正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

BREAKING: DHS is LYING about Jonathan Ross having "Internal torso injuries". I will prove it: - He was allegedly hit at 9:37 am - At 5:52 pm The WaPo reported that Noem said that Ross was released from the hospital. - This leaves less than a 9 hour window...

462,993 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨DHS is now claiming the ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered “internal bleeding.” Which is an interesting thing to lie about, since high school girls’ basketball players have taken harder hits taking a charge than that fully grown man did brushing up against the vehicle. Because let’s be clear… The videos show his body was never struck in a way that would plausibly cause internal bleeding. And while he was near the car, it was moving slowly… not at a speed anywhere close to what physics would require to cause serious internal trauma… unless he had preexisting medical issues. In synced footage, it appears he was pushing off the car as she was turning before he fired his first shot. He then moves to the side, leaning over the car. That’s the only moment any contact could possibly have occurred… and it was because he was leaning into it, not because the vehicle struck him with force. At that exact moment, he fired his first shot. After that, he was no longer near the vehicle. So, DHS claim that he suffered “internal bleeding”… with no independent medical verification released… and after video shows him walking away on his own feet, without so much as a limp, looks a lot more like an attempt to retroactively justify an unjustifiable shooting than a medical fact. Because here’s the reality: If the government wants to claim a life was in danger, they need to show a credible threat, not invent one after the fact. And the footage… the only objective record we have… simply doesn’t support the narrative that she “violently ran over” him or caused serious injury. Until DHS produces clear evidence of this “internal bleeding,” the only thing that narrative truly shows is how far the authorities will go to protect their own, even at the expense of the truth.

Jesus Freakin Congress

40,729 次观看 • 7 个月前

This group of friends were celebrating a birthday, they had brought heir own cake in which was purchased at a high end bakery in the area. The server said they could use that cake instead of theirs but it would be a $400 cutting fee so they cut it themselves outside, I would do the same, that price is outrageous. There was a time in Hudson, Ohio where we went to celebrate a friend’s birthday. The restaurant was upscale but wasn’t like a 4 star place or anything. When I booked the reservation for 4 people we told them it was for a birthday. I asked them specifically if I was allowed to bring our own cake, our friend has food allergies and I had to get his cake at a specialty place that made a gluten free cake. They said it shouldn’t be an issue. They checked with the manager and the manager said it was ok. After having our dinner we were ready to do the cake. So I went to the car to get it so I could surprise him. At the door I was stopped by the hostess who told me it was against the rules to bring outside food in. I mentioned that I was told by a manager that it would be ok. They asked when I called and I said it was two days ago when they opened at 11am. She said well that was the day shift manager and he wasn’t there. She said we couldn’t bring in outside cake or food but they were happy to sell me one for $100. I said pass and I ended up just giving him the cake outside in the box as a gift so he could enjoy it at home.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

31,309 次观看 • 3 天前