Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨 BREAKING: In a major development, Rep. Keith Self has just petitioned Sec. Scott Bessent to launch a probe into "nonprofit" Islamic Society of North America engaging in PROHIBITED ACTIVITY for MI Senate candidate Abdul El Sayed (D) ISNA is linked to ISLAMIC TERRORISM as well, like Hamas, and...

EricLDaugh's profile picture

Eric Daugherty

1,187,059 subscribers

141,699 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaEğitimKomedi
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

This is the Democrat candidate for US Senate in Michigan: Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed. A "physician" who doesn't have a medical license, whose father-in-law worked with CAIR and ISNA, both of whom have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, according to the DOJ. What kind of trash voted for this man? This man could be on a Select Committee for Intelligence or Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, for fck sake. h/t: CSPAN
0:12

This is the Democrat candidate for US Senate in Michigan: Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed. A "physician" who doesn't have a medical license, whose father-in-law worked with CAIR and ISNA, both of whom have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, according to the DOJ. What kind of trash voted for this man? This man could be on a Select Committee for Intelligence or Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, for fck sake. h/t: CSPAN

Kentucky Girl

12,665 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨🇺🇸 Khalistanis Hijacking American Gurdwaras - IRS Must Act Now Tax-exempt Gurdwaras turned into Khalistan propaganda hubs? Stockton and Renton exposed flags, posters, and separatism inside sacred spaces. Gurdwaras in America are registered as 501(c)(3) nonprofit charitable organizations, recognized by the IRS as places of worship and community service open to everyone. But when Khalistani elements hijack these sacred spaces, they stop fulfilling the core criteria of a true charitable institution. The Stockton Gurdwara has been openly taken over by #Khalistani activists. They’ve hosted #Khalistan flags right on the premises for years. Now, fresh videos are circulating showing Khalistanis at the Ranton (Renton) Gurdwara raising the Khalistani flag alongside posters of the so-called “Democratic Republic of Khalistan.” This is not worship. This is politicization. How can anyone justify hijacking a Gurdwara and turning it into a political outpost for a separatist movement? Politicizing a tax-exempt, non-profit charitable organization raises serious red flags: Are they misusing public donations and government-recognized tax benefits to push a separatist agenda? Are they using religion as a shield to justify activities that may violate #US laws? The #IRS has a duty to protect the integrity of 501(c)(3) status. Clear, thorough investigations are needed into any Gurdwara that appears to be operating as a political front rather than a charitable religious institution.
0:12

🚨🇺🇸 Khalistanis Hijacking American Gurdwaras - IRS Must Act Now Tax-exempt Gurdwaras turned into Khalistan propaganda hubs? Stockton and Renton exposed flags, posters, and separatism inside sacred spaces. Gurdwaras in America are registered as 501(c)(3) nonprofit charitable organizations, recognized by the IRS as places of worship and community service open to everyone. But when Khalistani elements hijack these sacred spaces, they stop fulfilling the core criteria of a true charitable institution. The Stockton Gurdwara has been openly taken over by #Khalistani activists. They’ve hosted #Khalistan flags right on the premises for years. Now, fresh videos are circulating showing Khalistanis at the Ranton (Renton) Gurdwara raising the Khalistani flag alongside posters of the so-called “Democratic Republic of Khalistan.” This is not worship. This is politicization. How can anyone justify hijacking a Gurdwara and turning it into a political outpost for a separatist movement? Politicizing a tax-exempt, non-profit charitable organization raises serious red flags: Are they misusing public donations and government-recognized tax benefits to push a separatist agenda? Are they using religion as a shield to justify activities that may violate #US laws? The #IRS has a duty to protect the integrity of 501(c)(3) status. Clear, thorough investigations are needed into any Gurdwara that appears to be operating as a political front rather than a charitable religious institution.

Allen Hampton

37,254 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

NEW: 🚨 Self Proclaimed “Physician” Abdul El-Sayed Once Admitted On Audio He Was Only “Cosplaying As A Doctor” 🚨 Abdul El-Sayed repeatedly presents himself as a “physician” and “medical doctor” on the campaign trail, in bios, LinkedIn, and interviews, yet his own words prove he’s been overstating his position. Michigan Jihadist Democrat Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed Dr. Abdul El-Sayed has made his so called “medical credentials” a centerpiece of his pitch to voters. He often calls himself a physician and he regularly says, “I’ve been a doctor my whole career.” His LinkedIn lists him as a physician. However, records tell a different story. He has never held a medical license in Michigan or New York. His documented hands-on patient care consists of a four-week sub-internship (a clinical rotation) at a small Manhattan hospital at the end of medical school. In a 2022 podcast, El-Sayed himself described that experience this way: his “job was to be the, like, worst doctor on the team” and he was “cosplaying a doctor.” Listen to him say this in his own words below. 👇🏻 He earned an MD from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons (after time at the University of Michigan Medical School) and he has worked in epidemiology and as Detroit’s health officer where he oversaw the slaughter of nearly 4,000 innocent dogs and cats that were held at Detroit animal control. An MD is an academic degree. A licensed, practicing physician is someone who completed residency, passed boards, obtained a state license, and treats patients under ongoing regulatory oversight on a regular basis. El-Sayed has not done the latter, and thus, he should stop referring to himself as a practicing physician. Abdul’s Islamic ideology compels him and encourages him to lie to non-Muslims for the purpose of advancing Islam, which is why he feels comfortable lying to Michigan voters about being a “practicing physican”. This is called Taqiyya, and it’s the foundation of Abdul’s US Senate campaign. In his own words, Abdul was only “cosplaying” as a doctor, specifically the worst doctor. Michigan voters, BEWARE!
0:12

NEW: 🚨 Self Proclaimed “Physician” Abdul El-Sayed Once Admitted On Audio He Was Only “Cosplaying As A Doctor” 🚨 Abdul El-Sayed repeatedly presents himself as a “physician” and “medical doctor” on the campaign trail, in bios, LinkedIn, and interviews, yet his own words prove he’s been overstating his position. Michigan Jihadist Democrat Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed Dr. Abdul El-Sayed has made his so called “medical credentials” a centerpiece of his pitch to voters. He often calls himself a physician and he regularly says, “I’ve been a doctor my whole career.” His LinkedIn lists him as a physician. However, records tell a different story. He has never held a medical license in Michigan or New York. His documented hands-on patient care consists of a four-week sub-internship (a clinical rotation) at a small Manhattan hospital at the end of medical school. In a 2022 podcast, El-Sayed himself described that experience this way: his “job was to be the, like, worst doctor on the team” and he was “cosplaying a doctor.” Listen to him say this in his own words below. 👇🏻 He earned an MD from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons (after time at the University of Michigan Medical School) and he has worked in epidemiology and as Detroit’s health officer where he oversaw the slaughter of nearly 4,000 innocent dogs and cats that were held at Detroit animal control. An MD is an academic degree. A licensed, practicing physician is someone who completed residency, passed boards, obtained a state license, and treats patients under ongoing regulatory oversight on a regular basis. El-Sayed has not done the latter, and thus, he should stop referring to himself as a practicing physician. Abdul’s Islamic ideology compels him and encourages him to lie to non-Muslims for the purpose of advancing Islam, which is why he feels comfortable lying to Michigan voters about being a “practicing physican”. This is called Taqiyya, and it’s the foundation of Abdul’s US Senate campaign. In his own words, Abdul was only “cosplaying” as a doctor, specifically the worst doctor. Michigan voters, BEWARE!

Laura Loomer

254,804 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

#ZimElection2023 CHAMISA RAN HIS CAMPAIGN LIKE AN INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE WITH NO STRUCTURES AND EXPECTED TO WIN AND BECOME PRESIDENT WITH NO MAJORITY IN PARLIAMENT This is what Nelson Chamisa said on 21 June 2023 about the strategic thrust of the campaign of his CCC in the 2023 harmonised general election held last week: "our [CCC] campaign is going to be basically a presidential... our [CCC] focus is not to be in parliament but to be in government. We [as MDC opposition] have been in parliament for a long time, that's not our [CCC] station of choice at the moment". The fact that Chamisa thought he could win the presidential election even if, or regardless of whether, his CCC won a majority in Parliament, explains his crushing defeat. An election in Zimbabwe is defined in terms of section 4 of the Electoral Act which provides that: election” means— (a) the election of a member of Parliament; or (b) an election to the office of President; or (c) an election for the purposes of the Rural District Councils Act [Chapter 29:13] or the Urban Councils Act [Chapter 29:15]; as the case may be. These three elections used to be held separately before they were harmonised for the first time in the 2008 election in terms of section 38 of the Act. It is odd and even irrational, and it defies the logic of the harmonised general election for any political party that seeks power to govern the country as a whole to only target – as did Chamisa in the 2023 harmonised general election held last week –winning only one of the three elections, just the presidential election. It is foolhardy for a political party to say its strategy and focus is only to win the presidential election, without basing that strategy and focus on winning the local authority and parliamentary elections, as well. Such a strategy, if it can be called a strategy, renders the presidential candidate no different from an independent presidential candidate who contests for the presidency without the advantage of the structures of a political party. Simply put, a presidential candidate in Zimbabwe cannot win a presidential election if the candidate does not have a campaign strategy that is based on his or her political party winning a majority of wards in the local authority election, and a majority of constituencies in the parliamentary election. If it’s an independent presidential candidate, then he or she must have ground structures of one sort or another, or forget it. Chamisa contested the presidential election as if he was an independent candidate, and he boasted about it, without relying on his CCC and without any ground structures. In the circumstances, just how or why did Chamisa expect to win the presidential election by effectively running as an independent candidate? Which structures did Chamisa expect to use, or did he in fact use to campaign for the presidency in every street and every village, across the length and breadth of the country? Since by his own admission, as quoted above and reflected on the attached video clip, Chamisa was clearly not relying on his CCC to win the presidency. This begs the question: by not relying on CCC structures, and by not having alternative ground structures in the streets and in villages, did Chamisa think that ZanuPF members and supports would vote for him, as an act of God, perhaps? Was Chamisa's presidential election campaign, for him an article of faith, in other words was it about his belief that God had chosen him, and that he would win regardless of whether or not CCC won a majority in the local authority and parliamentary elections? Where did Chamisa and his supporters in Zimbabwe and among the legions of his fans in America and Europe think he would get the necessary number of polling agents to monitor the voting and vote counting at the country’s 12,374 polling stations, and to secure the 12,374 V11s from those polling stations, given the fact that he actually ran for the presidency as an independent candidate, expecting to be supported less by his own CCC party and more by the members and supporters of ZanuPF? Does this kind of strategy make sense to anyone on earth? And, does that strategy make sense to Nerves Mumba and his Sadc Election Observation Mission or to any other foreign election observation mission that was in Zimbabwe last week like, say for example, the European Union Observer Mission or any of the several observer missions from the United States that were in Zimbabwe to observe the elections? How did the various foreign election observer missions and Chamisa’s social media supporters expect him to win the presidential election, not only where and when his CCC party was losing the local authority and parliamentary elections but, and critically, where Chamisa himself did not believe that the local authority and parliamentary elections were important or necessary for him to win the presidency? The fact that the loquacious, belligerent and inflammatory foreign election observer missions that are peddling falsehoods about the elections, and Chamisa’s social media supporters who claim with no evidence that Chamisa won, did not raise a finger against the results of the local and parliamentary elections that were declared at 1970 wards and 209 constituencies well ahead of the declaration of the result for the presidential election on 26 August, clearly means that there was no problem with two of the three elections that make up Zimbabwe’s harmonised general election. Only after the declaration of the presidential election result on 26 August did all hell break loose. It must be asked, again, how did anyone expect Chamisa to win a presidential election whose campaign was – as per Chamisa’s deliberate strategy – organised and pursued as if it was the presidential campaign of an independent candidate? Chamisa’s presidential election campaign was not based on the CCC parliamentary election campaign or on CCC’s structural capacity on the ground, strangely, it was based on the expectation that ZanuPF members and supporters would vote for Chamisa. Why on earth did anyone expect ZanuPF members and supporters to vote for someone whose base is ever singing cacophonic noise that ZanuPF must go, and hurling insults at the incumbent party, its officials and its supporters? What kind of politics is that? You are contemptuous of ZanuPF and anyone associated with it, but you expect ZanuPF members and supporters to vote for you. This expectation does not compute, certainly not in electoral politics. As things turned out, ZanuPF members and supporters who are registered voters voted for their party candidates in all the three elections: local authority election, the parliamentary election and the presidential election. As a result, in the parliamentary election, CCC won just 73 constituency seats. There's just no way that CCC's 73 constituency seats in the National Assembly would have boosted Chamisa to win the presidency. No ways. In Zimbabwe's first harmonised general election in 2008, Morgan Tsvangirai did well in the first round of the presidential election primarily if not only because the two MDC formations used their round structures to win a majority in Parliament with a combined strength of 110 constituency seats, while ZanuPF garnered 99 seats and an independent got one seat. This was the first time since independence in 1980 that the opposition commanded the majority in Parliament. So, clearly, in 2008 Tsvangirai was propelled by the solid parliamentary performance of the MDC formations. The same structural dynamic was conspicuously absent for Chamisa in the just ended harmonised general election. Chamisa ran a solo presidential election campaign and, predictably, it went horribly wrong. The fact that CCC did not field local authority candidates in 90 wards made a bad situation worse for Chamisa, and it was further compounded by the fact that CCC did not have ground structures to harness and harvest from the loose and unreliable protest vote, especially in the wards and constituencies outside CCC strongholds, which in fact used to be MDC strongholds in the days of Morgan Tsvangirai!
0:11

#ZimElection2023 CHAMISA RAN HIS CAMPAIGN LIKE AN INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE WITH NO STRUCTURES AND EXPECTED TO WIN AND BECOME PRESIDENT WITH NO MAJORITY IN PARLIAMENT This is what Nelson Chamisa said on 21 June 2023 about the strategic thrust of the campaign of his CCC in the 2023 harmonised general election held last week: "our [CCC] campaign is going to be basically a presidential... our [CCC] focus is not to be in parliament but to be in government. We [as MDC opposition] have been in parliament for a long time, that's not our [CCC] station of choice at the moment". The fact that Chamisa thought he could win the presidential election even if, or regardless of whether, his CCC won a majority in Parliament, explains his crushing defeat. An election in Zimbabwe is defined in terms of section 4 of the Electoral Act which provides that: election” means— (a) the election of a member of Parliament; or (b) an election to the office of President; or (c) an election for the purposes of the Rural District Councils Act [Chapter 29:13] or the Urban Councils Act [Chapter 29:15]; as the case may be. These three elections used to be held separately before they were harmonised for the first time in the 2008 election in terms of section 38 of the Act. It is odd and even irrational, and it defies the logic of the harmonised general election for any political party that seeks power to govern the country as a whole to only target – as did Chamisa in the 2023 harmonised general election held last week –winning only one of the three elections, just the presidential election. It is foolhardy for a political party to say its strategy and focus is only to win the presidential election, without basing that strategy and focus on winning the local authority and parliamentary elections, as well. Such a strategy, if it can be called a strategy, renders the presidential candidate no different from an independent presidential candidate who contests for the presidency without the advantage of the structures of a political party. Simply put, a presidential candidate in Zimbabwe cannot win a presidential election if the candidate does not have a campaign strategy that is based on his or her political party winning a majority of wards in the local authority election, and a majority of constituencies in the parliamentary election. If it’s an independent presidential candidate, then he or she must have ground structures of one sort or another, or forget it. Chamisa contested the presidential election as if he was an independent candidate, and he boasted about it, without relying on his CCC and without any ground structures. In the circumstances, just how or why did Chamisa expect to win the presidential election by effectively running as an independent candidate? Which structures did Chamisa expect to use, or did he in fact use to campaign for the presidency in every street and every village, across the length and breadth of the country? Since by his own admission, as quoted above and reflected on the attached video clip, Chamisa was clearly not relying on his CCC to win the presidency. This begs the question: by not relying on CCC structures, and by not having alternative ground structures in the streets and in villages, did Chamisa think that ZanuPF members and supports would vote for him, as an act of God, perhaps? Was Chamisa's presidential election campaign, for him an article of faith, in other words was it about his belief that God had chosen him, and that he would win regardless of whether or not CCC won a majority in the local authority and parliamentary elections? Where did Chamisa and his supporters in Zimbabwe and among the legions of his fans in America and Europe think he would get the necessary number of polling agents to monitor the voting and vote counting at the country’s 12,374 polling stations, and to secure the 12,374 V11s from those polling stations, given the fact that he actually ran for the presidency as an independent candidate, expecting to be supported less by his own CCC party and more by the members and supporters of ZanuPF? Does this kind of strategy make sense to anyone on earth? And, does that strategy make sense to Nerves Mumba and his Sadc Election Observation Mission or to any other foreign election observation mission that was in Zimbabwe last week like, say for example, the European Union Observer Mission or any of the several observer missions from the United States that were in Zimbabwe to observe the elections? How did the various foreign election observer missions and Chamisa’s social media supporters expect him to win the presidential election, not only where and when his CCC party was losing the local authority and parliamentary elections but, and critically, where Chamisa himself did not believe that the local authority and parliamentary elections were important or necessary for him to win the presidency? The fact that the loquacious, belligerent and inflammatory foreign election observer missions that are peddling falsehoods about the elections, and Chamisa’s social media supporters who claim with no evidence that Chamisa won, did not raise a finger against the results of the local and parliamentary elections that were declared at 1970 wards and 209 constituencies well ahead of the declaration of the result for the presidential election on 26 August, clearly means that there was no problem with two of the three elections that make up Zimbabwe’s harmonised general election. Only after the declaration of the presidential election result on 26 August did all hell break loose. It must be asked, again, how did anyone expect Chamisa to win a presidential election whose campaign was – as per Chamisa’s deliberate strategy – organised and pursued as if it was the presidential campaign of an independent candidate? Chamisa’s presidential election campaign was not based on the CCC parliamentary election campaign or on CCC’s structural capacity on the ground, strangely, it was based on the expectation that ZanuPF members and supporters would vote for Chamisa. Why on earth did anyone expect ZanuPF members and supporters to vote for someone whose base is ever singing cacophonic noise that ZanuPF must go, and hurling insults at the incumbent party, its officials and its supporters? What kind of politics is that? You are contemptuous of ZanuPF and anyone associated with it, but you expect ZanuPF members and supporters to vote for you. This expectation does not compute, certainly not in electoral politics. As things turned out, ZanuPF members and supporters who are registered voters voted for their party candidates in all the three elections: local authority election, the parliamentary election and the presidential election. As a result, in the parliamentary election, CCC won just 73 constituency seats. There's just no way that CCC's 73 constituency seats in the National Assembly would have boosted Chamisa to win the presidency. No ways. In Zimbabwe's first harmonised general election in 2008, Morgan Tsvangirai did well in the first round of the presidential election primarily if not only because the two MDC formations used their round structures to win a majority in Parliament with a combined strength of 110 constituency seats, while ZanuPF garnered 99 seats and an independent got one seat. This was the first time since independence in 1980 that the opposition commanded the majority in Parliament. So, clearly, in 2008 Tsvangirai was propelled by the solid parliamentary performance of the MDC formations. The same structural dynamic was conspicuously absent for Chamisa in the just ended harmonised general election. Chamisa ran a solo presidential election campaign and, predictably, it went horribly wrong. The fact that CCC did not field local authority candidates in 90 wards made a bad situation worse for Chamisa, and it was further compounded by the fact that CCC did not have ground structures to harness and harvest from the loose and unreliable protest vote, especially in the wards and constituencies outside CCC strongholds, which in fact used to be MDC strongholds in the days of Morgan Tsvangirai!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

98,230 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Jihadi Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed just left the Senate Democrats where he was meeting with Democrat Senators for 8 hours. All of the Senate Democrat leadership, including Chuck Schumer Jon Ossoff and Kirsten Gillibrand were in attendance. Loomer Unleashed Charles R Downs confronted Abdul as he was leaving the DSCC headquarters in DC moments ago. We asked him if he would apologize for supporting Islamic terrorism and signing a pledge in support of the Muslim Brotherhood, a designated Islamic terrorist organization. He blew us a kiss and refused to apologize for supporting Islamic terror groups. The Democrat Party is the party of Islamic jihad. Remember this come November on Election Day! Senate Democrats
0:19

Jihadi Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed just left the Senate Democrats where he was meeting with Democrat Senators for 8 hours. All of the Senate Democrat leadership, including Chuck Schumer Jon Ossoff and Kirsten Gillibrand were in attendance. Loomer Unleashed Charles R Downs confronted Abdul as he was leaving the DSCC headquarters in DC moments ago. We asked him if he would apologize for supporting Islamic terrorism and signing a pledge in support of the Muslim Brotherhood, a designated Islamic terrorist organization. He blew us a kiss and refused to apologize for supporting Islamic terror groups. The Democrat Party is the party of Islamic jihad. Remember this come November on Election Day! Senate Democrats

Laura Loomer

127,605 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

Abdul El-Sayed Inherited a Terror-Financing Shadow, Then Recruited Hamas Superfan Hasan Piker Abdul El-Sayed’s largest individual super PAC donor is his father-in-law, Jukaku S. Tayeb, who leads two Islamic organizations named as unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation case. Five defendants were convicted of funneling $12 million to Hamas. El-Sayed’s mother worked for the Islamic American Relief Agency, a network designated by the U.S. Treasury for supporting Osama bin Laden and Hamas. Federal exhibits connected her to wire transfers, recorded calls and a request to send more than $24,000 to the organization’s Iraq office. IARA later pleaded guilty to illegally transferring nearly $1.4 million to Iraq. El-Sayed later welcomed campaign help from Hasan Piker, who has glorified Hamas and Hezbollah and declared that “America deserved 9/11.” Piker used his enormous platform to mobilize young voters for El-Sayed after spending years portraying support for terrorists as a moral obligation. During one livestream, Piker even threatened to kill his dog if it moved while his young audience watched. The footage appears below. Hasan Piker to his dog: "Stay. If you run right now, I'll fucking kill you — like I'll actually kill you, okay, in front of everyone" When a Hezbollah-inspired terrorist rammed a truck into a Michigan synagogue and attempted to massacre Jewish American children, El-Sayed responded that “hurt people, hurt people.” He declared the attacker’s Hezbollah-linked relatives “innocent” Democrats have answered scrutiny of this record with a single accusation... “Islamophobia.” The word is expected to erase two organizations named in the Holy Land Foundation Hamas-financing case, a family connection to a Treasury-designated terror network, a guilty plea involving $1.4 million in illegal transfers, El-Sayed’s largest individual super PAC donor leading those organizations, Hasan Piker campaigning for him after years of glorifying terrorists, and El-Sayed explaining an attempted massacre of Jewish children as inevitable. Under this standard, Treasury designations are prejudice. Justice Department filings are smears. Terror-financing cases are religious attacks. Hasan Piker is merely a streamer. A terrorist targeting Jewish American children becomes a wounded man responding to events overseas. That explanation follows the same grievance El-Sayed campaigns on. He accuses Americans of financing a “genocide” and blames them for civilian deaths caused by Hamas deliberately storing rocket launchers, missiles and ammunition inside homes, schools and hospitals, leaving Israel no choice but to strike those sites and neutralize the threat. El-Sayed and Piker broadcast that accusation to millions, assigning Americans moral responsibility for the consequences of Hamas’s human-shield strategy. The Palestinian population is growing 4.7 times faster than the U.S. population. Repeated often enough, that message turns Hamas’s tactics into an American crime and could convince a Hezbollah-inspired extremist in Michigan that Jewish American children are legitimate targets for events overseas, leading him to ram a truck into their synagogue and attempt to massacre them. But the Democratic Party has already warned voters that voicing these concerns is Islamophobic and that we are expected to accept the possibility of terrorist attacks against our children to keep Democrats in power. If you are reading this in Michigan and have children in school, please understand that the Democratic Party will not be there for you should another attack occur. Mike Rogers will be. Contact his campaign anytime.
0:13

Abdul El-Sayed Inherited a Terror-Financing Shadow, Then Recruited Hamas Superfan Hasan Piker Abdul El-Sayed’s largest individual super PAC donor is his father-in-law, Jukaku S. Tayeb, who leads two Islamic organizations named as unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation case. Five defendants were convicted of funneling $12 million to Hamas. El-Sayed’s mother worked for the Islamic American Relief Agency, a network designated by the U.S. Treasury for supporting Osama bin Laden and Hamas. Federal exhibits connected her to wire transfers, recorded calls and a request to send more than $24,000 to the organization’s Iraq office. IARA later pleaded guilty to illegally transferring nearly $1.4 million to Iraq. El-Sayed later welcomed campaign help from Hasan Piker, who has glorified Hamas and Hezbollah and declared that “America deserved 9/11.” Piker used his enormous platform to mobilize young voters for El-Sayed after spending years portraying support for terrorists as a moral obligation. During one livestream, Piker even threatened to kill his dog if it moved while his young audience watched. The footage appears below. Hasan Piker to his dog: "Stay. If you run right now, I'll fucking kill you — like I'll actually kill you, okay, in front of everyone" When a Hezbollah-inspired terrorist rammed a truck into a Michigan synagogue and attempted to massacre Jewish American children, El-Sayed responded that “hurt people, hurt people.” He declared the attacker’s Hezbollah-linked relatives “innocent” Democrats have answered scrutiny of this record with a single accusation... “Islamophobia.” The word is expected to erase two organizations named in the Holy Land Foundation Hamas-financing case, a family connection to a Treasury-designated terror network, a guilty plea involving $1.4 million in illegal transfers, El-Sayed’s largest individual super PAC donor leading those organizations, Hasan Piker campaigning for him after years of glorifying terrorists, and El-Sayed explaining an attempted massacre of Jewish children as inevitable. Under this standard, Treasury designations are prejudice. Justice Department filings are smears. Terror-financing cases are religious attacks. Hasan Piker is merely a streamer. A terrorist targeting Jewish American children becomes a wounded man responding to events overseas. That explanation follows the same grievance El-Sayed campaigns on. He accuses Americans of financing a “genocide” and blames them for civilian deaths caused by Hamas deliberately storing rocket launchers, missiles and ammunition inside homes, schools and hospitals, leaving Israel no choice but to strike those sites and neutralize the threat. El-Sayed and Piker broadcast that accusation to millions, assigning Americans moral responsibility for the consequences of Hamas’s human-shield strategy. The Palestinian population is growing 4.7 times faster than the U.S. population. Repeated often enough, that message turns Hamas’s tactics into an American crime and could convince a Hezbollah-inspired extremist in Michigan that Jewish American children are legitimate targets for events overseas, leading him to ram a truck into their synagogue and attempt to massacre them. But the Democratic Party has already warned voters that voicing these concerns is Islamophobic and that we are expected to accept the possibility of terrorist attacks against our children to keep Democrats in power. If you are reading this in Michigan and have children in school, please understand that the Democratic Party will not be there for you should another attack occur. Mike Rogers will be. Contact his campaign anytime.

Apple Lamps

31,687 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

Abdul El-Sayed Wins Michigan Senate Primary Progressive candidate Abdul El-Sayed has won the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate in Michigan, defeating Rep. Haley Stevens. El-Sayed campaigned alongside far-left streamer Hasan Piker, who once said: “America deserved 9/11, dude. F*** it, I’m saying it.” When asked to disavow those comments, El-Sayed refused, calling it a “gotcha game” and defending Piker’s place in the party. El-Sayed’s own record includes: • Saying he would put an “ogre on a pike” (make an example of a moderate Democrat by primarying them) so others fall in line • Declaring, “When they go low, we don’t go high. We take them to the mud and choke them out.” • Struggling to affirm Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state • Suggesting the U.S. should understand the “pain and frustration” that drives people to commit terrorist acts • Calling border agents “white supremacists” in a since-deleted post He will face Republican Mike Rogers in November. Rogers has called El-Sayed’s comments “disqualifying” and said: “It’s a scary world we live in where Democrats now make excuses for terrorists… this level of radicalism is propelling Abdul.” I agree with Rogers, this is scary. Democrat candidates should be condemning terrorists not rationalizing them.
0:15

Abdul El-Sayed Wins Michigan Senate Primary Progressive candidate Abdul El-Sayed has won the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate in Michigan, defeating Rep. Haley Stevens. El-Sayed campaigned alongside far-left streamer Hasan Piker, who once said: “America deserved 9/11, dude. F*** it, I’m saying it.” When asked to disavow those comments, El-Sayed refused, calling it a “gotcha game” and defending Piker’s place in the party. El-Sayed’s own record includes: • Saying he would put an “ogre on a pike” (make an example of a moderate Democrat by primarying them) so others fall in line • Declaring, “When they go low, we don’t go high. We take them to the mud and choke them out.” • Struggling to affirm Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state • Suggesting the U.S. should understand the “pain and frustration” that drives people to commit terrorist acts • Calling border agents “white supremacists” in a since-deleted post He will face Republican Mike Rogers in November. Rogers has called El-Sayed’s comments “disqualifying” and said: “It’s a scary world we live in where Democrats now make excuses for terrorists… this level of radicalism is propelling Abdul.” I agree with Rogers, this is scary. Democrat candidates should be condemning terrorists not rationalizing them.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

25,319 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

What is an individual? Can we accept the idea that an individual is not an isolated being, but a totality of traits, ideas, and deeds that arise within humanity, are shaped by it, and return to it? Every human being is a temporary form through which humanity expresses a part of itself. : The author redefines the individual not as an isolated entity but as a transient expression of humanity itself: a unique constellation of traits, ideas, and deeds that emerge from the collective, are molded by it, and ultimately return to enrich it. Each person serves as a temporary vessel through which humanity manifests and explores its own nature. This dissolves the illusion of absolute separateness, revealing every life as an integral thread in the living fabric of humankind. It portrays individuality as both gift and responsibility: a fleeting opportunity to contribute distinct value to the whole. The concept elevates personal existence to a sacred role in humanity’s continuous self-creation. It leads to recognition that our thoughts, actions, and choices ripple beyond the self, shaping the shared human story. Ultimately, framing every individual as both creation and co-creator of humanity’s evolving essence, bound in profound interdependence.
0:19

What is an individual? Can we accept the idea that an individual is not an isolated being, but a totality of traits, ideas, and deeds that arise within humanity, are shaped by it, and return to it? Every human being is a temporary form through which humanity expresses a part of itself. : The author redefines the individual not as an isolated entity but as a transient expression of humanity itself: a unique constellation of traits, ideas, and deeds that emerge from the collective, are molded by it, and ultimately return to enrich it. Each person serves as a temporary vessel through which humanity manifests and explores its own nature. This dissolves the illusion of absolute separateness, revealing every life as an integral thread in the living fabric of humankind. It portrays individuality as both gift and responsibility: a fleeting opportunity to contribute distinct value to the whole. The concept elevates personal existence to a sacred role in humanity’s continuous self-creation. It leads to recognition that our thoughts, actions, and choices ripple beyond the self, shaping the shared human story. Ultimately, framing every individual as both creation and co-creator of humanity’s evolving essence, bound in profound interdependence.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

864,277 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

As Georgia Democrat U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff Jon Ossoff made his way into the DSCC Senate Democrats to meet with Jihadist Michigan US Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed Dr. Abdul El-Sayed today, Loomer Unleashed Charles R Downs asked him if he would condemn Abdul for refusing to disavow Hasan Piker hasanabi on 9/11. Naturally, Ossoff refused. This is such a telling video, as Ossoff claims to be a “moderate,” yet he is meeting with and refusing to disavow an Islamic Communist. Ossoff and Abdul are essentially the same person. Georgia voters be warned!
0:12

As Georgia Democrat U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff Jon Ossoff made his way into the DSCC Senate Democrats to meet with Jihadist Michigan US Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed Dr. Abdul El-Sayed today, Loomer Unleashed Charles R Downs asked him if he would condemn Abdul for refusing to disavow Hasan Piker hasanabi on 9/11. Naturally, Ossoff refused. This is such a telling video, as Ossoff claims to be a “moderate,” yet he is meeting with and refusing to disavow an Islamic Communist. Ossoff and Abdul are essentially the same person. Georgia voters be warned!

Laura Loomer

59,588 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

Dagknight technical progress As would be mentioned in a still unshared post by Michael Sutton, the dagknight effort is split into v0 devnet, v1 testnet and v2 mainnet candidate. I’ve been testing the current v0-based implementation in a small devnet with the help of some testers who run nodes and miners with me. The DK work can be thought of as split into two parts: (1) implementing the actual protocol and (2) wiring it up and using it. The testing and development over the last month has been focused on (2). Obviously, DK is a consensus change for selecting parents. What’s not so obvious is that such a change affects DAA, coinbase, IBD, pruning and a lot more. Each of these areas is very sensitive and requires proper understanding to wire correctly. An important consideration and difference from GD is that DK does not focus on maximizing a property like blue work. So to maintain topological properties of blue work, an independent (free) GD implementation is kept running specifically for maintaining blue work. This allows us to keep using the property for topology. Coloring and blue score use the megachain induced by DK. The wiring around DK as of this posting is in a working state, but still needs to be reviewed. Next efforts will be focused on protocol specific components, particularly Tie-Breaking and incremental UMC. Attached are some captures from the internal devnet. The dense DAG image is what happens when things related to DAA or other similar consensus parameter causes a node to insist on their POV. The video is a recent snippet of the KGI running on the devnet showing (perhaps not obviously) DK at work. The current “dagknight” branch is now posted on the main repo. A topic in the Public R&D has been opened for Dagknight development.
0:17

Dagknight technical progress As would be mentioned in a still unshared post by Michael Sutton, the dagknight effort is split into v0 devnet, v1 testnet and v2 mainnet candidate. I’ve been testing the current v0-based implementation in a small devnet with the help of some testers who run nodes and miners with me. The DK work can be thought of as split into two parts: (1) implementing the actual protocol and (2) wiring it up and using it. The testing and development over the last month has been focused on (2). Obviously, DK is a consensus change for selecting parents. What’s not so obvious is that such a change affects DAA, coinbase, IBD, pruning and a lot more. Each of these areas is very sensitive and requires proper understanding to wire correctly. An important consideration and difference from GD is that DK does not focus on maximizing a property like blue work. So to maintain topological properties of blue work, an independent (free) GD implementation is kept running specifically for maintaining blue work. This allows us to keep using the property for topology. Coloring and blue score use the megachain induced by DK. The wiring around DK as of this posting is in a working state, but still needs to be reviewed. Next efforts will be focused on protocol specific components, particularly Tie-Breaking and incremental UMC. Attached are some captures from the internal devnet. The dense DAG image is what happens when things related to DAA or other similar consensus parameter causes a node to insist on their POV. The video is a recent snippet of the KGI running on the devnet showing (perhaps not obviously) DK at work. The current “dagknight” branch is now posted on the main repo. A topic in the Public R&D has been opened for Dagknight development.

coderofstuff

52,857 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Hamas and Islamic Republic are terrorists, and they do not talk for the people of Iran or Palestine. The whole situation in Israel and Gaza is an incredible tragedy. While this is a proxy war by the Islamic Republic and its terrorist arm Quds Force and should be condemned in strongest terms, it is critical that Israel should do everything in its power to protect Palestinian civilians under the laws of armed conflict. Let’s us be honest: the crisis today is largely due to Hamas who took over Gaza in 2006 and has not allowed any elections since then. Gaza could have been another Dubai or Singapore. Instead, Hamas diverted funds to build tunnels and obtain rockets and weapons from the Islamic Republic of Iran, the world's biggest sponsor of terrorism, to wage war. The vast majority of Iranians don't support the Islamic Republic and are hostage to its soul destroying policies of the regime. The vast majority of Palestinians want peace, they want good jobs and decent education for their kids. They want a better life. That's not possible with Hamas leadership that takes its orders from the Islamist leaders in Tehran who want to export their vile revolution to take the world backwards to the sixth century. Hamas, like the Islamic Republic, is in the business of terrorism. Hamas doesn't care about Palestinians. Hamas knew exactly how Israel would respond to the brutal attack on its citizens on Oct. 7. Hamas is like ISIS. It must be destroyed.
0:11

Hamas and Islamic Republic are terrorists, and they do not talk for the people of Iran or Palestine. The whole situation in Israel and Gaza is an incredible tragedy. While this is a proxy war by the Islamic Republic and its terrorist arm Quds Force and should be condemned in strongest terms, it is critical that Israel should do everything in its power to protect Palestinian civilians under the laws of armed conflict. Let’s us be honest: the crisis today is largely due to Hamas who took over Gaza in 2006 and has not allowed any elections since then. Gaza could have been another Dubai or Singapore. Instead, Hamas diverted funds to build tunnels and obtain rockets and weapons from the Islamic Republic of Iran, the world's biggest sponsor of terrorism, to wage war. The vast majority of Iranians don't support the Islamic Republic and are hostage to its soul destroying policies of the regime. The vast majority of Palestinians want peace, they want good jobs and decent education for their kids. They want a better life. That's not possible with Hamas leadership that takes its orders from the Islamist leaders in Tehran who want to export their vile revolution to take the world backwards to the sixth century. Hamas, like the Islamic Republic, is in the business of terrorism. Hamas doesn't care about Palestinians. Hamas knew exactly how Israel would respond to the brutal attack on its citizens on Oct. 7. Hamas is like ISIS. It must be destroyed.

Masih Alinejad

2,081,413 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Contrary to CSIS Canada's 2024 Public Report, which stated “non-violent advocacy for an independent state of Khalistan is not considered extremism," Conservative Party's Melissa Lantsman & Shuv Majumdar, both equated Sikh political advocacy for Khalistan as "terror" in recent speeches. Melissa Lantsman, when identifying current terrorist threats to Canada said, "Elements of Khalistani terror who terrorize communities and people in their neighbourhoods in this country.” She did not allude to what "Khalistani terror" has recently occurred in Canadian neighbourhoods. There has been, however, Indian government-orchestrated criminal gangs committing homicides, arsons, and shootings in Canadian neighbourhoods, targeting Sikhs, as part of a broader campaign of transnational repression. Shuvaloy Majumdar called out terror groups in Canada and said, “To never back down, to never surrender, and to never be afraid to name them, whether they are Hamas or Hezbollah or Khalistan or anything else.” Khalistan, unlike Hamas or Hezbollah, is not an organization or group, but a name given to the long-standing principles of Sikh self-determination. Baaz reached out to the CPC asking if these recent comments are official party positions. We did not receive a response in time for this post. Sikh organizations had also reached out to the CPC, asking for clarification on these recent comments, but did not hear back.
0:19

Contrary to CSIS Canada's 2024 Public Report, which stated “non-violent advocacy for an independent state of Khalistan is not considered extremism," Conservative Party's Melissa Lantsman & Shuv Majumdar, both equated Sikh political advocacy for Khalistan as "terror" in recent speeches. Melissa Lantsman, when identifying current terrorist threats to Canada said, "Elements of Khalistani terror who terrorize communities and people in their neighbourhoods in this country.” She did not allude to what "Khalistani terror" has recently occurred in Canadian neighbourhoods. There has been, however, Indian government-orchestrated criminal gangs committing homicides, arsons, and shootings in Canadian neighbourhoods, targeting Sikhs, as part of a broader campaign of transnational repression. Shuvaloy Majumdar called out terror groups in Canada and said, “To never back down, to never surrender, and to never be afraid to name them, whether they are Hamas or Hezbollah or Khalistan or anything else.” Khalistan, unlike Hamas or Hezbollah, is not an organization or group, but a name given to the long-standing principles of Sikh self-determination. Baaz reached out to the CPC asking if these recent comments are official party positions. We did not receive a response in time for this post. Sikh organizations had also reached out to the CPC, asking for clarification on these recent comments, but did not hear back.

Baaz

61,891 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

💔 HEARTBREAKING — Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed, a Democrat candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan, allegedly oversaw an animal 'slaughterhouse' which killed over 4,000 puppies and kittens under his watch. According to the report by the Daily Mail, Abdul El-Sayed served as executive director and health officer of the Detroit Health Department – a powerful post that put him over the city's Animal Control operation during some of its darkest days.
0:16

💔 HEARTBREAKING — Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed, a Democrat candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan, allegedly oversaw an animal 'slaughterhouse' which killed over 4,000 puppies and kittens under his watch. According to the report by the Daily Mail, Abdul El-Sayed served as executive director and health officer of the Detroit Health Department – a powerful post that put him over the city's Animal Control operation during some of its darkest days.

America First Works

23,423 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 Democrat Arkansans US Senate Candidate Hallie Shoffner Brags on Her Website About Support From Democrat U.S. Senator Andy Kim Andy Kim, Who Is an Abdul El-Sayed Dr. Abdul El-Sayed Fanboy 🚨 Today, outside the DSCC Senate Democrats, Loomer Unleashed Charles R Downs asked Senator Andy Kim, a Hallie Shoffner Hallie Shoffner supporter, to condemn Abdul El-Sayed for refusing to disavow Hasan Piker hasanabi on 9/11. Instead, Kim reiterated his support for Abdul, saying: “Look, I want to make sure that we win the seat, and it’s up to the voters to decide.” We replied: “Oh, you didn’t answer the question, but thank you, Senator.” Our questioning of Kim occurred as he was leaving a meeting with Abdul at DSCC headquarters in DC. Arkansas voters must beware that Arkansas Democrat U.S. Senate candidate Hallie Shoffner proudly lists Kim’s endorsement on her campaign website. Farmer Hallie needs to drop the “moderate Democrat” act. Her supporters are Abdul’s supporters, which means Hallie Shoffner is on the same team as the Islamic communists. WATCH 👇🏻
0:18

🚨 Democrat Arkansans US Senate Candidate Hallie Shoffner Brags on Her Website About Support From Democrat U.S. Senator Andy Kim Andy Kim, Who Is an Abdul El-Sayed Dr. Abdul El-Sayed Fanboy 🚨 Today, outside the DSCC Senate Democrats, Loomer Unleashed Charles R Downs asked Senator Andy Kim, a Hallie Shoffner Hallie Shoffner supporter, to condemn Abdul El-Sayed for refusing to disavow Hasan Piker hasanabi on 9/11. Instead, Kim reiterated his support for Abdul, saying: “Look, I want to make sure that we win the seat, and it’s up to the voters to decide.” We replied: “Oh, you didn’t answer the question, but thank you, Senator.” Our questioning of Kim occurred as he was leaving a meeting with Abdul at DSCC headquarters in DC. Arkansas voters must beware that Arkansas Democrat U.S. Senate candidate Hallie Shoffner proudly lists Kim’s endorsement on her campaign website. Farmer Hallie needs to drop the “moderate Democrat” act. Her supporters are Abdul’s supporters, which means Hallie Shoffner is on the same team as the Islamic communists. WATCH 👇🏻

Laura Loomer

29,162 görüntüleme • 11 saat önce

WHY HAS INDIA SIGNED THE CONDOLENCE BOOK FOR KHAMENEI? India’s decision to sign the condolence book for Ali Khamenei is being framed as a calibrated diplomatic signal rather than a political endorsement. FS Misri signed on behalf of the government to acknowledge protocol and maintain official channels with Iran, an important regional partner for India. The government describes it as a "graded response, an official level participation, not a political statement of mourning." By keeping the gesture bureaucratic and low key, New Delhi signals respect for diplomatic norms while avoiding a public position on the killing or the wider conflict involving Israel and the United States.
0:10

WHY HAS INDIA SIGNED THE CONDOLENCE BOOK FOR KHAMENEI? India’s decision to sign the condolence book for Ali Khamenei is being framed as a calibrated diplomatic signal rather than a political endorsement. FS Misri signed on behalf of the government to acknowledge protocol and maintain official channels with Iran, an important regional partner for India. The government describes it as a "graded response, an official level participation, not a political statement of mourning." By keeping the gesture bureaucratic and low key, New Delhi signals respect for diplomatic norms while avoiding a public position on the killing or the wider conflict involving Israel and the United States.

Rahul Shivshankar

380,857 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

⚡️ A teenager from Bashkiria who planned a terrorist attack in an Orthodox church on the orders of a handler from Ukraine has been detained by the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB). The 16-year-old suspect was recruited by an unknown individual going by the pseudonym "Mansur al-Ukraini", who is based in Ukraine. The minor conducted agitational conversations with his acquaintances, students and schoolmates, persuading them to join the terrorist organization "Islamic State", which is banned in Russia. He has been charged with the crimes of "aiding terrorist activities", "public calls for terrorist activities, public justification and propaganda of terrorism", and "participation in a terrorist organization". Extremist literature, symbols of the "Islamic State" and video instructions for making explosive devices were seized from him. *A terrorist organization banned in Russia. - AN
0:18

⚡️ A teenager from Bashkiria who planned a terrorist attack in an Orthodox church on the orders of a handler from Ukraine has been detained by the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB). The 16-year-old suspect was recruited by an unknown individual going by the pseudonym "Mansur al-Ukraini", who is based in Ukraine. The minor conducted agitational conversations with his acquaintances, students and schoolmates, persuading them to join the terrorist organization "Islamic State", which is banned in Russia. He has been charged with the crimes of "aiding terrorist activities", "public calls for terrorist activities, public justification and propaganda of terrorism", and "participation in a terrorist organization". Extremist literature, symbols of the "Islamic State" and video instructions for making explosive devices were seized from him. *A terrorist organization banned in Russia. - AN

Zlatti71

15,739 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Abdul El-Sayed on Meet the Press: 9/11 Comments Are Just “Dumb Things Said Out of Context” Michigan Democrat Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed sat down with NBC’s Meet the Press today and addressed questions about his campaign associations and policy plans. On Hasan Piker — who has previously said “America deserved 9/11” and has been involved with the campaign — El-Sayed downplayed the remark as just some “dumb thing somebody said out of context.” When asked if he planned to continue campaigning with him, he replied: “I’m less concerned now with who I’m campaigning with… I’m a lot more focused on who I’m campaigning to.” On his push for government-run healthcare, El-Sayed acknowledged the cost: Americans would “pay a little bit more in taxes.” He also offered this view of the current system: “I understand right now, though, that we don’t live under capitalism…” In short: He dismissed the 9/11 comment as no big deal, confirmed higher taxes for his healthcare plan, and said America doesn’t currently operate under capitalism. This is exactly the kind of candidate the Democrat Party should be moving away from.
0:15

Abdul El-Sayed on Meet the Press: 9/11 Comments Are Just “Dumb Things Said Out of Context” Michigan Democrat Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed sat down with NBC’s Meet the Press today and addressed questions about his campaign associations and policy plans. On Hasan Piker — who has previously said “America deserved 9/11” and has been involved with the campaign — El-Sayed downplayed the remark as just some “dumb thing somebody said out of context.” When asked if he planned to continue campaigning with him, he replied: “I’m less concerned now with who I’m campaigning with… I’m a lot more focused on who I’m campaigning to.” On his push for government-run healthcare, El-Sayed acknowledged the cost: Americans would “pay a little bit more in taxes.” He also offered this view of the current system: “I understand right now, though, that we don’t live under capitalism…” In short: He dismissed the 9/11 comment as no big deal, confirmed higher taxes for his healthcare plan, and said America doesn’t currently operate under capitalism. This is exactly the kind of candidate the Democrat Party should be moving away from.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

16,206 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

An update for everyone who is not in our Discord... Obviously we are still early in development, and our team has been working hard to release updates for everyone to see. We have a peak at the terrain, which is this picture is based of the North Dakota drift prairie, Great care, time and effort was put into the terrain to create smooth rolling hills, the road network in this region will be challenging, just as it is in real life. From Will The current state of the TIV2 model, which will include a lot more in depth details, From Jlkillen03 The stages of damage to a Blender made house, From Kunahic And how texturing will be used for assets like the interiors! From BSP
0:17

An update for everyone who is not in our Discord... Obviously we are still early in development, and our team has been working hard to release updates for everyone to see. We have a peak at the terrain, which is this picture is based of the North Dakota drift prairie, Great care, time and effort was put into the terrain to create smooth rolling hills, the road network in this region will be challenging, just as it is in real life. From Will The current state of the TIV2 model, which will include a lot more in depth details, From Jlkillen03 The stages of damage to a Blender made house, From Kunahic And how texturing will be used for assets like the interiors! From BSP

Severity

18,960 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

If you are using an if statement inside a for loop, did you know there's a better way of doing this is Swift? I'm talking about the where clause. Using the where clause in a for loop can provide several benefits over using an if statement inside a for loop: Readability: It explicitly states the condition that must be met for an element to be processed, making the purpose of the loop clearer to anyone reading the code. Efficiency: When using a where clause, the filtering of elements is done at the level of the sequence, which can be more efficient than filtering within the loop with an if statement. Brevity: Using a where clause often results in more concise code, as it eliminates the need for an if statement and associated braces. This can make the code more manageable and easier to maintain.
0:18

If you are using an if statement inside a for loop, did you know there's a better way of doing this is Swift? I'm talking about the where clause. Using the where clause in a for loop can provide several benefits over using an if statement inside a for loop: Readability: It explicitly states the condition that must be met for an element to be processed, making the purpose of the loop clearer to anyone reading the code. Efficiency: When using a where clause, the filtering of elements is done at the level of the sequence, which can be more efficient than filtering within the loop with an if statement. Brevity: Using a where clause often results in more concise code, as it eliminates the need for an if statement and associated braces. This can make the code more manageable and easier to maintain.

Everton Carneiro

23,416 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce