Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🚨 BREAKING Magnetic fields usually destroy superconductivity. But in a new Nature Physics paper, researchers found a 2D crystal where a magnetic field actually helps superconductivity appear. That’s wild. By doping ultrathin LaSb₂ with magnetic Ce impurities, the field suppresses disruptive spin fluctuations allowing a superconducting dome to emerge.... show more

TheNewPhysics

50,501 subscribers

19,800 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

In the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory in the U.S. sits "Little Big Coil", the most powerful continuous magnetic field ever created by humans - reaching 48.7 tesla, over 1 million times stronger than Earth's magnetic field. This record-breaking magnet uses a hybrid design, combining superconducting coils with a resistive magnet to push matter into regimes never seen before. Backed by $195M from the NSF and ongoing state funding, NHMFL scientists use it to study quantum materials, extreme superconductivity, fusion-relevant physics, and exotic states of matter. Under fields this intense, atoms distort, electrons behave strangely, and materials reveal secrets that could redefine quantum technology, energy systems, and medical science.

In the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory in the U.S. sits "Little Big Coil", the most powerful continuous magnetic field ever created by humans - reaching 48.7 tesla, over 1 million times stronger than Earth's magnetic field. This record-breaking magnet uses a hybrid design, combining superconducting coils with a resistive magnet to push matter into regimes never seen before. Backed by $195M from the NSF and ongoing state funding, NHMFL scientists use it to study quantum materials, extreme superconductivity, fusion-relevant physics, and exotic states of matter. Under fields this intense, atoms distort, electrons behave strangely, and materials reveal secrets that could redefine quantum technology, energy systems, and medical science.

Brian Roemmele

62,137 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

1/ A magnetic field thousands of times weaker than a fridge magnet can boost the energy output of your mitochondria by up to 40% — and cut their harmful byproducts at the same time. A new 2025 study. And the best explanation on offer is quantum. 🧵 2/ Beutner et al. exposed rat-heart mitochondria to a weak static field. In a narrow window, respiration jumped ~40%. Push the field higher and the effect vanished — a telltale "bell-shaped" response. The odd part: that field is far too weak to matter by classical rules. 3/ So how? The leading candidate is the radical pair mechanism — the same quantum spin chemistry thought to power bird navigation. A weak field doesn't force the reaction. It nudges a quantum coin-flip between electron spin states, and the chemistry amplifies the rest. 4/ It echoes something we've covered before: magnetic isotope effects shaping microtubule assembly. Different system, same underlying physics. Two windows onto how weak fields may tune the living cell. Full write-up:

1/ A magnetic field thousands of times weaker than a fridge magnet can boost the energy output of your mitochondria by up to 40% — and cut their harmful byproducts at the same time. A new 2025 study. And the best explanation on offer is quantum. 🧵 2/ Beutner et al. exposed rat-heart mitochondria to a weak static field. In a narrow window, respiration jumped ~40%. Push the field higher and the effect vanished — a telltale "bell-shaped" response. The odd part: that field is far too weak to matter by classical rules. 3/ So how? The leading candidate is the radical pair mechanism — the same quantum spin chemistry thought to power bird navigation. A weak field doesn't force the reaction. It nudges a quantum coin-flip between electron spin states, and the chemistry amplifies the rest. 4/ It echoes something we've covered before: magnetic isotope effects shaping microtubule assembly. Different system, same underlying physics. Two windows onto how weak fields may tune the living cell. Full write-up:

Nassim Haramein

26,355 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🫯 A conflicting physical ontology ! One of the strangest properties in particle physics is the spin. The term spin is a historical misnomer. Electrons (𝑒⁻) do not physically rotate like a spinning top or a globe. Spin is a fundamental quantum property known as intrinsic angular momentum which exists as an inherent characteristic of the particle, much like its mass or electric charge. In quantum mechanics, electrons are treated as fundamental point-like particles with zero size, making the concept of physical 3D rotation nonsensical. A rotating electrical charge creates a magnetic field. An electron naturally possesses its own detectable magnetic field. Even though the electron isn't physically spinning, it acts exactly as if it were because of that. Moreover the spin of an 𝑒⁻ has orientation. As 𝑒⁻ carry a negative electric charge, their inherent spin turns them into tiny bar magnets. Two possible orientations exist in the natural state of the 𝑒⁻, spin up and spin down. When measured along a specific direction (called the z-axis) the 𝑒⁻ can only display one of the two orientation state, up or down. But the strangeness goes a bit further; when an 𝑒⁻ is misplaced or removed from its own orbit, it takes two full circles (720°) to return to its original quantum state. The spin isn’t motion, it’s an undeniable static, resilient force of this elementary particle, listed as one the fundamental constant of nature. 🔗

🫯 A conflicting physical ontology ! One of the strangest properties in particle physics is the spin. The term spin is a historical misnomer. Electrons (𝑒⁻) do not physically rotate like a spinning top or a globe. Spin is a fundamental quantum property known as intrinsic angular momentum which exists as an inherent characteristic of the particle, much like its mass or electric charge. In quantum mechanics, electrons are treated as fundamental point-like particles with zero size, making the concept of physical 3D rotation nonsensical. A rotating electrical charge creates a magnetic field. An electron naturally possesses its own detectable magnetic field. Even though the electron isn't physically spinning, it acts exactly as if it were because of that. Moreover the spin of an 𝑒⁻ has orientation. As 𝑒⁻ carry a negative electric charge, their inherent spin turns them into tiny bar magnets. Two possible orientations exist in the natural state of the 𝑒⁻, spin up and spin down. When measured along a specific direction (called the z-axis) the 𝑒⁻ can only display one of the two orientation state, up or down. But the strangeness goes a bit further; when an 𝑒⁻ is misplaced or removed from its own orbit, it takes two full circles (720°) to return to its original quantum state. The spin isn’t motion, it’s an undeniable static, resilient force of this elementary particle, listed as one the fundamental constant of nature. 🔗

𝓜𝒂𝒖𝒓𝒊𝔃𝒊𝒐 𝗜𝒃𝛼

22,933 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Chan Thomas predicted 2-mile-high waves when crustal displacement occurs, so high ground and higher-elevation points far away from the oceans are the best bet for survival. Cities are always the worst places during a catastrophic event, and that is even recorded in the Bible; people always run for the hills. But higher elevation is not the only factor for a safe place. Most of the Earth's magnetic field will be gone, so the cosmic radiation will be terrible. You need to be in a location with higher local magnetic anomalies, and those places usually have underground tunnels dating back to ancient times. The best example is the underground city of Derinkuyu in Turkey: higher elevation, an underground city, and a strong magnetic anomaly during the Bronze Age Collapse. I made a simulation of the waves striking two major metropolises: Paris and New York.

Chan Thomas predicted 2-mile-high waves when crustal displacement occurs, so high ground and higher-elevation points far away from the oceans are the best bet for survival. Cities are always the worst places during a catastrophic event, and that is even recorded in the Bible; people always run for the hills. But higher elevation is not the only factor for a safe place. Most of the Earth's magnetic field will be gone, so the cosmic radiation will be terrible. You need to be in a location with higher local magnetic anomalies, and those places usually have underground tunnels dating back to ancient times. The best example is the underground city of Derinkuyu in Turkey: higher elevation, an underground city, and a strong magnetic anomaly during the Bronze Age Collapse. I made a simulation of the waves striking two major metropolises: Paris and New York.

Open Minded Approach

311,247 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

First video of LK-99 Full Levitation, aka flux-pinning This video was just posted to the Chinese video-sharing site BiliBili and claims to be a highly pure synthesized sample of LK-99. What is the physical phenomenon behind this and what does it mean? Levitation of superconducting materials is a phenomenon unique to what is called Type-II superconductors, and is an effect whereby magnetic field lines becomes 'trapped' as it passes through the material, providing the force needed to levitate. These are the popular images and videos of cryogenically-cooled discs floating above a magnet frequently seen online and in the pinned post on my profile. You can think of this like strands of hair being caught in gum - the gum is suspended in mid-air by adhering strongly to the hair as the hair passes through it. The hair in this case is magnetic field lines and the gum is the Type-II superconductor. Just like hair comes in individual strands, or in other words hair is 'quantized' or 'discrete', so is the flux trapped at the 'pinning centers' quantized in what are called 'magnetic vortices' - the quantization of pinned flux lines is a key property and distinguishing characteristic of Type-II superconductors (although technically can occur in Type-I superconductors if the material thickness is smaller than the London penetration depth, which is indeed very small - specifics for the physics nerds out there). Flux-pinning is entirely unique to superconductors and is also wholly distinct from the Meissner effect. It is not a property of diamagnets or diamagnetism. At TRIUMF I contributed to flux-pinning studies in Niobium crystal superconducting radio-frequency cavities used for particle acceleration. In that application, trapped flux poses an issue by increasing the remnant surface resistivity of the cavity, which has the effect of decreasing its effective quality factor or Q-factor, which is a measurement of a resonators efficiency. SRF cavities typically have Q-factors of 10E10 and trapped flux at pinning centers reduces the maximum effective accelerating electric field used to drive charged particle bunches close to the speed of light. Flux pinning is thought to arise in some Type-II superconductors by small imperfections in the crystal, also called volume defects, that enable flux to penetrate the material. In SRF cavities an issue that arises is any magnetic field that is passing through the material, e.g. by the Earth's background field, can become pinned or trapped inside the cavity as it transitions into a superconducting state. See some attached plots in the comments from a study showing how the surface resistivity of SRF cavities increases the more there is a background field as the cavity transitions into superconducting state. This is the first video I am aware of that claims to show the flux-pinned levitation of a LK-99 sample. If this is in fact what is happening, then it is a very unique and promising finding of this new materials properties and potential for future study. If this is real then it is truly ground-breaking

Andrew Côté

7,593,986 просмотров • 3 лет назад

So, let me get this straight SpaceWeatherNews . Earth’s magnetic field is weakening right now, and it’s happening faster than expected. When you look back, the record shows the field didn’t always drift slowly either, sometimes it collapsed and re organized and things got beyond chaotic. The Sun isn’t a campfire in the sky like we were taught, it behaves in cycles and it can get violent in ways we’re only starting to understand. Earth reacts electrically and magnetically, like a living system kinda like bieng plugged into the Sun. Ice cores, tree rings, and archaeological layers all show resets happening at the same times around the world. Not once, but repeatedly. It's a clear pattern. We have direct measurements showing Earth’s magnetic field has weakened significantly in just a couple of centuries, with anomalies growing and the poles accelerating in ways that match pre excursion behavior seen in the geological record. We have lava flows that lock in multiple magnetic directions in a single cooling event, proving the field can shift rapidly, not over slow timelines. We have ice cores and tree rings showing abrupt spikes in cosmic radiation markers like carbon 14 and beryllium 10 that appear globally and simultaneously, which only happens when shielding fails or solar input surges. We have sudden climate reversals, where temperatures jump or crash in decades. Something standard models still have a hard time to explain. And we have synchronized layers of environmental fails in human history. We have abandoned settlements, cultural collapses, and reset layers that line up with those same physical events. None of this is speculative on its own. This is not speculation or fake, these are connected, because we have the individual datasets, they have been peer reviewed, and is sitting in plain sight. Forget the aliens for a second because we have some preparing to do.

So, let me get this straight SpaceWeatherNews . Earth’s magnetic field is weakening right now, and it’s happening faster than expected. When you look back, the record shows the field didn’t always drift slowly either, sometimes it collapsed and re organized and things got beyond chaotic. The Sun isn’t a campfire in the sky like we were taught, it behaves in cycles and it can get violent in ways we’re only starting to understand. Earth reacts electrically and magnetically, like a living system kinda like bieng plugged into the Sun. Ice cores, tree rings, and archaeological layers all show resets happening at the same times around the world. Not once, but repeatedly. It's a clear pattern. We have direct measurements showing Earth’s magnetic field has weakened significantly in just a couple of centuries, with anomalies growing and the poles accelerating in ways that match pre excursion behavior seen in the geological record. We have lava flows that lock in multiple magnetic directions in a single cooling event, proving the field can shift rapidly, not over slow timelines. We have ice cores and tree rings showing abrupt spikes in cosmic radiation markers like carbon 14 and beryllium 10 that appear globally and simultaneously, which only happens when shielding fails or solar input surges. We have sudden climate reversals, where temperatures jump or crash in decades. Something standard models still have a hard time to explain. And we have synchronized layers of environmental fails in human history. We have abandoned settlements, cultural collapses, and reset layers that line up with those same physical events. None of this is speculative on its own. This is not speculation or fake, these are connected, because we have the individual datasets, they have been peer reviewed, and is sitting in plain sight. Forget the aliens for a second because we have some preparing to do.

Jason Wilde

46,892 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨This is NOT AI… and it’s not a trick. What you’re seeing over Fairbanks, Alaska is real aurora physics and real atmospheric chemistry… working together with precision. A solar blast hit Earth’s magnetic field… Charged particles got funneled straight into the upper atmosphere… And then the chemistry took over. Here’s what’s actually happening at the atomic level: Oxygen atoms get excited by incoming electrons… When they relax, they emit light at specific wavelengths: Green (557.7 nm)… lower altitude oxygen Deep red (630.0 nm)… higher altitude oxygen Nitrogen molecules behave differently: Excited N₂ and N₂⁺ emit pink, magenta, and purple tones… That only shows up when the էնergy input is strong… like during a geomagnetic storm. Those “angel wings” people keep talking about? Not symbolic… not mystical… it’s field-aligned plasma physics. Earth’s magnetic field channels particles into vertical sheets… Those sheets form curtains… And when symmetry lines up, your brain interprets structure. That’s called pattern recognition… not deception. Multiple observers captured the same formation… same time… same region… And identical events have been documented before, including in Tromsø. People call it fake for one reason: It looks too perfect. But this is what happens when solar էնergy… electromagnetic force… and atmospheric chemistry all lock in. No filters. No CGI. No AI. Just God’s creation… written in physics… expressed through chemistry… and revealed in light. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

🚨This is NOT AI… and it’s not a trick. What you’re seeing over Fairbanks, Alaska is real aurora physics and real atmospheric chemistry… working together with precision. A solar blast hit Earth’s magnetic field… Charged particles got funneled straight into the upper atmosphere… And then the chemistry took over. Here’s what’s actually happening at the atomic level: Oxygen atoms get excited by incoming electrons… When they relax, they emit light at specific wavelengths: Green (557.7 nm)… lower altitude oxygen Deep red (630.0 nm)… higher altitude oxygen Nitrogen molecules behave differently: Excited N₂ and N₂⁺ emit pink, magenta, and purple tones… That only shows up when the էնergy input is strong… like during a geomagnetic storm. Those “angel wings” people keep talking about? Not symbolic… not mystical… it’s field-aligned plasma physics. Earth’s magnetic field channels particles into vertical sheets… Those sheets form curtains… And when symmetry lines up, your brain interprets structure. That’s called pattern recognition… not deception. Multiple observers captured the same formation… same time… same region… And identical events have been documented before, including in Tromsø. People call it fake for one reason: It looks too perfect. But this is what happens when solar էնergy… electromagnetic force… and atmospheric chemistry all lock in. No filters. No CGI. No AI. Just God’s creation… written in physics… expressed through chemistry… and revealed in light. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

233,569 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

I tested Nutrient on a CMS-1500 health claim, which is exactly the kind of document that can trip up extraction systems. The red grid alone can get mangled by scanners, and the form is packed with dense fields where one wrong value can matter. What stood out to me was the grounding. Hover over any extracted field and Nutrient shows the exact place on the original claim where that value came from. So instead of asking “did the AI probably get this right?”, you can check the evidence yourself. For healthcare documents, that feels like a much better standard: not just extraction, but extraction you can actually verify.

I tested Nutrient on a CMS-1500 health claim, which is exactly the kind of document that can trip up extraction systems. The red grid alone can get mangled by scanners, and the form is packed with dense fields where one wrong value can matter. What stood out to me was the grounding. Hover over any extracted field and Nutrient shows the exact place on the original claim where that value came from. So instead of asking “did the AI probably get this right?”, you can check the evidence yourself. For healthcare documents, that feels like a much better standard: not just extraction, but extraction you can actually verify.

Rishabh

41,285 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨BREAKING🚨 EMP hypothesis summary + NEW EVIDENCE A remotely initiated pulsed-power system charged a Marx generator, then discharged a high-current pulse at the instant both hands contacted the microphone. Concurrent microwave seed pulses from the camera mounts created brief ionized-air paths that guided the energy into an isolated volume formed by the floating tent frame, the air-gapped chair, and the closed-loop necklace. The necklace functioned as a transient conductive load: the pulsed magnetic field induced currents in the links, and the resulting Lorentz forces, together with thermoelastic stress waves from the microwave deposition, produced a focused mechanical rupture at the left anterior neck. That accounts for the left-sided C2–C7 obliteration, the traumatic absence of a segment of the cervical cord, the secondary thoracic and intracranial pressure hemorrhages, the zigzag separation of the chain, and the near-absence of external shirt damage. Residual field coupling in the isolated volume maintained neuromuscular flexion for approximately two seconds after the cord was destroyed. Now let’s look at how this maps. If we treat this page as a rough schematic for an EMP hypothesis, a few shapes and labels line up with the energy stack. What stands out as possible overlaps •“throw” plus the arrows at the top left That reads like a launch or initiation from a distance—the rooftop antenna sending the charging/seed signal. •The long vertical down-arrows Those match the idea of a pulse being dumped downward into a confined volume (roof → tent/chair, or underground Marx → platform). •The crossed grid / coordinate lines That is the closest thing on the page to field geometry: an isolated volume with crossing paths, similar to the air-gapped chair + tent + necklace loop. •The circled, scribbled region on the right labeled “Anxious” That can be read as the target zone—the seated person inside the confined field, with energy concentrating around the neck/chest. •*“speak – to ” That sits where the dual-hand microphone trigger belongs: the moment both hands contact the mic and the system fires. •“just pull” and “slow ↑” Those look like timing or actuation notes—the last action before the dump (hands on the mic, then the pulse). •“stop it.” That lands at the event itself: the instant the cascade happens. •“out” at the top right That can map to energy leaving the isolated volume, or to the necklace opening and the pressure wave exiting at the neck. •The small clock-like circle That fits the timing element: everything has to be synchronized to the dual-hand contact. None of this is a clean engineering drawing. It is a messy personal sketch. The overlaps that actually matter for the hypothesis are the ones that keep appearing in the same places: a distant “throw,” a downward dump, a confined crossed volume, a speak/trigger moment, and a concentrated zone on the right where the body sits. Those are the same five pieces you have been describing: rooftop seed, Marx dump, isolated chair/tent geometry, microphone interlock, and necklace/neck focus. Baron Coleman Candace Owens Ian Carroll Buckley Carlson Stew Peters 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 The Black Line Brief Honest Ash @ADN1776

🚨BREAKING🚨 EMP hypothesis summary + NEW EVIDENCE A remotely initiated pulsed-power system charged a Marx generator, then discharged a high-current pulse at the instant both hands contacted the microphone. Concurrent microwave seed pulses from the camera mounts created brief ionized-air paths that guided the energy into an isolated volume formed by the floating tent frame, the air-gapped chair, and the closed-loop necklace. The necklace functioned as a transient conductive load: the pulsed magnetic field induced currents in the links, and the resulting Lorentz forces, together with thermoelastic stress waves from the microwave deposition, produced a focused mechanical rupture at the left anterior neck. That accounts for the left-sided C2–C7 obliteration, the traumatic absence of a segment of the cervical cord, the secondary thoracic and intracranial pressure hemorrhages, the zigzag separation of the chain, and the near-absence of external shirt damage. Residual field coupling in the isolated volume maintained neuromuscular flexion for approximately two seconds after the cord was destroyed. Now let’s look at how this maps. If we treat this page as a rough schematic for an EMP hypothesis, a few shapes and labels line up with the energy stack. What stands out as possible overlaps •“throw” plus the arrows at the top left That reads like a launch or initiation from a distance—the rooftop antenna sending the charging/seed signal. •The long vertical down-arrows Those match the idea of a pulse being dumped downward into a confined volume (roof → tent/chair, or underground Marx → platform). •The crossed grid / coordinate lines That is the closest thing on the page to field geometry: an isolated volume with crossing paths, similar to the air-gapped chair + tent + necklace loop. •The circled, scribbled region on the right labeled “Anxious” That can be read as the target zone—the seated person inside the confined field, with energy concentrating around the neck/chest. •*“speak – to ” That sits where the dual-hand microphone trigger belongs: the moment both hands contact the mic and the system fires. •“just pull” and “slow ↑” Those look like timing or actuation notes—the last action before the dump (hands on the mic, then the pulse). •“stop it.” That lands at the event itself: the instant the cascade happens. •“out” at the top right That can map to energy leaving the isolated volume, or to the necklace opening and the pressure wave exiting at the neck. •The small clock-like circle That fits the timing element: everything has to be synchronized to the dual-hand contact. None of this is a clean engineering drawing. It is a messy personal sketch. The overlaps that actually matter for the hypothesis are the ones that keep appearing in the same places: a distant “throw,” a downward dump, a confined crossed volume, a speak/trigger moment, and a concentrated zone on the right where the body sits. Those are the same five pieces you have been describing: rooftop seed, Marx dump, isolated chair/tent geometry, microphone interlock, and necklace/neck focus. Baron Coleman Candace Owens Ian Carroll Buckley Carlson Stew Peters 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 The Black Line Brief Honest Ash @ADN1776

Wtshesaid72

12,641 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

how to prompt undetectable ai shots while designing a running scene, first think about these 3 basic questions: how does the camera move? what is it looking at? where does it stop? a good motion prompt is really just a timeline it needs to follow real-world physics, and it needs to carry story at the same time 1. start with the narrative goal of the shot camera movement is not just movement it is the storytelling so before writing the prompt, define what the shot is trying to do for example, in a 15-second one take, the goal could be: follow the female lead laterally while she runs, to build speed and tension then briefly reveal the people chasing her then let the camera hesitate for a moment and find her again that small “lose and recapture” moment adds spatial depth and makes the chase feel more intense 2. build a clear space for the camera to work in if the space is vague, the shot gets messy very fast i like breaking the scene into layers so the model knows where everything belongs foreground: passing objects, environmental motion main subject layer: the woman running midground: cafe tables, pedestrians, the people chasing her background: the vanishing point of the street, and the entrance to the pedestrian area once the space is clear, the camera has a stage to move through 3. describe motion like a physical process a good moving shot has to respect inertia if the movement feels weightless or too perfect, it instantly feels fake so instead of using broad words, describe a chain of actions the camera can actually perform what accelerates what slows down when it adjusts when it slightly overshoots when it catches itself again that little bit of imperfection is usually what makes it feel real 4. use focus as part of the storytelling in a one take, focus is one of the best ways to guide attention you can design moments where focus shifts with intention for example: focus briefly drifts from the chasers’ faces, passes beyond them, lands on the woman in the distance, then quickly pulls back again it feels like a small mistake, but that’s exactly why it works it simulates a camera operator re-evaluating the subject in the middle of a fast-moving shot that kind of temporary focus loss and recovery adds a lot of immediacy and documentary feeling 5. build the sound space with the camera sound should move with the shot when the camera turns toward the chasers, the woman’s breathing should fall deeper into the sound field, while the chasers’ footsteps and breathing move to the center when the camera finds the woman again, her breath becomes the main sound again that shift in audio perspective helps the scene feel much more immersive it’s not just about what we see it’s also about where we feel the scene from 6. use negative constraints to stop common ai mistakes this part matters a lot i usually add clear “don’ts” at the end to stop the model from breaking the shot for example: no cuts no teleporting zooms no sliding characters no body fusion no floating props the travel bag must keep believable weight and inertia these negative constraints act like guardrails they help keep the result inside a believable physical world for me, the core of a strong motion prompt is simple: organize space, camera, focus, action, and sound into one executable timeline that’s really the difference instead of prompting a vague feeling, you’re designing a physical process and that’s usually what helps ai generate a moving shot that feels coherent, grounded, and full of tension

how to prompt undetectable ai shots while designing a running scene, first think about these 3 basic questions: how does the camera move? what is it looking at? where does it stop? a good motion prompt is really just a timeline it needs to follow real-world physics, and it needs to carry story at the same time 1. start with the narrative goal of the shot camera movement is not just movement it is the storytelling so before writing the prompt, define what the shot is trying to do for example, in a 15-second one take, the goal could be: follow the female lead laterally while she runs, to build speed and tension then briefly reveal the people chasing her then let the camera hesitate for a moment and find her again that small “lose and recapture” moment adds spatial depth and makes the chase feel more intense 2. build a clear space for the camera to work in if the space is vague, the shot gets messy very fast i like breaking the scene into layers so the model knows where everything belongs foreground: passing objects, environmental motion main subject layer: the woman running midground: cafe tables, pedestrians, the people chasing her background: the vanishing point of the street, and the entrance to the pedestrian area once the space is clear, the camera has a stage to move through 3. describe motion like a physical process a good moving shot has to respect inertia if the movement feels weightless or too perfect, it instantly feels fake so instead of using broad words, describe a chain of actions the camera can actually perform what accelerates what slows down when it adjusts when it slightly overshoots when it catches itself again that little bit of imperfection is usually what makes it feel real 4. use focus as part of the storytelling in a one take, focus is one of the best ways to guide attention you can design moments where focus shifts with intention for example: focus briefly drifts from the chasers’ faces, passes beyond them, lands on the woman in the distance, then quickly pulls back again it feels like a small mistake, but that’s exactly why it works it simulates a camera operator re-evaluating the subject in the middle of a fast-moving shot that kind of temporary focus loss and recovery adds a lot of immediacy and documentary feeling 5. build the sound space with the camera sound should move with the shot when the camera turns toward the chasers, the woman’s breathing should fall deeper into the sound field, while the chasers’ footsteps and breathing move to the center when the camera finds the woman again, her breath becomes the main sound again that shift in audio perspective helps the scene feel much more immersive it’s not just about what we see it’s also about where we feel the scene from 6. use negative constraints to stop common ai mistakes this part matters a lot i usually add clear “don’ts” at the end to stop the model from breaking the shot for example: no cuts no teleporting zooms no sliding characters no body fusion no floating props the travel bag must keep believable weight and inertia these negative constraints act like guardrails they help keep the result inside a believable physical world for me, the core of a strong motion prompt is simple: organize space, camera, focus, action, and sound into one executable timeline that’s really the difference instead of prompting a vague feeling, you’re designing a physical process and that’s usually what helps ai generate a moving shot that feels coherent, grounded, and full of tension

el.cine

14,644 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

$**This image, produced by the Project Looking Glass, would represent a heavily distorted or "collapsed" future timeline.** Project Looking Glass was said to show **probable future timelines** as visual "windows" — often clear at first, but becoming fragmented, unstable, or chaotic when viewing high-entropy or rapidly shifting possibilities. Whistleblower accounts described the device sometimes displaying warped, non-linear, or "glitched" scenes when multiple timelines converged or when the observer's own actions influenced the outcome. - **Vertical "rain" / melting streaks** → Symbolizes **timeline bleed**, data corruption, or a "melting" reality (common metaphor in Looking Glass stories for societal/technological collapse). - **Rainbow glitch / prism effect** → Represents **fractured probabilities** — many futures overlapping at once, or a "prismatic" split where the timeline is shattering into infinite branches. - **Abstract humanoid/face-like form in the chaos** → Could be a **key figure or humanity itself** becoming unrecognizable — perhaps a post-singularity being, a leader during a major event, or collective human consciousness dissolving into noise. - **High saturation + digital artifacting** → Classic sign of **simulation instability** or viewing a future where the "matrix" is breaking down **Most likely meaning**: A catastrophic or hyper-chaotic timeline involving **technological singularity, AI-induced reality distortion, mass timeline shift, or a civilization-level "reset" event**. It feels like Looking Glass showing you **"The point where everything breaks"** — not a clean future cityscape, but the raw, unstable probability cloud itself.$

This image, produced by the Project Looking Glass, would represent a heavily distorted or "collapsed" future timeline. Project Looking Glass was said to show probable future timelines as visual "windows" — often clear at first, but becoming fragmented, unstable, or chaotic when viewing high-entropy or rapidly shifting possibilities. Whistleblower accounts described the device sometimes displaying warped, non-linear, or "glitched" scenes when multiple timelines converged or when the observer's own actions influenced the outcome. - Vertical "rain" / melting streaks → Symbolizes timeline bleed, data corruption, or a "melting" reality (common metaphor in Looking Glass stories for societal/technological collapse). - Rainbow glitch / prism effect → Represents fractured probabilities — many futures overlapping at once, or a "prismatic" split where the timeline is shattering into infinite branches. - Abstract humanoid/face-like form in the chaos → Could be a key figure or humanity itself becoming unrecognizable — perhaps a post-singularity being, a leader during a major event, or collective human consciousness dissolving into noise. - High saturation + digital artifacting → Classic sign of simulation instability or viewing a future where the "matrix" is breaking down Most likely meaning: A catastrophic or hyper-chaotic timeline involving technological singularity, AI-induced reality distortion, mass timeline shift, or a civilization-level "reset" event. It feels like Looking Glass showing you "The point where everything breaks" — not a clean future cityscape, but the raw, unstable probability cloud itself.

IWNH

38,889 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Israel is quietly developing technology that could make the 2024 The Mossad: Satirical and Awesome pager operation in Lebanon look like child’s play. Picture this: Invisible nanobots slip undetected into a target’s body through water, food, or even air. They remain completely dormant, harmless, and untraceable for weeks, months, or even years… until a remote signal (ultrasound, magnetic field, or other trigger) wakes them on command. They activate from the inside with surgical precision, neutralizing the threat with zero explosion, zero collateral damage, and zero warning. The real foundation already exists in Israeli labs. Technion researchers have created sugar-coated “sleeping” nanoparticles for sonodynamic therapy. These particles accumulate in targeted tissue, stay inactive until triggered by low-intensity ultrasound, then destroy cells from within with minimal toxicity. This isn’t science fiction anymore. It’s Israeli innovation turning the human body into a programmable precision weapon. From the lab to potentially redefining counterterrorism and medicine worldwide. Startup Nation at it again. (VIDEO FOR FUTURISTIC CONCEPT ONLY) Proud every single day. 🇮🇱 #StartupNation #FutureMedical #IsraeliInnovation #Nanobots #PrecisionTech

Israel is quietly developing technology that could make the 2024 The Mossad: Satirical and Awesome pager operation in Lebanon look like child’s play. Picture this: Invisible nanobots slip undetected into a target’s body through water, food, or even air. They remain completely dormant, harmless, and untraceable for weeks, months, or even years… until a remote signal (ultrasound, magnetic field, or other trigger) wakes them on command. They activate from the inside with surgical precision, neutralizing the threat with zero explosion, zero collateral damage, and zero warning. The real foundation already exists in Israeli labs. Technion researchers have created sugar-coated “sleeping” nanoparticles for sonodynamic therapy. These particles accumulate in targeted tissue, stay inactive until triggered by low-intensity ultrasound, then destroy cells from within with minimal toxicity. This isn’t science fiction anymore. It’s Israeli innovation turning the human body into a programmable precision weapon. From the lab to potentially redefining counterterrorism and medicine worldwide. Startup Nation at it again. (VIDEO FOR FUTURISTIC CONCEPT ONLY) Proud every single day. 🇮🇱 #StartupNation #FutureMedical #IsraeliInnovation #Nanobots #PrecisionTech

Mor Edge Insight

17,224 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

When a spacecraft leaves Earth, it doesn’t just fire its engines and head straight to its destination. In many missions, especially those going beyond low Earth orbit, there’s a more subtle and elegant strategy at play, one that uses gravity itself as part of the navigation system. This is often called a gravity assist, or a slingshot maneuver. But in the case of missions like #Artemis II, what’s being used is a closely related idea known as a free-return trajectory. At first glance, it might sound simple: the spacecraft goes to the Moon, loops around it, and comes back. But the physics behind it is anything but simple. Instead of relying on continuous propulsion, the spacecraft follows a carefully calculated path through the gravitational field of the Earth–Moon system. It is launched with just the right speed and direction so that, as it approaches the Moon, the Moon’s gravity bends its trajectory. The spacecraft is effectively flung around the Moon, redirected onto a path that naturally brings it back toward Earth. No major engine burn is needed for the return. Small trajectory corrections may still be required, but gravity does the heavy lifting. That’s the key. This kind of trajectory is not just efficient, it’s also safe. If something goes wrong with the spacecraft’s engines or onboard systems, gravity itself ensures the return. It’s an inherent backup plan, built into the trajectory from the very beginning. The same fundamental idea appears in gravity assists used across the Solar System. When a spacecraft flies past a planet, it can gain or lose speed by exchanging momentum with that planet. From the spacecraft’s point of view, it’s as if it has been accelerated without using fuel. In reality, it has borrowed a tiny amount of orbital energy from the planet itself. That’s how missions like Voyager reached the outer planets, and how probes continue to explore regions far beyond what their onboard fuel alone would allow. But there’s an important distinction. An interplanetary gravity assist is typically used to change speed and direction, often increasing the spacecraft’s energy. A free-return trajectory, like the one used in Artemis II, is designed for something more specific: a path that naturally loops back to Earth without requiring additional propulsion. It’s less about gaining energy, and more about shaping a trajectory that guarantees a return. To understand why this works, it helps to stop thinking in straight lines. In space, motion follows curves defined by gravity. The spacecraft is constantly falling, first toward Earth, then toward the Moon, and then back toward Earth again. What looks like a loop is really a continuous free fall through a changing gravitational landscape. This way of navigating space reveals something deeper. We tend to think of engines as the drivers of motion, but once a spacecraft is on its way, gravity does most of the work. The art of spaceflight is not just about thrust. It’s about knowing when not to use it. #GoodLuck #Artemis NASA Artemis

When a spacecraft leaves Earth, it doesn’t just fire its engines and head straight to its destination. In many missions, especially those going beyond low Earth orbit, there’s a more subtle and elegant strategy at play, one that uses gravity itself as part of the navigation system. This is often called a gravity assist, or a slingshot maneuver. But in the case of missions like #Artemis II, what’s being used is a closely related idea known as a free-return trajectory. At first glance, it might sound simple: the spacecraft goes to the Moon, loops around it, and comes back. But the physics behind it is anything but simple. Instead of relying on continuous propulsion, the spacecraft follows a carefully calculated path through the gravitational field of the Earth–Moon system. It is launched with just the right speed and direction so that, as it approaches the Moon, the Moon’s gravity bends its trajectory. The spacecraft is effectively flung around the Moon, redirected onto a path that naturally brings it back toward Earth. No major engine burn is needed for the return. Small trajectory corrections may still be required, but gravity does the heavy lifting. That’s the key. This kind of trajectory is not just efficient, it’s also safe. If something goes wrong with the spacecraft’s engines or onboard systems, gravity itself ensures the return. It’s an inherent backup plan, built into the trajectory from the very beginning. The same fundamental idea appears in gravity assists used across the Solar System. When a spacecraft flies past a planet, it can gain or lose speed by exchanging momentum with that planet. From the spacecraft’s point of view, it’s as if it has been accelerated without using fuel. In reality, it has borrowed a tiny amount of orbital energy from the planet itself. That’s how missions like Voyager reached the outer planets, and how probes continue to explore regions far beyond what their onboard fuel alone would allow. But there’s an important distinction. An interplanetary gravity assist is typically used to change speed and direction, often increasing the spacecraft’s energy. A free-return trajectory, like the one used in Artemis II, is designed for something more specific: a path that naturally loops back to Earth without requiring additional propulsion. It’s less about gaining energy, and more about shaping a trajectory that guarantees a return. To understand why this works, it helps to stop thinking in straight lines. In space, motion follows curves defined by gravity. The spacecraft is constantly falling, first toward Earth, then toward the Moon, and then back toward Earth again. What looks like a loop is really a continuous free fall through a changing gravitational landscape. This way of navigating space reveals something deeper. We tend to think of engines as the drivers of motion, but once a spacecraft is on its way, gravity does most of the work. The art of spaceflight is not just about thrust. It’s about knowing when not to use it. #GoodLuck #Artemis NASA Artemis

Erika 

235,152 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

In the summer of 2023, I cold emailed Jensen Huang and asked to capture a NeRF of him at SIGGRAPH. He responded in about an hour and said yes. A radiance field is, in the simplest terms, akin to a 3D photograph. A moment in time, so completely reconstructed that you can move through it and see it from angles the original cameras never occupied. NeRFs were the original method. Gaussian splatting, which debuted at that same SIGGRAPH, has since become the dominant form of radiance field. I called my late friend James, who told me we needed to begin practicing immediately. We ran capture after capture for weeks until we consistently got the capture time down to ~30 seconds with one camera. Later, in a hallway at the LA Convention Center during SIGGRAPH, I captured the portrait you're seeing now, a full 360° gaussian splat of Jensen, rendered here as a 2D flythrough. Afterward, I continued the conversation with him and members of his team to make the case for radiance fields as a foundational representation for imaging. To my surprise, they listened. Three years later, NVIDIA has several works, including NuRec, fVDB, 3DGRUT, and gsplat all utilizing radiance fields. The landscape has evolved enough that the reasoning is obvious. Gaussian splatting has begun to ship across some of the world’s largest industries, including autonomous vehicles, AEC, geospatial, media and entertainment, robotics, e-commerce, hospitality. It’s become clear that lifelike 3D is here to stay. And yet I think we will look back and be disappointed by how late we started taking 3D portraits of the people around us, just like how we have sparse 2D photos of our grandparents and great grandparents. We have billions of photographs of the people we know and love, but almost no radiance fields of them. I'll be returning to SIGGRAPH in LA where this was initially captured three years ago, with the landscape looking significantly different. Radiance fields are more under deployed than ever relative to what they can do. I'm excited for the future of imaging, and for 2D to transition into 3D. I have a few things up my sleeve that I think will make that case plainly.

In the summer of 2023, I cold emailed Jensen Huang and asked to capture a NeRF of him at SIGGRAPH. He responded in about an hour and said yes. A radiance field is, in the simplest terms, akin to a 3D photograph. A moment in time, so completely reconstructed that you can move through it and see it from angles the original cameras never occupied. NeRFs were the original method. Gaussian splatting, which debuted at that same SIGGRAPH, has since become the dominant form of radiance field. I called my late friend James, who told me we needed to begin practicing immediately. We ran capture after capture for weeks until we consistently got the capture time down to ~30 seconds with one camera. Later, in a hallway at the LA Convention Center during SIGGRAPH, I captured the portrait you're seeing now, a full 360° gaussian splat of Jensen, rendered here as a 2D flythrough. Afterward, I continued the conversation with him and members of his team to make the case for radiance fields as a foundational representation for imaging. To my surprise, they listened. Three years later, NVIDIA has several works, including NuRec, fVDB, 3DGRUT, and gsplat all utilizing radiance fields. The landscape has evolved enough that the reasoning is obvious. Gaussian splatting has begun to ship across some of the world’s largest industries, including autonomous vehicles, AEC, geospatial, media and entertainment, robotics, e-commerce, hospitality. It’s become clear that lifelike 3D is here to stay. And yet I think we will look back and be disappointed by how late we started taking 3D portraits of the people around us, just like how we have sparse 2D photos of our grandparents and great grandparents. We have billions of photographs of the people we know and love, but almost no radiance fields of them. I'll be returning to SIGGRAPH in LA where this was initially captured three years ago, with the landscape looking significantly different. Radiance fields are more under deployed than ever relative to what they can do. I'm excited for the future of imaging, and for 2D to transition into 3D. I have a few things up my sleeve that I think will make that case plainly.

