Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨🧵BREAKING: Major Chinese AI Bot Network Discovered on X; Promoting Website Selling Intoxicating Hemp / Possible Illicit Chinese Marijuana, Flavored Chinese Nicotine Vapes, 7-OH, Kratom, & Other Intoxicating Products Multiple AI generated posts promoting "d8superstore" have been appearing on accounts that talk about vaping, cannabis, and cannabinoids. The AI...

58,775 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

8 Yorum

The Dank Informer profil fotoğrafı
The Dank Informer1 yıl önce

🧵2/X - Flavored Geek Bar Nicotine Vapes Found on the d8superstore website. According to Reuters Chinese Geek Bar flavored vapes not authorized for sale in the US.

The Dank Informer profil fotoğrafı
The Dank Informer1 yıl önce

🧵3/X This THCa hemp flower product below is clocking at a whopping 41% D9 THCA, but only 0.176% D9 THC per the COA? 👀 src: COA: Is this flower sprayed with synthetic THCa isolate or is KCA labs pumping out "legit" fake Certificates of Analysis?

The Dank Informer profil fotoğrafı
The Dank Informer1 yıl önce

🧵4/X THCa "hemp" flower sold on d8superstore also appears to be exhibit a dense flower structure, indicating possible plant growth regulator, PGR, usage as seen in most THCa flower linked to illicit Chinese marijuana grows. Difference between PGR vs non-PGR weed.

The Dank Informer profil fotoğrafı
The Dank Informer1 yıl önce

🧵5/X Highly potent 7-OH products are also sold on d8superstore: 7-OH is referred to as "legal morphine" and is an opioid agonist with high addiction potential. Regulators in every state are scrambling to ban and/or regulate 7-OH & Kratom as it has become a public health hazard.

Pat_the_Hat profil fotoğrafı
Pat_the_Hat1 yıl önce

5910 Long Creek Park Dr, Charlotte, NC 28230 USA. +1 (615) 285-9468

TheLegacyScale profil fotoğrafı
TheLegacyScale1 yıl önce

So is this bad because it’s Chinese? Good way to scare boomers & help the Feds justify piss poor policies & restricting access to much needed alternatives

the.unknown.trader. profil fotoğrafı
the.unknown.trader.1 yıl önce

Is China actually in a drug war with the US? Targeted operations.

TheLegacyScale profil fotoğrafı
TheLegacyScale1 yıl önce

You just a snitch or what? Are they scamming ppl? Even when you bring up authentic concerns there’s something nefarious about you & your intentions. You’re making more noise & creating drama around topics that need to be addressed in a soundful manner.

Benzer Videolar

This is the moment Chinese AI beat American AI. One of the largest public crypto companies in the world just DUMPED OpenAI and Anthropic. Coinbase switched to open-weight Chinese models from Zhipu and DeepSeek, and shaved nearly 50% off the company's internal AI spending. The numbers are absolutely ridiculous: Running the same enterprise workload through Anthropic's Claude costs $4,811. Running it through Zhipu's GLM 5.2 costs $544. That's a 9x price difference for equivalent output. OpenAI's GPT-5.5 sits in the middle at $3,357. DeepSeek's V4 lands at $1,071. Moonshot's Kimi at $948. On the actual benchmarks: Zhipu's GLM 5.2 scored 62.1 on SWE-bench Pro, the gold standard for coding. OpenAI's GPT-5.5 scored 58.6. One AI researcher called GLM 5.2 "at least as good as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5." Another called it "the first open model that can really compete with closed-source systems." The Chinese models are not just cheaper but they are now also beating American models on the benchmarks American companies pay $4,811 per workload for. Coinbase did the math first and reacted - more companies will certainly follow. Now watch what happens to the IPO timeline: Anthropic confidentially filed for an IPO targeting October at a $965 billion valuation. OpenAI followed days later with its own confidential filing. Both companies built their financial models on the assumption that they could keep charging enterprise prices that are 9 to 33x what Chinese competitors charge for the same task. Brian Armstrong publicly proved customers WILL leave. 45% of companies are now spending over $100,000 per month on AI, up from 20% last year. Every one of those customers is one quarterly budget review away from dumping American AI. OpenAI has reportedly already started preparing major token price cuts. Anthropic is expected to follow. And here's the thing... The export controls were supposed to CRUSH Chinese AI. The US government banned American AI chips, restricted model weights, blacklisted Alibaba and Baidu as Chinese military companies, and just banned Anthropic's flagship model from every foreign national on the planet. The entire premise of the American AI valuation bubble is that Washington can keep China two generations behind. But Chinese labs responded by building cheaper, more efficient models on inferior hardware and pricing them at one ninth the cost of the American alternative. And now American companies are voting with their checkbooks. The dominant American labs are valued at nearly $2 trillion combined on the assumption that their pricing power is durable. Coinbase proved it is not, and every customer doing a year-end budget review will be looking at the same math. For investors, the question here is what happens to the Anthropic IPO at $965 billion when the company is being forced to cut prices to defend share against open-weight Chinese models that score higher on the benchmarks. For everyone else, the bigger question is what happens when Washington spent four years and billions of dollars trying to contain Chinese AI, and the only thing that actually shifted in the end was American customers.

Ricardo

252,696 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

A Chinese AI company has unveiled its new model, Kimi K2.5, which quickly climbed to the forefront in global AI rankings. Notably, this is an open-source model, currently positioned as the world’s strongest in that category. China’s AI development still trails the U.S. by about 6-7 months, thus the Sputnik moment has yet to arrive. Taking the U.S. restrictions on exporting the most advanced AI chips to China into consideration, this gap is likely to persist for a considerable time. However, China appears to be charting a distinct path in AI evolution, seeking alternative approaches. Nearly all leading Chinese AI large models follow an open-source strategy. This means the source code is publicly available, allowing anyone to use or modify it freely. As a result, users benefit from accessible technology while also contributing as refiners and new developers. Global downloads of Chinese open-source large models have cumulatively reached 10 billion, a figure that has just surpassed the U.S. Compared to AI behind the screen, China seems to prioritize embedding AI into humanoid and industrial robots, a concept they term “embodied intelligence.” In the past, assembly-line robotic arms could only perform preset, singular tasks; if a screw unexpectedly fell, they were helpless. Now, AI serves not just as the robots’ eyes and skin—enabling them to see the world clearly and sense force, temperature, and more—but also endows them with reasoning capabilities: they can figure out what they’re doing, what they should do, and how to do it better. In this new era of tech competition, the role of the Chinese government has subtly shifted. Whether developing nuclear weapons, satellites, rockets, or space stations, the government traditionally assembled top experts, poured in vast funds and resources, and treated it as a “political imperative.” In recent AI advancements, however, we’re seeing a government that’s more in the background—focusing primarily on removing institutional barriers that hinder AI progress—backing enterprises from the sidelines. And the leading large models—such as DeepSeek, Qwen, Dola, and others—are developed by private-owned enterprises.

Sinical

96,267 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

In China, you can't make misleading claims in advertisements. That gets tricky when an AI actor is your brand ambassador. In my last newsletter, I mentioned the success of the Chinese short AI drama "Laid-Off Girl" (被裁掉的女孩) and its protagonist, Fang Taozi (方桃子). She might be virtual, but she's not cheap. Having her appear in an ad campaign of less than 60 seconds already costs 258,000 yuan (38.235 USD). For the Chinese cosmetic contact-lens brand Nutnutlook/坚果力, their campaign featuring the AI actress might turn out to be much more costly than that. The ad, in which Fang Taozi claims her contact lenses feel so comfortable ("戴美瞳很舒服"), has been flagged by market regulators because it's a "fabricated personal experience": Fang Taozi has no physical eyes and therefore cannot actually wear contact lenses.😂 The regulators are extra strict when it comes to advertisements for medical devices (cosmetic contact lenses also fall within this category). This ad is now under investigation, and once it's officially confirmed to have violated China's Advertising Laws, Nutnutlook could be fined 3-5 times the original advertising fee. Many netizens agree with the regulators and don't like AI actors promoting these kinds of physical products. "If it's an AI actor promoting it, let an AI person buy it." Others, however, don't see an issue with it: "It's not like when it's a real person we can actually believe what they're saying anyway."

Manya Koetse

28,398 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

Meta literally spent $72 BILLION building AI infrastructure that generates ZERO revenue. Then a Chinese company launches an AI agent in March, hits $125 million in revenue by December, and Zuck writes a $2 billion check in 10 days. But this isn't a strategic acquisition... It's panic. Here's what happened: Meta has been burning cash on AI for years. Building data centers. Hiring researchers. Training models. Claiming they're building "superintelligence." The problem: None of it makes money. Meta AI is free. Their models are open source. Their chatbots generate zero revenue. Meanwhile, investors are getting twitchy about the $72 billion infrastructure spending spree with no clear path to profitability. Enter Manus. A startup that launched 8 months ago. Founded in Beijing. Chinese founders. Moved to Singapore in June. March 2025: Manus launches with a viral demo video showing an AI agent that screens job candidates, plans vacations, analyzes stock portfolios. April 2025: Benchmark leads a $75M funding round at $500M valuation. US Senator John Cornyn immediately drags them for investing in a Chinese AI company, asking "who thought it was a good idea for American investors to subsidize our biggest adversary in AI?" December 2025: Manus announces $100M in annual recurring revenue. The fastest startup in HISTORY to hit that milestone. Revenue run rate: $125M. That's when Meta started negotiating. The deal closed in 10 days for ~$2 billion. Meta paid 4x the valuation from 8 months ago for a company that's ACTUALLY making money from AI. Here's why this matters: Manus hit $125M revenue in 8 months. Meta spent $72B on AI and has generated exactly $0 in AI-specific revenue. Zuck couldn't build profitability, so he bought it. But there's a problem. Manus has Chinese founders. Started in Beijing. Backed by Tencent and HongShan Capital (formerly Sequoia China). In the current geopolitical climate, that's radioactive. So Meta immediately issued a statement: "There will be no continuing Chinese ownership interests in Manus following the transaction, and Manus will discontinue its services and operations in China." Translation: We're buying your revenue and your team, cutting all Chinese ties, and pretending this was always an American company. This is geopolitical cleanup. The numbers tell the real story: Manus processed 147 trillion tokens in 8 months. Created 80 million virtual computers. Hit $100M ARR faster than any startup in history. Meta spent years and $72 billion trying to build this and failed. So they panic-bought the Chinese company that figured it out in 8 months. Meanwhile, this is Meta's third major AI acquisition THIS YEAR: June: Bought 49% of Scale AI for $14 billion to get CEO Alexandr Wang. Earlier this month: Acquired AI-wearables startup Limitless. Now: Manus for $2B. Meta's AI strategy is literally pay-to-win. Because after burning $72 billion, they still can't answer the one question investors keep asking: "When does AI make money?" Manus answered that question in 8 months. Meta couldn't answer it in 3 years. The craziest part: Manus charges $39-$199/month for subscriptions. That's it. No fancy enterprise deals. No complex pricing. Just a simple SaaS model that actually works. And it took a Chinese startup to figure out what Silicon Valley couldn't: people will pay for AI that actually does work instead of just answering questions. So Zuck wrote a $2 billion check, promised to cut all Chinese ownership, and is now claiming credit for "accelerating AI innovation." But everyone watching knows the truth... Meta spent $72B building infrastructure for a business they couldn't figure out how to monetize. Then they bought the company that cracked the code in 8 months. The AI race isn't about who builds the best models. It's about who builds a business that actually makes money. And right now, Meta just admitted they can't do it alone.

Ricardo

98,070 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

I want to clarify something about posting about the statues or figures. I don't sell the Resident Evil products, statues, or figures that I post. I only share information and links about new pre-orders that might interest the community, as I'm also a collector. Many large Resident Evil community accounts also share them, both licensed and unlicensed. I also help inform the community on how to get official Resident Evil merchandise from Japan by translating for them. is one of the largest statue shops out there (they're a shop, they don't manufacture the figures), and I've also bought from their site before and received the figure. If people are curious, they can just check out the studio's other statues/busts on the Orzgk website or at other reputable retailers that also sell the SAME figure. You can also wait for the first photos and/or videos of the statues in person; many studios provide these to retailers after pre-orders close. In case they cancel the project, they'll refund your money in full. So, to everyone who insults me, do your research before accusing me of sharing potential "scams" or creating the "conceptual" images that the studio shares of its products. I don't use AI in my posts or in the edits I make (posters, collages, etc.). Besides, X has an AI detector and flags posts if you created something with AI (it can't be disabled even if you have a verified account). • Here's a video of the finished Requiem replica. You can see more on the official IG account:

ᴋᴛʏɴʏ | ᴋᴀᴛʜʏᴀɴʜʏ 🌿

14,714 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚀 Exciting News $SHELL the Future of AI Agents and $TAO with the TTS Subnet on Bittensor! 🚀 MyShell extends the impact of Bittensor's incentive mechanism to its over 1 million registered users and 50,000 creators, greatly expanding Bittensor's and $TAO's influence. MyShell and Bittensor are right at the heart this massive shake-up with $SHELL and $TAO. They’re all about making AI not just smart but also something everyone can get into, thanks to the power of decentralized networks. And at the core? AI agents. These aren't your average digital assistants; they're about to change how we interact with tech on a whole new level. MyShell's Big Idea with $SHELL So, MyShell’s got this big plan to make AI something anyone can dive into. They're launching this TTS Subnet thing on Bittensor's network, which is all about making machines talk in more human-like ways, and they're using $SHELL tokens to fuel this vision. Their goal? To push past old-school AI limits and create with AI as easy as pie, all while keeping it open-source and community-powered. Bittensor Does Its Magic with $TAO On the other side, you’ve got Bittensor doing wonders with $TAO, building this massive network where anyone, anywhere, can chip in on AI research and development. This partnership with MyShell? It’s a game-changer, breaking down walls in AI development and letting folks from all over the world have a go at making AI smarter. $SHELL + $TAO = AI Revolution Putting $SHELL and $TAO together is where the magic really happens. MyShell and Bittensor aren’t just teaming up for the tech; they’re here to transform our digital world, making AI agents a big part of our online lives. Imagine AI that doesn’t just follow orders but helps, creates, and learns with you. That’s the future they’re building. Hop on Board the AI Revolution This isn’t just tech talk; it’s a call to action. MyShell and Bittensor are inviting anyone with a spark for AI to jump in and help shape this new world. Whether you’re a coder, a creator, or just curious, there’s a spot for you to dive in and make a difference. Want to get started? Check out MyShell on GitHub: Follow the latest buzz on X: MyShell.AI Take a deeper dive at Website: This is more than just building AI; it’s about crafting a future where AI is part of everyone’s life, powered by the community, for the community. Let’s make it happen with $SHELL and $TAO. Share on YouTube:

Andy ττ

10,842 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The Xiaohongshu #TikTokRefugee phenomenon is truly fascinating and really exciting if it perdures. It would be the first time ever that we would have a social media app where Western and Chinese users interact at scale. Pretty ironic when this is spurred by an attempt by the U.S. government to get rid of TikTok because it is "Chinese" when it has no Chinese users nor Chinese content. I've been testing the app 👇 and the phenomenon is real: a huge proportion of the posts in the main timeline are by "Tiktok refugees", with many posts being "refugees" asking questions to the Chinese user base. The app is still missing some obvious features that would make it more usable to an international user base. You can have the app in English but it doesn't look like you can translate posts or videos yet. Which means that if you don't speak or read Chinese, you can only understand the posts that are in English (and vice-versa: no translation for English content into Chinese either). My bet is that the Xiaohongshu tech team in Shanghai (where Xiaohongshu is based) must already be working hard on this. All in all this illustrates several important and actually quite hopeful lessons. Firstly, this shapes up to be yet another U.S. attempt to contain China backfiring: instead of reducing Chinese tech influence, it's potentially creating an even more direct bridge between Chinese and Western users on a platform that's actually based in China, unlike TikTok which operates separately from its Chinese version Douyin. Secondly, there's obviously significant untapped demand for genuine cross-cultural social media platforms, despite (or perhaps because of) the geopolitical tensions. Many people obviously do not want the digital iron curtain that the U.S. is trying to erect here: this is all happening organically without any promotional push from Xiaohongshu, people genuinely do not want an artificially divided world. Lastly, less obvious but no less important, the business dimension is particularly interesting. Xiaohongshu isn't just another social media app - it's fundamentally an e-commerce platform where social features emerged organically around shopping. If this trend continues, this has the potential to reshape cross-border commerce between China and the U.S. in really profound ways. Many "TikTok refugees" are actually small business owners who built their success on TikTok: imagine the potential of a platform that gives them direct access to Chinese consumers! This, alongside Chinese sellers finding new ways to reach American audiences, could create entirely new patterns of trade, bypassing traditional intermediaries. This would be the icing on the cake with the other ironies: when governments are trying to 'de-risk' and decouple supply chains, Xiaohongshu could help the ground-level reality of ordinary entrepreneurs and consumers move in the exact opposite direction. Anyhow, whether this phenomenon lasts or not, it reveals something that should give us all some measure of hope: while politicians and policymakers focus on trying to divide the world and fearmonger, ordinary people seem more interested in finding ways to connect. They're more interested in bridges than walls, and that's a good thing!

Arnaud Bertrand

277,660 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce