Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

BREAKING: Jack Smith just eviscerated the Republican talking point that Trump was protected by the First Amendment when he attempted to defraud the American people. “The First Amendment does not protect speech that facilitates a crime. Speech that is used to facilitate a crime — a fraud crime in...

EdKrassen's profile picture

Ed Krassenstein

1,097,628 subscribers

307,492 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Raskin: Is there a valid first amendment defense to violating the voting rights of the people and cheating the public out of a fair election? Smith: Speech that is used to facilitate a crime, a fraud crime in particular, is not protected under the first amendment.
1:45

Raskin: Is there a valid first amendment defense to violating the voting rights of the people and cheating the public out of a fair election? Smith: Speech that is used to facilitate a crime, a fraud crime in particular, is not protected under the first amendment.

Acyn

95,869 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Rep. Raskin: "[Congressional Republicans] have been saying that there's some kind of First Amendment defense that Donald Trump would have had to the crimes you indicted him for." Jack Smith: "The First Amendment does not protect speech that facilitates a crime."
1:44

Rep. Raskin: "[Congressional Republicans] have been saying that there's some kind of First Amendment defense that Donald Trump would have had to the crimes you indicted him for." Jack Smith: "The First Amendment does not protect speech that facilitates a crime."

Home of the Brave

25,066 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia explains why burning the American flag is protected free speech under the First Amendment: “If I were king, I would not allow people to go about burning the American flag. However, we have a First Amendment…”
1:24

Former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia explains why burning the American flag is protected free speech under the First Amendment: “If I were king, I would not allow people to go about burning the American flag. However, we have a First Amendment…”

Republicans against Trump

355,521 просмотров • 1 год назад

The Edmonds (WA) School District is hanging up signs that falsely claim "hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment."
6:15

The Edmonds (WA) School District is hanging up signs that falsely claim "hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment."

Brandi Kruse

34,205 просмотров • 1 год назад

The First Amendment was passed not to protect convenient speech, but to protect the speech that nobody wants to hear.
1:13

The First Amendment was passed not to protect convenient speech, but to protect the speech that nobody wants to hear.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr

831,924 просмотров • 1 год назад

Neera Tanden: "What could possibly be protected speech if not facts developed from evidence and crime statistics about governmental policies? It's hard to imagine what the First Amendment would protect if it doesn't protect speech like that."
0:37

Neera Tanden: "What could possibly be protected speech if not facts developed from evidence and crime statistics about governmental policies? It's hard to imagine what the First Amendment would protect if it doesn't protect speech like that."

Center for American Progress

13,685 просмотров • 9 дней назад

RFK Jr. blasts Governor Walz for not understanding the first amendment: “We’re in a very frightening time now where we are seeing the normalization of censorship. I saw this quote Governor Walz, said last year where he said that the First Amendment is not absolute, that it does not protect misinformation or disinformation, and he is legally wrong there, it does protect that. The First Amendment protects speech, true speech, and it protects lies. It protects good speech, and it protects bad speech. It protects all speech.” They didn't pass the First Amendment to protect speech that everybody likes. They passed it to protect the speech that's inconvenient, that's abhorrent, that nobody wants to hear, that's dangerous.” “Louis Brandeis said that the remedy for bad speech, the remedy for lies is not censorship, it's more speech. If we don't understand that, we will lose democracy for sure.”
2:43

RFK Jr. blasts Governor Walz for not understanding the first amendment: “We’re in a very frightening time now where we are seeing the normalization of censorship. I saw this quote Governor Walz, said last year where he said that the First Amendment is not absolute, that it does not protect misinformation or disinformation, and he is legally wrong there, it does protect that. The First Amendment protects speech, true speech, and it protects lies. It protects good speech, and it protects bad speech. It protects all speech.” They didn't pass the First Amendment to protect speech that everybody likes. They passed it to protect the speech that's inconvenient, that's abhorrent, that nobody wants to hear, that's dangerous.” “Louis Brandeis said that the remedy for bad speech, the remedy for lies is not censorship, it's more speech. If we don't understand that, we will lose democracy for sure.”

End Tribalism in Politics

261,846 просмотров • 2 лет назад

RFK Jr: “Tim Walz has said that he doesn't think that the First Amendment protects misinformation or disinformation, that the government gets to decide what kind of speech is protected.” “Kamala Harris has said the same thing; that if you promote misinformation we're going to punish you, you've abused your privilege. In other words to her, the First Amendment is a privilege not a right.” “When we give government the power to be the arbiter of what speech is protected and which isn't, then that is the end of democracy.”
1:23

RFK Jr: “Tim Walz has said that he doesn't think that the First Amendment protects misinformation or disinformation, that the government gets to decide what kind of speech is protected.” “Kamala Harris has said the same thing; that if you promote misinformation we're going to punish you, you've abused your privilege. In other words to her, the First Amendment is a privilege not a right.” “When we give government the power to be the arbiter of what speech is protected and which isn't, then that is the end of democracy.”

End Tribalism in Politics

187,411 просмотров • 1 год назад

The first amendment does not exist to protect polite speech that everyone agrees with. It exists to protect speech that people - or the government - find “offensive.” That’s the whole point. And that protection extends to Shiloh Hendrix.
2:00

The first amendment does not exist to protect polite speech that everyone agrees with. It exists to protect speech that people - or the government - find “offensive.” That’s the whole point. And that protection extends to Shiloh Hendrix.

Brittany Hughes

24,915 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Remember all of the people who were claiming that Trump can’t be held liable for January 6th because of “free speech?” Well Judge Chutkan just slammed the door on that defense, saying: “It is well established that the First Amendment does not protect speech that is used as an instrument of a crime, and consequently the Indictment — which charges Defendant with, among other things, making statements in furtherance of a crime — does not violate Defendant’s First Amendment rights.” The judge also shot down Trump’s argument that he can’t be charged for actions taken during his presidency, saying: “"Defendant’s four-year service as Commander in Chief did not bestow on him the divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his fellow citizens." Video per MSNBC
1:51

Remember all of the people who were claiming that Trump can’t be held liable for January 6th because of “free speech?” Well Judge Chutkan just slammed the door on that defense, saying: “It is well established that the First Amendment does not protect speech that is used as an instrument of a crime, and consequently the Indictment — which charges Defendant with, among other things, making statements in furtherance of a crime — does not violate Defendant’s First Amendment rights.” The judge also shot down Trump’s argument that he can’t be charged for actions taken during his presidency, saying: “"Defendant’s four-year service as Commander in Chief did not bestow on him the divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his fellow citizens." Video per MSNBC

Ed Krassenstein

1,344,083 просмотров • 2 лет назад

JUST IN: The ACLU is suing Louisiana over Act 399, which prohibits interference with ICE operations there. ACLU Louisiana: "Act 399 criminalizes first amendment protected speech by essentially suggesting that if anyone were to delay, thwart or interfere with border patrol agents trying to effect arrests of individuals, they could be charged with a crime. And the reason why we believe that this is a first amendment violation is because the words delay or interfere or thwart are very vague. And we believe that the attorney general is using this vagueness to intimidate, threaten, and chill first amendment speech." Apparently deporting illegal immigrants is unconstitutional. That makes sense, right???
0:42

JUST IN: The ACLU is suing Louisiana over Act 399, which prohibits interference with ICE operations there. ACLU Louisiana: "Act 399 criminalizes first amendment protected speech by essentially suggesting that if anyone were to delay, thwart or interfere with border patrol agents trying to effect arrests of individuals, they could be charged with a crime. And the reason why we believe that this is a first amendment violation is because the words delay or interfere or thwart are very vague. And we believe that the attorney general is using this vagueness to intimidate, threaten, and chill first amendment speech." Apparently deporting illegal immigrants is unconstitutional. That makes sense, right???

DeVory Darkins

23,022 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Attorney General Liz Murrill and I are at the Supreme Court today continuing the fight for our First Amendment rights! When the federal government silences American’s speech because they disagree with it—that is a clear violation of our First Amendment. #SCOTUS
1:03

Attorney General Liz Murrill and I are at the Supreme Court today continuing the fight for our First Amendment rights! When the federal government silences American’s speech because they disagree with it—that is a clear violation of our First Amendment. #SCOTUS

Governor Jeff Landry

12,520 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 This Should Terrify Every American Jack Smith’s newly released deposition isn’t just about Trump—it’s about you. He openly says calling the 2020 election fraudulent isn’t protected by the First Amendment. He labels political speech about an election as “fraud,” not free speech. That’s not law enforcement. That’s thought-policing. This isn’t a fringe topic—elections are the most protected political speech in America. If a special counsel can decide what opinions about an election are allowed, the First Amendment is already dead.
1:26

🚨 This Should Terrify Every American Jack Smith’s newly released deposition isn’t just about Trump—it’s about you. He openly says calling the 2020 election fraudulent isn’t protected by the First Amendment. He labels political speech about an election as “fraud,” not free speech. That’s not law enforcement. That’s thought-policing. This isn’t a fringe topic—elections are the most protected political speech in America. If a special counsel can decide what opinions about an election are allowed, the First Amendment is already dead.

Tom Renz

51,703 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Q: Isn't the First Amendment at risk when the FCC Chair tries to intimidate a news network over content that the state disagrees with? Pence: Well, the First Amendment protects against government censorship. The First Amendment does not protect entertainers
0:41

Q: Isn't the First Amendment at risk when the FCC Chair tries to intimidate a news network over content that the state disagrees with? Pence: Well, the First Amendment protects against government censorship. The First Amendment does not protect entertainers

FactPost

557,010 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Watch Rep. Randy Fine Call For Five Years In Jail For Antisemitic Free Speech He Says "Conduct" Is Not Protected By The First Amendment & Wants Hate Speech To Be A Felony
1:50

Watch Rep. Randy Fine Call For Five Years In Jail For Antisemitic Free Speech He Says "Conduct" Is Not Protected By The First Amendment & Wants Hate Speech To Be A Felony

Alex Jones

393,175 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: A veteran was just arrested outside the White House for burning the American flag. In 1989, the Supreme Court ruled flag burning is protected speech under the First Amendment. Trump’s crackdown doesn’t override the Constitution, it violates it. If we’re locking up veterans for expression, we’re not defending America. We’re impersonating China.
1:47

🚨BREAKING: A veteran was just arrested outside the White House for burning the American flag. In 1989, the Supreme Court ruled flag burning is protected speech under the First Amendment. Trump’s crackdown doesn’t override the Constitution, it violates it. If we’re locking up veterans for expression, we’re not defending America. We’re impersonating China.

Brian Allen

553,324 просмотров • 1 год назад

Court issues a ruling for AI generated Csam material is protected under the first Amendment.
2:05

Sensitive content

Court issues a ruling for AI generated Csam material is protected under the first Amendment.

JOKAMRREDPILLZ

22,707 просмотров • 1 день назад

Don Lemon and the First Amendment — What It Does Not Protect The First Amendment protects speech — not trespass, intimidation, or the disruption of religious worship. This post examines conduct shown on video and the legal boundaries that apply.
2:59

Don Lemon and the First Amendment — What It Does Not Protect The First Amendment protects speech — not trespass, intimidation, or the disruption of religious worship. This post examines conduct shown on video and the legal boundaries that apply.

DeepFakeQuotes

35,009 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад