. That was the entire point. He watched the smartest men closely, took what he could use, and made himself into someone who did work that lasted. As he put it near the end, no one ever told him these things. He had to find them alone. You have no such excuse.

Zyron

15,886 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Remote viewing didn't start at Stanford Research Institute in the 1970s. It started two decades earlier in a barn on the coast of Maine, funded by the Astors, the DuPonts, and U.S. military intelligence. Greg Mallozzi, who spent a decade making his documentary Mind Traveler on Andrija Puharich, has the archive to prove it. Puharich was running what would now be called remote viewing experiments at his Roundtable Foundation as early as the 1950s. He built one of the first Faraday cages used for ESP testing, believing it would block outside interference and sharpen psychic focus. The research archive is massive and largely unseen. "I'm not trying to make bold statements, but that's not true. If you're looking at it from a research standpoint, when did this start? We have all of the Roundtable research." "They were doing exactly the definition of remote viewing." "The intelligence community were just very intrigued with what was going on there." "He was one of the first people doing ESP tests in a Faraday cage, where he would put people who claimed to be psychic in the cage." "It was his belief that it could block out anything from the outside and really help the psychic focus."
1:58

Remote viewing didn't start at Stanford Research Institute in the 1970s. It started two decades earlier in a barn on the coast of Maine, funded by the Astors, the DuPonts, and U.S. military intelligence. Greg Mallozzi, who spent a decade making his documentary Mind Traveler on Andrija Puharich, has the archive to prove it. Puharich was running what would now be called remote viewing experiments at his Roundtable Foundation as early as the 1950s. He built one of the first Faraday cages used for ESP testing, believing it would block outside interference and sharpen psychic focus. The research archive is massive and largely unseen. "I'm not trying to make bold statements, but that's not true. If you're looking at it from a research standpoint, when did this start? We have all of the Roundtable research." "They were doing exactly the definition of remote viewing." "The intelligence community were just very intrigued with what was going on there." "He was one of the first people doing ESP tests in a Faraday cage, where he would put people who claimed to be psychic in the cage." "It was his belief that it could block out anything from the outside and really help the psychic focus."

American Alchemy

22,101 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

UPDATE : Many in the comments are saying that it's not Andrew Tate who is trying to hand the mobile phone to his bodyguard but rather the US Marshal who was handcuffing him. This is not true and unrealistic. First of all look at the slow downed video it is clear that Andrew Tate was holding the phone and was going to put it in his pocket whilst the officer pulled him and started handcuffing him, a moment later Andrew Tate tried to give the phone to his bodyguard instead but his bodyguard did not flinch and the phone dropped on the floor. Also look at the hands, Andrew Tate had no watch on his left hand, whilst the officer clearly had a black watch on. The hand trying to give the phone to the bodyguard clearly had no watch on, further proving that it was Andrew Tate who handed him the phone. The attention of the US Marshal was obviously to handcuff him and not to get the phone at that moment. The person picking up the phone is also obviously a US Marshal and not a member of Tate's entourage because moments before he could be seen telling his bodyguards to move back to allow the arrest to proceed snoothly.
0:30

UPDATE : Many in the comments are saying that it's not Andrew Tate who is trying to hand the mobile phone to his bodyguard but rather the US Marshal who was handcuffing him. This is not true and unrealistic. First of all look at the slow downed video it is clear that Andrew Tate was holding the phone and was going to put it in his pocket whilst the officer pulled him and started handcuffing him, a moment later Andrew Tate tried to give the phone to his bodyguard instead but his bodyguard did not flinch and the phone dropped on the floor. Also look at the hands, Andrew Tate had no watch on his left hand, whilst the officer clearly had a black watch on. The hand trying to give the phone to the bodyguard clearly had no watch on, further proving that it was Andrew Tate who handed him the phone. The attention of the US Marshal was obviously to handcuff him and not to get the phone at that moment. The person picking up the phone is also obviously a US Marshal and not a member of Tate's entourage because moments before he could be seen telling his bodyguards to move back to allow the arrest to proceed snoothly.

Caffe' Satoshi

211,493 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

One of the most intriguing comments Jeffrey Mishlove makes in his interview with Jesse Michels concerns what some of his past interview subjects have told him about the ultimate purpose of contact. According to Mishlove, he has spoken with people who claim the long-term intention is an eventual civilization on Earth where humans and non-human beings live together openly. If true, that radically changes the framework. Not invasion. Not observation. Not even Disclosure as the endpoint. Integration. It raises an extraordinary possibility: perhaps the Phenomenon is not simply revealing its existence to humanity. Perhaps it is preparing humanity for coexistence. #ufox #ufotwitter
5:21

One of the most intriguing comments Jeffrey Mishlove makes in his interview with Jesse Michels concerns what some of his past interview subjects have told him about the ultimate purpose of contact. According to Mishlove, he has spoken with people who claim the long-term intention is an eventual civilization on Earth where humans and non-human beings live together openly. If true, that radically changes the framework. Not invasion. Not observation. Not even Disclosure as the endpoint. Integration. It raises an extraordinary possibility: perhaps the Phenomenon is not simply revealing its existence to humanity. Perhaps it is preparing humanity for coexistence. #ufox #ufotwitter

Tom Thompson🛸 (ＣＯＲＴＥＸ ＺＥＲＯ)

40,659 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

Who Do You Think The 3rd Person Is? Bill Gates? Klaus Schwab? Someone Else? “Nostradamus saw in his future three men that he called antichrists. One was Napoleon, the second one was Hitler, and the third one is the one that is to come, who is said to be the worst of all, because he will learn from the mistakes of the others. A very dangerous person. He didn't like the term antichrist. He said it was a Christian term, and it was not exactly what he meant. But he said, if you think of Christ as representing people, humanity, then antichrist is someone who does terrible things against humanity, against people. And it can be the type of personality like Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun, the type that doesn't care anything about what it's doing, it only wants power. So this is what he meant by an Antichrist. But the third one, he gave us a great deal of information about him because he wanted us to do something to stop the man. He said in the Bible, in the book of Revelation and other books in the Old Testament, the people saw the same things that he saw their symbolism they could understand in their time, but they all saw the same thing. And the man he refers to as the Antichrist is the number 666 in the Book of Revelation, called the Beast. Of course he said 666 also refers to his connection to his computers. So there's a lot more to it. But he has been predicted as far back as Bible times. So he said he has a destiny to fulfill. He has to come, but after he comes, what happens after that is in the hands of mankind. Do we allow it to go through the worst case scenarios or can we lessen it? That's the point fulfill. We were given a lot of information about this man because he is so important. We have his horoscope. He was born on February the 4th, 1962 in Jerusalem, but he's not Jewish. And his parents were killed during the Israeli war and when he was about six or seven years old, and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle is a very evil man, and we have had many people see him, and we have in my work, and we had one woman who was able to put together a police composite picture of the uncle and of the antichrist. She was a psychic who had worked with police on many cases, so she knew how to do the police composite kits. But the uncle took the young boy him as his own. What the young boy doesn't know was that the uncle had his parents killed, so he could have him for himself. And he has gotten together a very powerful group of rich Arabs in the Middle East, and they've been taking care of this young boy and grooming him for the role he is to take. It's a very powerful group of people that control everything that happens in the Middle East. They're the puppet masters behind the scenes. Nusrat Dhamma said, by the time seven puppets arise in the Middle East, you will realize what is happening that they are not the real leaders of the countries, but they are the puppets being manipulated by the puppet masters behind the scenes. The young Antichrist went to college in Egypt, and we were working on this at the same time he was in college, so we were shown several scenes of him in college. We knew where he was living. We had all this information.”
3:32

Who Do You Think The 3rd Person Is? Bill Gates? Klaus Schwab? Someone Else? “Nostradamus saw in his future three men that he called antichrists. One was Napoleon, the second one was Hitler, and the third one is the one that is to come, who is said to be the worst of all, because he will learn from the mistakes of the others. A very dangerous person. He didn't like the term antichrist. He said it was a Christian term, and it was not exactly what he meant. But he said, if you think of Christ as representing people, humanity, then antichrist is someone who does terrible things against humanity, against people. And it can be the type of personality like Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun, the type that doesn't care anything about what it's doing, it only wants power. So this is what he meant by an Antichrist. But the third one, he gave us a great deal of information about him because he wanted us to do something to stop the man. He said in the Bible, in the book of Revelation and other books in the Old Testament, the people saw the same things that he saw their symbolism they could understand in their time, but they all saw the same thing. And the man he refers to as the Antichrist is the number 666 in the Book of Revelation, called the Beast. Of course he said 666 also refers to his connection to his computers. So there's a lot more to it. But he has been predicted as far back as Bible times. So he said he has a destiny to fulfill. He has to come, but after he comes, what happens after that is in the hands of mankind. Do we allow it to go through the worst case scenarios or can we lessen it? That's the point fulfill. We were given a lot of information about this man because he is so important. We have his horoscope. He was born on February the 4th, 1962 in Jerusalem, but he's not Jewish. And his parents were killed during the Israeli war and when he was about six or seven years old, and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle is a very evil man, and we have had many people see him, and we have in my work, and we had one woman who was able to put together a police composite picture of the uncle and of the antichrist. She was a psychic who had worked with police on many cases, so she knew how to do the police composite kits. But the uncle took the young boy him as his own. What the young boy doesn't know was that the uncle had his parents killed, so he could have him for himself. And he has gotten together a very powerful group of rich Arabs in the Middle East, and they've been taking care of this young boy and grooming him for the role he is to take. It's a very powerful group of people that control everything that happens in the Middle East. They're the puppet masters behind the scenes. Nusrat Dhamma said, by the time seven puppets arise in the Middle East, you will realize what is happening that they are not the real leaders of the countries, but they are the puppets being manipulated by the puppet masters behind the scenes. The young Antichrist went to college in Egypt, and we were working on this at the same time he was in college, so we were shown several scenes of him in college. We knew where he was living. We had all this information.”

Wall Street Apes

1,338,694 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The evidence against Tyler Robinson is overwhelming. It's not close. Robinson confessed. Repeatedly. In person to his partner Lance Twiggs, crying, saying he was sorry he did it. By text the night of the shooting. In a note left under his keyboard. In a Discord message announcing he was about to surrender. And then he did surrender, at 9 p.m. the next night, exactly as the message said. And the single hardest fact to wave away: in that text, Robinson described leaving the rifle in a bush, wrapped in a towel — accurately describing where and how the Mauser was found by police, before any of that was public. The gun was recovered exactly there. A Mauser 98 .30-06, wrapped in a black towel, in the wooded area across Campus Drive — right where surveillance shows the rooftop figure fleeing within minutes of the shot. His DNA is all over it. Major contributor on the stock, grips, trigger and trigger guard, bolt, barrel, and scope. On the fired casing. On two of the unfired casings. On the screwdriver left on the roof. The casings were engraved — "hey fascist! CATCH!" among them. A Dremel tool and a matching bit capable of making those exact engravings were found in his home. So was a separate "Test Shot" casing — forensically matched as fired by that same rifle — sitting on a safe next to his bedroom. Plus boxes of Remington .30-06 and perforated paper targets. Surveillance puts him there. On the Losee Center roof, lying in the prone position, facing the courtyard — then up and running the moment Charlie was shot. Visiting the campus three other times that day, in different clothing, including the roof and the amphitheater where the shooting happened — tied each time to his gray Dodge Challenger. His own phone puts him there. Two Google Maps routes stored on his device: one starting near the shooting scene 23 minutes after Charlie was killed, headed to a car wash — where surveillance confirms his Challenger arrived at 12:57. The second, at 1:33 a.m., in the early hours of Sept 11, routing from near the rifle's location directly back to his home. His car puts him there. A Ring camera caught the Challenger parked near campus after midnight. At 12:30 a.m. an officer contacted that car at Campus Drive, wrote down the plate, and traced it through DMV records straight to Robinson — the same window he was texting Twiggs about sneaking back for the gun. The autopsy fits. Cause of death: homicide by a single gunshot wound. Recovered fragments measured consistent with a .30-caliber bullet. His own family turned him in. His parents recognized him from the released images and confronted him. A family friend helped coordinate his surrender. Twiggs identified him on the surveillance footage. Countless people have been convicted of murder on a fraction of this. You can find one detail that isn't explained to pixel-perfect satisfaction — a battery that died, a blurry frame, a fragment ruled inconclusive, a witness's recollection. Fine. Now explain all of it. The confession that knew where the towel-wrapped gun was before police announced it. The DNA on the roof and weapon. The engraved casings and the tool that made them. The car. The phone. His own family. His own words. Explain all of it. Not one piece or one question — all of it. Video: Knubeltier
1:29

The evidence against Tyler Robinson is overwhelming. It's not close. Robinson confessed. Repeatedly. In person to his partner Lance Twiggs, crying, saying he was sorry he did it. By text the night of the shooting. In a note left under his keyboard. In a Discord message announcing he was about to surrender. And then he did surrender, at 9 p.m. the next night, exactly as the message said. And the single hardest fact to wave away: in that text, Robinson described leaving the rifle in a bush, wrapped in a towel — accurately describing where and how the Mauser was found by police, before any of that was public. The gun was recovered exactly there. A Mauser 98 .30-06, wrapped in a black towel, in the wooded area across Campus Drive — right where surveillance shows the rooftop figure fleeing within minutes of the shot. His DNA is all over it. Major contributor on the stock, grips, trigger and trigger guard, bolt, barrel, and scope. On the fired casing. On two of the unfired casings. On the screwdriver left on the roof. The casings were engraved — "hey fascist! CATCH!" among them. A Dremel tool and a matching bit capable of making those exact engravings were found in his home. So was a separate "Test Shot" casing — forensically matched as fired by that same rifle — sitting on a safe next to his bedroom. Plus boxes of Remington .30-06 and perforated paper targets. Surveillance puts him there. On the Losee Center roof, lying in the prone position, facing the courtyard — then up and running the moment Charlie was shot. Visiting the campus three other times that day, in different clothing, including the roof and the amphitheater where the shooting happened — tied each time to his gray Dodge Challenger. His own phone puts him there. Two Google Maps routes stored on his device: one starting near the shooting scene 23 minutes after Charlie was killed, headed to a car wash — where surveillance confirms his Challenger arrived at 12:57. The second, at 1:33 a.m., in the early hours of Sept 11, routing from near the rifle's location directly back to his home. His car puts him there. A Ring camera caught the Challenger parked near campus after midnight. At 12:30 a.m. an officer contacted that car at Campus Drive, wrote down the plate, and traced it through DMV records straight to Robinson — the same window he was texting Twiggs about sneaking back for the gun. The autopsy fits. Cause of death: homicide by a single gunshot wound. Recovered fragments measured consistent with a .30-caliber bullet. His own family turned him in. His parents recognized him from the released images and confronted him. A family friend helped coordinate his surrender. Twiggs identified him on the surveillance footage. Countless people have been convicted of murder on a fraction of this. You can find one detail that isn't explained to pixel-perfect satisfaction — a battery that died, a blurry frame, a fragment ruled inconclusive, a witness's recollection. Fine. Now explain all of it. The confession that knew where the towel-wrapped gun was before police announced it. The DNA on the roof and weapon. The engraved casings and the tool that made them. The car. The phone. His own family. His own words. Explain all of it. Not one piece or one question — all of it. Video: Knubeltier

KanekoaTheGreat

183,993 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Ethan Hawke says he found Robin Williams hiding alone in the dark on the Dead Poets Society set “Even at 18 I was aware of the complexity of his emotional life” “I’ve had a lot of depression in my family, and it was obvious to me that all that power and that charisma came at a certain cost” “It’s a deeply, deeply sensitive person who was highly attuned to the energy of a room” “I remember once he was making up lines and everybody’s laughing, everybody’s praising him, and then I went to get a glass of water, get a bagel or something” “And I saw him hiding in a little corner. He was hiding in the dark by himself” “Okay, it makes a lot more sense to me now, actually. It was a lot. It was taxing” “There’s a lot of stories about clowns, and the happiness that they give and at what cost” Interviewer: “How much that takes out of them” Ethan: “The end of his life does not define his life to me. When I watch the movie, I think of the spirit of the man that I knew on those days, and how powerful it was, and how much he weathered that storm of his own psyche for us and for other people” “And I admire him tremendously. You know, there aren’t two of him”
1:43

Ethan Hawke says he found Robin Williams hiding alone in the dark on the Dead Poets Society set “Even at 18 I was aware of the complexity of his emotional life” “I’ve had a lot of depression in my family, and it was obvious to me that all that power and that charisma came at a certain cost” “It’s a deeply, deeply sensitive person who was highly attuned to the energy of a room” “I remember once he was making up lines and everybody’s laughing, everybody’s praising him, and then I went to get a glass of water, get a bagel or something” “And I saw him hiding in a little corner. He was hiding in the dark by himself” “Okay, it makes a lot more sense to me now, actually. It was a lot. It was taxing” “There’s a lot of stories about clowns, and the happiness that they give and at what cost” Interviewer: “How much that takes out of them” Ethan: “The end of his life does not define his life to me. When I watch the movie, I think of the spirit of the man that I knew on those days, and how powerful it was, and how much he weathered that storm of his own psyche for us and for other people” “And I admire him tremendously. You know, there aren’t two of him”

sara

70,833 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

During a previous appearance on the Full Send Podcast, Tucker Carlson asserted with absolute certainty that Epstein was murdered. Tucker said a friend of his was one of the last people to talk to Epstein before he was killed. The friend told Tucker that Epstein truly believed he was getting out of prison. “A friend of mine, one of the people who last talked to him on the phone the day he was killed, and he had an expectation of a bail hearing in two days.” “He thought he was getting out. He was not despondent at all. I talked to his lawyer, told me the same thing.” “They moved someone out of his cell. They put two people, one of whom was not even a full-time, prison guard on duty. None of the cameras trained on the cell work. They were all out of it that night.”
2:04

During a previous appearance on the Full Send Podcast, Tucker Carlson asserted with absolute certainty that Epstein was murdered. Tucker said a friend of his was one of the last people to talk to Epstein before he was killed. The friend told Tucker that Epstein truly believed he was getting out of prison. “A friend of mine, one of the people who last talked to him on the phone the day he was killed, and he had an expectation of a bail hearing in two days.” “He thought he was getting out. He was not despondent at all. I talked to his lawyer, told me the same thing.” “They moved someone out of his cell. They put two people, one of whom was not even a full-time, prison guard on duty. None of the cameras trained on the cell work. They were all out of it that night.”

Collin Rugg

780,790 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

I watched a film recently, based on a true story, about a man who spent fifty years consumed by what one person had done to him, then went looking for that very person. His name was Eric Lomax, a British army officer captured when Singapore fell to Japan in 1942. He was sent to work as a prisoner on the Burma Railway, a line the Japanese forced tens of thousands of POWs and local labourers to build through the jungle in horrific conditions. So many men died that it became known as the Death Railway. Lomax was a lifelong railway enthusiast, which is its own cruel irony. He and some others built a small radio from scrap to hear news of the war. When it was discovered, Lomax was singled out and interrogated for weeks, and what was done to him left wounds that never really closed. Through all of it there was one figure he could not forget, the interpreter who stood beside him and translated every question and answer. The man’s name was Takashi Nagase. Lomax went home to Scotland carrying that face for decades. The nightmares did not stop. He has said he spent years rehearsing what he would do if he ever found that interpreter again. Much later in life, he learned that Nagase was not only alive but had spent his postwar years as a campaigner for peace, building a temple of penance near the railway and helping reunite former prisoners with their captors. Nagase had been carrying the same fifty years of guilt that Lomax had been carrying as anger. They agreed to meet, on a hillside in Thailand near the river the prisoners had bridged. Nagase saw him, bowed, and began trembling and apologising over and over. Lomax, who had arrived without a shred of sympathy, took his hand instead. The two became real friends and stayed close for the rest of their lives. He first told all of this in his memoir, also a true account, called The Railway Man. It was later made into the film I watched.
0:28

I watched a film recently, based on a true story, about a man who spent fifty years consumed by what one person had done to him, then went looking for that very person. His name was Eric Lomax, a British army officer captured when Singapore fell to Japan in 1942. He was sent to work as a prisoner on the Burma Railway, a line the Japanese forced tens of thousands of POWs and local labourers to build through the jungle in horrific conditions. So many men died that it became known as the Death Railway. Lomax was a lifelong railway enthusiast, which is its own cruel irony. He and some others built a small radio from scrap to hear news of the war. When it was discovered, Lomax was singled out and interrogated for weeks, and what was done to him left wounds that never really closed. Through all of it there was one figure he could not forget, the interpreter who stood beside him and translated every question and answer. The man’s name was Takashi Nagase. Lomax went home to Scotland carrying that face for decades. The nightmares did not stop. He has said he spent years rehearsing what he would do if he ever found that interpreter again. Much later in life, he learned that Nagase was not only alive but had spent his postwar years as a campaigner for peace, building a temple of penance near the railway and helping reunite former prisoners with their captors. Nagase had been carrying the same fifty years of guilt that Lomax had been carrying as anger. They agreed to meet, on a hillside in Thailand near the river the prisoners had bridged. Nagase saw him, bowed, and began trembling and apologising over and over. Lomax, who had arrived without a shred of sympathy, took his hand instead. The two became real friends and stayed close for the rest of their lives. He first told all of this in his memoir, also a true account, called The Railway Man. It was later made into the film I watched.

Lemma the Optimist

591,464 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🇮🇷 He was raised to dream of dying for Islam, joined the IRGC, then a single sentence from an old friend made him walk away from all of it... Mohamad Faridi's story starts in a family of martyrs. An uncle killed in the Iran-Iraq war, streets named for the dead, a cousin's face painted on the local mosque. He grew up, he says, idolizing a 13-year-old who strapped a grenade to himself and ran at a tank, and at 21, fresh out of IRGC service, his nightly prayer was to be granted the same death. Then an old friend, calmer than he remembered, told him the sacrifice he'd been chasing was already paid. That was the hinge. He converted to Christianity, got caught praying by his father, and ran, three years underground in Iran's home-church network before fleeing to Turkey ahead of the arrests. From the inside, he describes a country most of his generation has quietly left behind, mosques shuttered, faith abandoned, a people he says are exhausted by financing wars they never wanted. His read on what comes next is bold and contested, and it's where the conversation got its sharpest. He left me sitting with one image in particular: a hostage, bound and buried in a basement, while the world shouts at him to free himself. Is that help, he asks, or just a clean conscience? Mohamad Faridi
51:02

🇮🇷 He was raised to dream of dying for Islam, joined the IRGC, then a single sentence from an old friend made him walk away from all of it... Mohamad Faridi's story starts in a family of martyrs. An uncle killed in the Iran-Iraq war, streets named for the dead, a cousin's face painted on the local mosque. He grew up, he says, idolizing a 13-year-old who strapped a grenade to himself and ran at a tank, and at 21, fresh out of IRGC service, his nightly prayer was to be granted the same death. Then an old friend, calmer than he remembered, told him the sacrifice he'd been chasing was already paid. That was the hinge. He converted to Christianity, got caught praying by his father, and ran, three years underground in Iran's home-church network before fleeing to Turkey ahead of the arrests. From the inside, he describes a country most of his generation has quietly left behind, mosques shuttered, faith abandoned, a people he says are exhausted by financing wars they never wanted. His read on what comes next is bold and contested, and it's where the conversation got its sharpest. He left me sitting with one image in particular: a hostage, bound and buried in a basement, while the world shouts at him to free himself. Is that help, he asks, or just a clean conscience? Mohamad Faridi

Mario Nawfal

290,023 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

‼️BACKSTORY ‼️ The legend Scarface, the king of the Savannah and ruler of the Maasai Mara Reserve, killed 400 hyenas and 130 lions and controlled an area of 400 square kilometers. He had 900 lions under his command. He is also considered the only lion who was able to kill an adult hippopotamus in a single battle and expel crocodiles from his reserve because they preyed on a young cub. In 2012, Scarface got into a fight with a lion called Marsupial, who was 3 years younger and bigger than him. Everyone thought that Scarface would lose the fight.Scarface was injured in his foot, but he emerged victorious and kept Marsupial's head for two weeks before throwing it away. In 2016, he and his brothers Sekiu, Hunter and Murami got into a fight with 6 lions and killed 2 of them on their own. A few days before his death, Scarface walked several miles back to his home and birthplace. On his way, the lions gave him food instead of attacking him. This is unusual in the animal world but Scarface broke the rule and gained great respect from everyone. He was buried by the National Geographic team in honor of his legendary life... the lion who was only defeated by death.
0:46

‼️BACKSTORY ‼️ The legend Scarface, the king of the Savannah and ruler of the Maasai Mara Reserve, killed 400 hyenas and 130 lions and controlled an area of 400 square kilometers. He had 900 lions under his command. He is also considered the only lion who was able to kill an adult hippopotamus in a single battle and expel crocodiles from his reserve because they preyed on a young cub. In 2012, Scarface got into a fight with a lion called Marsupial, who was 3 years younger and bigger than him. Everyone thought that Scarface would lose the fight.Scarface was injured in his foot, but he emerged victorious and kept Marsupial's head for two weeks before throwing it away. In 2016, he and his brothers Sekiu, Hunter and Murami got into a fight with 6 lions and killed 2 of them on their own. A few days before his death, Scarface walked several miles back to his home and birthplace. On his way, the lions gave him food instead of attacking him. This is unusual in the animal world but Scarface broke the rule and gained great respect from everyone. He was buried by the National Geographic team in honor of his legendary life... the lion who was only defeated by death.

LASHY BILLS

41,917 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

For most of his life, Charles Murray was a casual agnostic who assumed smart people had left religion behind. Now he's not so sure. Murray joins Peter Robinson on Uncommon Knowledge to discuss the evidence that forced him to reconsider God, the soul, and Christianity—from near-death experiences and the mysterious Shroud of Turin to the historical reliability of the Gospels and the Resurrection. It's the story of an empirically minded skeptic following the evidence wherever it leads—and discovering that faith may be far more reasonable than he once believed. Watch more of Uncommon Knowledge on Hoover+:
1:06:45

For most of his life, Charles Murray was a casual agnostic who assumed smart people had left religion behind. Now he's not so sure. Murray joins Peter Robinson on Uncommon Knowledge to discuss the evidence that forced him to reconsider God, the soul, and Christianity—from near-death experiences and the mysterious Shroud of Turin to the historical reliability of the Gospels and the Resurrection. It's the story of an empirically minded skeptic following the evidence wherever it leads—and discovering that faith may be far more reasonable than he once believed. Watch more of Uncommon Knowledge on Hoover+:

Hoover Institution

43,094 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

This painting shows the most heartbreaking reunion in all of literature. To understand it, you have to know who the dog is... His name is Argos, and he belongs to Ulysses, the Greek hero also known as Odysseus. Before Ulysses sailed away to fight in the Trojan War, he had raised Argos from a puppy, a fast and beautiful hunting dog. Then the war called, and Ulysses left. He would not come home for twenty years. When Ulysses finally set foot on his own island again, he came in disguise, dressed as a beggar, so that no one would know him. His house was full of men trying to steal his wife and his kingdom. To survive, he had to remain a stranger in his own home. No one recognized him. Not his loyal servants. Not the people who had known him all his life. But lying in the dirt by the gate, old and forgotten, covered in ticks, too weak to stand, was a dog. Argos had waited twenty years. And the moment he saw him, he knew. He was the only one. Nearly blind, half dead, he lifted his head and pricked up his ears, and he wagged his tail for the master he had never stopped waiting for. Ulysses saw him. And because he was in disguise, surrounded by enemies, he could not run to him, could not kneel down, could not say his name. He could only look at his old friend and, turning his face away so no one would see, let a single tear fall. And then, in Homer's own words, "the dark shadow of death closed down on Argos' eyes, the instant he had seen Odysseus, twenty years away." He had held on to life for one reason only: he was waiting to see him come home. And the moment he did, he could finally let go... It is such a beautiful painting, and the look on that dog's face is so universal, so instantly understood by anyone who has ever loved and waited, that it is enough to bring a grown man to tears.
1:01

This painting shows the most heartbreaking reunion in all of literature. To understand it, you have to know who the dog is... His name is Argos, and he belongs to Ulysses, the Greek hero also known as Odysseus. Before Ulysses sailed away to fight in the Trojan War, he had raised Argos from a puppy, a fast and beautiful hunting dog. Then the war called, and Ulysses left. He would not come home for twenty years. When Ulysses finally set foot on his own island again, he came in disguise, dressed as a beggar, so that no one would know him. His house was full of men trying to steal his wife and his kingdom. To survive, he had to remain a stranger in his own home. No one recognized him. Not his loyal servants. Not the people who had known him all his life. But lying in the dirt by the gate, old and forgotten, covered in ticks, too weak to stand, was a dog. Argos had waited twenty years. And the moment he saw him, he knew. He was the only one. Nearly blind, half dead, he lifted his head and pricked up his ears, and he wagged his tail for the master he had never stopped waiting for. Ulysses saw him. And because he was in disguise, surrounded by enemies, he could not run to him, could not kneel down, could not say his name. He could only look at his old friend and, turning his face away so no one would see, let a single tear fall. And then, in Homer's own words, "the dark shadow of death closed down on Argos' eyes, the instant he had seen Odysseus, twenty years away." He had held on to life for one reason only: he was waiting to see him come home. And the moment he did, he could finally let go... It is such a beautiful painting, and the look on that dog's face is so universal, so instantly understood by anyone who has ever loved and waited, that it is enough to bring a grown man to tears.

James Lucas

107,315 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat