正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

BREAKING: DeSantis hints that he might veto a legislative tax package that includes sales tax relief over property tax relief "Any Florida-last tax package is going to be dead on arrival. We are not going to kneecap our ability to provide you property tax relief just so we can...

75,005 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Florida’s Voice 的头像
Florida’s Voice1 年前

DeSantis hints veto of lawmaker package with sales tax relief, pushes for property tax relief

WierengaTax 的头像
WierengaTax1 年前

Looking for a new tax return preparer?✅ Want to handle the entire process from your smartphone, computer, or tablet?✅ Reach out today for a free estimate! 😀 [email protected]

The Official Unofficial Casey Movement 的头像
The Official Unofficial Casey Movement1 年前

And when the Governor rightfully vetoes this tourist tax break, we’ll demand that the House of Pettiness send him a bill that delivers immediate property tax relief for Floridians. And they’d better not try to override that veto—unless they’re ready to face primaries across the state.

J badger 🐊🐊🦈🦈🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 的头像
J badger 🐊🐊🦈🦈🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸1 年前

If Canadians can afford to come here they don’t need help or $ breaks. I’m with DeSantis on this

Charlie Brown 的头像
Charlie Brown1 年前

Good. He’s fighting for Floridians! End property taxes!!! @GovRonDeSantis

susie 的头像
susie1 年前

Good! That’s what his constituents want! No need to assist the tourist. Help Florida homeowners!!!

Allyn Hane 的头像
Allyn Hane1 年前

hey @Daniel_PerezFL you ever going to get on board or just keep taking an opposite stance against what we, the people want? I'm going to donate to your competition in the next election and I don't even live in your district.

SweetPeaJeepher 的头像
SweetPeaJeepher1 年前

Good. Maybe the @FloridaGOP should focus on Property Tax relief for residents instead of minute tourist tax breaks which barely help Floridians.

Ellen Davis 的头像
Ellen Davis1 年前

Best Governor ever!

🇺🇸AMERICA FIRST MAGA🇺🇸 的头像
🇺🇸AMERICA FIRST MAGA🇺🇸1 年前

Floridians want Property Tax relief! Get it done!

Jason 的头像
Jason1 年前

He’s 100% correct. Not many people are even asking for sales tax relief. It seems like something the house came up with because they thought it would be more popular than it is. Instead of back tracking they doubled down only because the governor doesn’t support it.

相关视频

SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY? “People are waking up to the fact that the asset seizure tax is an elimination of private property rights, that fundamentally what you're saying [is] that private property now becomes public property. Because as soon as you give the government the right to collect your post-tax assets through a legislative vote, you are basically saying that you no longer have private property — because at any point in the future the government can vote to say I'm going to take your private property — which is different than an income tax. [An income tax] is when you earn something that you didn't have before, and they take a percentage of your earnings (of your income). The statement now is after you've made your income (it's now your private property) — they can come and take it. And so that is a distinction that has never existed in the United States. And I will make the retort right now to property tax, because people always say to me: ‘what about property tax?’ A property tax is a service fee on a particular, specific asset. The money that is collected provides services for that asset to make it more valuable. So you get roads, infrastructure, policing, fire, schools… All the stuff that comes with property tax makes that property [more valuable]. And you have the option at any point you want to sell that property and stop paying that property tax. You have the option at any point to downgrade your property and get a cheaper property and pay [a lower tax]. And here's the other important point about property tax: it’s uniform. Uniform means that everyone pays the same percentage, the same property tax rate in a county. This asset seizure tax that's being proposed is a demographic tax — meaning that the state or the legislature defines a specific group of individuals (in this case, they're saying anyone with a net worth over a billion dollars) and then they can go and take assets from only that group. That is nonuniform taxation. It means that for the first time we're saying based on the demographics of a person meaning whatever you want to use to define that person (in this case their wealth) — you are going to be treated differently. And that is different than an income tax, because remember when you have graduated income tax rates (and you say high earners get taxed more) — what you're taxing is the earnings, not the individual. You're not looking through to the individual to determine whether or not they're wealthy. All you're doing is looking at the independent earnings amount that's coming in. And so a uniformity clause is supposed to protect people from being demographically discriminated against. And you may roll your hand and be like: ‘Oh, who cares about the billionaires? Eat the rich. That's great.’ But fundamentally, you're giving the government, the legislature, the ability to in the future take any demographic definition they want and go in and take any percentage they want of after-tax property from you. That is why this is so troubling.” david friedberg The All-In Podcast

Ron Pragides 

258,567 次观看 • 6 个月前