Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

BREAKING: Hank Brennan admits the Commonwealth has not and cannot satisfy their burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Unclear if this was deliberate. #KarenRead

OliviaLambo_'s profile picture

Olivia

28,107 subscribers

153,568 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & WellnessNachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & Technologie#KarenRead
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von John Devlin
John Devlinvor 1 Jahr

Clearly, that was the whole purpose of hiring Welcher. To get a credentialed engineer in front of a jury, and a judge who absolutely does not care how perverse this is, to argue that the burden of proof should be shifted to the defendant. The prosecution has weaponized the fact that it has no theory and insufficient evidence to formulate one, let alone test it. This is the most outraged I’ve been in this case, and *that* is saying something.

Profilbild von Rock Paper Sizzle
Rock Paper Sizzlevor 2 Jahren

💪If you're seeing this, it must mean you support Trump. 👏 Let us help you show it. ✅ Classic, Tough, Real American Gear Here:

Profilbild von Conservaknitter
Conservaknittervor 1 Jahr

What are we doing here? He discredited his own witness

Profilbild von People In Court
People In Courtvor 1 Jahr

At this point, a mistrial is his only hope. There’s not coming back from this. AJ is about to start running up the score. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadRetrial #AlanJackson

Profilbild von Sheila
Sheilavor 1 Jahr

That is going right over the heads of everyone that spews that KR is guilty! Stick a fork in HB. This is over

Profilbild von Katy
Katyvor 1 Jahr

He’s been doing this the entire time. Trying to make the defense witnesses look bad using his own witnesses lack of knowledge. It’s astounding

Profilbild von Joanne Muti
Joanne Mutivor 1 Jahr

Lally must be laughing under his breath as Brennan blew up his own case.

Profilbild von Martin McLoughlin
Martin McLoughlinvor 1 Jahr

Gotta finish the trial anyway!! Morrissey has a plant on that Jury that will GUARANTEE a hung jury!!! Gotta finish and get to deliberations no matter how embarrassing..

Profilbild von Karli S
Karli Svor 1 Jahr

Ummm… is he trying to prove that his expert can’t prove their theory?? Smh

Profilbild von Myself
Myselfvor 1 Jahr

This is unreal!

Profilbild von Martin McLoughlin
Martin McLoughlinvor 1 Jahr

Brennan could get up there and speak Klingon from Star Trek...Doesnt matter.. Morrissey has a plant on the Jury that WILL ASSURE HUNG JURY. Brennan just needs to get to deliberations no matter how embarrassing... Brennan still makes $500k - $1M of Taxpayer money!!

Ähnliche Videos

This is a calculated ambush by the Criminal Commonwealth. Hank Brennan is an absolute disgrace. (2m 9s) #KarenRead
2:14

This is a calculated ambush by the Criminal Commonwealth. Hank Brennan is an absolute disgrace. (2m 9s) #KarenRead

Microdots

124,489 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

LIVE: MA v. #KarenRead Retrial | Day 33 - Closing Arguments The attorneys will present their final arguments to the jury in the #KarenReadRetrial. Hank Brennan for the Commonwealth and Alan Jackson for the defense. #CourtTV What do YOU think? WATCH LIVE
0:30

LIVE: MA v. #KarenRead Retrial | Day 33 - Closing Arguments The attorneys will present their final arguments to the jury in the #KarenReadRetrial. Hank Brennan for the Commonwealth and Alan Jackson for the defense. #CourtTV What do YOU think? WATCH LIVE

Court TV

33,337 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I’m sure the jury really appreciates Hank Brennan wasting their time over a ham sandwich and Uber rides. Tell me you’ve got nothing without telling me you’ve got nothing, Hank. #ARCCA #KarenRead #DrAndrewRentschler
0:57

I’m sure the jury really appreciates Hank Brennan wasting their time over a ham sandwich and Uber rides. Tell me you’ve got nothing without telling me you’ve got nothing, Hank. #ARCCA #KarenRead #DrAndrewRentschler

Olivia

44,044 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The most important thing to understand before closing arguments today is what Massachusetts law actually requires, because the legal posture of this case has been wildly misrepresented. The Commonwealth must FIRST prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Lindsay Clancy committed the alleged acts. Only then does criminal responsibility become the question. There is NO stipulation before this jury that Lindsay killed her children. Her plea is NOT GUILTY. Reddington has not conceded that she killed them either. You’ve probably seen his opening statement quoted as, “she knows that she killed these children.” Except that’s not what he said. His actual statement was, “And they would bring their evidence in front of a jury that she knows that she killed these children. We’ll sit here, listen to the evidence, but I suggest to you that the issue of consideration is what was going on in that woman’s mind.” He was describing what the COMMONWEALTH would attempt to prove. Cutting off the beginning completely changes the meaning. The civil filings don’t change this either. They are not evidence in this criminal trial and are not before this jury. Reddington twice sought to bifurcate the trial so whether Lindsay committed the acts and whether she was criminally responsible could be considered separately. The judge denied those requests. He also requested a Bowden instruction regarding deficiencies in the police investigation. The judge declined to give the specific instruction, but Reddington can still argue that those investigative failures create reasonable doubt during closing. This case has become a complete cluster of selectively edited quotes, legal misunderstandings, assumptions repeated as facts, and emotion substituted for evidence. Strip all of that away and the jury’s job is straightforward: What does the evidence actually prove? Has the Commonwealth proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Lindsay committed these crimes? And ONLY if it has, was she criminally responsible? Your feelings about Lindsay do not change the burden of proof. Cora, Dawson and Callan deserved a thorough investigation and a case proven with evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Whatever this verdict is, I pray those three precious children ultimately receive the complete truth and justice they deserve.
1:44

The most important thing to understand before closing arguments today is what Massachusetts law actually requires, because the legal posture of this case has been wildly misrepresented. The Commonwealth must FIRST prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Lindsay Clancy committed the alleged acts. Only then does criminal responsibility become the question. There is NO stipulation before this jury that Lindsay killed her children. Her plea is NOT GUILTY. Reddington has not conceded that she killed them either. You’ve probably seen his opening statement quoted as, “she knows that she killed these children.” Except that’s not what he said. His actual statement was, “And they would bring their evidence in front of a jury that she knows that she killed these children. We’ll sit here, listen to the evidence, but I suggest to you that the issue of consideration is what was going on in that woman’s mind.” He was describing what the COMMONWEALTH would attempt to prove. Cutting off the beginning completely changes the meaning. The civil filings don’t change this either. They are not evidence in this criminal trial and are not before this jury. Reddington twice sought to bifurcate the trial so whether Lindsay committed the acts and whether she was criminally responsible could be considered separately. The judge denied those requests. He also requested a Bowden instruction regarding deficiencies in the police investigation. The judge declined to give the specific instruction, but Reddington can still argue that those investigative failures create reasonable doubt during closing. This case has become a complete cluster of selectively edited quotes, legal misunderstandings, assumptions repeated as facts, and emotion substituted for evidence. Strip all of that away and the jury’s job is straightforward: What does the evidence actually prove? Has the Commonwealth proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Lindsay committed these crimes? And ONLY if it has, was she criminally responsible? Your feelings about Lindsay do not change the burden of proof. Cora, Dawson and Callan deserved a thorough investigation and a case proven with evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Whatever this verdict is, I pray those three precious children ultimately receive the complete truth and justice they deserve.

Kylie Jane Kremer

25,254 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Smith: I came to the conclusion we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt. We were ready, willing and able to go to trial.
0:24

Smith: I came to the conclusion we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt. We were ready, willing and able to go to trial.

Acyn

37,846 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

If the FBI would of released the CCTV footage and proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Tyler Robinson was the man on the roof. Not a single person would be digging into Erika Kirk. Don’t shoot the messenger.
6:48

If the FBI would of released the CCTV footage and proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Tyler Robinson was the man on the roof. Not a single person would be digging into Erika Kirk. Don’t shoot the messenger.

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

492,480 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Hank Brennan has lost the plot. He’s wasted 45 minutes asking Dr. Wolfe zero questions about the case, the evidence, or his conclusions. And now he dragged Dr. Wolfe’s wife into it — because Hank Brennan is a morally bankrupt, spineless, little rat coward piece of 🤬🤬🤬. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial
1:00

Hank Brennan has lost the plot. He’s wasted 45 minutes asking Dr. Wolfe zero questions about the case, the evidence, or his conclusions. And now he dragged Dr. Wolfe’s wife into it — because Hank Brennan is a morally bankrupt, spineless, little rat coward piece of 🤬🤬🤬. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial

Olivia

77,877 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

💙🇺🇸🖤 I re-watched Hank Brennan‘s closing argument again, today. I’ve come to the conclusion that you did not need to watch the trial, if you watch Hank Brennan‘s 1 hour 20 minute truth telling, evidenced based, closing argument, there is no room for ANY doubt, (NONE!) that #karenread is responsible for the death of #johnokeefe If you have not seen this, I implore to watch. If you have seen it, I implore you to watch it again, it hits a little bit different these days. Hank was brilliant! #hankbrennan #karenread is guilty #justiceforjohnokeefe 💙
1:20:40

💙🇺🇸🖤 I re-watched Hank Brennan‘s closing argument again, today. I’ve come to the conclusion that you did not need to watch the trial, if you watch Hank Brennan‘s 1 hour 20 minute truth telling, evidenced based, closing argument, there is no room for ANY doubt, (NONE!) that #karenread is responsible for the death of #johnokeefe If you have not seen this, I implore to watch. If you have seen it, I implore you to watch it again, it hits a little bit different these days. Hank was brilliant! #hankbrennan #karenread is guilty #justiceforjohnokeefe 💙

Andie (Albert) Dufrense

23,283 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

BREAKING: The defense moves for a mistrial with prejudice due to Hank Brennan misrepresenting evidence to the court and in front of the jury. Specifically, Brennan represented that there were holes on the back of John O’Keefe’s sweatshirt caused by an alleged impact. There were not. These were “holes” or samplings which lab tech Maureen Hartnett cut from the back of the sweatshirt and were not sustained on January 29, 2022. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead
8:18

BREAKING: The defense moves for a mistrial with prejudice due to Hank Brennan misrepresenting evidence to the court and in front of the jury. Specifically, Brennan represented that there were holes on the back of John O’Keefe’s sweatshirt caused by an alleged impact. There were not. These were “holes” or samplings which lab tech Maureen Hartnett cut from the back of the sweatshirt and were not sustained on January 29, 2022. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

102,261 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Judge Cecilia Githua: The prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt that the deceased's death was not caused by natural causes... I do not therefore have any hesitation in finding that Sharon's death was unlawful.
4:52

Judge Cecilia Githua: The prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt that the deceased's death was not caused by natural causes... I do not therefore have any hesitation in finding that Sharon's death was unlawful.

NTV Kenya

143,207 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Forget reasonable doubt, one of the jurors who voted to acquit #KarenRead of a murder charge in her retrial says he felt she was completely innocent. Full exclusive at the 🔗 HERE:
10:23

Forget reasonable doubt, one of the jurors who voted to acquit #KarenRead of a murder charge in her retrial says he felt she was completely innocent. Full exclusive at the 🔗 HERE:

TMZ

579,443 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: Super powerful words from Jack Smith just now: "The investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity… No one should be above the law in this country and the law required he be held to account.” Every American needs to hear this
0:41

BREAKING: Super powerful words from Jack Smith just now: "The investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity… No one should be above the law in this country and the law required he be held to account.” Every American needs to hear this

Brian Krassenstein

513,428 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

#BREAKING: Lawrence: “Congressman Eric Swalwell presented clear and convincing proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump’s FBI Director Kashyap Patel LIED UNDER OATH and did it on video…we now know that the number is over a million times, yes, a million. Donald Trump’s name is in the #EpsteinFiles over a million times…and Kashyap Patel is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of LYING under oath about that, and during every presidency in the history of the FBI except the Trump presidency, the FBI Director would be forced to immediately RESIGN…and he would be prosecuted.”😳
1:40

#BREAKING: Lawrence: “Congressman Eric Swalwell presented clear and convincing proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump’s FBI Director Kashyap Patel LIED UNDER OATH and did it on video…we now know that the number is over a million times, yes, a million. Donald Trump’s name is in the #EpsteinFiles over a million times…and Kashyap Patel is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of LYING under oath about that, and during every presidency in the history of the FBI except the Trump presidency, the FBI Director would be forced to immediately RESIGN…and he would be prosecuted.”😳

Emoluments Clause

382,193 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten