正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨 BREAKING: ANC Finally Admits BEE Benefited Elites Before Real Transformation? Khusela Diko has openly conceded that BBBEE in its current form is problematic and needs serious review. She acknowledged that the earlier version, BEE, largely enriched an ANC-linked elite before evolving into BBBEE, which was meant to drive...

29,258 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Oliver Tambo: “Just about anything is welcome as an alternative to the Apartheid system”. This is what happens when a liberation movement defines its primary victory negatively. In this case, as the removal of a regime rather than the affirmation of a specific economic system. By declaring that “just about anything is welcome”, Tambo was speaking from the urgency of the time, but that signalled to White capital and the National Party that the ANC’s political flexibility was nearly infinite. The then-President of the ANC had announced that his liberation movement was open to anything. Tambo’s logic that defeat of the enemy was the sole immediate objective meant that concrete economic strategy was relegated to an afterthought. And because the ANC was hyper-focused on ending racial oppression at any cost, the Apartheid regime and White capital ensured that the cost went as high as possible. To capitalise on this weakness, the White minority gave the ANC political authority, and in return they gained property rights protection, central bank independence, the Bill of Rights, Constitutional supremacy, the maintenance of the old macro-economic system and the ability to externalise capital. Because the ANC had deferred the development of a concrete economic policy, when it inherited the state in 1994, it didn’t have a solid economic model that could withstand international market pressure and IMF/World Bank influence. The rest is history. This “anything but this” logic didn’t stay confined to the ANC’s leadership, though. Three decades later, it has become the default mindset of the voters themselves, in the form of negative voting. The 2024 general election outcome, which forced the creation of the Government of National Unity, is a classic example of this mentality. Sections of the public, fed up with the ANC, were desperate to “vote it out” and constantly encouraged other voters to “vote for anyone but the ANC”, instead of voting *for* something specific. So, just like the ANC in the ’80s and ’90s, 2024 was dictated by what South Africans were desperate to destroy rather than what they were organised to build. Until this changes, the outcome will continuously default to more compromise and more stagnation.

Sizwe SikaMusi

10,748 次观看 • 1 个月前

[WATCH] The question before the Court is short, and it is a question of law. When a political party has completed the Commission’s prescribed forms and uploaded its lists onto the Commission’s own system before the hour, has that party submitted its lists? The movement says it has. The Commission says it has not. That is a disagreement between a political party and a public institution about what a statute means, and this country built a specialist court for precisely that. The Electoral Court will decide it. The ANC will abide by what the courts decide. I say that now, before judgment, so that nobody need ask afterwards. I want to address the judgment the Electoral Court handed down on Friday in the matter of the UDF Party, because it has been reported as a blow to the ANC. The Court held that the Commission has no power to exempt one party from a deadline that binds all others. The African National Congress agrees with that. We have never asked for an exemption. We have never asked for an extension. We are not asking for one now. What the UDF asked for and what the ANC asks for are different things, and Friday’s judgment is the clearest statement yet of that difference. And to those who have warned the Commission against giving the ANC “preferential treatment”, I say this plainly. The ANC wants none. Whatever relief the Court grants, the movement has asked that it apply to every affected party on the same terms — to the forty-four other parties as much as to us. If the ANC succeeds, two thousand and ninety-three candidates who are not ours succeed with us. That is the only kind of relief this movement would accept. Now let me speak about the Electoral Commission again. The Electoral Commission is a Chapter Nine institution of our Constitution. The African National Congress, more than any other organisation in this country, argued for it, negotiated it and built it. Through seven national elections and six local elections, the ANC has accepted every substantive result the Commission has declared — including the result of 2024, which took from this movement the majority it had held for thirty years. We accepted it on the night. We did not go to a stage and call the Commission a thief. That record is who we are, and it is not for sale in a dispute over six councils. So let me be clear about what the ANC is doing and what it is not doing. The ANC is not attacking the Electoral Commission. The ANC disagrees with the Commission on a point of law, and it has taken that disagreement to the court that Parliament created to hear it. Disagreement in a court is how a democracy respects an institution. Disagreement on a stage, with slogans, is how a democracy weakens one. The movement has chosen the court, respectfully. There are parties in this country who have used this matter to relitigate their own grievances against the Commission. The ANC will not join them, and it will not be used by them. Where the Commission is attacked for doing its work, this movement will defend it, as it has always defended it. We have a responsibility to the institutions of this state that the Commission’s other critics do not carry, and we will carry it even while we are in court against it. And there is a responsibility on all of us that goes beyond this matter. Forty-five parties used one channel and had challenges. That is a fact about the channel, whatever the Court decides about the law. After this election the ANC will go to the Party Liaison Committee and propose, for every party, that the electronic route carry a receipt; that its final step be prescribed in regulation, published in the Gazette, where every party can read it, and not only in software; and that a party be able to see the record of what the Commission holds from it. Not so that the ANC is spared next time. So that no party, large or small, ever again stands where forty-five parties stand this morning. #ANCMediaBriefing #SGMbalulaSpeaks #LGE2026VoteANC

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

14,268 次观看 • 11 天前