Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

BREAKING: CNN Just Surfaced A Pretty Stunning Exchange. By 2010, Jeffrey Epstein had already pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution involving a minor. His conviction was public. His reputation was known. Yet according to records reviewed by CNN, Epstein contacted Faith Kates, the co-founder of Next Management, asking for a...

allenanalysis's profile picture

Brian Allen

301,286 subscribers

130,724 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

BREAKING: This Is One Of The Most Disturbing Details To Emerge From The Epstein Investigation. After Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 child sex conviction, you might expect the pipeline of introductions to stop. According to CNN, it continued. The network reviewed records showing model scouts and agents allegedly sending Epstein photos of young women, discussing meetings, and helping facilitate introductions years after his conviction. Then came the message that chills the blood. A scout sends a photo. Epstein replies: "Too old." This suggests the issue wasn't just Epstein. It was the network of people who continued opening doors for him after everyone already knew what he had done.
1:30

BREAKING: This Is One Of The Most Disturbing Details To Emerge From The Epstein Investigation. After Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 child sex conviction, you might expect the pipeline of introductions to stop. According to CNN, it continued. The network reviewed records showing model scouts and agents allegedly sending Epstein photos of young women, discussing meetings, and helping facilitate introductions years after his conviction. Then came the message that chills the blood. A scout sends a photo. Epstein replies: "Too old." This suggests the issue wasn't just Epstein. It was the network of people who continued opening doors for him after everyone already knew what he had done.

Brian Allen

107,523 views • 2 months ago

Q: Is it possible that the release of the Epstein files turns out to be good for Trump? MICHAEL WOLFF: Yeah, I think already already it has. Wolff goes on to excuse his dalliances with Epstein by claiming that, after his first conviction, he was no longer into underage girls.
3:20

Q: Is it possible that the release of the Epstein files turns out to be good for Trump? MICHAEL WOLFF: Yeah, I think already already it has. Wolff goes on to excuse his dalliances with Epstein by claiming that, after his first conviction, he was no longer into underage girls.

Breitbart News

126,299 views • 6 months ago

HILLARY CLINTON addressed former President Bill Clinton’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein after her deposition. "I think the chronology of the connection that he had with Epstein ended years, several years, before anything about Epstein's criminal activities came to light." "I think it is fair to say that the vast majority of people who had contact with him before his criminal pleas in '08 were like most people: they did not know what he was doing." "I think that that is exactly what my husband will testify to tomorrow."
1:17

HILLARY CLINTON addressed former President Bill Clinton’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein after her deposition. "I think the chronology of the connection that he had with Epstein ended years, several years, before anything about Epstein's criminal activities came to light." "I think it is fair to say that the vast majority of people who had contact with him before his criminal pleas in '08 were like most people: they did not know what he was doing." "I think that that is exactly what my husband will testify to tomorrow."

Fox News

158,393 views • 6 months ago

BREAKING: A Congressman Just Revealed What Bill Gates Allegedly Told Investigators Behind Closed Doors. For years, Gates has said his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was a mistake. Now, according to a member of Congress who attended the interview, Gates acknowledged he actively sought out Epstein's connections. Why? To help raise money for his global health initiatives. First came Epstein's conviction. Then came Gates' relationship with him. Now comes an explanation for why that relationship continued. The question is why one of the richest and most influential people on Earth believed he needed JEFFERY EPSTEIN.
1:30

BREAKING: A Congressman Just Revealed What Bill Gates Allegedly Told Investigators Behind Closed Doors. For years, Gates has said his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was a mistake. Now, according to a member of Congress who attended the interview, Gates acknowledged he actively sought out Epstein's connections. Why? To help raise money for his global health initiatives. First came Epstein's conviction. Then came Gates' relationship with him. Now comes an explanation for why that relationship continued. The question is why one of the richest and most influential people on Earth believed he needed JEFFERY EPSTEIN.

Brian Allen

49,962 views • 2 months ago

A lot of people are reading this Jeffrey Epstein/ Mark Epstein email exchange and making jokes about Trump blowing Clinton. It’s difficult to tell from the context whether they are joking or not, but the thing that jumped out to me was that Mark Epstein is keeping in contact with his brother. Below is his interview where he told PBD he had no idea what Jeffrey was ever doing and he definitely didn’t work for the Mossad…..
4:11

A lot of people are reading this Jeffrey Epstein/ Mark Epstein email exchange and making jokes about Trump blowing Clinton. It’s difficult to tell from the context whether they are joking or not, but the thing that jumped out to me was that Mark Epstein is keeping in contact with his brother. Below is his interview where he told PBD he had no idea what Jeffrey was ever doing and he definitely didn’t work for the Mossad…..

Uncommon Sense

1,170,172 views • 9 months ago

Kash Patel just testified that no one is working harder than him to bring the truth about Jeffrey Epstein to the public. He said the original sin of the Epstein cover-up belongs to prosecutor Alexander Acosta who gave Epstein a sweetheart deal. Patel explained that the investigation was limited to only a few years and that he is now working tirelessly to uncover more material on Epstein.
1:14

Kash Patel just testified that no one is working harder than him to bring the truth about Jeffrey Epstein to the public. He said the original sin of the Epstein cover-up belongs to prosecutor Alexander Acosta who gave Epstein a sweetheart deal. Patel explained that the investigation was limited to only a few years and that he is now working tirelessly to uncover more material on Epstein.

Shadow of Ezra

120,162 views • 11 months ago

🚨NEW: Epstein Book Author Barry Levine tells CNN what he thinks Epstein meant in 2011 email about TRUMP🚨 SMERCONISH: "The 'dog that hasn't barked is trump.' What do you think he's referring to?" LEVINE: "I think Jeffrey Epstein is referring to the fact that he believes that Donald Trump talked to Michael Ryder, who was the Palm Beach police chief in 2004 and began the first investigation into Jeffrey Epstein." "I suspect that Jeffrey Epstein was saying he was '75% there,' believing that Trump might have been the whistleblower at the time." "That particular year, the 2 men had a falling out — not only over the fact that Ghislaine Maxwell was taking young women from his spa at Mar-a-Lago for Jeffrey Epstein — but they also had a nasty real estate deal that both men were trying to get." "So there was bad blood between the 2 of them." Daily Caller
2:08

🚨NEW: Epstein Book Author Barry Levine tells CNN what he thinks Epstein meant in 2011 email about TRUMP🚨 SMERCONISH: "The 'dog that hasn't barked is trump.' What do you think he's referring to?" LEVINE: "I think Jeffrey Epstein is referring to the fact that he believes that Donald Trump talked to Michael Ryder, who was the Palm Beach police chief in 2004 and began the first investigation into Jeffrey Epstein." "I suspect that Jeffrey Epstein was saying he was '75% there,' believing that Trump might have been the whistleblower at the time." "That particular year, the 2 men had a falling out — not only over the fact that Ghislaine Maxwell was taking young women from his spa at Mar-a-Lago for Jeffrey Epstein — but they also had a nasty real estate deal that both men were trying to get." "So there was bad blood between the 2 of them." Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

309,382 views • 9 months ago

JUST IN: Epstein’s brother claims Trump called Epstein after the 2016 election, says he doesn’t believe his brother killed himself. CNN: Epstein said ‘I haven't spoken to him in probably 15 years or more.’ That was in 2019. But you say your brother talked to him in 2016? Mark Epstein: Yeah, after the election … CNN: Is there anything that the DOJ could do to convince you that su*cide is indeed what happened? Epstein: Well, the thing is, they didn't do an investigation into the cause of death of Jeffrey. Bill Barr admitted that in his congressional testimony.
3:26

JUST IN: Epstein’s brother claims Trump called Epstein after the 2016 election, says he doesn’t believe his brother killed himself. CNN: Epstein said ‘I haven't spoken to him in probably 15 years or more.’ That was in 2019. But you say your brother talked to him in 2016? Mark Epstein: Yeah, after the election … CNN: Is there anything that the DOJ could do to convince you that su*cide is indeed what happened? Epstein: Well, the thing is, they didn't do an investigation into the cause of death of Jeffrey. Bill Barr admitted that in his congressional testimony.

Collin Rugg

751,899 views • 9 months ago

Comer: "One of the things I think President Trump has always been concerned about is there are people that have maybe been listed by the government as someone who associated with Epstein, they may have attended a party with Epstein or invited Epstein to a party at their house -- the president was concerned the media or public would assume that person had done terrible things, that they were guilty by association."
1:41

Comer: "One of the things I think President Trump has always been concerned about is there are people that have maybe been listed by the government as someone who associated with Epstein, they may have attended a party with Epstein or invited Epstein to a party at their house -- the president was concerned the media or public would assume that person had done terrible things, that they were guilty by association."

Aaron Rupar

87,950 views • 8 months ago

“The problem wasn’t the vetting process. It was ignoring what the vetting process said. It included the report that said Peter Mandelson had a particularly close relationship with Epstein after his child sex offence conviction. The Prime Minister was told that Mandelson had stayed at Epstein’s house in New York while he was in jail on charges of soliciting a minor for prostitution and continued to have connections to him until at least 2014” Utterly damning.
4:08

“The problem wasn’t the vetting process. It was ignoring what the vetting process said. It included the report that said Peter Mandelson had a particularly close relationship with Epstein after his child sex offence conviction. The Prime Minister was told that Mandelson had stayed at Epstein’s house in New York while he was in jail on charges of soliciting a minor for prostitution and continued to have connections to him until at least 2014” Utterly damning.

Peter Stefanovic

46,625 views • 5 months ago

Megyn Kelly exposes mainstream media hosts Katie Couric and George Stephanopoulos went and had dinner with Jeffrey Epstein at Epstein’s home after he pleaded guilty for solicitation of sex with a minor “Those two journalists, NBC and ABC respectively, went and sat with Jeffrey Epstein at his home where these alleged crimes occurred for dinner, knowing all of that.” “Here's what I wanna know. Why was Katie Couric, why was George Stephanopoulos at Epstein's home in 2010, chumming it up, having dinner with him after, after he pleaded guilty to solicitation of sex with a minor? Which, as I've said countless times, is not a thing. There's no such thing as a minor prostitute. That's rape. That's what that is. But they allowed him to plead guilty to that. It was on the record. And by the way, Katie Couric knows full well that you cannot solicit a minor prostitute. That's rape. So does George Stephanopoulos.”
1:40

Megyn Kelly exposes mainstream media hosts Katie Couric and George Stephanopoulos went and had dinner with Jeffrey Epstein at Epstein’s home after he pleaded guilty for solicitation of sex with a minor “Those two journalists, NBC and ABC respectively, went and sat with Jeffrey Epstein at his home where these alleged crimes occurred for dinner, knowing all of that.” “Here's what I wanna know. Why was Katie Couric, why was George Stephanopoulos at Epstein's home in 2010, chumming it up, having dinner with him after, after he pleaded guilty to solicitation of sex with a minor? Which, as I've said countless times, is not a thing. There's no such thing as a minor prostitute. That's rape. That's what that is. But they allowed him to plead guilty to that. It was on the record. And by the way, Katie Couric knows full well that you cannot solicit a minor prostitute. That's rape. So does George Stephanopoulos.”

Wall Street Apes

90,994 views • 9 months ago

The Supreme Court has declined to take up the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell, who was contesting her prosecution and conviction on grounds that the government had violated a non-prosecution agreement made with Jeffrey Epstein before his death. Read more:
0:52

The Supreme Court has declined to take up the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell, who was contesting her prosecution and conviction on grounds that the government had violated a non-prosecution agreement made with Jeffrey Epstein before his death. Read more:

ABC News

22,547 views • 10 months ago

BREAKING: CNN Just Highlighted A Pretty Devastating Number. 84% of Americans say the Epstein files reinforce their belief that powerful people are rarely held accountable. Think about that. Not 84% of Democrats. Not 84% of Republicans. 84% of Americans. The breakdown was even more striking: - 82% of Republicans - 80% of Independents - 90% of Democrats Prediction markets have reportedly lowered the odds that Todd Blanche becomes Trump's next Attorney General. The Epstein controversy isn't creating distrust. It's validating distrust that was already there. And now it's starting to affect people connected to the administration.
1:03

BREAKING: CNN Just Highlighted A Pretty Devastating Number. 84% of Americans say the Epstein files reinforce their belief that powerful people are rarely held accountable. Think about that. Not 84% of Democrats. Not 84% of Republicans. 84% of Americans. The breakdown was even more striking: - 82% of Republicans - 80% of Independents - 90% of Democrats Prediction markets have reportedly lowered the odds that Todd Blanche becomes Trump's next Attorney General. The Epstein controversy isn't creating distrust. It's validating distrust that was already there. And now it's starting to affect people connected to the administration.

Brian Allen

302,180 views • 2 months ago

NEW: Joe Rogan reacts to being in the Epstein files, says one of his show guests tried introducing him to Jeffrey Epstein. "I’m in the files for not going... because Jeffrey Epstein was trying to meet with me. And I was like what?" "It’s not even a possibility that I would’ve ever went, especially after I Googled him."
4:12

NEW: Joe Rogan reacts to being in the Epstein files, says one of his show guests tried introducing him to Jeffrey Epstein. "I’m in the files for not going... because Jeffrey Epstein was trying to meet with me. And I was like what?" "It’s not even a possibility that I would’ve ever went, especially after I Googled him."

Collin Rugg

1,884,576 views • 6 months ago

Scott Jennings just flipped the script on a frantic attorney who tried to spin the Epstein emails as a Trump scandal. Stacy Schneider insisted the release was somehow devastating for Trump — but Scott Jennings didn’t let that fantasy survive more than a few seconds. SCHNEIDER: “His connections to Epstein, as shown in those emails, according to Epstein, is unsavory. And it’s not good for him.” Jennings fired back with a series of hammer blows to her entire narrative: JENNINGS: “Is that new information that he knew Jeffrey Epstein?” “Is it new information that Trump excommunicated him from Mar-a-Lago?” Then he dropped the real headline: “The only new information that we got this week of those emails was that somebody from the New York Times was advising Jeffrey Epstein, and we learned tonight from the Washington Post that Jeffrey Epstein was programing Democratic members of Congress.” “We didn’t learn anything we didn’t already know about Donald Trump, which was other than Jeffrey Epstein, hated Donald Trump.” “And now Democrats are aligning themselves with Jeffrey Epstein because Orange man, bad!”
0:46

Scott Jennings just flipped the script on a frantic attorney who tried to spin the Epstein emails as a Trump scandal. Stacy Schneider insisted the release was somehow devastating for Trump — but Scott Jennings didn’t let that fantasy survive more than a few seconds. SCHNEIDER: “His connections to Epstein, as shown in those emails, according to Epstein, is unsavory. And it’s not good for him.” Jennings fired back with a series of hammer blows to her entire narrative: JENNINGS: “Is that new information that he knew Jeffrey Epstein?” “Is it new information that Trump excommunicated him from Mar-a-Lago?” Then he dropped the real headline: “The only new information that we got this week of those emails was that somebody from the New York Times was advising Jeffrey Epstein, and we learned tonight from the Washington Post that Jeffrey Epstein was programing Democratic members of Congress.” “We didn’t learn anything we didn’t already know about Donald Trump, which was other than Jeffrey Epstein, hated Donald Trump.” “And now Democrats are aligning themselves with Jeffrey Epstein because Orange man, bad!”

Overton

390,122 views • 9 months ago

This is wild. Eric Weinstein says he’d “bet money” Epstein was an intelligence asset—and that his reach even extended to controlling scientists and burying discoveries. According to Weinstein, Epstein and his girlfriend's father were part of a “control mechanism” designed to keep revolutionary discoveries “within a framework.” In plain English, that likely means discoveries didn’t see the light of day unless whoever was controlling Epstein approved it. “I was in the Harvard Mathematics Department. Jeffrey Epstein was absolutely connected to the Harvard Math Department. I want to know why. How was he connected to the Math Department?” “Jeffrey Epstein knew a tremendous amount about my work when nobody knew anything about my work.” “It was very important to get Nobel laureates and some of the smartest people on Earth to come to the Virgin Islands and talk about gravity. Stephen Hawking was there, David Gross was there. Lawrence Krauss was there. Lisa Randall was there right before his conviction.” “I think that his girlfriend’s father, Robert Maxwell, was all through scientific publishing. And I think Pergamon Press was in part a control mechanism for making sure that revolutionary discoveries were taking place within a framework.” “I think Jeffrey Epstein was in part trying to fund science, trying to control it. I don’t really know.” This 7-minute clip says a lot.
7:25

This is wild. Eric Weinstein says he’d “bet money” Epstein was an intelligence asset—and that his reach even extended to controlling scientists and burying discoveries. According to Weinstein, Epstein and his girlfriend's father were part of a “control mechanism” designed to keep revolutionary discoveries “within a framework.” In plain English, that likely means discoveries didn’t see the light of day unless whoever was controlling Epstein approved it. “I was in the Harvard Mathematics Department. Jeffrey Epstein was absolutely connected to the Harvard Math Department. I want to know why. How was he connected to the Math Department?” “Jeffrey Epstein knew a tremendous amount about my work when nobody knew anything about my work.” “It was very important to get Nobel laureates and some of the smartest people on Earth to come to the Virgin Islands and talk about gravity. Stephen Hawking was there, David Gross was there. Lawrence Krauss was there. Lisa Randall was there right before his conviction.” “I think that his girlfriend’s father, Robert Maxwell, was all through scientific publishing. And I think Pergamon Press was in part a control mechanism for making sure that revolutionary discoveries were taking place within a framework.” “I think Jeffrey Epstein was in part trying to fund science, trying to control it. I don’t really know.” This 7-minute clip says a lot.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,753,647 views • 1 year ago

Very interesting part of Hillary’s deposition, Everybody saying it was a “waste of time”. It was not. Here, Clinton talks about Maxwell’s “public persona” in 2013. In 2013 (!!!). How Maxwell spoke at the United Nations, gave a TED talk, was featured in CNN. She had a public persona “because nobody at that time knew what was later discovered”. Hillary suggests that Maxwell‘s social stature was prominent because nobody knew. The problem is that as of 2013 (earlier in fact), everybody ALREADY knew of her association with Jeffrey Epstein. She was known as the “lady of the house”. She was known as his “confidante”. So her reputable “public persona” at the United Nations, at Ted, in the press, was not because of what was not known. It existed *despite* what *was* known. And all of these political figures - including those involved in “humanitarian aid” - contributed to fraternize and do business with not only Maxwell, but Jeffrey Epstein as well. Right up until he “killed himself”. That is a serious admission that seems to have slipped under the radar.
2:07

Very interesting part of Hillary’s deposition, Everybody saying it was a “waste of time”. It was not. Here, Clinton talks about Maxwell’s “public persona” in 2013. In 2013 (!!!). How Maxwell spoke at the United Nations, gave a TED talk, was featured in CNN. She had a public persona “because nobody at that time knew what was later discovered”. Hillary suggests that Maxwell‘s social stature was prominent because nobody knew. The problem is that as of 2013 (earlier in fact), everybody ALREADY knew of her association with Jeffrey Epstein. She was known as the “lady of the house”. She was known as his “confidante”. So her reputable “public persona” at the United Nations, at Ted, in the press, was not because of what was not known. It existed *despite* what *was* known. And all of these political figures - including those involved in “humanitarian aid” - contributed to fraternize and do business with not only Maxwell, but Jeffrey Epstein as well. Right up until he “killed himself”. That is a serious admission that seems to have slipped under the radar.

Viva Frei

147,046 views • 6 months ago

BREAKING: This May Be One Of The Strangest Epstein Revelations Yet. An Epstein associate reportedly testified that her legal fees were being paid through a fund established by Jeffrey Epstein's estate. Think about that for a second. Epstein died years ago. The investigations continued. The lawsuits continued. The witnesses remained. And according to the testimony, the money kept flowing. The question is how many other people are benefiting from similar arrangements.
0:26

BREAKING: This May Be One Of The Strangest Epstein Revelations Yet. An Epstein associate reportedly testified that her legal fees were being paid through a fund established by Jeffrey Epstein's estate. Think about that for a second. Epstein died years ago. The investigations continued. The lawsuits continued. The witnesses remained. And according to the testimony, the money kept flowing. The question is how many other people are benefiting from similar arrangements.

Brian Allen

317,306 views • 2 months ago