Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

BREAKING🚨 JPMorgan Allegedly Participating In Market Manipulation In 2017, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said bitcoin is a ‘fraud’, then JPMorgan bought bitcoin when it dropped over 20% that weekend NOW, JPMORGAN MANIPULATION STRIKES AGAIN… JPMorgan sells shares of $MSTR, increases margin req. from 50-95%, pushes for Strategy’s exclusion from...

xMarketNews's profile picture

X Market News🚨

50,320 subscribers

66,215 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаФинансы
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Ripple CEO Blasts JPMorgan: Intentional misrepresentation to protect profits On June 11, 2026, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse Brad Garlinghouse responded to JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon's opposition to the Clarity Act during an interview on Fox Business. Garlinghouse stated that Dimon has been dismissing the crypto industry for decades, calling it a Ponzi scheme and Bitcoin a "pet rock." He believes that since JPMorgan generates $20 billion in revenue and over $5 billion in profit from its payments business, Dimon's attempt to block the bill is essentially to dig a deeper moat to protect this highly profitable business and maintain the status quo. Furthermore, Garlinghouse believes Dimon's claim that the bill would reduce compliance requirements is completely untrue, characterizing it as either an intentional misrepresentation or highly negligent to make support for the act go away.
1:19

Ripple CEO Blasts JPMorgan: Intentional misrepresentation to protect profits On June 11, 2026, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse Brad Garlinghouse responded to JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon's opposition to the Clarity Act during an interview on Fox Business. Garlinghouse stated that Dimon has been dismissing the crypto industry for decades, calling it a Ponzi scheme and Bitcoin a "pet rock." He believes that since JPMorgan generates $20 billion in revenue and over $5 billion in profit from its payments business, Dimon's attempt to block the bill is essentially to dig a deeper moat to protect this highly profitable business and maintain the status quo. Furthermore, Garlinghouse believes Dimon's claim that the bill would reduce compliance requirements is completely untrue, characterizing it as either an intentional misrepresentation or highly negligent to make support for the act go away.

Wu Blockchain

16,619 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN : JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon rocks the crypto world, stating he would "close down" #Bitcoin & crypto if he were the government. "The only true use case for it is criminals, drug traffickers, money laundering, tax avoidance." Amidst headlines like these, it's crucial to consider perspectives from the other side of the debate… Here’s a video of Former US Comptroller Brian Brooks, flipping the narrative & shedding light on crypto's mission to replace traditional banks. 🏦💡 💥 As you watch the video, consider the events of 2020 between Ripple and the SEC, focusing on Ripple's pursuit of the on-demand liquidity market. Could this be the reason companies like JP Morgan are against #Bitcoin & #Crypto ? Comment Below 👇 #CryptoDebate #JamieDimon #BrianBrooks #BTC #XRP
1:41

🚨 JUST IN : JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon rocks the crypto world, stating he would "close down" #Bitcoin & crypto if he were the government. "The only true use case for it is criminals, drug traffickers, money laundering, tax avoidance." Amidst headlines like these, it's crucial to consider perspectives from the other side of the debate… Here’s a video of Former US Comptroller Brian Brooks, flipping the narrative & shedding light on crypto's mission to replace traditional banks. 🏦💡 💥 As you watch the video, consider the events of 2020 between Ripple and the SEC, focusing on Ripple's pursuit of the on-demand liquidity market. Could this be the reason companies like JP Morgan are against #Bitcoin & #Crypto ? Comment Below 👇 #CryptoDebate #JamieDimon #BrianBrooks #BTC #XRP

Good Evening Crypto

51,908 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 THE SILVER LIE THAT HOLDS UP THE WAR MACHINE Andy Schectman just said something that should terrify anyone paying attention. For 30–40 years, just 8 Western banks have held the largest concentrated short position of any commodity in COMEX history — and it isn’t oil… it isn’t gold… It’s silver. Not because of jewellery. Not because of coins. Because silver is the bloodstream of modern warfare. Every cruise missile. Every F-35. Every stealth bomber. Every submarine. Every drone. They all depend on silver. So what do BlackRock and JPMorgan do? They crush the price. They flood the market with paper silver. They sell the same bars over and over. So the military-industrial complex gets the most strategic metal on Earth cheap. JPMorgan was caught. They paid $920 million for manipulating the metals market — the biggest fine in history. And who holds the world’s largest silver trust? JPMorgan… and BlackRock. The same BlackRock that now gets the reconstruction contracts for Ukraine after the bombs go off. That isn’t capitalism. That is war financing through market manipulation. But here’s the twist… The Global South just called their bluff. Instead of taking paper IOUs, they are now saying: “Give us the metal.” And suddenly the vaults are empty. The silver is gone. The entire system was built on pretending the bars were there… Until someone actually asked for them. This isn’t a trade. This is a quiet collapse of Western financial and military dominance — and almost nobody is talking about it. Except Andy Schectman. Miles Franklin Precious Metals Andy Schectman
2:09

🚨 THE SILVER LIE THAT HOLDS UP THE WAR MACHINE Andy Schectman just said something that should terrify anyone paying attention. For 30–40 years, just 8 Western banks have held the largest concentrated short position of any commodity in COMEX history — and it isn’t oil… it isn’t gold… It’s silver. Not because of jewellery. Not because of coins. Because silver is the bloodstream of modern warfare. Every cruise missile. Every F-35. Every stealth bomber. Every submarine. Every drone. They all depend on silver. So what do BlackRock and JPMorgan do? They crush the price. They flood the market with paper silver. They sell the same bars over and over. So the military-industrial complex gets the most strategic metal on Earth cheap. JPMorgan was caught. They paid $920 million for manipulating the metals market — the biggest fine in history. And who holds the world’s largest silver trust? JPMorgan… and BlackRock. The same BlackRock that now gets the reconstruction contracts for Ukraine after the bombs go off. That isn’t capitalism. That is war financing through market manipulation. But here’s the twist… The Global South just called their bluff. Instead of taking paper IOUs, they are now saying: “Give us the metal.” And suddenly the vaults are empty. The silver is gone. The entire system was built on pretending the bars were there… Until someone actually asked for them. This isn’t a trade. This is a quiet collapse of Western financial and military dominance — and almost nobody is talking about it. Except Andy Schectman. Miles Franklin Precious Metals Andy Schectman

Jim Ferguson

182,569 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Michael Saylor: We Sold Bitcoin to Prove It Wouldn't Crash the Market Strategy founder Michael Saylor Michael Saylor said in an August 6 interview with The Diary Of A CEO that the market believed Strategy could not sell Bitcoin because doing so might cause BTC to crash, leaving the company trapped in a "doom loop" of repeatedly selling equity to pay dividends. To break that narrative, Strategy sold Bitcoin when BTC was trading at around $59,000 to $60,000, and the price instead moved higher. Saylor said the company's break-even point is about 3.2%, meaning that if Bitcoin appreciates by that amount, Strategy can sell part of its BTC to pay dividends without continuing to sell equity.
2:23

Michael Saylor: We Sold Bitcoin to Prove It Wouldn't Crash the Market Strategy founder Michael Saylor Michael Saylor said in an August 6 interview with The Diary Of A CEO that the market believed Strategy could not sell Bitcoin because doing so might cause BTC to crash, leaving the company trapped in a "doom loop" of repeatedly selling equity to pay dividends. To break that narrative, Strategy sold Bitcoin when BTC was trading at around $59,000 to $60,000, and the price instead moved higher. Saylor said the company's break-even point is about 3.2%, meaning that if Bitcoin appreciates by that amount, Strategy can sell part of its BTC to pay dividends without continuing to sell equity.

Wu Blockchain

22,843 просмотров • 25 дней назад

📺 The Bitcoin For Corporations Show Episode 8 now live — hosted by Pierre Rochard Phong Le, CEO of Strategy, shares how MSTR became the world’s first Bitcoin-native public company—and why it’s more than just a software stock. From capital markets to balance sheet strategy, Phong lays out the new rules of valuation in the #Bitcoin era. 00:00 – Intro: How to Value a Bitcoin Treasury Company 01:28 – Phong Le on Strategy’s Bitcoin Thesis 04:45 – Why MSTR Isn’t Just a Tech Stock Anymore 08:12 – The Role of FASB Accounting in Bitcoin Adoption 11:39 – Capital Markets: Equity, Debt & Bitcoin 15:20 – Convertible Bonds & Leveraged Bitcoin Exposure 19:05 – What Investors Miss When Valuing MSTR 23:34 – How Institutions View Bitcoin 27:48 – Risks, Volatility, and Shareholder Expectations 32:15 – Bitcoin’s Role in Long-Term Corporate Strategy 36:20 – Advice for Other Bitcoin Treasury Companies 39:12 – Building a Bitcoin-Backed Capital Market 43:10 – Addressing Bitcoin Volatility 46:00 – Why STRF Is Gaining Market Traction 48:30 – Final Thoughts from Phong Le
1:05:02

📺 The Bitcoin For Corporations Show Episode 8 now live — hosted by Pierre Rochard Phong Le, CEO of Strategy, shares how MSTR became the world’s first Bitcoin-native public company—and why it’s more than just a software stock. From capital markets to balance sheet strategy, Phong lays out the new rules of valuation in the #Bitcoin era. 00:00 – Intro: How to Value a Bitcoin Treasury Company 01:28 – Phong Le on Strategy’s Bitcoin Thesis 04:45 – Why MSTR Isn’t Just a Tech Stock Anymore 08:12 – The Role of FASB Accounting in Bitcoin Adoption 11:39 – Capital Markets: Equity, Debt & Bitcoin 15:20 – Convertible Bonds & Leveraged Bitcoin Exposure 19:05 – What Investors Miss When Valuing MSTR 23:34 – How Institutions View Bitcoin 27:48 – Risks, Volatility, and Shareholder Expectations 32:15 – Bitcoin’s Role in Long-Term Corporate Strategy 36:20 – Advice for Other Bitcoin Treasury Companies 39:12 – Building a Bitcoin-Backed Capital Market 43:10 – Addressing Bitcoin Volatility 46:00 – Why STRF Is Gaining Market Traction 48:30 – Final Thoughts from Phong Le

Bitcoin For Corporations

237,146 просмотров • 1 год назад

Making Sense Of Strategy What is happening with $MSTR? If you’ve been following me on X for any meaningful length of time, you will know that I have been attempting to calibrate people’s expectations of the stock's performance for the best part of 2025. Here I have synthesised all of my thoughts and distilled them into a single video. If you prefer YouTube, you can watch it here: If you prefer written format, continue reading. The first thing we need to understand is what Strategy is and why people invest in it. Strategy At the highest level, Strategy is leveraged Bitcoin. That’s it. Strategy leverages debt to acquire more Bitcoin. Therefore, the main reason you invest in Strategy is because you want to outperform Bitcoin. The only thing better than Bitcoin is more Bitcoin. The second thing we need to understand is mNAV. mNAV Generally speaking for a pure-play Bitcoin Treasury Company like Strategy, mNAV is a reflection of the market's expectation of future Bitcoin Yield. Bitcoin Yield comes with diminishing returns because each additional Bitcoin purchase contributes less to Bitcoin Per Share. Thus, the larger your Bitcoin stack, the harder it becomes to generate Bitcoin Yield and by extension the harder it becomes to outperform Bitcoin. This is why on a Bitcoin Standard, over a long enough time horizon, mNAV trends towards 1 since the maximum amount of Bitcoin you can own is 21M. With all this in mind, why is Strategy trading where it is and why is it trading at such a low mNAV? There are a few reasons. 1. Strategy Is A Different Company In 2025 Firstly, Strategy is a totally different company in 2025 to the one it was in 2020. For context, believe it or not, the company only introduced Bitcoin Yield and Bitcoin Per Share in the July 2024 Q2 Earnings Call and so it was only after that that they began optimising for those metrics. In my view, that is also when Michael Saylor truly started to understand the opportunity that was in front of him, which is why in October 2024 we saw Strategy announce the 21/21 plan which became the catalyst for the parabolic run we saw in November 2024 where $MSTR went on to briefly hit an all-time-high of around $550. Since people are comparing $MSTR this cycle to the $MSTR of last cycle when it briefly traded at an mNAV of over 8x, it is distorting their expectations. Again, Strategy is a totally different company today with a totally different set of dynamics. 2. New Industry Secondly, we need to recognise that the Bitcoin Treasury Company industry is entirely new which means that the market has been forced to learn and adapt in real-time. With Strategy being the first and by far the largest Bitcoin Treasury Company, it has gained a disproportionate amount of attention and as a result it has attracted a disproportionate amount of speculative capital along the way while everyone has been trying to figure out how to value it. Consequently, in my view, the move we saw in November 2024 was an over-correction to the upside — which by the way coincided with Bitcoin’s parabolic run following Donald Trump’s election win — and what we’re now seeing is an over-correction to the downside. 3. Bitcoin Yield Thirdly, as I mentioned at the beginning, Bitcoin Treasury Companies are currently valued based on how much Bitcoin Yield they are expected to generate in the future. At the time of recording, Strategy currently holds precisely 637,460 Bitcoin — that’s over 3% of the total Bitcoin supply — which means that it is much, much harder to generate meaningful Bitcoin Yield, which again is why we’re seeing the mNAV compress. However, there is a caveat here. There is another metric that Strategy have introduced which is Bitcoin $ Gain. Bitcoin $ Gain is defined as the $ value of newly acquired Bitcoin within any period. Strategy — and I don’t blame them — have been attempting to encourage the market to interpret Bitcoin $ Gain as “earnings” and to value the company based on how much earnings it is expected to generate in the future. For full disclosure, I personally dislike Bitcoin $ Gain as a valuation metric. I think framing it as “earnings” is misleading and disingenuous. I understand why it has been introduced because it speaks the language of Wall Street. However, traditional earnings are final. Bitcoin $ Gain is not because it is forever subject to the price of Bitcoin. Therefore, for Bitcoin $ Gain to be embraced by Wall Street, the market must collectively agree that Bitcoin is going up forever. I remain very sceptical of that happening — especially in the short-to-medium term. However, I am also not attached to my beliefs and so if Wall Street does decide to embrace Bitcoin $ Gain as its primary valuation metric, then $MSTR is likely undervalued by a factor of 5-10x. If not, then $MSTR is likely undervalued by a factor of 1-2x. If you’re not content with the latter being the worst case scenario, then the stock probably isn’t for you. 4. Preferred Products Fourthly, the Strategy thesis right now revolves entirely around the success of its preferred products. Remember, Michael Saylor wants Strategy to become the Amazon of the fixed income market. Thus, we’re not talking about a small innovation here — we are talking about completely transforming global finance. This means that the process of generating awareness and educating the market that will ultimately drive demand for these products is going to take years — not months — which is why you need to have a long time-horizon. Presently, the market is completely discounting the success of Strategy’s preferred products. What it’s not factoring in however is that the capital markets are desperate for yield right now. Thus, when — not if — but when, they eventually wake up to Bitcoin, how do you think they’re going to get that yield? Who is going to be the entity that is offering Bitcoin-backed credit instruments at scale? The answer is obviously Strategy, but again, this is a 5-to-10 year and beyond story. So with all that said, if you’re reading this right now, what should you do? Valuing Strategy There are 3 steps you need to take: 1. Firstly, you need to define your time horizon. In other words, how long do you intend on holding the stock for? 2. Secondly, you need to estimate either — depending on your preferred metric — how much Bitcoin Yield or how much Bitcoin $ Gain you expect Strategy to generate during that period and then calculate how much you expect $MSTR to outperform Bitcoin based on those values. 3. Thirdly, ask yourself whether you’d be satisfied with the level of outperformance you have calculated? In other words, is the trade-off worth it? Or would you be better off investing in either spot Bitcoin, an alternative Bitcoin Treasury Company or a Bitcoin ETF. If you’re satisfied with the level of outperformance that you’ve calculated, then $MSTR it probably a good choice of investment for you. If you're not satisfied, then $MSTR is probably a bad choice of investment for you. I personally believe that $MSTR will outperform Bitcoin by a minimum factor of 1-2x over the next 5/10 years and potentially much more if Bitcoin $ Gain becomes the primary metric by which it is valued, but again, I remain sceptical of that happening. Regardless, the best is yet to come.
11:54

Making Sense Of Strategy What is happening with $MSTR? If you’ve been following me on X for any meaningful length of time, you will know that I have been attempting to calibrate people’s expectations of the stock's performance for the best part of 2025. Here I have synthesised all of my thoughts and distilled them into a single video. If you prefer YouTube, you can watch it here: If you prefer written format, continue reading. The first thing we need to understand is what Strategy is and why people invest in it. Strategy At the highest level, Strategy is leveraged Bitcoin. That’s it. Strategy leverages debt to acquire more Bitcoin. Therefore, the main reason you invest in Strategy is because you want to outperform Bitcoin. The only thing better than Bitcoin is more Bitcoin. The second thing we need to understand is mNAV. mNAV Generally speaking for a pure-play Bitcoin Treasury Company like Strategy, mNAV is a reflection of the market's expectation of future Bitcoin Yield. Bitcoin Yield comes with diminishing returns because each additional Bitcoin purchase contributes less to Bitcoin Per Share. Thus, the larger your Bitcoin stack, the harder it becomes to generate Bitcoin Yield and by extension the harder it becomes to outperform Bitcoin. This is why on a Bitcoin Standard, over a long enough time horizon, mNAV trends towards 1 since the maximum amount of Bitcoin you can own is 21M. With all this in mind, why is Strategy trading where it is and why is it trading at such a low mNAV? There are a few reasons. 1. Strategy Is A Different Company In 2025 Firstly, Strategy is a totally different company in 2025 to the one it was in 2020. For context, believe it or not, the company only introduced Bitcoin Yield and Bitcoin Per Share in the July 2024 Q2 Earnings Call and so it was only after that that they began optimising for those metrics. In my view, that is also when Michael Saylor truly started to understand the opportunity that was in front of him, which is why in October 2024 we saw Strategy announce the 21/21 plan which became the catalyst for the parabolic run we saw in November 2024 where $MSTR went on to briefly hit an all-time-high of around $550. Since people are comparing $MSTR this cycle to the $MSTR of last cycle when it briefly traded at an mNAV of over 8x, it is distorting their expectations. Again, Strategy is a totally different company today with a totally different set of dynamics. 2. New Industry Secondly, we need to recognise that the Bitcoin Treasury Company industry is entirely new which means that the market has been forced to learn and adapt in real-time. With Strategy being the first and by far the largest Bitcoin Treasury Company, it has gained a disproportionate amount of attention and as a result it has attracted a disproportionate amount of speculative capital along the way while everyone has been trying to figure out how to value it. Consequently, in my view, the move we saw in November 2024 was an over-correction to the upside — which by the way coincided with Bitcoin’s parabolic run following Donald Trump’s election win — and what we’re now seeing is an over-correction to the downside. 3. Bitcoin Yield Thirdly, as I mentioned at the beginning, Bitcoin Treasury Companies are currently valued based on how much Bitcoin Yield they are expected to generate in the future. At the time of recording, Strategy currently holds precisely 637,460 Bitcoin — that’s over 3% of the total Bitcoin supply — which means that it is much, much harder to generate meaningful Bitcoin Yield, which again is why we’re seeing the mNAV compress. However, there is a caveat here. There is another metric that Strategy have introduced which is Bitcoin $ Gain. Bitcoin $ Gain is defined as the $ value of newly acquired Bitcoin within any period. Strategy — and I don’t blame them — have been attempting to encourage the market to interpret Bitcoin $ Gain as “earnings” and to value the company based on how much earnings it is expected to generate in the future. For full disclosure, I personally dislike Bitcoin $ Gain as a valuation metric. I think framing it as “earnings” is misleading and disingenuous. I understand why it has been introduced because it speaks the language of Wall Street. However, traditional earnings are final. Bitcoin $ Gain is not because it is forever subject to the price of Bitcoin. Therefore, for Bitcoin $ Gain to be embraced by Wall Street, the market must collectively agree that Bitcoin is going up forever. I remain very sceptical of that happening — especially in the short-to-medium term. However, I am also not attached to my beliefs and so if Wall Street does decide to embrace Bitcoin $ Gain as its primary valuation metric, then $MSTR is likely undervalued by a factor of 5-10x. If not, then $MSTR is likely undervalued by a factor of 1-2x. If you’re not content with the latter being the worst case scenario, then the stock probably isn’t for you. 4. Preferred Products Fourthly, the Strategy thesis right now revolves entirely around the success of its preferred products. Remember, Michael Saylor wants Strategy to become the Amazon of the fixed income market. Thus, we’re not talking about a small innovation here — we are talking about completely transforming global finance. This means that the process of generating awareness and educating the market that will ultimately drive demand for these products is going to take years — not months — which is why you need to have a long time-horizon. Presently, the market is completely discounting the success of Strategy’s preferred products. What it’s not factoring in however is that the capital markets are desperate for yield right now. Thus, when — not if — but when, they eventually wake up to Bitcoin, how do you think they’re going to get that yield? Who is going to be the entity that is offering Bitcoin-backed credit instruments at scale? The answer is obviously Strategy, but again, this is a 5-to-10 year and beyond story. So with all that said, if you’re reading this right now, what should you do? Valuing Strategy There are 3 steps you need to take: 1. Firstly, you need to define your time horizon. In other words, how long do you intend on holding the stock for? 2. Secondly, you need to estimate either — depending on your preferred metric — how much Bitcoin Yield or how much Bitcoin $ Gain you expect Strategy to generate during that period and then calculate how much you expect $MSTR to outperform Bitcoin based on those values. 3. Thirdly, ask yourself whether you’d be satisfied with the level of outperformance you have calculated? In other words, is the trade-off worth it? Or would you be better off investing in either spot Bitcoin, an alternative Bitcoin Treasury Company or a Bitcoin ETF. If you’re satisfied with the level of outperformance that you’ve calculated, then $MSTR it probably a good choice of investment for you. If you're not satisfied, then $MSTR is probably a bad choice of investment for you. I personally believe that $MSTR will outperform Bitcoin by a minimum factor of 1-2x over the next 5/10 years and potentially much more if Bitcoin $ Gain becomes the primary metric by which it is valued, but again, I remain sceptical of that happening. Regardless, the best is yet to come.

Chris Millas

36,835 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon on why he rejected Jeff Bezos offer to be CEO of Amazon: "I loved what he did, it just was beyond - I spent my whole life in financial services - it's a little bit like playing tennis your whole life and then going to play golf" this is him telling how he invested $60M into a dying bank - that is now JPMorgan - after being fired from Citigroup Citigroup fired him after 17 years - he calls it "a hell of a run - and then he fired me" he called them a year later - lunch at the Four Seasons: "I said you did the wrong thing for the company - and here are the mistakes I made" why he took a dying bank instead: "thirty major financial companies - four or five change CEO in a four year period - one goes outside - and it's probably going to be a troubled one" "I put a lot of my money into it - not because the stock was cheap. I wear the damn jersey - I'm not a hired gun" that dying bank became JPMorgan - now the largest in America, worth twice its nearest competitor save this - the best biography of one of the greatest on Wall Street
18:53

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon on why he rejected Jeff Bezos offer to be CEO of Amazon: "I loved what he did, it just was beyond - I spent my whole life in financial services - it's a little bit like playing tennis your whole life and then going to play golf" this is him telling how he invested $60M into a dying bank - that is now JPMorgan - after being fired from Citigroup Citigroup fired him after 17 years - he calls it "a hell of a run - and then he fired me" he called them a year later - lunch at the Four Seasons: "I said you did the wrong thing for the company - and here are the mistakes I made" why he took a dying bank instead: "thirty major financial companies - four or five change CEO in a four year period - one goes outside - and it's probably going to be a troubled one" "I put a lot of my money into it - not because the stock was cheap. I wear the damn jersey - I'm not a hired gun" that dying bank became JPMorgan - now the largest in America, worth twice its nearest competitor save this - the best biography of one of the greatest on Wall Street

bodila

722,513 просмотров • 25 дней назад

🚨 THE CRASH IS NOT STOPPING AND MICHAEL SAYLOR IS NOW IN REAL TROUBLE. Bitcoin just crashed nearly -5% in 30 minutes. $BTC hit a NEW 21-MONTH LOW. $STRC collapsed to a NEW ALL-TIME LOW. $MSTR is already down over -83% from its peaK. Read that again. Bitcoin is breaking down. STRC is breaking down. MSTR is breaking down. All at the same time. This is no longer just a crypto dump. This is the market starting to ask the question nobody wanted to ask: Could Strategy eventually be forced to sell Bitcoin? Because if liquidity keeps disappearing… Saylor’s Bitcoin empire becomes the next domino. Keep in mind: I’ve called every major market top and bottom for over 10 YEARS. I was one of the only people who called the top in October, and I’ll do it again, that’s literally my job. If you still haven’t followed me, you’ll regret it.
0:35

🚨 THE CRASH IS NOT STOPPING AND MICHAEL SAYLOR IS NOW IN REAL TROUBLE. Bitcoin just crashed nearly -5% in 30 minutes. $BTC hit a NEW 21-MONTH LOW. $STRC collapsed to a NEW ALL-TIME LOW. $MSTR is already down over -83% from its peaK. Read that again. Bitcoin is breaking down. STRC is breaking down. MSTR is breaking down. All at the same time. This is no longer just a crypto dump. This is the market starting to ask the question nobody wanted to ask: Could Strategy eventually be forced to sell Bitcoin? Because if liquidity keeps disappearing… Saylor’s Bitcoin empire becomes the next domino. Keep in mind: I’ve called every major market top and bottom for over 10 YEARS. I was one of the only people who called the top in October, and I’ll do it again, that’s literally my job. If you still haven’t followed me, you’ll regret it.

DANNY

120,254 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

CEO Jamie Dimon of J.P. Morgan Chase told me to bring it on regarding the DEI fight, so I brought it. I went on the same network he did and laid out how JPMorgan Chase has: • Sponsored an event for Dylan Mulvaney to speak to "LGBTQ youth" • Pledged $30 BILLION to "racial equity" • Trained staff with the "genderbread person" • Run racist internship programs • Not listed in the segment but noteworthy is that JPMorgan Chase sponsored a mentorship program where mentors were told that they could hide gender identity information from the parents of kids they mentored • JPMorgan has also worked with the explicitly anti-Trump HRC who’ve forced the trans agenda into every workplace There’s MUCH more to come in terms of crazy things JPMC has been involved with but Jamie said to bring it so I challenged him to come on CNBC to defend these policies. So far his office has given media "no comment" on joining for a debate. Alternatively if Jamie is unwilling to do a debate, I’m happy to privately walk him through the plethora of insane policies that have been shared with us. He’s either woke or has no idea what’s going on within the DEI programs at his company.
10:29

CEO Jamie Dimon of J.P. Morgan Chase told me to bring it on regarding the DEI fight, so I brought it. I went on the same network he did and laid out how JPMorgan Chase has: • Sponsored an event for Dylan Mulvaney to speak to "LGBTQ youth" • Pledged $30 BILLION to "racial equity" • Trained staff with the "genderbread person" • Run racist internship programs • Not listed in the segment but noteworthy is that JPMorgan Chase sponsored a mentorship program where mentors were told that they could hide gender identity information from the parents of kids they mentored • JPMorgan has also worked with the explicitly anti-Trump HRC who’ve forced the trans agenda into every workplace There’s MUCH more to come in terms of crazy things JPMC has been involved with but Jamie said to bring it so I challenged him to come on CNBC to defend these policies. So far his office has given media "no comment" on joining for a debate. Alternatively if Jamie is unwilling to do a debate, I’m happy to privately walk him through the plethora of insane policies that have been shared with us. He’s either woke or has no idea what’s going on within the DEI programs at his company.

Robby Starbuck

412,233 просмотров • 1 год назад

Classic Market Manipulation. The Trump administration not only insider trades, but they manipulate the markets for personal profits. For anyone that doesn understand this, let me explain. Lets say the price of Bitcoin was $70,000 right now..... Barron could buy $10,000,000 in Bitcoin then get his dad to speak about Bitcoin positively in an interview, before this happens Barron uses his Bitcoin to bet that the price will increase with Leverage, He bets with the Power of $100,000,000 that the price will increase. Trump comes out in an interview and say the US will invest heavily in crypto currencies, crypto is the future ect... The price of Bitcoin instantly spikes to $80,000. Barron would profit $14.29M from that trade, then again they could do it the opposite way. They can short the market betting the price will go down, Buys 10 mill of Bitcoin, Shorts with Leverage. Trump comes out and says that the Crypto Clarity act may not pass, Bitcoin Price crashes, Barron Profits. We have seen the Trump administration do this already with Oil Prices with Barron making oil trades to the tune of $50 Million dollars just days before Trump invaded Iran and made Oil Prices spike. Every single one of these people need to go to jail.
0:36

Classic Market Manipulation. The Trump administration not only insider trades, but they manipulate the markets for personal profits. For anyone that doesn understand this, let me explain. Lets say the price of Bitcoin was $70,000 right now..... Barron could buy $10,000,000 in Bitcoin then get his dad to speak about Bitcoin positively in an interview, before this happens Barron uses his Bitcoin to bet that the price will increase with Leverage, He bets with the Power of $100,000,000 that the price will increase. Trump comes out in an interview and say the US will invest heavily in crypto currencies, crypto is the future ect... The price of Bitcoin instantly spikes to $80,000. Barron would profit $14.29M from that trade, then again they could do it the opposite way. They can short the market betting the price will go down, Buys 10 mill of Bitcoin, Shorts with Leverage. Trump comes out and says that the Crypto Clarity act may not pass, Bitcoin Price crashes, Barron Profits. We have seen the Trump administration do this already with Oil Prices with Barron making oil trades to the tune of $50 Million dollars just days before Trump invaded Iran and made Oil Prices spike. Every single one of these people need to go to jail.

Bricktop_NAFO

102,303 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This week Jordi Visser breaks down why the AI trade already bottomed, how bitcoin fits into the future of markets, and why companies like $FIGR are outgrowing legacy banks like JPMorgan. We also discuss inflation, the AI IPO wave with Anthropic and OpenAI, and how AI is reshaping everyday life...from raising kids to running a household. YouTube: Apple: Spotify: TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 - Intro 0:50- Why stocks keep climbing despite AI fears 2:41 - Jordy's AI portfolio & calling market bottoms 7:05 - Inflation report & the Bayesian mindset 11:27 - Figure Technologies & the tokenization boom 19:47 - Why JPMorgan and legacy banks are at risk 24:18 - Bitcoin is the "S&P 500 of ten years from now" 26:14 - Anthropic, OpenAI & the AI IPO wave 31:25 - AI goes mainstream: his wife & raising kids in the AI era 42:43 - ICE deportations & the inflation debate 47:47 - Politics, protests & the AI data center fight 55:50 - Jordi’s weekly videos & how you can help him
59:09

This week Jordi Visser breaks down why the AI trade already bottomed, how bitcoin fits into the future of markets, and why companies like $FIGR are outgrowing legacy banks like JPMorgan. We also discuss inflation, the AI IPO wave with Anthropic and OpenAI, and how AI is reshaping everyday life...from raising kids to running a household. YouTube: Apple: Spotify: TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 - Intro 0:50- Why stocks keep climbing despite AI fears 2:41 - Jordy's AI portfolio & calling market bottoms 7:05 - Inflation report & the Bayesian mindset 11:27 - Figure Technologies & the tokenization boom 19:47 - Why JPMorgan and legacy banks are at risk 24:18 - Bitcoin is the "S&P 500 of ten years from now" 26:14 - Anthropic, OpenAI & the AI IPO wave 31:25 - AI goes mainstream: his wife & raising kids in the AI era 42:43 - ICE deportations & the inflation debate 47:47 - Politics, protests & the AI data center fight 55:50 - Jordi’s weekly videos & how you can help him

Anthony Pompliano 🌪

78,128 просмотров • 18 дней назад

THIS IS PURE MANIPULATION ON $BTC 🚨 PROOF in the video 👇 I think market is playing with the new retailers coming in with anticipation of Trump's Inauguration ceremony. Position yourself smartly, and we have always seen that when prices go down back to back - FUD is shown to us. What if they create FUD on selling Silk Road Bitcoins, and dump it, Then, Trump announces during the inauguration ceremony that his government would buy back those sold $BTC in reserves. When the price starts going up we get back-to-back positive news. $ETH is at major zone, and crypto is a major part of Trump's election victory. Major support on ETH is till 2800 zone. On Bitcoin, we have 90800 and 89900 for now. Breaking that we can see a test of 87k zone, still very normal. Silk Road Bitcoin wallet address : #Bitcoin #Crypto
7:46

THIS IS PURE MANIPULATION ON $BTC 🚨 PROOF in the video 👇 I think market is playing with the new retailers coming in with anticipation of Trump's Inauguration ceremony. Position yourself smartly, and we have always seen that when prices go down back to back - FUD is shown to us. What if they create FUD on selling Silk Road Bitcoins, and dump it, Then, Trump announces during the inauguration ceremony that his government would buy back those sold $BTC in reserves. When the price starts going up we get back-to-back positive news. $ETH is at major zone, and crypto is a major part of Trump's election victory. Major support on ETH is till 2800 zone. On Bitcoin, we have 90800 and 89900 for now. Breaking that we can see a test of 87k zone, still very normal. Silk Road Bitcoin wallet address : #Bitcoin #Crypto

Karan Singh Arora

56,964 просмотров • 1 год назад

“There was never any talk of the risk.” Peter Schiff is just lying at this point. The risk of $STRC was always obvious: it is preferred equity issued by a Bitcoin Treasury Company. Saylor said it clearly: if Bitcoin goes down long term or forever, that is the risk. And what are we seeing now? Bitcoin under pressure. Liquidity rotated into AI and IPOs. Maximum fear. STRC down. That is not some hidden scandal. That is risk premium repricing. Strategy does not magically control STRC’s market price. They can adjust the dividend rate, but the market prices the risk of Bitcoin and Strategy’s ability to keep paying dividends. And when Bitcoin starts going up again, what do you think happens? The same risk premium reprices in the other direction. If you buy preferred equity in a Bitcoin company, you are making one core assumption: Bitcoin goes up over the long term. That was never hidden.
0:42

“There was never any talk of the risk.” Peter Schiff is just lying at this point. The risk of $STRC was always obvious: it is preferred equity issued by a Bitcoin Treasury Company. Saylor said it clearly: if Bitcoin goes down long term or forever, that is the risk. And what are we seeing now? Bitcoin under pressure. Liquidity rotated into AI and IPOs. Maximum fear. STRC down. That is not some hidden scandal. That is risk premium repricing. Strategy does not magically control STRC’s market price. They can adjust the dividend rate, but the market prices the risk of Bitcoin and Strategy’s ability to keep paying dividends. And when Bitcoin starts going up again, what do you think happens? The same risk premium reprices in the other direction. If you buy preferred equity in a Bitcoin company, you are making one core assumption: Bitcoin goes up over the long term. That was never hidden.

Alex 👽

21,220 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

$MSTR “My investment thesis is you buy technology companies that have a dominant place in their industry that are going to eat everything, and then you just wait.” - Michael Saylor If you embraced Saylor’s bet in 2020, sat through the volatility, and ignored the general advice along the way, you’ve achieved an annualized return most investors would dream of. Strategy despite two 70–80% drawdowns, has still compounded at 41% annually since adopting the Bitcoin Standard, outperforming Bitcoin itself over the same period. That bet started with 21,454 BTC acquired for $250 million. Today, it stands at 843,775 BTC, representing 4% of the entire Bitcoin network. If you believe Bitcoin remains the dominant monetary network, Strategy now owns roughly 20× more Bitcoin than the world’s second largest corporate holder. And while Bitcoin has spent much of this year under pressure, Strategy has still accumulated roughly 4× the entire treasury of the world’s second largest corporate holder, through its upgraded capital acquisition engine in $STRC I understand why Michael doesn’t spend much time asking for advice. Whether you agree with every decision or not, he’s spent six years executing one thesis with remarkable consistency. Mission Strategy. $BTC $MSTR $STRC
1:43

$MSTR “My investment thesis is you buy technology companies that have a dominant place in their industry that are going to eat everything, and then you just wait.” - Michael Saylor If you embraced Saylor’s bet in 2020, sat through the volatility, and ignored the general advice along the way, you’ve achieved an annualized return most investors would dream of. Strategy despite two 70–80% drawdowns, has still compounded at 41% annually since adopting the Bitcoin Standard, outperforming Bitcoin itself over the same period. That bet started with 21,454 BTC acquired for $250 million. Today, it stands at 843,775 BTC, representing 4% of the entire Bitcoin network. If you believe Bitcoin remains the dominant monetary network, Strategy now owns roughly 20× more Bitcoin than the world’s second largest corporate holder. And while Bitcoin has spent much of this year under pressure, Strategy has still accumulated roughly 4× the entire treasury of the world’s second largest corporate holder, through its upgraded capital acquisition engine in $STRC I understand why Michael doesn’t spend much time asking for advice. Whether you agree with every decision or not, he’s spent six years executing one thesis with remarkable consistency. Mission Strategy. $BTC $MSTR $STRC

Zaid 🟧

28,537 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This was the most critical takeaway from the entire interview, yet no one is talking about it. Saylor’s final point was essentially this: you can’t extrapolate into the future based on historical data when the market structure has fundamentally shifted—and continues to do so. Before the approval of the Bitcoin ETFs (and the strategic emergence of Bitcoin accretive derivatives like MicroStrategy), 99% of the capital in the world didn’t have access to Bitcoin. Now, a significant portion of that capital finally has a viable on-ramp to Bitcoin. Take a moment to really consider the implications of that. In other words, the motorcycle has entered the bicycle race. ( Can I request Saylor on a motorcycle entering a bicycle race, please?) And all of your bicycle race data is worthless. Basically, If you're trading #Bitcoin or $MSTR based on historical data (and by extension, the old market structure), you’ll lose. Don’t just take my word for it—listen to Saylor himself: “the fundamental structure of the market is changing.” As a result, the outcomes will inevitably change too. Beyond that, Saylor’s core advice, shaped by his first four years in Bitcoin, is clear: hold through the volatility, stay solvent, and stick to the winning strategy—buy and hold. Bitcoin is intense, unpredictable, and nothing like the traditional markets. Don’t try to predict the beast that is Bitcoin. Prepare yourself for the roller coaster ahead, hold strong, and above all, enjoy the ride.
2:45

This was the most critical takeaway from the entire interview, yet no one is talking about it. Saylor’s final point was essentially this: you can’t extrapolate into the future based on historical data when the market structure has fundamentally shifted—and continues to do so. Before the approval of the Bitcoin ETFs (and the strategic emergence of Bitcoin accretive derivatives like MicroStrategy), 99% of the capital in the world didn’t have access to Bitcoin. Now, a significant portion of that capital finally has a viable on-ramp to Bitcoin. Take a moment to really consider the implications of that. In other words, the motorcycle has entered the bicycle race. ( Can I request Saylor on a motorcycle entering a bicycle race, please?) And all of your bicycle race data is worthless. Basically, If you're trading #Bitcoin or $MSTR based on historical data (and by extension, the old market structure), you’ll lose. Don’t just take my word for it—listen to Saylor himself: “the fundamental structure of the market is changing.” As a result, the outcomes will inevitably change too. Beyond that, Saylor’s core advice, shaped by his first four years in Bitcoin, is clear: hold through the volatility, stay solvent, and stick to the winning strategy—buy and hold. Bitcoin is intense, unpredictable, and nothing like the traditional markets. Don’t try to predict the beast that is Bitcoin. Prepare yourself for the roller coaster ahead, hold strong, and above all, enjoy the ride.

Mason

141,126 просмотров • 1 год назад

Watch the market care… Strategy just sold another 1,638 BTC for $105 million. Third sale of 2026. $19,000 loss per coin against their cost basis. Bitcoin is up 2% today anyway. Six months ago every Strategy sale sent Bitcoin lower. The market treated Saylor's moves as the primary demand signal. Now he is selling and nobody cares. That tells you the bid underneath Bitcoin is no longer dependent on one company's capital raises and that is a healthier market structure than we had at the start of the year. The deeper story is that Strategy has not bought a single Bitcoin in over five weeks. The company built its identity around perpetual accumulation. It is now sending proceeds to preferred dividends and STRC buybacks instead. The playbook shifted from offense to defense. The market cares. $BTC
0:25

Watch the market care… Strategy just sold another 1,638 BTC for $105 million. Third sale of 2026. $19,000 loss per coin against their cost basis. Bitcoin is up 2% today anyway. Six months ago every Strategy sale sent Bitcoin lower. The market treated Saylor's moves as the primary demand signal. Now he is selling and nobody cares. That tells you the bid underneath Bitcoin is no longer dependent on one company's capital raises and that is a healthier market structure than we had at the start of the year. The deeper story is that Strategy has not bought a single Bitcoin in over five weeks. The company built its identity around perpetual accumulation. It is now sending proceeds to preferred dividends and STRC buybacks instead. The playbook shifted from offense to defense. The market cares. $BTC

Chento

17,973 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This is Jamie Dimon. He was born in New York City in 1956. His father and grandfather were both stockbrokers. He went to Tufts, then Harvard Business School. Joined Sandy Weill at American Express and followed him through a series of mergers that built Citigroup - one of the largest financial institutions on earth. Then Weill fired him. No public explanation. The man he had followed for sixteen years cut him loose. He was 42. Unemployed. In a city where everyone knew his name and everyone knew he'd been thrown out. He took a year off. Read. Traveled. Thought. Then he took over Bank One in Chicago a struggling regional bank that Wall Street had written off. He rebuilt it so effectively that JPMorgan Chase bought Bank One just to get Dimon. He became CEO of JPMorgan in 2005. It became the largest and most profitable bank in the United States. When the 2008 financial crisis hit, every major bank in America was on the edge of collapse. JPMorgan was the one that survived intact. While competitors were taking government bailouts, Dimon was buying Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual at a discount. He didn't panic when the industry panicked. He had spent years building a balance sheet strong enough to go on offense when everyone else was playing defense. When your industry has its worst quarter are you built to survive it, or built to buy what everyone else is selling?
1:44

This is Jamie Dimon. He was born in New York City in 1956. His father and grandfather were both stockbrokers. He went to Tufts, then Harvard Business School. Joined Sandy Weill at American Express and followed him through a series of mergers that built Citigroup - one of the largest financial institutions on earth. Then Weill fired him. No public explanation. The man he had followed for sixteen years cut him loose. He was 42. Unemployed. In a city where everyone knew his name and everyone knew he'd been thrown out. He took a year off. Read. Traveled. Thought. Then he took over Bank One in Chicago a struggling regional bank that Wall Street had written off. He rebuilt it so effectively that JPMorgan Chase bought Bank One just to get Dimon. He became CEO of JPMorgan in 2005. It became the largest and most profitable bank in the United States. When the 2008 financial crisis hit, every major bank in America was on the edge of collapse. JPMorgan was the one that survived intact. While competitors were taking government bailouts, Dimon was buying Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual at a discount. He didn't panic when the industry panicked. He had spent years building a balance sheet strong enough to go on offense when everyone else was playing defense. When your industry has its worst quarter are you built to survive it, or built to buy what everyone else is selling?

BILLIONAIRE UNIVERSITY®

12,948 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

$80 billion erased from Bitcoin treasury companies, with 43 of the 50 largest trading below where they announced "What has two thumbs and told you copying Strategy was going to be a terrible idea for all these companies? This guy. Been saying it for a year and a half, and sadly my opinion on what was going to happen is coming true." "The combined market cap of the 50 largest Bitcoin treasury companies has fallen from approximately $150 billion in July of 2025, when this was all the hype, to $67 billion. More than $80 billion has been erased from the trade." "43 of the 50 companies now trade below where they were when they announced their Bitcoin strategy. And 35 have fallen by at least 50%, out of 50." "In July, the 50 largest treasury companies became net Bitcoin sellers, selling approximately 2,500 Bitcoin more than they purchased."
1:10

$80 billion erased from Bitcoin treasury companies, with 43 of the 50 largest trading below where they announced "What has two thumbs and told you copying Strategy was going to be a terrible idea for all these companies? This guy. Been saying it for a year and a half, and sadly my opinion on what was going to happen is coming true." "The combined market cap of the 50 largest Bitcoin treasury companies has fallen from approximately $150 billion in July of 2025, when this was all the hype, to $67 billion. More than $80 billion has been erased from the trade." "43 of the 50 companies now trade below where they were when they announced their Bitcoin strategy. And 35 have fallen by at least 50%, out of 50." "In July, the 50 largest treasury companies became net Bitcoin sellers, selling approximately 2,500 Bitcoin more than they purchased."

The Wolf Of All Streets

34,814 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Strategy sold 3,588 BTC last week. That's 112x more than the 32 BTC they sold a few weeks ago (which freaked out the market). Here's what's happening and why they are doing this... 1. Last week = Strategy sold Last week, Strategy sold 3,588 BTC and used all of the proceeds ($216m) to fund dividend payments on their suite of preferred equities. Q2 dividend payments for STRF, STRK, STRD, and STRE... and June dividends for STRC. Notably, BTC price opened last week at $59.5k. Strategy sold 3,588 BTC over the course of the week, yet BTC price went up to $63.5k. 2. The bigger picture = Strategy is NET buying Strategy bought 85,296 BTC in Q2. Their combined selling for Q2 was 3,620 BTC (32 + 3,588). In other words, they bought 22.5x more BTC in Q2 than they sold. (For 2026 YTD numbers, Strategy has bought ~175k BTC and sold 3.6k BTC. That's a 48x ratio.) 3. The message in advance Weeks ago, Saylor explained what they are doing, in an interview with Michaël van de Poppe (see clip) "On occasion, we'll buy 20 Bitcoin & we'll sell 1 Bitcoin... Then the credit investors will give us enough to buy 20 more Bitcoin." Saylor further explained the strategic rationale of selling Bitcoin... "Our credit investors expect that we're going to support the credit dividend and pay it (and our asset is BTC)... 'will you sell some Bitcoin to pay us the money?' They expect me to say yes, because if I'm not going to pay the dividend, they're not going to buy the credit & the credit agency won't rate the credit." 4. What Strategy is doing Strategy is showing the market that they can and will sell BTC. They are doing this to gain access to more credit market capital... so that they can buy much more BTC. Saylor has recently asserted that it's important to "buy more Bitcoin than you sell." This is that in action. In Q2, they bought 85k BTC. They then used 3.5k BTC to fund the dividends on the Digital Credit that enabled them to buy 85k BTC. They bought 22.5 and sold 1. 5. What to expect next Saylor said they will "inoculate the market" by selling a little BTC. This is the second dose of inoculation. They will keep doing it until the market expects it and no longer reacts to it. They are not dumping their BTC treasury strategy for dollars. That is the click-bait headline for the uninformed. What they are telling you is that they plan to sell 1 BTC so they can buy 20 BTC. Over and over.
1:24

Strategy sold 3,588 BTC last week. That's 112x more than the 32 BTC they sold a few weeks ago (which freaked out the market). Here's what's happening and why they are doing this... 1. Last week = Strategy sold Last week, Strategy sold 3,588 BTC and used all of the proceeds ($216m) to fund dividend payments on their suite of preferred equities. Q2 dividend payments for STRF, STRK, STRD, and STRE... and June dividends for STRC. Notably, BTC price opened last week at $59.5k. Strategy sold 3,588 BTC over the course of the week, yet BTC price went up to $63.5k. 2. The bigger picture = Strategy is NET buying Strategy bought 85,296 BTC in Q2. Their combined selling for Q2 was 3,620 BTC (32 + 3,588). In other words, they bought 22.5x more BTC in Q2 than they sold. (For 2026 YTD numbers, Strategy has bought ~175k BTC and sold 3.6k BTC. That's a 48x ratio.) 3. The message in advance Weeks ago, Saylor explained what they are doing, in an interview with Michaël van de Poppe (see clip) "On occasion, we'll buy 20 Bitcoin & we'll sell 1 Bitcoin... Then the credit investors will give us enough to buy 20 more Bitcoin." Saylor further explained the strategic rationale of selling Bitcoin... "Our credit investors expect that we're going to support the credit dividend and pay it (and our asset is BTC)... 'will you sell some Bitcoin to pay us the money?' They expect me to say yes, because if I'm not going to pay the dividend, they're not going to buy the credit & the credit agency won't rate the credit." 4. What Strategy is doing Strategy is showing the market that they can and will sell BTC. They are doing this to gain access to more credit market capital... so that they can buy much more BTC. Saylor has recently asserted that it's important to "buy more Bitcoin than you sell." This is that in action. In Q2, they bought 85k BTC. They then used 3.5k BTC to fund the dividends on the Digital Credit that enabled them to buy 85k BTC. They bought 22.5 and sold 1. 5. What to expect next Saylor said they will "inoculate the market" by selling a little BTC. This is the second dose of inoculation. They will keep doing it until the market expects it and no longer reacts to it. They are not dumping their BTC treasury strategy for dollars. That is the click-bait headline for the uninformed. What they are telling you is that they plan to sell 1 BTC so they can buy 20 BTC. Over and over.

Jesse Myers

170,555 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Donald Trump has been secretly communicating with ‘man crush’ Jamie Dimon about White House agenda for months: sources | James Franey & Charles Gasparino, New York Post JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has been communicating with Donald Trump in recent months through secret back channels, helping the president-elect hammer out a policy agenda before and since his decisive White House victory, The Post has learned. The 68-year-old Wall Street titan — who, like 78-year-old Trump, grew up in Queens in New York City — has acted as “a sounding board” for the incoming commander-in-chief’s economic manifesto, four sources close to Trump’s transition team said. One GOP insider said the president-elect’s inner circle held a series of “no-holds-barred conversations” with Dimon — who at the time was rumored to be eyeing a government job himself. “They have been speaking regularly for months,” said another GOP source briefed on the situation. Three of the sources close to Trump said the secret back channel focused on plans for cutting government spending, banking regulation, taxes and trade. A company insider added that Trump’s top aides set up the calls, which continued after the election, to “create a bit of daylight” between the two men and stop details of the exchanges leaking. A spokesperson for the Trump transition team declined to comment. A JPMorgan spokesman also declined to comment. The quietly cozy relationship between Trump and Dimon has flourished despite the banker’s cryptic and tight-lipped tendencies when it comes to politics. Trump had floated Dimon’s name as a possible Treasury secretary pick in June and later claimed he had won his White House endorsement — despite a lack of any public statement from Dimon to that effect. Trump and Dimon also have continued to talk despite bouts of tension, including on Nov. 14 when the president-elect declared on Truth Social that Dimon ”will not be invited” to join his Cabinet. The banker promptly shot back: “I haven’t had a boss in 25 years and I’m not about ready to start.” The JPMorgan CEO, a registered Democrat who declined to back either candidate in the White House race, had even reportedly toyed with the idea of joining a Kamala Harris administration but then ruled himself out of leaving the Wall Street giant when her poll numbers tanked, The Post previously reported. On Nov. 22, The Post broke the news that Trump was also consulting with Blackrock CEO Larry Fink, a major Dem donor, on policy issues. Nevertheless, the former” Apprentice” star’s admiration of Dimon, who has helmed JPMorgan Chase for nearly two decades and has a net worth estimated by Forbes at $2.6 billion, was described by one source as “a man crush.” Another individual close to the president-elect said Trump “greatly appreciated” it when Dimon, an avid reader of the New York Post, told CNBC in January the eventual election winner was “kind of right” to criticize illegal immigration and weak defense spending by America’s NATO allies. Dimon’s comments angered left-wingers within the Biden administration who then blacklisted Dimon from the White House in a fit of pique, as The Post exclusively reported. Two weeks ago, the JPMorgan boss said Trump’s threat of slapping tariffs on Uncle Sam’s major trading partners “will bring people to the table” if “done wisely.” Dimon, a vocal critic of current US banking rules, recently slammed the ‘onslaught’ of red tape drafted by Dem-backed regulators, launching a foul-mouthed tirade over a list of his most-hated pieces of legislation at a recent conference in New York, “It’s time to fight back…I’ve had it with this s–t,” Dimon told the stunned audience. The JPMorgan boss singled out regulations aimed at keeping banks resistant to financial storms by forcing them to hold more capital on their balance sheets. The proposal, known as Basel III, would see major lenders raise that emergency buffer by 9%. “Things are becoming unfair and unjust, and they are hurting companies, a lot of these rules are hurting lower-paid individuals,” Dimon said on Oct. 28. Dimon, who pulled down a salary of $34.5 million last year, urged the US government in his annual letter to shareholders last May to deliver “effective policy-making” issuing a warning that “a politician’s dream is a businessman’s nightmare.” Wells Fargo analyst Mike Mayo said Trump’s second term as president will present “the biggest inflection point for banking regulation in three decades.” “This is Jamie’s vindication,” Mayo told The Post. “He is looking at all the bureaucracy and red tape and saying enough of the regulatory theater. It’s like banking with one hand tied behind your back” Read more:
1:24

Donald Trump has been secretly communicating with ‘man crush’ Jamie Dimon about White House agenda for months: sources | James Franey & Charles Gasparino, New York Post JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has been communicating with Donald Trump in recent months through secret back channels, helping the president-elect hammer out a policy agenda before and since his decisive White House victory, The Post has learned. The 68-year-old Wall Street titan — who, like 78-year-old Trump, grew up in Queens in New York City — has acted as “a sounding board” for the incoming commander-in-chief’s economic manifesto, four sources close to Trump’s transition team said. One GOP insider said the president-elect’s inner circle held a series of “no-holds-barred conversations” with Dimon — who at the time was rumored to be eyeing a government job himself. “They have been speaking regularly for months,” said another GOP source briefed on the situation. Three of the sources close to Trump said the secret back channel focused on plans for cutting government spending, banking regulation, taxes and trade. A company insider added that Trump’s top aides set up the calls, which continued after the election, to “create a bit of daylight” between the two men and stop details of the exchanges leaking. A spokesperson for the Trump transition team declined to comment. A JPMorgan spokesman also declined to comment. The quietly cozy relationship between Trump and Dimon has flourished despite the banker’s cryptic and tight-lipped tendencies when it comes to politics. Trump had floated Dimon’s name as a possible Treasury secretary pick in June and later claimed he had won his White House endorsement — despite a lack of any public statement from Dimon to that effect. Trump and Dimon also have continued to talk despite bouts of tension, including on Nov. 14 when the president-elect declared on Truth Social that Dimon ”will not be invited” to join his Cabinet. The banker promptly shot back: “I haven’t had a boss in 25 years and I’m not about ready to start.” The JPMorgan CEO, a registered Democrat who declined to back either candidate in the White House race, had even reportedly toyed with the idea of joining a Kamala Harris administration but then ruled himself out of leaving the Wall Street giant when her poll numbers tanked, The Post previously reported. On Nov. 22, The Post broke the news that Trump was also consulting with Blackrock CEO Larry Fink, a major Dem donor, on policy issues. Nevertheless, the former” Apprentice” star’s admiration of Dimon, who has helmed JPMorgan Chase for nearly two decades and has a net worth estimated by Forbes at $2.6 billion, was described by one source as “a man crush.” Another individual close to the president-elect said Trump “greatly appreciated” it when Dimon, an avid reader of the New York Post, told CNBC in January the eventual election winner was “kind of right” to criticize illegal immigration and weak defense spending by America’s NATO allies. Dimon’s comments angered left-wingers within the Biden administration who then blacklisted Dimon from the White House in a fit of pique, as The Post exclusively reported. Two weeks ago, the JPMorgan boss said Trump’s threat of slapping tariffs on Uncle Sam’s major trading partners “will bring people to the table” if “done wisely.” Dimon, a vocal critic of current US banking rules, recently slammed the ‘onslaught’ of red tape drafted by Dem-backed regulators, launching a foul-mouthed tirade over a list of his most-hated pieces of legislation at a recent conference in New York, “It’s time to fight back…I’ve had it with this s–t,” Dimon told the stunned audience. The JPMorgan boss singled out regulations aimed at keeping banks resistant to financial storms by forcing them to hold more capital on their balance sheets. The proposal, known as Basel III, would see major lenders raise that emergency buffer by 9%. “Things are becoming unfair and unjust, and they are hurting companies, a lot of these rules are hurting lower-paid individuals,” Dimon said on Oct. 28. Dimon, who pulled down a salary of $34.5 million last year, urged the US government in his annual letter to shareholders last May to deliver “effective policy-making” issuing a warning that “a politician’s dream is a businessman’s nightmare.” Wells Fargo analyst Mike Mayo said Trump’s second term as president will present “the biggest inflection point for banking regulation in three decades.” “This is Jamie’s vindication,” Mayo told The Post. “He is looking at all the bureaucracy and red tape and saying enough of the regulatory theater. It’s like banking with one hand tied behind your back” Read more:

Owen Gregorian

98,823 просмотров • 1 год назад