Radiance Fields

18,084 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The discourse around the Eze penalty last night is fascinating. If nothing else it provides Arteta with an excuse as to how his team has been hard done by and robbed. He loves excuses. It’s a fascinating situation because I actually think the right outcome was reached albeit through the wrong process. Once given on the field under the current rules it shouldn't have been overturned. For that Arsenal can feel aggrieved. Don't forget Arsenal were the beneficiaries of an incredibly soft penalty in Leverkusen. It wasn’t overturned. I find the attached video interesting because it clearly shows how minimal the contact is. The defender doesn’t pin Ezes foot to the ground. Doesn’t smash into it. It brushes down the side of it. It’s where the still pictures of it were wildly misleading. Are we really saying that contact such as that is worthy of a penalty? What’s clear in the video is that Eze has absolutely made the most of the slight contact. I love the straight left leg. A very natural position. It’s a brilliant dive and normally it would have been rewarded. By saying that is a stone wall penalty all we are doing is encouraging such theatrics and cheating. Whenever you hear the words “that was clever” by a commentator they are intimating the player has cheated/made the most of it. We complain about refs all the time but what chance do they have when players are doing stuff like this. Until players are punished properly there is no disincentive for players to keep doing this stuff. I also find it fascinating when you have a foot brushed like this. When you compare it to all the holding/pushing/grappling at other times. Sometimes a contact sport and others not. Is this really what football has become?

The discourse around the Eze penalty last night is fascinating. If nothing else it provides Arteta with an excuse as to how his team has been hard done by and robbed. He loves excuses. It’s a fascinating situation because I actually think the right outcome was reached albeit through the wrong process. Once given on the field under the current rules it shouldn't have been overturned. For that Arsenal can feel aggrieved. Don't forget Arsenal were the beneficiaries of an incredibly soft penalty in Leverkusen. It wasn’t overturned. I find the attached video interesting because it clearly shows how minimal the contact is. The defender doesn’t pin Ezes foot to the ground. Doesn’t smash into it. It brushes down the side of it. It’s where the still pictures of it were wildly misleading. Are we really saying that contact such as that is worthy of a penalty? What’s clear in the video is that Eze has absolutely made the most of the slight contact. I love the straight left leg. A very natural position. It’s a brilliant dive and normally it would have been rewarded. By saying that is a stone wall penalty all we are doing is encouraging such theatrics and cheating. Whenever you hear the words “that was clever” by a commentator they are intimating the player has cheated/made the most of it. We complain about refs all the time but what chance do they have when players are doing stuff like this. Until players are punished properly there is no disincentive for players to keep doing this stuff. I also find it fascinating when you have a foot brushed like this. When you compare it to all the holding/pushing/grappling at other times. Sometimes a contact sport and others not. Is this really what football has become?

Luke Paton

104,573 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

PMP vs. NDC and INEC By: "Sadiq Dasin Adamawa" I have finally obtained the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the judgment in this case. After reading it, I now have a better understanding of what happened. Here are my observations: 1. NDC was registered by a court order. I am convinced that if INEC had registered the party through its normal administrative process, it would not have allowed NDC to use a logo that allegedly belonged to another party. 2. Avoiding disputes like this over the registration of a new political party is one of the reasons why the coalition chose to join an already existing party instead. After reading the case, I realized that the same judge who ordered INEC to register NDC later issued another order last Friday directing that NDC's registration be set aside. According to my understanding, the judge changed his position for the following reasons: i. When he made the initial order on 10 December 2025 directing INEC to register NDC, he was unaware that the Peace Movement Party (PMP) had already claimed ownership of the two-finger logo and had previously submitted it to INEC as part of its own registration application. ii. NDC did not inform the judge that the two-finger logo had already been claimed by PMP, even though NDC was aware of it. In other words, NDC failed to disclose a material fact to the court. Although, as a general rule, once a judge has delivered judgment in a case, the proper remedy is an appeal, there are exceptions where the same judge may reopen or set aside the judgment if: A. The judgment is shown to be a nullity. B. The judgment was obtained by fraud. C. There was suppression of a material fact. D. The judgment was obtained in violation of the constitutional right to a fair hearing. In my view, this case involves: Suppression of a material fact; and A violation of the constitutional right to a fair hearing. I say this because the two-finger logo allegedly belongs to PMP, not NDC, and PMP was not aware that NDC had used the logo to obtain a court-ordered registration from INEC. Secondly, after reviewing the record of proceedings, I found something surprising. In its own affidavit, NDC openly admitted that both it and PMP submitted the same logo to INEC, and further admitted that PMP had submitted the logo before NDC did. Thirdly, in that same affidavit, NDC also admitted before the court that: "The existence of PMP's prior submission of the logo formed part of the considerations that informed INEC's administrative decision to discontinue or decline the registration process of NDC." In my opinion, this is where NDC made a serious mistake. They brought this problem upon themselves. Based on that affidavit alone, even if NDC appeals, I think it will be difficult for the appellate court to restore its registration. With only about seven months before the elections, when would NDC have enough time to conduct primaries and submit the names of its candidates? In my view, NDC made a major blunder.

Sulaiman Uwaisu Idris

43,182 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Everything about that clip feels staged. The direction he came from doesn’t line up with any Jewish areas where you’d find men in black hats. He’s wearing gloves and a mask at 6:30 a.m., when it’s cool but not freezing, around 45°F that morning in Brooklyn on November 5, 2025. That’s premeditated behavior. But he leaves the hat on. That’s not caution; that’s costume. The hat itself doesn’t match any Syrian Jewish style, and the area where it happened is majority Syrian, where most don’t even wear hats. It’s not the kind worn by Ashkenazi Haredi Jews either. It looks like someone trying to look Jewish, not someone who is. Too many tells. None of them make sense unless it was meant to look this way. As everyone has pointed out, there are cameras everywhere in that area, it's a Jewish school. But that is the point, isn’t it? The hat was not to hide. It was to be seen. I look forward to seeing who is caught, regardless of background. People live chronically online now. The hatred that festers on this platform seeps into real life. You think no one would play into that? Even Hamas’ spokesperson Abu Obaida adjusted his tone with every speech to match whatever is trending in the streets. People called the D.C. murders a “false flag” too. The hatred for Jews runs so deep it bends logic itself. With the kind of vitriol unleashed on social media and in the streets today, a small staged act of vandalism or fear-baiting is not unthinkable. Your own hatred for us justifies it. For God’s sake, read the responses. We are living in an age where hate does not just appear. It performs.

Everything about that clip feels staged. The direction he came from doesn’t line up with any Jewish areas where you’d find men in black hats. He’s wearing gloves and a mask at 6:30 a.m., when it’s cool but not freezing, around 45°F that morning in Brooklyn on November 5, 2025. That’s premeditated behavior. But he leaves the hat on. That’s not caution; that’s costume. The hat itself doesn’t match any Syrian Jewish style, and the area where it happened is majority Syrian, where most don’t even wear hats. It’s not the kind worn by Ashkenazi Haredi Jews either. It looks like someone trying to look Jewish, not someone who is. Too many tells. None of them make sense unless it was meant to look this way. As everyone has pointed out, there are cameras everywhere in that area, it's a Jewish school. But that is the point, isn’t it? The hat was not to hide. It was to be seen. I look forward to seeing who is caught, regardless of background. People live chronically online now. The hatred that festers on this platform seeps into real life. You think no one would play into that? Even Hamas’ spokesperson Abu Obaida adjusted his tone with every speech to match whatever is trending in the streets. People called the D.C. murders a “false flag” too. The hatred for Jews runs so deep it bends logic itself. With the kind of vitriol unleashed on social media and in the streets today, a small staged act of vandalism or fear-baiting is not unthinkable. Your own hatred for us justifies it. For God’s sake, read the responses. We are living in an age where hate does not just appear. It performs.

Isaac Choua

439,831 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

The first maglev train in China with a speed of 600 km/h, with the code name CF600-0001, has shown its majesty under the lens of railway photographers. This maglev train is a major breakthrough for China's railway, marking a new advancement in high-speed rail technology. A maglev train is a high-speed train that utilizes electromagnetic force for levitation and is propelled by magnetic power, capable of traveling at astonishing speeds on maglev tracks. The CF600-0001 is China's first maglev train with a speed reaching 600 kilometers per hour, drawing global attention due to its high speed and advanced technology. The design of this maglev train incorporates the latest materials and techniques, including lightweight alloys, carbon fiber, and other high-strength materials, ensuring stability and safety during high-speed operation. Additionally, advanced control and power systems guarantee the train's high-speed operation and comfort. The successful research and operation of maglev trains by China's railway will bring revolutionary changes to high-speed railway transportation both domestically and internationally. This will not only significantly reduce travel time, but also promote the internationalization and globalization of China's high-speed rail technology. Railway photographers have captured the magnificent sight of this maglev train through their lenses, allowing people to witness the new achievements of China's high-speed rail technology and showcasing China's leading position in the field of transportation and logistics.

The first maglev train in China with a speed of 600 km/h, with the code name CF600-0001, has shown its majesty under the lens of railway photographers. This maglev train is a major breakthrough for China's railway, marking a new advancement in high-speed rail technology. A maglev train is a high-speed train that utilizes electromagnetic force for levitation and is propelled by magnetic power, capable of traveling at astonishing speeds on maglev tracks. The CF600-0001 is China's first maglev train with a speed reaching 600 kilometers per hour, drawing global attention due to its high speed and advanced technology. The design of this maglev train incorporates the latest materials and techniques, including lightweight alloys, carbon fiber, and other high-strength materials, ensuring stability and safety during high-speed operation. Additionally, advanced control and power systems guarantee the train's high-speed operation and comfort. The successful research and operation of maglev trains by China's railway will bring revolutionary changes to high-speed railway transportation both domestically and internationally. This will not only significantly reduce travel time, but also promote the internationalization and globalization of China's high-speed rail technology. Railway photographers have captured the magnificent sight of this maglev train through their lenses, allowing people to witness the new achievements of China's high-speed rail technology and showcasing China's leading position in the field of transportation and logistics.

Johannes Maria

57,724 просмотров • 2 лет назад

sorry, they just did WHAT someone gave a machine one disease name, the leading cause of blindness in the developed world with 1.5 million americans already in its path, and it came back pointing at a drug that has sat in pharmacies for years under a different label: 551 papers read in 30 minutes against the 294 hours a human would have needed, and the loop that did it is public on GitHub most agent setups answer one question at a time, so the ceiling on the work is the quality of the question you happened to think of this one was handed a single question and wrote the second one itself. turns out that follow-up is where the real find was: a target called ABCA1, upregulated threefold, in an experiment no human ordered i read the whole paper looking for the trick, and the trick is structural. that is the second question, and it is the gap between an assistant and a factory: - hand the loop a field rather than a task: it was given a disease, and choosing the mechanism was part of its job - make it rank before it spends: 151 papers in, ten candidate mechanisms out, scored against each other before anything touched a bench - split reading from judging, so the agent that forms the theory is a different agent from the one grading it - close every cycle on physical reality: the verdict was an experiment, and another model's opinion was never allowed to stand in for one - feed each result back as the next question rather than a log line, which is the step almost nobody builds - search what already passed inspection first: the winner was an approved compound with a safety file already on record - write down what the round learned before opening the next one, so round two starts where round one stopped my read, and i think it is the uncomfortable one: reading was the entire bottleneck in that field, and everybody spent the decade optimising the writing. people ran every physical experiment here, the analysis agent needs a domain expert writing its prompts, and the authors decline to call this the leap it resembles. the thinking got replaced, and the hands did not so the question i cannot answer for my own setup: which step of your loop still stops dead until you sit down and type something bookmark this one. the four parts that turn one model into a line that runs like this, the queue, the rooms, the write permissions and the gate, are built file by file in the piece below ↓

sorry, they just did WHAT someone gave a machine one disease name, the leading cause of blindness in the developed world with 1.5 million americans already in its path, and it came back pointing at a drug that has sat in pharmacies for years under a different label: 551 papers read in 30 minutes against the 294 hours a human would have needed, and the loop that did it is public on GitHub most agent setups answer one question at a time, so the ceiling on the work is the quality of the question you happened to think of this one was handed a single question and wrote the second one itself. turns out that follow-up is where the real find was: a target called ABCA1, upregulated threefold, in an experiment no human ordered i read the whole paper looking for the trick, and the trick is structural. that is the second question, and it is the gap between an assistant and a factory: - hand the loop a field rather than a task: it was given a disease, and choosing the mechanism was part of its job - make it rank before it spends: 151 papers in, ten candidate mechanisms out, scored against each other before anything touched a bench - split reading from judging, so the agent that forms the theory is a different agent from the one grading it - close every cycle on physical reality: the verdict was an experiment, and another model's opinion was never allowed to stand in for one - feed each result back as the next question rather than a log line, which is the step almost nobody builds - search what already passed inspection first: the winner was an approved compound with a safety file already on record - write down what the round learned before opening the next one, so round two starts where round one stopped my read, and i think it is the uncomfortable one: reading was the entire bottleneck in that field, and everybody spent the decade optimising the writing. people ran every physical experiment here, the analysis agent needs a domain expert writing its prompts, and the authors decline to call this the leap it resembles. the thinking got replaced, and the hands did not so the question i cannot answer for my own setup: which step of your loop still stops dead until you sit down and type something bookmark this one. the four parts that turn one model into a line that runs like this, the queue, the rooms, the write permissions and the gate, are built file by file in the piece below ↓

Argona

32,744 просмотров • 1 месяц назад